Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Made a Mistake Waiting on Byron Buxton’s Hip Surgery

    Every week matters when a player is facing a six- to eight-month recovery, and the Twins may have cost themselves valuable time with their Buxton decision.

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of © Matt Blewett-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Byron Buxton's 2026 season ended with another injury. Buxton's incapacitation derailed the team's push toward the postseason, but the bigger concern for the Minnesota Twins might be what happens next. Buxton underwent arthroscopic surgery on his right hip last week, with the Twins announcing that the procedure included a labral repair, decompression and cam resection. Some of that is just to relieve the hip impingement he dealt with all year, but the labral repair is more involved—and more ominous.

    Nobody should pretend to be a doctor when discussing a complicated hip surgery. However, previous MLB cases involving labral repairs suggest a recovery that can take roughly 6-8 months. That timeline raises a question: Why did the Twins wait as long as they did to make this decision?

    Buxton's last game came on August 25 in Sacramento. His surgery didn't take place until September 18. That's nearly four weeks between Buxton's final game and the procedure. The Twins quasi-officially shut Buxton down for the season on September 11, but another week passed before the surgery actually happened. By that point, Minnesota's postseason chances had dwindled to virtually nothing, anyway.

    Even after he limped off the field against the A's, there was some hope that Buxton could return late in the season, but that increasingly looked like a long shot. Once that became clear, the argument for continuing to wait became much more difficult to understand. This is where the timeline becomes particularly important. Six months after Buxton's September 18 surgery lands on March 18. That's only one week before Opening Day. An eight-month recovery pushes his potential return to May 18, which would be 47 games into the 2027 season.

    Obviously, recovery timelines aren't guaranteed. Buxton could progress faster. He could also require more time. The latter seems more likely, given Buxton’s extensive injury history. There are too many variables involved to declare a specific return date this far in advance. But that's exactly why those extra weeks mattered.

    If the Twins had determined earlier that surgery was necessary, they could have started the recovery process sooner. Instead, they waited until late September to perform a procedure that could keep their best player out for a significant portion of the following season.

    The most frustrating part is that the Twins had already been dealing with the hip issue for months. Buxton and manager Derek Shelton both expressed confidence before the surgery that Buxton would be ready for next season. The exact wording varied, particularly when it came to whether that meant being ready for spring training or Opening Day. That optimism now feels more like a pipe dream. If he'd had surgery three weeks sooner, the chances of being ready on time would certainly be better.

    There is also a significant difference between saying a player will be "ready for next season" and having him physically prepared to play 162 games. That’s something few players accomplish in modern baseball, and Buxton has averaged 107 games per year over the last three seasons—the three healthiest campaigns he's had in the last decade. Even if Buxton avoids a major setback, a player returning from this type of surgery could need additional time to build strength and regain his normal workload.

    The Twins have spent years trying to get the most out of Buxton while managing his injury history. Minnesota paid Buxton roughly $70 million through the first five seasons of the contract. FanGraphs estimates that he has provided approximately $122.5 million in value over that span. Even when he misses time, he provides remarkable value.

    That makes the decision to sacrifice four weeks of recovery time even more difficult to understand. Maybe the surgery ultimately doesn't cost Buxton any games in 2027. Maybe his rehab goes perfectly and he's ready for Opening Day. But the Twins didn't need to gamble on that outcome. They had an opportunity to give Buxton more time to recover, and they didn't take it.

    A Mistake that Could Linger into 2027

    The Twins' decision to wait on Buxton's surgery is one of those choices that might not be fully judged until next season. If Buxton is healthy for Opening Day and plays a full season, the timing becomes a footnote. If he's forced to miss the beginning of the season because the recovery takes closer to eight months, those September weeks will look much more significant.

    Minnesota already has plenty of questions to answer heading into the offseason. Payroll needs to be addressed, the roster needs more direction, and the organization needs to determine what kind of team it wants to build around its remaining core.

    The last thing the Twins needed was to unnecessarily complicate their plans for their most important player. There was a point when waiting made sense, because Buxton was still trying to return. But once it became apparent that his season was effectively over, the clock should have started immediately. Instead, the Twins waited. Now, they have to hope those lost weeks don't come back to haunt them in April and May. Considering the usual recovery timeline for Buxton's surgery, that is a gamble the Twins probably didn't need to take.


    Was it a mistake for the Twins to wait on Buxton’s surgery? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    We should actually be surprised that he already had surgery. Secondly, who wants buxton playing in march and April anyhow? He would just get hurt and not be available July-October when we really need him on the active roster. Let the kids play next spring and bring in an unbroken Buxton in June to heat up and let it rip in late summer!!! Ya’ll are short sighted.

    30 minutes ago, Kummel said:

    Considering that he is rarely able to play late in the season, delaying his return could mean he is more likely to be healthy and available to play in the second half. 

    I'm seeing this argument a lot. I think people are forgetting that a playoff run can be derailed by a bad April. You want banked wins to build on, not an early hole to dig out of.

    And if the Twins are struggling, Buxton might feel additional pressure to push himself in his return. He would have missed Spring Training, and re-injury could be even more likely.

    This only works if a work stoppage lasts about as long as his recovery. Maybe the Twins just assumed that the season will start in June or July.

    Yes, the first half is important.  And as we can see from three years of collapses, the latter half is as well.  The problem for Twins and their fans is that Buxton is not a full season player.  So let Jenkins develop in CF and add Buxton later in season, I think it's a decent response to reality.

    The whole thing is a mess because of Buxton. With his injury history the team carried Outman to cover CF if Buxton went down. Now that is on the FO because Outman is far from what he was in LA but had no options. Then the medical staff didn't help the matter at AS break telling him he wouldn't do anymore damage if he could play though the pain. I think everyone knows that the older you are the longer it takes to come back from injury and or surgery. And another thing that seems to happen is when you favor a injury you have another. To be realistic he should have had the surgery around the AS break and it maybe would have been less complicated,but now that's all hindsight. Anyone who believes that he has value to this team at this point of his career is fooling themselves. 

    Everyone, don’t worry.

    The question is not if Buxton/the Twins waited to long to have his surgery - they didn’t, because it’s highly unlikely there is any baseball before June next season anyway.

    The actual question is what role is he going to play.  Ideally, he’s our primary DH, playing in the outfield no more than twice a week, and certainly not taking innings and ABs away from Keaschall, Jenkins and ERod.  If he still wants to be an everyday outfielder, we give him the option to do that somewhere else.  Easy peasy.

    2 hours ago, Cris E said:

    Oh good lord. Hyperbole much?

    The man is only making $15m and had hit 25 HR with a .930 OPS in mid-JUNE.  Yeah, he sucks. 

    That would be awesome if the season ended in mid-JUNE, but it didn't.

    After mid-JUNE, he performed terribly and had a surgery that will require extended rehab and may impact his ongoing performance, which is already declining because of aging. Nobody will give much for that kind of asset until they see if he can sustain decent performance.

    In 2028, he'll be 34 and in the last year of his contract. Maybe they can get something for him then from a team who thinks he could be an asset in contending. Of course, ideally the Twins have a somewhat competitive team in 2028 and Buxton could be a fourth outfielder for it.

    1 hour ago, HarmonK03 said:

    The team isn't going to force a trade if he wants to be here.  Regardless of how frustrated we are with the amount of games missed by Buxton, he has produced when in the lineup and has earned this right both contractually and from a business sense to be deferred to on this decision.

    That's fine, but a typical 75-win team trades assets like Buxton. The Twins, however, not only don't trade him if he doesn't want to be traded nor put him on the IL and call up someone able-bodied when he's injured, they don't even take him out of the lineup if he wants to play when he's injured.

    20 minutes ago, MeleMouth said:

    That's fine, but a typical 75-win team trades assets like Buxton. The Twins, however, not only don't trade him if he doesn't want to be traded nor put him on the IL and call up someone able-bodied when he's injured, they don't even take him out of the lineup if he wants to play when he's injured.

    Everyone that wants to just trade Buxton away keeps forgetting that he had a full no-trade clause for 2026.  Just because you stamp your feet and whine doesn't make the full no-trade clause go away.  Even if Buxton would have agreed to a trade, you're basically trading with one team, your trade value drops significantly, likely to the point that Buxton is more valuable on your team than trading him.  Now in 2027, he has a limited no-trade clause that allows him to be traded to five teams.  I don't know what that list is, but I'm reasonably assume the Pirates aren't on there.

    If you're in marketing for the Twins, how do you spin that you attempted to strong-arm your most recognizable player in on the team into breaking his NTC in what would appear to be a salary dump and giving up on the season.  Much of the fanbase is already apathetic, at best, towards the Twins.  You're trying to rebuild trust in the organization, not burn it down.

    There will be more Big Foot, Elvis & Unicorn sightings than Buxton playing Center field. Fans must stop listening to Jim Jones & not drink the Kool Aid. People with hip injuries use walkers not baseball bats. Baseball lost their greatest player Bo Jackson to a hip injury.

    4 hours ago, Mike h said:

    I’ve had several surgeries including a back surgery that was supposed to take 4 hours but ended up taking almost 7. More to the point, once it was determined that surgery was necessary I still had to fit in to the doctors schedule and O.R. availability, etc.  And Buxton may have needed some time to digest the reality and rethink alternatives.  That would seem normal and his right. The wait could have been on him, not the Twins.  If so, that’s ok.  When it comes to your health you have to look out for number one.

    Only Buxton can decide to have or not have surgery.  TC can suggest and push for him to get surgery but Buxton has final authority on the decision.

    13 minutes ago, Western SD Fan said:

    Everyone that wants to just trade Buxton away keeps forgetting that he had a full no-trade clause for 2026.  Just because you stamp your feet and whine doesn't make the full no-trade clause go away.  Even if Buxton would have agreed to a trade, you're basically trading with one team, your trade value drops significantly, likely to the point that Buxton is more valuable on your team than trading him.  Now in 2027, he has a limited no-trade clause that allows him to be traded to five teams.  I don't know what that list is, but I'm reasonably assume the Pirates aren't on there.

    If you're in marketing for the Twins, how do you spin that you attempted to strong-arm your most recognizable player in on the team into breaking his NTC in what would appear to be a salary dump and giving up on the season.  Much of the fanbase is already apathetic, at best, towards the Twins.  You're trying to rebuild trust in the organization, not burn it down.

    Because he has now reached 10 years of service, five with his current team, he effectively has a no-trade clause with the Twins.

    2 hours ago, Kummel said:

    I hope Buxton's recovery goes well.  We don't know how long it will impact him or how he will do when he returns.  Considering that he is rarely able to play late in the season, delaying his return could mean he is more likely to be healthy and available to play in the second half.  Of course it would be better to play an entire year, but this way he could be a factor late in a season.  And Jenkins can develop as next CF.  

     

    Better.   Jenkins is the starting CF out of the gate next year, is very good, and does not relinquish the job if/when Buxton comes back.  Buxton moves to 4th outfielder DH role.

    Wait, players only have value if they play 162 games?  Or is it the first half of the season doesn't count?  Or maybe guys that get hurt offend your aesthetic senses. Do you hate Mike Trout and Aaron Judge and Jacob DeGrom too? 

    If someone offered you a deal to sign a guy to a half season deal for $15m where he'd hit 25 HR and have a .930 OPS you'd jump at it.  (Or you should, but I admit I am really not following all your deep 4-D chess logic here.)  Plenty of players like Buxton get paid for 600AB even though they rarely play that much, but our guy is being paid about half what he's worth. And that's roughly what we get, 90-odd games.  And Byron isn't complaining even though he could make a lot more money elsewhere and the team isn't complaining because we're only paying for what he's providing, but ignorant fans are complaining that half a loaf is worse than none. 

    You seem to be having trouble wrapping your arms around the idea that the Twins did sign him to a smart, long-term deal where he's paid for about half a season of work and he's got huge bonuses in the event he does win an MVP or a World Series.  If this is the only way the Pohlads will spend money then take it, and maybe you need to get in the We Need New Owners line over there and leave Buxton alone.  

     

    6 hours ago, Czelgert said:

    The Twins were probably measuring whether they’d meet their medical plan deductible for the year and only scheduled after they had.  It’s all you can eat for the rest of the season!  /s

    Now this is funny!

    6 hours ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

    Wait a minute here.  You have assumed that the Twins' front office made the decision as to when the surgery would take place. How do you know it wasn't Buck's decision? How do you know what the doctor recommended? Did Buck get a second or third opinion? If so, what did these doctors recommend?  What went into this decision? Were there additional factors that influenced whomever made the final decision?   I know Buck has a contractual relationship with the Twins, but I doubt that contract gives the Twins carte blanche to make Buck's health decisions for him. 

    Preach.


     I'm sure Buck is a fine fella but he is constricting the organization.  he is.  And anyone cannot tell me if his salary wasn't doubled (which at the deadline it would have been)  he wouldn't accept the no trade thing.  So dumb.  Zoll should have moved him and I mean that positively for both the organization and Buck.  If he doesn't care about winning or $ , it's not loyalty but a major red flag.  Sorry.
     

    He wasn't living in a rental away from his kids in Georgia  for half of what his value was.  Zero superstars, aside from Mike Trout, do that.  Do better Zoll Pohlad and buck and trout 

    just my opinion 

    1 hour ago, Parfigliano said:

    Better.   Jenkins is the starting CF out of the gate next year, is very good, and does not relinquish the job if/when Buxton comes back.  Buxton moves to 4th outfielder DH role.

    1 hour ago, Parfigliano said:

    Better.   Jenkins is the starting CF out of the gate next year, is very good, and does not relinquish the job if/when Buxton comes back.  Buxton moves to 4th outfielder DH role.

    6 hours ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

    Wait a minute here.  You have assumed that the Twins' front office made the decision as to when the surgery would take place. How do you know it wasn't Buck's decision? How do you know what the doctor recommended? Did Buck get a second or third opinion? If so, what did these doctors recommend?  What went into this decision? Were there additional factors that influenced whomever made the final decision?   I know Buck has a contractual relationship with the Twins, but I doubt that contract gives the Twins carte blanche to make Buck's health decisions for him. 

    Good point. A pet peeve of mind was the decision to suddenly make sure he was ready to play in the Field of Dreams game with no AAA proof that he was ready. It hurt the team. I am so sick and tired of HOPING he will play well. He is entering his mid-30s. NOTE TO Buxton, Shelton, FO, and TP. . PLEASE stop thinking that he will be a wonderkid who should be answer to the Twins making the playoffs. Use him as the DH to prevent the likelihood of injuries and sparingly in the outfield. Outfield CF Jenkins in CF, Emma, LF,  Keasch RF

    4 hours ago, MeleMouth said:

    The Twins made many bad decisions regarding Buxton and his hip, but the timing of the surgery is not one of them and may actually be good.

    Mistakes:

    1. Letting Buxton continue to play when he was obviously injured and his results were terrible. Unlike surgery, which should be the player's decision, whether a player should play should not be up to the player.

    2. Not filling his roster spot with Roden or someone else who could play every day, likely with better results, and should have been given an opportunity so that the team could plan for next year.

    3. Deluding themselves, for the third time in just the last few years, that Buxton could get better with rehab and return to lead them in the playoffs.

    4. Deluding themselves that they actually had a team that could make the playoffs, with or without Buxton, and deciding to buy at the deadline with a team that already lost Lopez and Buxton, two of their three top players, and not admitting that Joe Ryan had much worse second halves in each of the three previous years (now four in a row), instead of leaning into a rebuild.

    5. Bonus mistake: not persuading Buxton to agree to a trade last summer or during the winter. His loyalty is admirable, but it's hard to see how staying on the Twins is good for Buxton or the Twins. I guess he wants to be remembered as a one-team player, but his legacy would be better if he was known as a guy who played in the World Series, which isn't going to happen here. This may be water under the bridge now, because it's hard to see how another team would give much for him.

    As for the timing of the surgery, it's fine. If it takes him eight or even nine months to recover, he can return in mid-June or July. Based on his average 90-game season, that would actually allow him to be relatively healthy for the playoffs, if the team is in them, instead of being run down by the All Star game. 

    Good analysis. My only question is the 90 day average.    It is an average. They should be full preparation not to count on him and have such plans in place. If he plays...and is healthy great. With his constant injuries...his 90 days may turn into less. He is not Roy Hobbs. .

    Buxton and his agent had huge influence on what went down. Obviously. There are big ($500k each) bonus steps tied to PA that were in play. They announced the surgery right after the first bonus became mathematically impossible. I don’t think this is a knock on Buxton. “Stars” and their agents are going to have some influence, and at the beginning at least, Buxton probably thought he could be productive through it, as well. Human nature. He should have been sent for surgery earlier, yes. But, it’s not an entirely simple and straightforward process to get the player there. There’s probably a parallel universe where management could have been more proactive and persuasive…but it ain’t this universe.

    More than likely this was like a lot of elbow surgeries. They don't actually know 100% how far they need to go to fix the problem until they are there. When you wake up and they tell you it was a little better or worse than they expected. Your like...give my pain killer prescriptions so I can get them going before this wears off and let me get the hell out of here. Such is my two-rotator cuff experiences....

    The Twins made a huge mistake in not trading Buxton in the offseason.  He was coming off one of his best seasons of his career and the 2nd most games played in a season.  He still was a valuable 5 tool player and for a contending team on a very favorable contract that at the start of 2026 had three full years of team control.

    The entire no-trade saga could have been easily overridden by trading him to a contending team that really wanted him.   Its one thing to say "I want to stay a Twin", it is another to consider being traded to the Braves, Dodgers, Yankees, or even the Cubs and becoming part of a team that would be good and push Byron into the limelight.

    But the Twins PRETENDED to be contenders, held onto all of their trade assets, and frankly they all lost value in 2026.   Buxton, another injury with a surgery that is going to require long term rehab.  Ryan, with a second consecutive season of fading in the 2nd half.   Jeffers, whose value is down to a Comp B draft pick.  If you made a quantitative measure of Buxton and Ryan's trade value in the offseason of 2026 and then in 2027, their value is less than HALF of what you could have got.  And I would argue a Comp B pick is about half of what Jeffers value would have been at the trade deadline.  

    Again, all to PRETEND to be a contender and 9 games under water at the 159 game mark.   If the team is going to put $60-70 million in incremental payroll for the 2027 season,  then perhaps this will be somewhat water under the bridge.  But the probability of them increasing payroll by that substantial amount is very low, starting with the fact that Minnesota is not considered a high value destination for major league baseball free agents. 

     

     

     

    4 hours ago, Wedman13 said:

    And anyone cannot tell me if his salary wasn't doubled (which at the deadline it would have been)  he wouldn't accept the no trade thing

    You must be part of Buxton's inner circle to make this claim.  I am sure he and his family looked at all his options with input from his agent and he stated he wanted to be here.  That is all we can go on, are his words, no one can speak for him.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...