Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

PatPfund

Verified Member
  • Posts

    673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by PatPfund

  1. Popkins is a scapegoat not the real problem. The real problem (other than Correa which might be Popkins influenced, but he's a big boy making final decisions himself) is health, roster construction, and how it is managed. Bringing in somebody else isn't going to change who Joey Gallo is (which might be someone sort of useful if he weren't on a team filled with whiffers). It's not going to fix Max Kepler. And both of those are lineup regulars blocking potentially better players. A new hitting coach isn't going to give Jorge Polanco healthy hammies, rush Royce a perfect oblique, or bless Byron with instant cures for knees, back, and whatever else is messed up. And a new hitting coach isn't going to get Rocco to stop putting the rally killing duo of CC and BB in the top 4, or keep him from benching some of his best hitters because of leftie pitchers (it's worked out so well, right?). Address the real problems, and if you need to change coaches (or managers or FO staff), do it in the offseason.
  2. The problem with the Twins offense is clear. 5 players (Correa, Buxton, Gallo, Kepler, Polanco) were expected to be regular foundations at the plate. Only one (Correa) is likely to have a bounce-back in the second half; the others are hurt all the time and are likely to keep that up (Buxton, Polanco), or have established over the past couple seasons than they aren't as good as they once were (Gallo, Kepler). The problem isn't acquiring better players (the Saints starting OF is better than the Twins), it is opening slots in the batting order for better hitters by trading (even for a bag of balls) Kepler and Gallo, putting Byron on IL whenever his injuries overwhelm his ability to hit, and moving Correa/Byron down the order until they start to hit. Only the Souhan column that hints ownership might be losing its patience gives me any (and it is dim) hope Falvine/Rocco will take the needed steps. (And folks, Byron ain't playing in the field any time soon. Because he physically can't. But he also shouldn't be blocking up the DH spot hitting like he is. IL him until he can play baseball.)
  3. Maybe Popkins is part of the problem, maybe not. I'd blame the FO, who added the King O' Ks to our OF, kept the fading Kepler (who Ks less, but isn't good and hasn't been for years), can't seem to admit acquisition mistakes, and built the lineup around chronically injured players (like Polanco and Buxton, who has been TERRIBLE since the end of April), though they did add a solid bat in Solano. Maybe its the manager who went through a brutal injury decline, and therefore (or for some reason) KEEPS running out two of his worst hitters (one injured all the time) in the top four of the order, like it was against the law to bat them lower until they snap out of it. Maybe it's all of the above. Brutal to watch whatever the reason.
  4. Love the target, but if the return is young controllable pitching, this team can't afford it. Seriously, their biggest problems on offense are the presence of supposed key pieces who are underperforming (Correa at the plate, Byron, Gallo, Kepler) who the team cannot or will not move to make way for potential in-house solutions (like Wallner, Miranda, Larnach). Solutions that can't sit forever unused, because they will need to be protected or dealt or exposed, and they are all at an age where they should be getting some run. I get it with Carlos, I get it a bit with Byron (though they go to ridiculous lengths to keep him off the IL with serious negative impacts on the offense), and I don't get it at all with Kepler and Gallo. They've had almost half a season to show they are critical (and they aren't), there is almost no chance they are here next year, and Wallner/Larnach/Stevenson/Celestino could almost certainly replace them at the plate, and mostly in the field. I don't think it is bailing on the season to dump Kepler/Gallo; you are just taking a chance on one or more youngsters catching fire. And if they don't, the Twins need to know before the season is over. Clear the deadwood, look in-house for hitting, bolster the 'pen, and take your chances.
  5. @darwin22 Sorry, I've been off-site a lot lately! @East Coast Twin has the vesting stat, and Polanco is highly unlikely to hit it. Spotrac seems to show the Twins would have the option at that point with a $1 million buyout if they decline the option. If Jorge has a completely healthy second half (not holding my breath on that), he'd be a bargain to renew even with an eye to trade. if he doesn't, the million seems like the rational bet with Julien on the scene and others who could play the position (like Lewis). But with this front office (see Kepler, Max) the rational isn't a given.
  6. A healthy Polanco is an asset to the team, and a good potential trade chip. But he hasn't been able to stay on the field for almost a year now, and a constantly hurt Polanco is not an asset to the team, and is untradeable (and the clock is ticking on the trade deadline if he is to prove himself an asset). If Jorge can't get healthy, I can't see him back with the Twins next year. Julien, Lewis, and Kirilloff are already among the team leaders in OPS, and all are still on their way up with other possible replacements on the way.
  7. As a few have pointed out (and the team's batting stats would confirm), if Miranda keeps hitting, you can easily find space for him at 1b (with some rotation through third and DH). Kepler's presence on the roster (and I say this as a long time Max fan) is beginning to border on malpractice of the sort that gets people fired. He shouldn't have been here to start (especially after signing Gallo), but any hopes of a resurgence are now gone. Kirilloff can play RF/1B/DH. Lewis can spell Correa while getting at-bats mostly at 3B and some at DH. Solano (whose long-season stats shows he can wear down if played too much) keeps his current role. The logjam clears a bit after this season with Kepler and Gallo gone. The real elephant in the room is actually Byron Buxton. Not that he can play CF right now, because he clearly cannot or he would be (you don't sit down the most dynamic OF in baseball if he is healthy). Every game (and there have been a few) where Byron runs wild on the bases, he either sits multiple games afterward, or runs off an 0-20, or both. He's clearly hurt. The Twins should be honest about his condition, and do what it takes to get him healthy enough to play in the field again (somewhere even if it isn't CF), because he isn't good enough as a hobbled batter to be blocking the DH spot full time. I was fine with him there when there were no bats clamoring to push him aside, but fortunately (with the arrival of Lewis, Julien, and Kirilloff with Miranda and Wallner pending) that isn't the case any more.
  8. Another excellent Nelson post. Love the dream targets (and think they'll probably remain dreams, but fun ones.) The real need short term on offense is to add by subtraction, and give the in-house options some extended run (even... SHOCKINGLY.. the chance to see pitchers from both sides) to see if they are the solution. Some of those in-house options like Larnach and Wallner aren't actually that young any more, and you HAVE to know soon what you actually have. The sooner we know, the better chances of making a good move (or not make) at the deadline. A couple deletions (Kepler and Garlick) are obvious (Kyle can stick as a depth piece in St Paul, but he should never have been called up in front of Wallner, and never should again; pretty sure Wallner can hit the crappy 80 OPS+ against LH that 'lefty-masher' Garlick has posted this year). The bullpen is another issue for another day (I'd love Pagan gone, but sadly I haven't exactly seen other pitchers pushing to make room the Wallner has done on the OF rotation). I expect Max will be either a bag o' balls transaction (or a A level flyer). I've seen others proposing Polanco or Buxton as trade chips; nobody is trading for players who can't stay healthy unless you want to give them away. (And it isn't some goofy FO strategy to not play Buxton in the outfield; he isn't physically capable of it right now by all appearances. And by reports in The Athletic.)
  9. Let's recap. Mahle was not having a good year last year, got Cincy a nice package based on previous good years (something I never considered a Twins "win", but a worthy gamble). Then he hurt his shoulder and missed most of the second half. Then he tore up his elbow. So, if the price is 5 and 15, absolutely not. Spend $15 million on a healthy arm next year (or $20 since that's what you'd sink on Mahle).
  10. Max's ranking doesn't surprise me at all. He has been good-to-great defensively throughout, and had some potent (and one stellar) offensive year. But what jumps out about the top Ten isn't really greatness, but the lack of extended greatness we've had in the OF since the Senators moved here. In 63-odd years we've had exactly 5 serious long-term OF stars (Byron doesn't make that cut yet, and may never as the injuries and lack of OF time pile up). Not even one per decade, which isn't great. I love Max (have a Kepler jersey), and after some time will focus mostly on the fun times, but am unlikely to ever think of him as one of the greatest (any more than I think that of Shane Mack, though I have fond memories of him as well; good not great player).
  11. It isn't really time yet, but that time may be coming fast as more of the younger players start to take their deserved spot in the batting order. The real problem isn't Byron's bat compared to the rest of the league, it is Byron's bat (or really Byron/MAT combined) vs an alternative (or the alternative/Byron combined). (And FYI, you say "including" MAT's better performance in April like you should only count the worst games. Not sure why; output goes up and down for everyone.) Of the alternatives you mention, only Polanco makes much sense to me (Gallo's value plummets if you take away D, Correa has been dreadful so far, and probably should go on the DL), because it is really Kepler keeping Wallner (and Larnach) in the minors more than it is Byron. But mixing in Jorge, Solano, Kirilloff, Lewis, Farmer, Jeffers, and giving Wallner/Larnach more play in the DH spot makes a lot of sense, and if Miranda snaps out of it and re-finds himself, the pressure to get Byron back in the OF grows rapidly. This offense needs more quality at-bats, even if it means heightened risk to Buxton, and Max Kepler being traded/DFA'd soon. (Love Max, but he looks like this year's Tyler Duffey.)
  12. To answer the OP's question directly, no I am not worried. Why? The answers are all right there; catchers are primarily important on D, and "all accounts" say he is doing that job well. His professional play behind the plate is a big reason the SPs are MLB front runners in several categories. The hitting is up and down, but that is almost always the case when you compare full data sets (as in complete seasons) to partial data (as in a couple months). I still love the signing, and am not discounting Vasquez's example for helping Jeffers mature. As others have mentioned, a more equal split in duty would be helpful to both, and that doesn't make the Vasquez contract bad; it confirms the wisdom of signing (and paying) a true pro to an area of deep need.
  13. I really like Max; have a Kepler jersey. And I think he has been awful offensively for years. I also hate the shift ban as giving in to limited skill players too stupid to learn to hit the other way (or even lay down a freakin' bunt if you are a lefty; looking at you, Max). But... The early going makes it appear the shift ban is doing two things. 1. Kepler is getting some hits that last year would have been outs. 2. (Maybe) the extra hits seem to have him more relaxed at the plate instead of mentally fighting (and losing) the mental game against the shift. Coming into the year, I wanted the Twins to serve the teams needs and not let Kepler stand in the way of a better younger player. Kepler hitting more like .240/.250 with pop (instead of a weak .210/.220) IS the better player until the kids prove better. Which is the way it should be on a good team.
  14. The real problem is we are not just short a middle reliever. Moran skipped AAA (except for a few messy outings), and it looked for a while (last year) like that worked. Now his MLB stats are starting to get messy as well, and it may just be he isn't good enough/isn't ready. Pagán hasn't had a few bad outings, he was a toss-in on a trade because his HR/innings pitched is brutal, and has been for years. And there is the revolving door at the multi-innings spot (where Sands has actually had several chances to kick in the door; unfortunately the frisbee slider comes with erratic control, and when Cole has to throw a strike, the fastball is very, very hittable). These three weak links haven't burned us (too much) so far, but it is a long season, and we can't essentially cede games down a few runs and the SP out after 3, because we can't afford to burn out our "A" RPs, and the only alternative is a rack of Molotov cocktail arms. Winder would be nice (if healthy). Maeda is possibly a great alternative (putting a Grade A arm in the 'pen, and calling on our deeper reserve of AAA starters). But this is also an area where offseason moves fell short, and if there is going to be a mid-season move, right now another very good reliever would be at the top of my shopping list (at least for now). (Good thing is RPs are a far cheaper/more readily available "get" than trying to rebuild half of the rotation, which is our usual goal.)
  15. Moran has plenty to prove at AAA (he has hardly pitched at that level, and he pitched pretty poorly when he did; 24 IP, 14 BB, 6.00 ERA, 1.6+ WHIP), and he should start on that tomorrow. Call up Ober in his stead if Maeda is not going on the IL, and regardless, start Ober in Maeda's slot next time around. I also had enough of the Archer dance last year, and would rather the Twins just put Kenta on IL for 10 days then give him rehab starts in St Paul. If after 3 or 4 he is strong enough for a regular turn, great; if not, just leave Ober in there, and let Maeda work out of the 'pen until he feels he is ready for a stretch-out and return to the rotation. (They need to control Maeda's innings anyway, this lets them do it.) Maeda instead of Moran in the bullpen sounds great to me. Pagán should be gone after this... but let's face it. He has pictures of Falvine and Rocco, or he has them hypnotized, or whatever. But sadly the "magic" probably still holds, and we are stuck with Emilio randomly blowing up on us for eternity.
  16. Great article! I would dearly love to see Polanco healthy and back; it would return our quality backups to backups, and I strongly suspect it would mean occasional days at DH, and the occasional return of Byron to CF if he up to it (making the lineup stronger in two ways). I've mostly put Kirilloff in a mental refrigerator more to preserve my own sanity than because I know how things will turn out (I don't). But your words, and the fact he is playing regularly and hitting has a thaw going; I'm starting to dream about how a hale Alex and that lovely swing could transform the lineup, and like Polanco, there is a clear regular spot for him at first (and a corner OF slot). The others are definitely something to look forward to, and while injuries may clear space, at some point the Twins are going to have to make deliberate room for some or move them via trades (can't make those mid-season moves without chips of your own), or the newbies are going to have to force the issue by beating out veterans. Which is as it should be.
  17. Got out of work, turned on the radio in time to hear Ryan put the Yankees down 1-2-3 in the first, and then kind of laughed because I thought I heard Cory Provus say it was 9-0, and I knew that couldn't be true. (But it was! Freakin' awesome!)
  18. OF is indeed a key position, and this was a great summary. If Taylor in the field means more healthy Byron at-bats, I'm fine with it (though I suspect at some point Buxton will get field time). Especially up to the point that we actually have some potent bats on the bench to DH (which with injuries and slow starts, we really don't). Max in particular needs to get healthy, and needs to start hitting, or he is a prime candidate to find bench time (or be this year's Tyler Duffey). Kepler (one of my personal favorites) isn't coming off a down year, but a batch of them with an increase in leg injuries mixing with a low average and loss of power. An outfield of Gordon, Taylor/Buxton, and Larnach/Gallo looks far more potent than one that includes Max (with Wallner and Lewis jostling to push Kepler further down the order). If Julien hits and/or Polo returns, Gordon's bat (like last year) may demand a run in the lineup, and that is most likely to be on the OF grass.
  19. It is super early for too many snap judgements (I like a lot of what @Doctor Gastsays, but Julien only has one error at 2B, and Solano's brutal boot at 1B the other day on a slow roller was far from pretty well). Miranda has looked pretty bad at 3B, but it is also early, and he didn't even get to play the position much in Spring Training. Maybe they have to move him eventually, or maybe he evens out at third; time will tell. Upside is that if the pitching stays healthy and/or good the team has a great foundation for winning through the ups and downs of hitting cycles. And hitting is easier to fix than pitching whether it be internally (like Julien, Wallner, or later, Lee/Lewis), or externally through a trade in June/July. I don't really care about Buxton DHing right now (given the injured bats), because there aren't a lot of big bat alternatives on the pine (Solano and Farmer against lefties, sure, but both are historically not as good against RHs). But when Polanco comes back, he and Byron may need to split the DH as Designated Sore Knee Off Days. (Seriously) Hope I'm wrong, but my (admittedly medically ignorant) opinion is that Kirilloff shouldn't be counted on at all. Ever. Until he can actually play for a month. Which may be never. I also think the team is at least one good reliever short still, though hopefully Winder can help fix that soon. Love the Weekly Nelsons!
  20. Polo for Castro, and I agree with your last sentence; I think Alex rehabs, then gets optioned to prove his wrists are actually healthy (short of injury need on the Twins). Unless Max flashes back to 2019, I see zero chance the Twins pick up the option. He is who he is, got no interest on the trade market last year, and is playing himself into a veteran defensive bench player (which the Twins frankly don't need). No way they are cutting Gallo in the foreseeable future after the KC games, and no way they are cutting Taylor at all since he gives the team a way to keep Buxton in the lineup with no loss on D. (Doubt they'd release Max either, but I'd do that before moving on from the other OF options. Assuming Max actually comes back from his knee anytime soon.) Larnach might have squeaked onto the roster, but he has quickly become a core roster player, his batting doesn't look flukey, and his increased walks cushion any batting average slump. I'm sure the Twins are planning on him long-term, so if he stays healthy, he's a Twin. Solano is a likelier cut (though he's also earning a longer leash with each strong game). Probably the dream for the team is to keep as many assets healthy, and thereby have something to deal at the deadline
  21. I'd put Taylor right up there with Gray on the long side, and unless a CF prospect goes wild, Michael might be the most likely to return especially if Buxton is healthy most of the year playing PT in the field. I'd call Mahle a "long" given what they gave up, and his history, but not as long as Gray/Taylor. I think it will take an injury to get him superceded in the foreseeable future. But if he recovers, I'd be more willing to extend Mahle than Gray (due to age). I agree the Twins are probably medium on Solano, though he should be "short"; he's 35, and his last two seasons are pure average in OPS+. No way an aging mediocrity with no team heritage (or record of FT success) should block an MLB-ready prospect. Castro is the first send-down if a middle infielder starts knocking or Polanco comes back, but Solano is the easy 2nd move. (Ex: Jorge comes back PT, Julien starts hitting, and the Twins still need a leadoff hitter.) Totally agree with you on Pagán. Wish the Twins did too...
  22. We probably aren't far apart (because neither really saw Sands making the Opening Day roster), but I sort of disagree with your last paragraph here assuming the Twins will be a competitive team. When you are down by 7, it really doesn't matter who comes in, any arm will do, but a good team probably has that happen once every couple weeks. Having a quarter of your 'pen being gas cans starts to hurt in two situations. 1. The SP struggles with control, uses a lot of pitches, but essentially needs to come out after 4 or 5, the team is down by a few, and you need a long arm to give the hitters a chance to rally (not somebody to eat innings while giving away the game). 2. A manager (let's call him Rocco for fun) gets in a habit of pulling people after 5 in competitive games, leans far too heavily on his top 4 RPs, and with them over-used finds himself forced to put 'low leverage' pitchers into high leverage situations (happened A LOT last year). As for amping up his stuff in a relief role, that is exactly what he was supposed to be doing this spring, and opponents beat him like a drum (12 innings pitched, 18 hits, 6 BB, 7 ER, 5.25 ERA, 2.00 WHIP per baseball-reference.com). That is more a stat line to get you released than one to make the 26-man, and if the Twins don't have a better option, I repeat that it is an indictment of their skipping the 'pen in the search for depth.
  23. Sands making the Opening Day roster is a pretty clear sign the Twins overlooked the bullpen in their offseason-stack-up-quality-backups bonanza. He is the pitching equivalent of Gilberto Celestino; maybe Sands has the goods to play MLB someday, but he really hasn't shown it yet. I suspect his pitch selection has a lot to do with not being able to control his better pitches (thus the less-than-ideal walk rate), and at times having to throw fastballs to avoid walks. With Sands and Pagán, the Twins 'pen now has two (aka a full quarter of the RPs) pitchers you just don't want to pitch with a game on the line. Hopefully Winder and Henriquez heal quickly, and too bad the Twins didn't skip signing Solano (who looks like the Archer of position players, and instead use the money on an MLB RP. Or just keep Coulombe in the role instead of bowing to the lefty/righty fetishists. Unless he has copies of Pagán's pictures, Cole might easily be the first one dropped from the 26-man roster.
  24. This should be an intriguing season, with what looks to be a strong foundation in the rotation and on defense, hopefully better base-running (the lowest of bars to clear after the '22 Debacle on De Bases), a couple big question marks in the 'pen (Pagán and Sands), and an offense could range from weak (Larnach, Gallo, Kepler, Taylor, Jeffers, Farmer, Solano, and Castro have similar/worse years than last year; Kirilloff, Polanco and Buxton limited by injuries) to fabulous (a few to several of the above step forward and Alex, Jorge, and Byron all play 100 games). Only real way to tell, is to roll the ball out there and get after it, and I am both hopeful and excited to see what the year brings!
×
×
  • Create New...