Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Ranking Minnesota’s Post-Hype Prospects

    Which of the Twins' former top prospects can still live up to the hype?

    Cody Christie
    Image courtesy of William Parmeter

    Twins Video

    There comes a point in every organization’s development cycle where the shine starts to wear off former top prospects. The tools are still there. The pedigree is still listed on Baseball Reference. The scouting reports still live somewhere in the back of your brain from when you watched their Futures Game highlights three summers ago. But the production has not quite followed them to the big leagues.

    That is what makes someone a post-hype prospect. These are players who were once considered foundational. Now they are in their mid-to-upper 20s, fighting to prove they still belong in an organization’s long-term plans. For the Minnesota Twins, that conversation has been happening recently thanks to John Bonnes and Aaron Gleeman on the Gleeman and The Geek.

    Now it is put up or shut up time. Minnesota believes it has a roster capable of contending in 2026, but they also need internal improvement to make that happen. If these players do not take a meaningful step forward this season, there is a good chance they will be wearing a different uniform in 2027.

    With the stakes clear, let's examine how Minnesota’s post-hype prospects stack up entering the season.

    8.  OF/DH Trevor Larnach
    Peak Prospect Rank: 39th by Baseball America (2021)

    At one point, Larnach looked like a middle-of-the-order fixture in the making. Now he feels like someone caught between roles. When he was used more regularly as a designated hitter in 2024, there were signs of life in the bat (116 OPS+), but the overall body of work has still been that of a below-average hitter for a corner outfielder (101 OPS+).

    That becomes a real problem for someone without a true defensive home. Larnach has to hit to justify his roster spot. If he does not, there may not be a clear path forward for him in Minnesota.

    7. UTL Austin Martin
    Peak Prospect Rank: 19th by Baseball America (2021)

    Martin quietly put together a strong second half last season with a 106 OPS+ and 11 steals in 50 games. He showed an improved offensive approach, the ability to impact the game on the bases, and enough defensive versatility to move around the diamond when needed.

    Even with those positives, Martin still projects as more of a role player than an everyday contributor. He can handle corner outfield duties and slide to second base in a pinch, but his path to playing time likely runs through the bench unless the bat takes another step.

    6. SP Simeon Woods Richardson
    Peak Prospect Rank: 61st by Baseball America (2020)

    Three years ago, it was fair to wonder if Woods Richardson was ever going to carve out a role in the big leagues. At Triple-A, he posted a 4.91 ERA with a 19.3 K%.  Now he has become a steady contributor in Minnesota’s rotation with a 103 ERA+ and a 4.30 FIP from 2024-25.  

    He may not have the frontline upside of some of the organization’s other arms, but there is real value in a pitcher capable of handling innings in a mid-rotation or back-end role. Woods Richardson has stabilized his trajectory, even if the ceiling still looks somewhat limited.

    5. SP Taj Bradley
    Peak Prospect Rank: 20th by MLB.com (2023)

    The Twins took a swing when they acquired Bradley at last year’s trade deadline in a one-for-one deal involving Griffin Jax. Bradley has pitched over 380 major league innings and has a reputation as someone who has been one of baseball’s top pitching prospects.

    The results have been inconsistent at the highest level (85 ERA+), which is exactly why he lands in the middle of this list. Minnesota is betting that there is another gear here, and if they can find it, Bradley could become a major piece of the rotation moving forward.

    4. IF Brooks Lee
    Peak Prospect Rank: 18th by MLB.com (2024)

    Lee is going to open the season as Minnesota’s starting shortstop, whether he is perfectly suited for the position or not. Circumstances have pushed him into the role, and now the Twins need the bat to justify it, as he has been limited to a 75 OPS+ in his first 189 games in the big leagues.

    As a prospect, Lee was known for elite bat-to-ball skills from both sides of the plate. He showed some improvement last season, but that contact ability has not fully translated against big- league pitching. If it does in 2026, it could change the outlook for both Lee and the lineup as a whole.

    3. SP Zebby Matthews
    Peak Prospect Rank: 73rd by Baseball America (2025)

    There may not be a wider range of outcomes on this list than there is in Matthews. Minnesota will give him every opportunity to stick in the rotation, especially with injuries thinning out the starting pitching depth. Some of his underlying metrics suggest there is still breakout potential here.

    He was known for his ability to throw strikes in the minors, and batters have keyed in on that trait, translating it into a 38.8 Hard-Hit%. Avoiding hard contact will be the biggest key for 2026. Matthews could develop into a playoff-caliber starter or eventually shift into a high-leverage bullpen role. Among the pitchers in this group, he may have the best chance to develop into a future All-Star if everything clicks.

    2. OF Matt Wallner
    Peak Prospect Rank: Never Ranked on Top-100 List

    Even in what felt like a down year in 2025, Wallner still managed a 110 OPS+ with 22 home runs. That alone tells you how impactful his power can be.

    If he takes even a modest step forward this season, clearing 30 home runs should be well within reach, with the upside for even more. The Twins need someone in this lineup to provide a legitimate offensive breakout. Wallner feels like the safest bet to do exactly that.

    1. 3B Royce Lewis
    Peak Prospect Rank: 5th by MLB.com (2019)

    Lewis has already shown flashes of stardom. Now he is working to make that level of performance more sustainable. After revamping his swing this winter, Lewis enters 2026 with plenty of internal hype from the organization.

    His defense at third base improved from a significant liability in 2024 to something closer to average last season. If the bat returns to what it looked like during his best stretches, Lewis is capable of being an All-Star caliber player and a franchise-altering presence in the middle of Minnesota’s lineup.

    Post-hype prospects do not always get a second act. Sometimes the league tells you exactly who a player is before they ever get the chance to adjust.

    The Twins are counting on several of these players to rewrite that narrative in 2026. If even two or three of them take meaningful steps forward, Minnesota’s chances of staying in contention improve dramatically. If not, the next time we talk about this group, it may be in the context of where their careers went after leaving the organization.


    How would your rankings look for the organization’s post-hype prospects? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    If the question is which of these players is most likely to have a substantial positive impact on the 2026 (and forward) Twins, then the top two are right on point.  Royce Lewis is still flashing the upside, while definitely improving on the defensive side of the ball.  Matt Wallner, in a down year for him, still was one of the Twins top contributors last year (I know, thinnest kid at fat camp, I know).  Then it gets interesting for me.  Zebby Matthews is probably the one with still the biggest swing in terms of range of outcomes. He might be a number 2, or a number 5, or maybe nothing in particular.  However, I think he is a little misplaced on the list because he has the least MLB experience and so he deserves more time than the others, both for tantalizing potential and because we just need to see him pitch more.  

    The next two, Lee and Bradley, I feel are entering put up or shut up status.  Both were wildly hyped. Both have had quite a bit of experience and both have vastly underperformed the hype. The backup plan for Bradley might be bullpen arm, but the backup plan for Lee is ???????.  I would be thrilled if ONE of these guys took a big step forward this year leaving only one as a bust. 

    Understanding that the reason for the list is “Guys who used to be Top 100 guys” is why SWR is on the list (but then why is Wallner?), it’s hard for me not to think that he is the guy who “is what he is”, a #4/5 starter that is relatively consistent and nice to have around. I sort of think the same thing for Austin Martin.  He’s not great, but he’s useful in many ways and is in that same “not bad and is what he is” category. 

    Larnach is to me the ultimate AAAA guy.  He’s got some hitting skill, but he has no defensive value.  The hitting skill isn’t enough to keep him in the lineup at a corner spot, so unless he plays a position where the team really needs somebody (too bad he’s not a shortstop — but then neither is Brooks Lee), he’s not very useful nor very valuable.  He’s also the guy with several built in replacements.  

    The really scary thing that this article exposes is the fallacy of “top prospect” or “ranked prospect” status.  Seven out of the eight of these guys were in that category and yet only about two or three seem like they could be good MLB players at this point.  To me, “top 100 prospect” should show an upside of all-star or at least above average player and a downside of solid reliever, strong utility guy, or average starter in the field.  However, as this shows, there are no guarantees out there and we just need to hope they can do something with these players.  

    This has been the same question for the past couple seasons (Lewis, Larnach, Wallner). A couple new faces in here with Bradley and Martin. Not sure Zebby belongs on this list yet. 
     

    Once again, we have a lot riding on this cast of characters. Are they part of the plans for 27 and beyond or do we move on and start bringing up the new kids? Only performance or injury will tell.

    When you are getting into your 5th and 6th seasons I am not sure post hype prospect status still qualifies.  At this point I won't even consider Larnach.  

    For me it more comes into 2 groups  - those with moderate skills that have had ok to average results and looking to consistently be average to slightly above average.   

    3. Martin  - Martin I think is finally finding a niche.   

    2. Lee - Lee looks trimmer this spring.  I expect the defense to be palatable and an improvement at the plate.  

    1. SWR - has provided pretty solid performances the last year and a half.   He is maximizing the stuff he has to be the best he can be.  

     

    Elite talents need improvement on the mental side - 

    4. Matthews  -  I am not sure Matthews is post hype - similar to Lee,  but his ceiling is higher than Lee's in my opinion

    3. Wallner - Wallner when he is on is one of the top hitters in baseball - when he is not he is a replacement level player.  The Twins need more consistency

    2. Lewis - I think some of Lewis's ceiling has been lowered by injuries - and some of his struggles at the plate have been a poor approach and the unwillingness to change or adapt.  The org seems to want to coddle him more this year, and Lewis says he is improved his approach,  we already had a setback on the injury front.  Of the position players he still has the highest ceiling but he may be the one I am least confident can achieve it.   

    1. Bradley - Bradley has talent and ability - he comes in throwing harder,  better pitches this spring.  His performances have been a microcosm of  his season good/great start,  blow up,  good great start.   I think the stuff and coaching, and his mental approach will be better this year.   He has to limit the bad outtings.  Of these players I think he has the highest ceiling and the highest chance of achieving it.    

     

    26 minutes ago, Rod Carews Birthday said:

    If the question is which of these players is most likely to have a substantial positive impact on the 2026 (and forward) Twins, then the top two are right on point.  Royce Lewis is still flashing the upside, while definitely improving on the defensive side of the ball.  Matt Wallner, in a down year for him, still was one of the Twins top contributors last year (I know, thinnest kid at fat camp, I know).  Then it gets interesting for me.  Zebby Matthews is probably the one with still the biggest swing in terms of range of outcomes. He might be a number 2, or a number 5, or maybe nothing in particular.  However, I think he is a little misplaced on the list because he has the least MLB experience and so he deserves more time than the others, both for tantalizing potential and because we just need to see him pitch more.  

    The next two, Lee and Bradley, I feel are entering put up or shut up status.  Both were wildly hyped. Both have had quite a bit of experience and both have vastly underperformed the hype. The backup plan for Bradley might be bullpen arm, but the backup plan for Lee is ???????.  I would be thrilled if ONE of these guys took a big step forward this year leaving only one as a bust. 

    Understanding that the reason for the list is “Guys who used to be Top 100 guys” is why SWR is on the list (but then why is Wallner?), it’s hard for me not to think that he is the guy who “is what he is”, a #4/5 starter that is relatively consistent and nice to have around. I sort of think the same thing for Austin Martin.  He’s not great, but he’s useful in many ways and is in that same “not bad and is what he is” category. 

    Larnach is to me the ultimate AAAA guy.  He’s got some hitting skill, but he has no defensive value.  The hitting skill isn’t enough to keep him in the lineup at a corner spot, so unless he plays a position where the team really needs somebody (too bad he’s not a shortstop — but then neither is Brooks Lee), he’s not very useful nor very valuable.  He’s also the guy with several built in replacements.  

    The really scary thing that this article exposes is the fallacy of “top prospect” or “ranked prospect” status.  Seven out of the eight of these guys were in that category and yet only about two or three seem like they could be good MLB players at this point.  To me, “top 100 prospect” should show an upside of all-star or at least above average player and a downside of solid reliever, strong utility guy, or average starter in the field.  However, as this shows, there are no guarantees out there and we just need to hope they can do something with these players.  

    Not really shocked by the "fallacy of the 'top prospect' or 'ranked prospect' status thing.  Maybe because I've been watching baseball for over 50 years and could write an article longer than this one just naming names of such guys I've seen (or who never actually got to the point where most fans ever even got to SEE them) reaching such status over the years. Tyler Jay, BJ Garbe & Adam Johnson jump off the page but it's a big page and these would merely be a start.

    This was a fun exercise - I do not put Zebby, SWR on the list.  I look for them to have better years this season.  SWR 

    Larnach 29 replacement level

    Martin 26 replacement level

    SWR 25 performing as good #4/5 starter

    Taj Bradley 24 still young enough and with enough talent to become a regular SP

    Brooks Lee 25 - 2 seasons - starting SS and below replacement at bat and in field.  This is key year for him.

    Zebby Matthews 25 - 2 seasons, poor results, high whip for a played known for control.  Key year for him, he was my favorite while in the minors

    Matt Wallner 28 - good power, no rbis.  A big disappointment to me.  I looked at the top RBI guys - in the top 20 Schwaber - number 1 with 132 - had the lowest BA but it was still 240.   Brooks Lee, who is getting a lot of criticism had 66 RBIs and Lewis 50.  Wallner had 40 and ranked 228 among all batters. 

    I know RBIs don't count for many of you, but scoring runs is still the name of the game. Clemens with almost as many ABs had 52 - same as Lewis.  Larnach we are also down on had 60. Jeffers and Ty France also had more and of course Buxton led the team.  So I don't want to hear that he did not have enough players on the bases.  I really hoped Matt would be a stud, but HR with bases empty and when the game is already out of hand does not impress.

    Royce Lewis 26 (thought he was older) had an OPS+ of 83.  That is bad. It ranked 14 on the team last year.   He has to be better Mr I don't slump seems to have had a slump since his first year.

    I had to look at ages - Wallner and Lewis are the oldest - for me the patience is limited at this point and if someone wants them I make the trade.

     

    3 hours ago, Cody Christie said:

    When he was used more regularly as a designated hitter in 2024, there were signs of life in the bat (116 OPS+), 

    This preface would be more relevant if he actually hit better when DHing, but in 2024 his OPS as a DH was .674 while as a LF it was .896(!).  The trend was similar in 2025, .702 vs .760.

    Not that I believe very much in slicing and dicing numbers this way - divide data in a million ways on a computer and you'll eventually turn up something that is probably stupid such as a propensity to hit better on Tuesdays.  But if a correlation is offered, there ought to be at least some evidence provided.

    It's really wearying to feel the need to fact-check everything in certain writers' bodies of work.

    8 minutes ago, old nurse said:

    The hype for prospects is created by the media. The rankings are just an opinion. So if the hype is wrong, it is not on the player 

    Agreed. And it's usually only one or two people in the media that create the rankings. The rest just copy them to fill column space and to avoid looking stupid. Rankings are almost useless. Sure, you get someone like Joe Mauer who meets expectations, but then you get guys like Luis Arraez who was on no ones list.

    I think rankings especially misfire when it comes to pitching. There are too many guys ranked solely on pitch speed and movement. They always come with a caveat that goes something like..."if he can refine his control the sky is the limit."  Guess what, this almost never happens.

    18 minutes ago, Nshore said:

    Lewis is rapidly entering FITP territory (flash in the pan).  Wallner and Larnach are just clogging up the roster for the next batch of prospects.  Next!

    All 3 of them have issues to work out. Its going to be a make or break season for them and others. I would add Martin and Lee to a develop your skills or become just an average fill in role player type. 

    Each of these players is in a different boat so comparing them in the same way doesn’t make sense. Larnach is hardly a prospect and is what he is - a borderline player. SWR has already made it - he was projected to be 4/5 starter and has done that the last two years. Even Wallner is kind of a finished product he’s just not the product we were hoping for. Lewis, Lee and Martin are really the ones this premise applies to. 

    3 hours ago, Fatbat said:

    Sometime along the path to MLB, someone should have taught Larnach and Wallner how to play 1B. They tried it with Kiriloff and that worked until his arm fell off. 

    The arm falling off doesn't explain the visibly bad footwork and awkward reaches Kirilloff displayed shortly before having to retire.

    Actually I have to lay a fair amount of the blame here on Falvey. Bad drafting, bad trades and definitely bad player development (particularly in the area of physical conditioning). 
     

    The Twins focused on HRs in drafting despite their claim to select the “best athlete available.”  Many on the list follow that pattern.  But power is 20% of the skill set.  If your only skill is power, then you are useless, except in the Twins RF. Larnach is not even 50 on any of the 5 skills.
     

    Why are these players still here? Simple: the Twins drafted them highly (poorly) and they just can’t stop believing they will suddenly turn into Ohtani.  Sometimes it’s a long road (Buxton-but he was always a give tool player) and sometimes they come up and are great on day one (Olivia. Puckett. Hrbek).

    And the other problem: bad, or really bad player development!  Development means working with the player to optimize their talents. Maybe it means switching to a new position.  Or adding 20 lbs. or learning conditioning and repetition.  Or training in the film room. Whatever.  The Twins have not invested here.  They have actually DEINVESTED in training. They inanely think that playing Moneyball will mean they can skip all that training expense. Just teach them to hit it over the wall and we will win the WS!  

    12 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    The arm falling off doesn't explain the visibly bad footwork and awkward reaches Kirilloff displayed shortly before having to retire.

    Pretty sure he had a very costly error in the ALDS at Target Field, completely unrelated to his arm. 

    FYI, Zebby's not post-hype, he's right where a prospect would normally be, given he was at high A a little less  than two years ago.  The leagues I'm in, he is a hot commodity.  However, if he doesn't show up this year, next year he'd be a prime post-hype candidate.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...