Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    What to Make of the Twins Arraez-for-Lopez Trade Now


    Ted Schwerzler

    The Minnesota Twins front office has not been shy about upgrading the 26-man roster. Derek Falvey and Thad Levine have been aggressive in their pursuit of free agents, and they have made several sizable swaps in recent seasons. Now nearly a full season into the deal that brought Pablo Lopez to Minnesota, do the Twins miss Luis Arraez?

     

    Image courtesy of Gregory Fisher-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    When the Minnesota Twins decided to send Luis Arraez to the Miami Marlins it was not because they thought that Rocco Baldelli’s lineup couldn’t use him. The Twins second baseman was a fan-favorite, and he was coming off winning an American League batting title. Despite looking like the second coming of Rod Carew, questions about defense and health tipped the scales just enough for the front office to dangle him out there.

    A deal between the Marlins and Twins came together over quite some time, and the sides talked about different constructions of a fit for a while. With the Twins offense seemingly in a good place, the front office decided that Sonny Gray, Joe Ryan, and Kenta Maeda needed some help in the starting rotation. Pablo Lopez was viewed as a talent that had projectable upside, and the organization doubled-down by signing him to a four-year extension that kicks in during the 2024 season.

    So far it’s hard to say that the sides didn’t get exactly what they were looking for. Miami is watching Arraez trend towards another batting title while having been named an All-Star for the second consecutive season, and the Twins are seeing Lopez pitch like something of a Cy Young candidate. Rather than view the deal just through the lens of a Minnesota trade though, I wanted to get a Marlins perspective. Ely Sussman of Fish on First covers Miami closely, and had plenty of thoughts to share about the new Marlins infielder.

    Twins Daily: Having watched Arraez for a full season, what are your thoughts on him as a player and how do they compare to what you believed you were getting?

    Ely Sussman: I was optimistic about Arraez continuing to be more or less the same player he had been with the Twins, and he has instead elevated his game a notch. I was concerned about his durability given his history of knee issues, but he's been available for the Marlins practically every day. Although his defensive metrics at second base have been a mixed bag, I have observed something close to league-average performance from him there. Arraez has shown good hands and a knack for making accurate, off-balance throws when necessary. Last but not least, he is very well-liked by his Marlins teammates and proactive about sharing advice with them. He has helped change the clubhouse chemistry for the better, which was sorely needed after losing 93 games the season before.

    TD: Moving Jazz Chisholm to centerfield was part of the Arraez acquisition. How has the Marlins defense benefitted or been hurt by the new construction?

    ES: Outside of a few April bloopers, Chisholm's transition to center field has been a success. He's been enough of an upgrade over Miami's 2022 centerfield options to mostly offset the drop-off in defense from Chisholm to Arraez at second base. However, the addition of Arraez also stranded free agent signing Jean Segura at third base, where he had limited experience. That went horribly and may have contributed to his struggles at the plate. Segura was among the worst everyday players in the majors before the Marlins dumped him at the trade deadline. Overall, the Marlins have been in the middle of the pack defensively, which is slightly worse than 2022, but that step back is due to other personnel changes rather than Arraez.

    TD: Arraez brought a few years of team control with him to Miami whereas the Twins immediately extended Pablo Lopez. Do you see a longer term deal getting done with the Marlins?

    ES: When Arraez was hitting .400-something throughout much of the first half, there was concern that he had played himself out of the Marlins' price range! The silver lining of his second-half regression is he now seems more realistically extendable for them. It is tricky to find relevant comps for Arraez given his old-school batted ball profile, but I estimate that the average annual value of an extension would be less than Pablo's $18.4 million. Perhaps a DJ LeMahieu-like deal (6/$90M) would get it done. There is a good chance of Arraez being signed long term, especially if Jorge Soler departs via free agency and vacates the designated hitter spot.

    TD: Year one has included a second straight All-Star appearance and Arraez is trending toward another batting title. Has the production been better than expected?

    ES: His production has exceeded expectations, yes. Even with MLB's restriction of the infield shift, it's astounding to see somebody hitting in the mid-.300s and consistently coming through in late-game situations, too. There are still things to nitpick about Arraez like his occasional over-aggressiveness, his inability to steal bases, and the frequency with which he grounds into double plays. But he is very valuable just as he is.

    TD: Missing Lopez in the rotation, has the presence of a missing starter been felt? Has Arraez's production in the lineup made that worth it?

    ES: López has been sorely missed. Sandy Alcantara's fall from Cy Young winner to ordinary innings eater has been well-documented. Also, the Marlins entered the season with both Johnny Cueto and Trevor Rogers in their starting rotation. Not only did they both suffer injuries in April, but then suffered additional, unrelated injuries while pitching in minor league rehab games. Cueto didn't return until the All-Star break and Rogers still hasn't made it back. The Marlins were relatively thin on upper-minors rotation depth and that was exposed by those unlucky breaks. I would still say that Arraez has made up for the absence of López. Miami's bullpen has thrived in clutch situations to cover up for some of the rotation's limitations.

    TD: Simply, would you do the deal again, why or why not?

    ES: It's a fascinating "what if" because it depends on whether I am tethered to Bruce Sherman's modest budget. The main reason that the Marlins shopped López is because of how his future salary would impact their flexibility to address other roster needs, rooted in ownership's lack of willingness to spend. This club understandably prioritizes veteran hitters over veteran pitchers because they've had much more success developing cheap pitching internally. An aspect of the trade that I strongly disliked was the inclusion of prospects Jose Salas and Byron Chourio. Salas was one of the few Marlins hitting prospects who had a path toward becoming a big league regular, but it turns out that his 2023 campaign was a nightmare, making that ceiling seem less attainable. If I'm stuck living in a universe where the Marlins operate with a small-market mentality, I would do the deal again. If I have the freedom to imagine the Marlins spending as much as the Twins do on payroll, then I would have kept and extended López and upgraded the lineup by shopping younger arms instead.

    It’s interesting to see what the other side thinks, because even with Lopez’s performance, there are plenty of Twins fans that still miss Arraez. Even with the emergence of Edouard Julien, the Twins lack a true average hitter and Arraez had the ability to set the table on a nightly basis.

    What is your takeaway from this deal? Would you still make the trade? How have you felt about Pablo in year one?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Hearing good things about a trade that is mutually beneficial is refreshing.  So often you hear people complain that a trade wasn't more beneficial to the home team.  Being in Maine, I only get news about the Red Sox and currently the discussion is all about front office changes.  A Boston reporter who covers the Red Sox said yesterday that the biggest cause of the decline of the Sox (and a major reason for the from office shakeup) is that the front office would only make trades that they perceived to be in favor of the Sox at a 70%/30% rate.  According to the reporter, Boston didn't finish several major trades last off-season because of this.  To me, that gives the Twins' front office a lot of positive points for the Arraez/Lopez trade.

    5 minutes ago, terrydactyls said:

    Hearing good things about a trade that is mutually beneficial is refreshing.  So often you hear people complain that a trade wasn't more beneficial to the home team.  Being in Maine, I only get news about the Red Sox and currently the discussion is all about front office changes.  A Boston reporter who covers the Red Sox said yesterday that the biggest cause of the decline of the Sox (and a major reason for the from office shakeup) is that the front office would only make trades that they perceived to be in favor of the Sox at a 70%/30% rate.  According to the reporter, Boston didn't finish several major trades last off-season because of this.  To me, that gives the Twins' front office a lot of positive points for the Arraez/Lopez trade.

    It's a good point. If the only way you'll deal with a team is if you're screwing them, then why would anyone deal with you? there are going to be cases where one team values a player differently than another team, but for the most part there's going to be fairly close valuations.

    I guess I'm going to repeat a lot of good stuff here, but so be it.

    Like most, I absolutely love watching Arraez and loved his attitude/enthusiasm. I hated losing him and was bummed out when he was moved. I also was worried about the offense, even with Arraez, as we had guys coming back from injury, and young guys not yet proven...or both...to really make the offense be what it could potentially be. Honestly, not having for the Arraez for the first half, looking back, wasn't the problem with out inconsistent and often poor offense. There were far too many K's and feeble AB to say he was any sole cost..

    But it was the number of those players that allowed the Twins to make this move. Lee, Lewis, Polanco, Martin, Kirilloff, Wallner, Larnach, and Miranda were all 2B/1B/DH options here, coming back, or coming soon. And that's before the whole Buxton to DH situation. Now, not everyone was going to be ready this year, or come back strong from injury, or even make it all. But when you have that many guys to work with, you have depth numbers.

    What's interesting is how, as of today, Friday, Arraez and Julien...who essentially replaced him...BOTH have an .842 OPS and an OPS+ of 130. Now, Arraez has been with the Marlins all season and has about 250 more AB's, but the point is while they are different players, they are essentially playing the exact same positions, hitting generally the same exact same spot in the lineup, and producing almost identically, though in different ways.

    So while I hated to lose Arraez for many reasons, I also would still make that trade. I also agree it's turned out to be a Win-Win for both sides. Now, with a couple prospects that MIGHT turn out, and the inherent value often placed on a top of the rotation starter, I might have to give the Twins a slight nod.

    NOTE: The perspective from the other side was absolutely a wonderful addition to the article. 

    2 hours ago, ashbury said:

    Last year Miami's offense was third from the bottom in the majors. This year they are fourth from the bottom.

    Last year the Twins' runs-against per game was around the middle of the pack. This year they rank fourth best.

    A table-setter for a solid starting pitcher, assuming the talent evaluation and medicals all check out, is a trade I make every time.  Pitchers are inherently injury-prone but we know from experience that position-players miss time and see declining performance due to physical ailments too.  I liked the trade even when Arraez was hitting .400 earlier this season, and I like it now.  Setting the table wasn't any kind of panacea for Miami.

    Gray blowing by his innings total from last year, a healthy/effective Ober, and the trickle down effect (for which Lopez also receives credit) from that reduced workload in the pen has likely played a massive role as well. 

    Loved the trade at the time and would do it again in a heartbeat. That we got two prospects thrown in really helps. I enjoyed watching Arreaz sprinkling hits all over the field. But that’s it - can’t hit for power can’t run and below average in the field. For similar reasons I would trade high on Julien. 

    The trade has been good for both teams and both teams would likely do it again.

    Eventually, as to who wins the trade, may get down to José Salas and Byron Chourio.
    Salas:  batting .188 for the Kernels, playing SS, I think.  Age: 20.
    Chourio: 18 years old, assigned to Florida Complex League.

    8 hours ago, Dman said:

    No one in Minnesota liked losing Arraez and his bat was sorely missed the beginning of this season, but the team had a glut of players to plug into his position and had a great need for top of the rotation starters.  The Twins needed a Pablo type pitcher even more than keeping around one of the best hitters in the game which sounds crazy as I write this, but given Julien's OPS is currently .842 and Arraez is at .842 it sounds less crazy.  They get there in different ways but the production is close enough to cover for the lose of Arraez at least in IMO.  Don't like OPS then Julien's WRc+ is 135 and Arreaz 128.  Like War better Julien is at 2.3 and Arraez is at 3.1.  Pretty much anyway you slice it they are close enough and we didn't have anyone close to the level that Lopez is at.

    Did I want the Twins to trade Arraez, No.  Do I think they made the right move Yes I do.

    I like the trade. And I'm not disputing the stats of Julien vs Arraez. I just want to point out that the numbers accrued are based on less than 300 AB from Julien vs 550 from Arraez. So it's not a totally accurate comparison. 

    1 hour ago, Schmoeman5 said:

    I like the trade. And I'm not disputing the stats of Julien vs Arraez. I just want to point out that the numbers accrued are based on less than 300 AB from Julien vs 550 from Arraez. So it's not a totally accurate comparison. 

    Yep their WAR number shows that difference as well but even when Julien wasn't playing there Solano or Polanco were and they are not too far off either.  Julien could tank the rest of the year and the numbers could look very different.  My main point was the Twins had an easier path to getting players close to Arraez's production but no real way to get players close to Pablo's level of production other than trade which is what they did.

    Getting in late to this conversation! Like all of us, watching Luis perform at the plate was such fun. But - like many of us - I liked the trade from the start.

    This past Sunday the 10th I was at Target Field to witness Pablo López pitch eight shutout innings with fourteen strikeouts. It was one of the most - perhaps the very most - dominant pitching performance I’ve witnessed in person in my 70 years.

    True, the Twins bats were silent and we lost the game 2-0. But watching Pablo was just wonderful. Luis is fun, to be sure, but give me this front line pitching any day.

    I'd do the trade again every time.

    I love Arraez, and did so at the time of the trade, but I looked forward to trading him. With his lack of slugging and poor defense (all due respect to Ely, but in several games I've seen him play for the Marlins he has NOT been average in the field), I remember most often viewing him as replaceable. I feel like an idiot for calling a batting champ replaceable, but that's how I projected him.

    He is a joy to watch (though only when in the batter's box and in interviews), but his biggest value was trade bait. He did a great job for us in many regards. I hope he continues to kick ass and gets a great contract when the time comes. I just appreciate that it won't be from us (or will it?? 😁)

    Great idea for an article.  Ted, did you do a similar written evaluation of the trade from the Twins point of view for the Marlins writer to publish for Marlins fans? If so, I would be interested in reading it. Win win for both teams, both of which filled  major needs. Win win for the fans, even though fan-favorites were traded away, because both players have also become fan favorites on their new teams, due to both players having outstanding seasons and both players being good, decent, likable men. 

    16 hours ago, Linus said:

    Loved the trade at the time and would do it again in a heartbeat. That we got two prospects thrown in really helps. I enjoyed watching Arreaz sprinkling hits all over the field. But that’s it - can’t hit for power can’t run and below average in the field. For similar reasons I would trade high on Julien. 

    Except Julien does hit for power and can run (he was a fine basestealer in the minors). Julien's weaknesses are: hitting LHP (which was an issue for Arraez as well, but so far in a small sample, Julien has been brutal there) and defense (has looked shaky at times and has a poor arm, but has done better lately).

    Julien also has what...5 more seasons of team control? This is a guy who can be part of the core, especially if he starts figuring out how to hit lefties.

    I miss Arraez: good guy, great hitter for average, fun player and adds a lot to the team. But we needed stalwarts in the rotation, and we got that in Lopez, who is also awfully fun to watch, is a good dude, an excellent pitcher, and adds a lot to the team. I don't think either team has any real regrets. It'll be interesting to see if Miami signs Arraez to a long-term deal and what the terms are if they do; signing Lopez to a below rate extension really makes me feel good about the Twins business in this one. And who knows? Maybe one of the prospects will show out.

    1 hour ago, jmlease1 said:

    Except Julien does hit for power and can run (he was a fine basestealer in the minors). Julien's weaknesses are: hitting LHP (which was an issue for Arraez as well, but so far in a small sample, Julien has been brutal there) and defense (has looked shaky at times and has a poor arm, but has done better lately).

    Julien also has what...5 more seasons of team control? This is a guy who can be part of the core, especially if he starts figuring out how to hit lefties.

    I miss Arraez: good guy, great hitter for average, fun player and adds a lot to the team. But we needed stalwarts in the rotation, and we got that in Lopez, who is also awfully fun to watch, is a good dude, an excellent pitcher, and adds a lot to the team. I don't think either team has any real regrets. It'll be interesting to see if Miami signs Arraez to a long-term deal and what the terms are if they do; signing Lopez to a below rate extension really makes me feel good about the Twins business in this one. And who knows? Maybe one of the prospects will show out.

    Yea I wasn’t implying they are similar ball players rather I would trade Julien for similar reasons. Both players have a thing or things they do extremely well but also have serious weaknesses. I feel like Arreazs trade value was higher than his real value. I think the case might be the same for Julien. Of course I have no idea what other GMs would be willing to give up for Julien so we will never know. 

    Trades where both teams get what they hoped/expected out of it are always good.  I was a fan of this trade from the outset and despite the fact that LA may become one of the few players to win a batting title in both leagues I still do.  We acquired a pitcher that will be our #1 for several years and we dealt from a position of strength:  We had Polanco firmly entrenched at 2B and we had Julien knocking on the door.  Add in that Royce Lewis also has the ability to play 2B (and Brooks Lee is on the way) and the trade was a no brainer for the Twins, especially when the 2 minor league talents were included.  

    I thoroughly enjoyed watching LA play for the Twins.  But when DMan lists the offensive impact Julien has already had versus Arraez this season the trade isn't just a homerun for the Twins, it's a grand slam!  If Sonny Gray and Kenta Maeda exit the Twins starting rotation this winter, we will need to come up with another trade like this to add talent and depth to our starting staff.   

    On 9/15/2023 at 10:40 AM, Dave The Dastardly said:

    Did I like trading Arraez? No. Do I like having Lopez? Yes. What I like just as much was the vacancy trading Arraez created as that gave Julian a shot at the Bigs. Otherwise the FO would probably still have him wallowing in the minors. Now if the FO can wangle a way to trade an unproductive Correa we can clear up the current infield logjam and give a couple other promising youngsters a chance to prove themselves at the major league level... and improve the lineup's batting average. Not to mention freeing up a lot of salary money for signing pitching talent.

    Correa being moved, never happening. Why would anyone trade for CC after this year’s lack of production & health issues. Maybe, if he has a great year in ‘25 or ‘26 we could then trade him but why would we if he’s playing well?

    I think most of us will admit that the trade has been a win-win for both teams. I don’t think people have really read what Ely Sussman has said to Ted.

    Miami has gone from a 69-93 team, to a winning team battling for the postseason—and minus the starting pitcher they gave up. That is the leadership and spark that Arraez has brought to the Marlins, an importance as hard to place a value on as Lopez’s value to the Twins. And he did it while playing second base. Comments like someone on the WCCO pregame broadcast recently made, that Arraez was a player without a position, are really lacking in integrity, in my opinion. We have commenters on this forum now who believe Lewis and Lee are future players without a position, who might be utilized in whatever position is needed. This is going too far. But anyway..

    In the long run, the Twins will be better off to draft and develop their own pitching, so that they have to trade away a future Arraez. They will have to do better than one Bailey Ober every several years, no offense to Ober. 

    On 9/15/2023 at 12:27 PM, jmlease1 said:

    I'm sorry, but do you actually believe this? That the Twins front office didn't want Arraez's influence over other hitters? Or that the players have simply all taken it upon themselves to now go their own way and ignore input from the coaching staff, scouts, etc? because that's just silliness.

    The current FO is the same one that promoted him from A+ to AA, then to AAA, then to MLB. They moved him from AA to MLB in the same year, and then kept rolling with him. the idea that they traded him to keep his voice out of the room is ludicrous.

    They dealt Arraez not because they didn't like him, but because he had a lot of value at a position they had a lot of depth at. In order to get what they really needed (and boy did we still need pitching) we had to give up someone that was established and had real value. That's Arraez. the other option was Polanco, but Polanco's value was likely lower at the time because of the injury he'd had last season, the time he had missed, the contract he had, and being older.

    It was a good trade for the Twins, even if it meant giving up a player that everyone loved. That includes the front office: they loved him too. But Pablo Lopez has been very good for us and is lined up to lead the rotation for the next several year, which is something we didn't have: an established, all-star quality starter in his prime to lead the rotation.

    I am 100% convinced it was a core strategy, mandated from above that this offense and all the hitters in it would swing for the fences. I think one would have to ignore all ration and evidence to draw a different conclusion after every single hitter in the lineup started the year with the statistical divergence we saw in the first half. Even established veterans diverged dramatically from their career norms. Literally, every single hitter was striking out more and making contact less often. That is approach, not coincidence.

    Pair that with the player quotes (especially from Royce Lewis) around the time of the players-only meeting and the offensive turnaround. Shortly after midseason both Falvey and Levine themselves made comments on Inside Twins interviews where they acknowledged they had to adjust hitting teamwide strategy to emphasize getting on base. They admitted as much.

    The plan entering 2023 with was totally contrary to Arraez's skillset. It is no leap to conclude they didn't want him or any high-contact, low-power hitter succeeding in this lineup. He was a tremendous asset that they didn't want, because he didn't fit their plan for the 2023 lineup.

    But their plan was pure dumb and it failed-just as the past 180 years of baseball history suggested it would. We watched an ugly series of strikeouts, pop-outs and ever-so-exciting solo home runs for the first 80-90 games before the FO had to throw their hands up in the air and allow the hitters return to a reasonable approach. That is simply what happened. Thank God it ended. Sadly, that first half pushed me away and I'm now out of the habit of watching Twins games. I know it is a different offense now, but I'm finding it hard to care.

    Your comment got a lot of thumbs up. Clearly, you're not alone in your perspective, but I don't see how any observer can  reasonably see this another way.

    Where we do agree, is that Pablo Lopez is a valuable asset that they were right to want. Hopefully, it works out for the team.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...