Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Twins Ace Pablo López Facing "Strong Likelihood" of Season-Ending Elbow Surgery

    In a terrible break that could reduce the Twins' hopes of contention from slim to none, ace starter Pablo López could be headed for the surgeon's slab, general manager Jeremy Zoll said Tuesday.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Jonah Hinebaugh/Naples Daily News/USA Today Network-Florida / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Pablo López eluded the Scalpel of Damocles last fall. He hurt his arm on an awkward dive in September, and he admitted afterward that he feared the worst. At the time, he escaped serious damage to his elbow, but spring is the reaping season for this kind of thing, and López was part of Jobe’s Harvest. He left the team’s first full-squad workout Monday with elbow soreness and underwent an MRI. On Tuesday, the team announced the bad news: López has a "significant tear" in his elbow and is likely to need season-ending (or, rather, season-thwarting) surgery.

    General manager Jeremy Zoll stressed that López, who will seek a second opinion before proceeding with the operation, suffered a new injury this spring. His MRIs from early 2023 and late 2025 looked identical; the damage to his ligament is new. López will get that second opinion from noted surgeon Dr. Keith Meister, but given the "significant tearing to his UCL in his elbow," even the best-case scenario would see him sidelined for a long time.

    "When it first happened, I was taken back to a bullpen session I threw in October 2013, where I threw a pitch and it felt like my elbow was right behind the ball," said a disappointed López, demonstrating his exceptional recall and attunement to his own body. "And it's, like, a raw way to put it, but that's kind of what it felt like, just something sharp happening by where I have a scar already."

    López, who will turn 30 early next month, also missed time with strains of his hamstring and shoulder in 2025. He made just 14 starts, but posted a 2.74 ERA and continued to be the co-ace of a strong starting rotation. If he elects surgery, he’ll miss the third season of a four-year contract extension worth a total of $73.5 million, which he signed in April 2023. He’s owed $21.5 million this season, and the same amount in 2027, after which he’ll become a free agent.

    Without him, Minnesota will struggle to maintain the rotation depth needed to compete even in the weak AL Central. Last year, starting pitching was a strength, but not a strong enough one to keep the team afloat. That was partially due to the prolonged absence of López for the middle stretch of the season, but also to Bailey Ober having a season marred by high home-run rates and a massive decrease in strikeout rate. Perhaps foreseeing this possibility, the team attempted to bolster their starting rotation in the final stages of free agency, pursuing Framber Valdez. Instead, though, Valdez signed with the Tigers, and now, there’s no strong candidate to replace what the Twins had hoped they would get from López this year.

    The loss of López does create more room in the rotation for the team’s young hurlers. In addition to Ober and Joe Ryan, the team has Simeon Woods Richardson, Zebby Matthews, Mick Abel, Taj Bradley and David Festa in position to push for starting roles. That’s hollow consolation, though, since none of that group is likely to be as good as López, even if one or more stays healthy and pitches to the best of their ability all year.

    "We spent a lot of the offseason talking about the strength of our roster being in the rotation depth, and [you can] view it as a real opportunity, as a 'next man up'," Zoll said, listing the aforementioned pitchers as candidates to thrive in expanded roles. "But, you know, we'll pick up the pieces once we have a better handle on things and catch our breath from where everything has shaken out here."

    The Twins acquired López from the Marlins in exchange for Luis Arraez. Almost immediately, both López and the Twins made it clear that he was more than a short-term boost for the starting rotation. The aforementioned extension cemented López as a pillar of the organization’s pitching plans. Now, the final guaranteed year of that contract looms as both a financial commitment and a target date for the club’s hopes of a full return.

    On the field, López largely delivered on that investment in his first two seasons in Minnesota. In 2023, he posted a 3.66 ERA across 194 innings with 234 strikeouts, immediately pitching like a staff leader and earning All-Star recognition. In 2024, he again took the ball 32 times, going 15–10 with a 4.08 ERA, striking out 198 in 185 1/3 innings. The raw ERA uptick didn’t change the larger picture: Minnesota had the kind of dependable, high-end starter the franchise has long prized.

    But the path to Tuesday was paved by a frustrating, stop-and-start 2025 season—one that offered both a reminder of López’s ceiling and a warning about his health. Even in his limited, interrupted workload, López was effective. He was the biggest source of the hopeful “what could have been” feeling around a season defined by missed opportunities and disappointment. That was supposed to carry him into a bounce-back 2026 season. Alas, those hopes are now scuttled.

    Zoll acknowledged that López, who first had Tommy John surgery as a teenager in the Marlins system, had exceeded the window of protection from reinjury that the operation typically affords.

    "It's an unfortunate reality with, you know, him originally having Tommy John surgery 12 years ago, and the reality of those, the shelf life of those ligaments, you just never know when these things could happen," Zoll said. The new top baseball executive said the team will explore the possibility of external additions to the rotation via free agency.

    All of that, however, undersells the irreplaceability of López. In addition to his excellence on the mound, he's been the team's most consistent leader and a pillar of the community for the last three baseball seasons. It would surprise no one in or around the Twins if he makes extraordinary efforts to be present with the team throughout the season, but players sidelined by injury have a hard time exercising the same influence in the clubhouse and the dugout, especially when they have to be away for significant stretches to complete major rehab processes. López's thoughtfulness, amiability and leadership will be missed just as much as his kick-change and his curveball. Characteristically, he went out of his way to express appreciation for how quickly the Twins and their medical team got him set up for an MRI on the Presidents Day holiday afternoon.

    López will cling to some hope while he awaits the second opinion, but was very realistic about it.

    "I think the second opinion is more just to shed a light or, you know, just one last hope that something can be interpreted in a different way," he said, acknowledging that the torn ligament "won't regenerate itself."

    Reader @rdehring raised a fair and good question in the comments on this piece, asking whether López's faster ramp-up to prepare for the World Baseball Classic could have contributed to this injury. Unfortunately, it's an impossible question to answer, but the theory is reasonable. For what it's worth, Zoll praised López's preparation in every particular and believed there was no red flag of any kind en route to this unhappy turn of events.

    "I guess to some extent, [this] feels like more of an inevitability than something he specifically did," Zoll said. "He had hit all his checkpoints throughout his build-up here in the offseason, and hadn't had any issues or soreness. And this was the first issue he had."

    In general, the WBC has been found to slightly increase the risk of pitcher injuries late in the season in which they take place, or the following spring. No systematic effect seems to produce more injuries to pitchers preparing for the Classic, but it's certainly one variable in the equation that bears further study.


    Twins Daily's John Bonnes is on site in Ft. Myers and provided reporting on this news.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Eduardo Tait

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, C
    On Thursday, the 19-year-old went 2-for-4 with two home runs and three RBI in Cedar Rapids. That gives him nine homers this season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    36 minutes ago, rdehring said:

    Another question related to my question above.  Would he have been pitching that third inning yesterday had he not been preparing for the WBC?  

    Good question. Probably not. But doesn't it seem like it was inevitable and would have just happened a week from now instead?

    1 hour ago, AceWrigley said:

    Lucas Giolito anyone?

    Obviously Pablo's injury sucks.  Do not sign any pitcher.  Play in house pitchers and find out if they are MLB caliber or not.  Same thing for position players.

    15 minutes ago, howeda7 said:

    Fans on this site represent the hardcore of the hardcore would rather watch rookies go 60-102 then veterans go 80-82. I get that.

    80-82 is out of the playoffs. They don't hang 3rd place pennants at Target Field.

    But that's a false equivalence. Trading Joe Ryan is the difference between 74-88 and 69-93. He's not worth 20 wins on his own. Are you a huge fan of 74-88? That's a team that is irrelevant from May to September.

    12 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    Well let's see how serious Tom Pohlads is about competing.  Let's go sign Giolito to a 1 year or 2 year deal

    It's not a terrible idea. Adding Giolito gives them something else to trade away in July. Buy low, sell high.

    8 minutes ago, Parfigliano said:

    Obviously Pablo's injury sucks.  Do not sign any pitcher.  Play in house pitchers and find out if they are MLB caliber or not.  Same thing for position players.

    Which position players are huge question marks? Keaschall is the only one we don't know about. The rest are mostly proven commodities. Are they going to learn anything about James Outman, Kody Clemens or Tristan Gray?

    2 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    $22MM for nothing this year with a tight $110-115MM cap. Can't have it. Can't risk it. Now we've got to eat it. I can be glad for Lopez he could make it back in time to get himself a big payday on his next contract. If I were him, I'd be 100% in on UCL surgery asap to give me a chance. Best of luck to him on a fast recovery and great 2027... please no cancellation to the season.

    I'll be rooting for the young guys having some breakout seasons.

    Twins have insurance policies on players.

    33 minutes ago, howeda7 said:

    Fans on this site represent the hardcore of the hardcore would rather watch rookies go 60-102 then veterans go 80-82. I get that.

     

    I'd consider myself pretty hardcore...and I would rather watch 80-82 than 60-102.

    For one thing, there's zero guarantee of any pot of gold at the end of that rookie rainbow. Just because you play a bunch of rookies doesnt mean there's a payoff down the line.

    For another, wins matter to me. And I only have so many seasons left to enjoy. I am loathe to see seasons wasted.

    8 minutes ago, Dawgzilla said:

    Twins have insurance policies on players.

    Player insurance premiums began skyrocketing due to risk so those kinds of policies became less and less common. Insurer's are no longer willing to take it on. See what's happening with the WBC as an example. 

    3 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    I'd consider myself pretty hardcore...and I would rather watch 80-82 than 60-102.

    For one thing, there's zero guarantee of any pot of gold at that rookie rainbow. Just because you play a bunch of rookies doesnt mean there's a payoff down the line.

    For another, wins matter to me. And I only have so many seasons left to enjoy. I am loathe to see seasons wasted.

    Exactly this.  Watching a baseball game between a good team and a .500 team is very interesting and mostly competitive.  Having a roughly 50% chance at victory keeps me interested in the team.  Watching a game between a 90 win team and a 60 win team isn’t usually very interesting and likely mostly uncompetitive.  It absolutely makes me want to tune out on the Twins.  

    The idea that “if we trade everyone and just bottom out now, we’ll be good in two or three years” is wishful thinking at best, and ridiculous at worst.  IF we make great trades, AND IF those players that we get do well, AND IF some other players do well, we MIGHT be that 85 win team that some are so frustrated for the past few years.  However, if some of those things don’t actually occur, we’re back at 70 wins  or less.  

    YMMV, but that’s where I’m coming from. 

    1 hour ago, rdehring said:

    Another question related to my question above.  Would he have been pitching that third inning yesterday had he not been preparing for the WBC?  

    The team isn't risking its players for an outside event. The WBC is happening because teams are considering it a wash based on the usage rules teams set. Just like the Olympics. Players need to be in basically full game ready state for the WBC at the same timeline they'd normally have for Spring Training games.

    51 minutes ago, Rod Carews Birthday said:

    MAYBE.  IF the reason to move Prielipp to the pen was that they didn’t think that his arm will hold up to a starter’s workload, then moving him to the pen is the right thing to do, both for the pitcher and for the team.   IF they were moving him from what was perceived as a logjam (I hate that word actually) of starters, then by all means keep him stretched out as a starter.  We don’t actually know with certainty what the situation is/was with Prielipp, as we can only guess.  

    A few years back there was another guy who they didn’t think would hold up to a starter’s workload named Duran.  They chose wisely in that case.  Regardless of which direction they go, let’s hope that they can choose wisely again.  

    Duran was moved to the pen as a means to get him to the bigs sooner. It was supposed to be temporary, but the Twins decided they liked him in the role. Duran actually wanted to move back to the rotation. I think he would have done great as a starter with his assortment of plus pitches.

    Prielipp had no health issues last year as a starter. Like I said, start him until he shows he can't be a starter.

    8 minutes ago, Rod Carews Birthday said:

    Exactly this.  Watching a baseball game between a good team and a .500 team is very interesting and mostly competitive.  Having a roughly 50% chance at victory keeps me interested in the team.  Watching a game between a 90 win team and a 60 win team isn’t usually very interesting and likely mostly uncompetitive.  It absolutely makes me want to tune out on the Twins.  

    The idea that “if we trade everyone and just bottom out now, we’ll be good in two or three years” is wishful thinking at best, and ridiculous at worst.  IF we make great trades, AND IF those players that we get do well, AND IF some other players do well, we MIGHT be that 85 win team that some are so frustrated for the past few years.  However, if some of those things don’t actually occur, we’re back at 70 wins  or less.  

    YMMV, but that’s where I’m coming from. 

    Sort of agree but also think they should see what they could get, if the better prospects are still a couple years away. The big risk with burning it to the ground is precisely things like injuries. Just seems to be so many these days across all sports that banking on young guys to deliver the goods AND stay healthy is a gamble. Baltimore doesn’t have much to show for a decade of terrible baseball.

    Man, what a terrible way to start the spring training... hate to say it but I'm sure a few others are thinking/saying it. A couple more injuries and we're looking at a tough fight for 70 wins if we weren't already.

    Play the kids instead of bringing in some cooked vet.

    Rooting for a quick and full recovery for Pablo. One of my favorite Twins.

    10 minutes ago, Rod Carews Birthday said:

    Exactly this.  Watching a baseball game between a good team and a .500 team is very interesting and mostly competitive.  Having a roughly 50% chance at victory keeps me interested in the team.  Watching a game between a 90 win team and a 60 win team isn’t usually very interesting and likely mostly uncompetitive.  It absolutely makes me want to tune out on the Twins.  

    The idea that “if we trade everyone and just bottom out now, we’ll be good in two or three years” is wishful thinking at best, and ridiculous at worst.  IF we make great trades, AND IF those players that we get do well, AND IF some other players do well, we MIGHT be that 85 win team that some are so frustrated for the past few years.  However, if some of those things don’t actually occur, we’re back at 70 wins  or less.  

    YMMV, but that’s where I’m coming from. 

    You and Chief make a great point here - fans are not monolithic.  If there was a "one size fits all" to get butts in the seats, teams would have discovered it by now.  Just like a baseball team needs to be able to win games in different ways in the playoffs, organizations need to be able to attract fans in different ways.  

    Personally a .500 season doesn't get me excited, and given the choice between endless mediocrity and boom/bust I'll take the latter.  And with this roster in particular I think 85 wins (starting to sniff the playoffs) would require historic overperformance and luck. 

    But you are right, nothing is guaranteed and the risk is that the Pohlads could turn a 1-2 year rebuild into a lost decade a la the post-91 Twins.  

    If Ober can return to the '23 version of himself the starting rotation won't be the reason I will be tuning out by late. August. More concerned about running out the same lackluster outfielders and a BP that has a lot of questions. But, yes... this sucks.

    Let's be realistic about what this is.  

    1. It truly is disappointing to lose a season of Pablo -  I still stand by this season is not dependent on Pablo.  Yes he would have been a key cog for starting pitching, but this is the one year we have excess starting pitching, with pretty high ceilings.  Ryan is now are de facto #1, Now will Ober or Bradley take the mantle of #2 pitcher.   They stated yesterday,  Bradley's stuff looked very very good.   The only thing we are missing out on potentially is some trade value had we traded Pablo. 

    2. Buxton came out and said he was was upset the Twins did not squash the trade rumors more,  even though if I recall the 1 quote was supposedly from Buxton saying he was open to be traded.  I think we are going to stand by Buxton is with us long term.  

    3. We are still building for the future whether Tom is willing to admit it or not.  The tradeable players are Ryan and potentially Jeffers. Jeffers was told though that he was going to be the primary catcher this year.   The mixed signals is the difficult part.  

    48 minutes ago, TJSweens said:

    Duran was moved to the pen as a means to get him to the bigs sooner. It was supposed to be temporary, but the Twins decided they liked him in the role. Duran actually wanted to move back to the rotation. I think he would have done great as a starter with his assortment of plus pitches.

    Prielipp had no health issues last year as a starter. Like I said, start him until he shows he can't be a starter.

    They were trying to keep him healthy as well and they weren’t sure that he could do that under a starter’s workload.  They also thought his stuff would play up big time in the bullpen — and they were correct.  Indeed, Prielipp had no health issues last year as a starter. . . . for the first time in his career. . . ever. . . . after multiple lost years to injury. I’d like to keep him that way.   

    1 hour ago, USAFChief said:

    I'd consider myself pretty hardcore...and I would rather watch 80-82 than 60-102.

    For one thing, there's zero guarantee of any pot of gold at the end of that rookie rainbow. Just because you play a bunch of rookies doesnt mean there's a payoff down the line.

    For another, wins matter to me. And I only have so many seasons left to enjoy. I am loathe to see seasons wasted.

    Especially wasted on day 1.  Sign Giolito or Scherzer or Litell and let's go! ..... 

    1 hour ago, USAFChief said:

    I'd consider myself pretty hardcore...and I would rather watch 80-82 than 60-102.

    For one thing, there's zero guarantee of any pot of gold at the end of that rookie rainbow. Just because you play a bunch of rookies doesnt mean there's a payoff down the line.

    For another, wins matter to me. And I only have so many seasons left to enjoy. I am loathe to see seasons wasted.

    I agree. Plus no one is being blocked. I reckon we will see all of Festa, Mathews, Bradley, Abel and more at some point during the season even if we sign Giolito. 

    47 minutes ago, hitterscount said:

    If Ober can return to the '23 version of himself the starting rotation won't be the reason I will be tuning out by late. August. More concerned about running out the same lackluster outfielders and a BP that has a lot of questions. But, yes... this sucks.

    I am hopeful that either Rodriguez or Gonzalez wins the LF job, or at least they are quick to call one of them up if Roden flops. 

    1 hour ago, DJL44 said:

    80-82 is out of the playoffs. They don't hang 3rd place pennants at Target Field.

    But that's a false equivalence. Trading Joe Ryan is the difference between 74-88 and 69-93. He's not worth 20 wins on his own. Are you a huge fan of 74-88? That's a team that is irrelevant from May to September.

    It's not a terrible idea. Adding Giolito gives them something else to trade away in July. Buy low, sell high.

    85-78 might be. I'm simply advocating that you replace Pablo as best you can and see how the 1st half plays out. You will likely get more for Ryan and Jeffers in July than you will now. If Pablo's arm went out on December 1st, it's a different discussion. A team suddenly doing a 180 and dumping players in February has pretty much never been done. 

    1 hour ago, USAFChief said:

    I'd consider myself pretty hardcore...and I would rather watch 80-82 than 60-102.

    For one thing, there's zero guarantee of any pot of gold at the end of that rookie rainbow. Just because you play a bunch of rookies doesnt mean there's a payoff down the line.

    For another, wins matter to me. And I only have so many seasons left to enjoy. I am loathe to see seasons wasted.

    And there's a good school of thought that because the playoffs are much more random than the regular season, any year where you have any chance of making the playoffs, you should be going for it. And if you think the team might be 80-82...hell, maybe they catch a few breaks and end up at 83-79 and steal a Wild Card slot (worked for Cincy in 2025).

    Plus, the changes to the draft/lottery have really disincentivized the Astro Strategy of "lose a ton for 4 years, pile up the top 5 draft picks, and get it on", because you ain't getting top 5 picks 4 seasons in a row again, ever.

    Sigh. I'm bummed about losing Pablo. He was fun to watch pitch. Maybe we'll get lucky (for once) and Mick Abel or Zebby Matthews figures it out and turns into A Guy.

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    The team isn't risking its players for an outside event. The WBC is happening because teams are considering it a wash based on the usage rules teams set. Just like the Olympics. Players need to be in basically full game ready state for the WBC at the same timeline they'd normally have for Spring Training games.

    Don't think you understood what I was trying to say.  On the first day of full team workouts, would Lopez have been pitching into the third inning of a simulated game if this wasn't a WBC year?  I don't know, but seriously doubt it.  Also don't have a clue if this was going to happen anyway and this just brought it on sooner.

    2 hours ago, howeda7 said:

    Fans on this site represent the hardcore of the hardcore would rather watch rookies go 60-102 then veterans go 80-82. I get that.

     

     

    If the question is would you rather go 60-102 or 80-82 that's a different question. 

    Speaking for myself and probably 1 or 2 others. 

    I just don't believe that going with youth automatically means 60-102 and I don't believe that vets mean 80-82. 

    I'm not talking about the specific random numbers thrown out. It's the implication that youth is bad and vet is good or at least average that I'm not so sure about. 

    Even if the youth is bad... At some point you'll have to turn your youth into vets... might as well get the process started.   

    Cleveland and Tampa are routinely youthful and routinely competitive. 

     

     

     

    This is where the Twins suffer in their marketplace standing. Between Pablos $20+m and the $10m paid to the Astros to play Correa the next few seasons, it is basically 1/3 of the payroll not being used to play the game.

    On top of that, the Twins will be stuck paying Pablo for 2027, with hopes that they get a decent season out of him, make a qualifying offer, and get at least a modest draft pick.

    The Twins can't afford to have salary sit on the bench, sadly, unlike BIG market teams. And although we could've got out of Pablo's services, possibly, right at season's end, the value wasn't there. it was still a major gamble for any other team who would jsut as soon wait to see how Pablo comes back in Spring Training, or how he starts the season.

    I'm still curious to see how the World Baseball Classic plays out in the end. Ryan pitching there. Is Hendriks still pitching for Australia, or realizing he is better suited to being in camp with the Twins to get the job. Matt Bowman also pitching in the classic. 

    2 minutes ago, Rosterman said:

    This is where the Twins suffer in their marketplace standing. Between Pablos $20+m and the $10m paid to the Astros to play Correa the next few seasons, it is basically 1/3 of the payroll not being used to play the game.

    On top of that, the Twins will be stuck paying Pablo for 2027, with hopes that they get a decent season out of him, make a qualifying offer, and get at least a modest draft pick.

    The Twins can't afford to have salary sit on the bench, sadly, unlike BIG market teams. And although we could've got out of Pablo's services, possibly, right at season's end, the value wasn't there. it was still a major gamble for any other team who would jsut as soon wait to see how Pablo comes back in Spring Training, or how he starts the season.

    I'm still curious to see how the World Baseball Classic plays out in the end. Ryan pitching there. Is Hendriks still pitching for Australia, or realizing he is better suited to being in camp with the Twins to get the job. Matt Bowman also pitching in the classic. 

    This is one of the biggest differences between big and small market teams.  A team with a $100M payroll needs to have nearly everything go right from a performance and injury perspective in order to be successful.  On the other hand, a team with a $200M payroll has some leeway built into the budget projection. They might just be able to go out and sign a replacement right out of the free agent market.  A hit of $20M (Lopez) plus $10M (Correa) is extremely detrimental when your budget can’t absorb it.  This problem takes the already inherent disadvantages of a small market/budget team and amplifies them to the point where an injury or two can tank an entire season, or at very least, delay progress.  

    33 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

    I'm not talking about the specific random numbers thrown out. It's the implication that youth is bad and vet is good or at least average that I'm not so sure about. 

    You know who the oldest team in MLB was in 2025?

    The LA Dodgers.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...