twinssporto Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 Good afternoon and welcome back to more game thread fun!! The Twin's seem to be heating up...can they make it 3 in a row? It was nice to see the Twins rally last night. Hopefully they can build off the momentum of last night and pull themselves out of the cellar. Berrios is throwing tonight too. Could be a good game! Finally got moved into our new place last week but still surrounded by boxes and lots of stuff .left to unpack. Will listen to the game on the radio as our internet and TV's still aren't operating at their capacity. I decided to cut the cable cord as well. I doubt anyone on here cares but thought I would let you in on that anyway. I'm now a cord cutter! OK - I have to go back to unpacking boxes. Here's tonights lineups: Go Twins!! TWINS: 1. Max Kepler DH 2. Josh Donaldson 3B 3. Alex Kirilloff RF 4. Miguel Sano 1B 5. Jorge Polanco 2B 6. Mitch Garver C 7. T. Larnach LF 8. R. Refsnyder CF 9. A. Simmons SS P - Jose Berrios 4-2 (3.91 ERA) BALTIMORE: 1. C Mullins CF 2. F. Galvis 3. Trey Mancini 1B 4. A. Santander RF 5. DJ Stewart DH 6. M. Franco 3B 7. R. Mountcastle LF 8. S. Wilkerson 2B 9. P. Severino C P - Dean Kremer (R) 0-4 (6.35 ERA)
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 There’s a significant starter gap in this game and it’s exactly the kind of game the Twins need to win handily if they want to crawl back to .500.
Dave The Dastardly Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 Good luck with the unpacking. Moved here 21 years ago and still find the occasional box that hasn't been unpacked. Found a box full of moldy paperbacks out in my shop just this last winter; the authors now gone to that Best Seller's List in the Sky, though I know at least three of them are still writing books from the grave. Ghostwriters I guess. Ditched satellite ten years ago. Can't say as I missed it, especially the constantly climbing monthly bills. Fees are now almost as high as the satellites.
sampleSizeOfOne Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 Is there a literal cord you get to cut to be a cord cutter, or is it figurative, merely indicative of a decision you make?
twinssporto Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Author Posted May 25, 2021 8 minutes ago, Dave The Dastardly said: Good luck with the unpacking. Moved here 21 years ago and still find the occasional box that hasn't been unpacked. Found a box full of moldy paperbacks out in my shop just this last winter; the authors now gone to that Best Seller's List in the Sky, though I know at least three of them are still writing books from the grave. Ghostwriters I guess. Ditched satellite ten years ago. Can't say as I missed it, especially the constantly climbing monthly bills. Fees are now almost as high as the satellites. I put a date on all of the boxes. Anything older than a year unpacked gets chucked into garbage bin.
twinssporto Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Author Posted May 25, 2021 10 minutes ago, sampleSizeOfOne said: Is there a literal cord you get to cut to be a cord cutter, or is it figurative, merely indicative of a decision you make? You gotta actually cut the cord. It's a serious endeavor.
sampleSizeOfOne Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, twinssporto said: You gotta actually cut the cord. It's a serious endeavor. Good luck with it all! It got me reminiscin' about society and technology and whatnot, i recalled the sadness of Dersu Uzala as he tried to live in the city and got in trouble for cutting down a tree in a park for firewood... But in my interweb meanderin's following this thought, i found out George Lucas hinted that Dersu Uzala was the inspiration for the character of Yoda, according to wikipedia. Learn something new every day...
MVP Nick Punto Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 Is kiriloff considered better in RF than Max that he gets the nod when they're both batting, or are we just giving Maximilian a little extra mojito time in the dugout?
Dave The Dastardly Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 3 minutes ago, twinssporto said: You gotta actually cut the cord. It's a serious endeavor. Takes two burly guys and a Finlander. The burly guys each get a vicegrips which they clamp on the cable about a foot apart. The Finlander steps in with a hacksaw and has at it. But you gotta watch it, if the burly guys lose their grip the loose end of the cable wraps itself around your billfold and sucks out the money faster than a Dyson vacuum.
sampleSizeOfOne Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Dave The Dastardly said: Takes two burly guys and a Finlander. The burly guys each get a vicegrips which they clamp on the cable about a foot apart. The Finlander steps in with a hacksaw and has at it. But you gotta watch it, if the burly guys lose their grip the loose end of the cable wraps itself around your billfold and sucks out the money faster than a Dyson vacuum. So not only is it serious, it's slow. I got no patience for hacksaws. I'd have at it with an axe.
Seth Stohs Site Manager Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 23 minutes ago, MVP Nick Punto said: Is kiriloff considered better in RF than Max that he gets the nod when they're both batting, or are we just giving Maximilian a little extra mojito time in the dugout? Not at all. Remember Kepler has missed time and came out early in the game on Sunday because of some leg injury. So, he's just DHing for now. Kepler's a better OF.
stringer bell Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 24 minutes ago, MVP Nick Punto said: Is kiriloff considered better in RF than Max that he gets the nod when they're both batting, or are we just giving Maximilian a little extra mojito time in the dugout? Not even close, but Kepler is still battling hamstring tightness. He's not played center field for several days and was removed from the game on Sunday for Garlick because of the hamstring.
stringer bell Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Seth Stohs said: Not at all. Remember Kepler has missed time and came out early in the game on Sunday because of some leg injury. So, he's just DHing for now. Kepler's a better OF. Ninjaed by Seth by seconds.
Platoon Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 23 minutes ago, Dave The Dastardly said: Takes two burly guys and a Finlander. The burly guys each get a vicegrips which they clamp on the cable about a foot apart. The Finlander steps in with a hacksaw and has at it. But you gotta watch it, if the burly guys lose their grip the loose end of the cable wraps itself around your billfold and sucks out the money faster than a Dyson vacuum. When the cord is cut don’t the burly guys both fall over backwards? And then file a work comp claim against the Finlander? A German would eliminate that by using a side cutter, thus saving himself the expense of the two litigious burly guys.
Nine of twelve Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 Watching the center field camera shots of Berrios pitching makes me wonder how anyone ever hits the ball. He gets what seems like such good movement that I don't understand why he isn't a top 5 starter.
MVP Nick Punto Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 11 minutes ago, Seth Stohs said: Not at all. Remember Kepler has missed time and came out early in the game on Sunday because of some leg injury. So, he's just DHing for now. Kepler's a better OF. Gotcha, thanks. I can't catch many games in full these days.
Nine of twelve Verified Member Posted May 25, 2021 Posted May 25, 2021 I've said this before but I enjoy hearing myself talk so I'll say it again. I think the review system should be tweaked to reduce the likelihood of reviewer bias. If possible the reviewer(s) should not know the call on the field. Instead of looking for clear evidence to overturn the call on the field the reviewer(s) should call outcome A, outcome B, or inconclusive. Only in the event of an inconclusive finding should the call on the field stand.
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 1 minute ago, Nine of twelve said: I've said this before but I enjoy hearing myself talk so I'll say it again. I think the review system should be tweaked to reduce the likelihood of reviewer bias. If possible the reviewer(s) should not know the call on the field. Instead of looking for clear evidence to overturn the call on the field the reviewer(s) should call outcome A, outcome B, or inconclusive. Only in the event of an inconclusive finding should the call on the field stand. There’s really no point in the New York reviewer knowing the call on the field unless it’s to protect the umpire.
wsnydes Old-Timey Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 4 minutes ago, Nine of twelve said: I've said this before but I enjoy hearing myself talk so I'll say it again. I think the review system should be tweaked to reduce the likelihood of reviewer bias. If possible the reviewer(s) should not know the call on the field. Instead of looking for clear evidence to overturn the call on the field the reviewer(s) should call outcome A, outcome B, or inconclusive. Only in the event of an inconclusive finding should the call on the field stand. That scenario seems like it forces the reviewer to make a call. I'm not sure that's a bad thing though. The system is flawed somehow either way. I'm not a fan of replay in it's current form anyhow.
sampleSizeOfOne Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 Makes it a touch more complicated to edit out the ump from any footage reviewed. And if ya ain't gonna do that, reviewer will know the call anyway.
Mill1634 Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 I like the above thoughts on replay, but if the current form stays I'd like to see the amount of looks NY gets at the play limited to 3. If you don't see anything that warrants an overturn after that, the play should stand. No reason these replays should take 3 or 4 minutes.
Nine of twelve Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, wsnydes said: That scenario seems like it forces the reviewer to make a call. I'm not sure that's a bad thing though. The system is flawed somehow either way. I'm not a fan of replay in it's current form anyhow. If the reviewer feels the outcome of the play is not clear s/he is not forced to make a call. S/he would simply rule inconclusive.
Nine of twelve Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 1 minute ago, Mill1634 said: I like the above thoughts on replay, but if the current form stays I'd like to see the amount of looks NY gets at the play limited to 3. If you don't see anything that warrants an overturn after that, the play should stand. No reason these replays should take 3 or 4 minutes. Depends on the situation. If there are 4 or 5 views of the play a reviewer should be able to see all of them before ruling.
Mill1634 Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 Way to eff up that play, Simmons. What a play by Jose.
Nine of twelve Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 I think I could have caught that throw.
sampleSizeOfOne Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 Wandeirn' off to forage for sustenance, by way of either a drive through, or a supermarket, depending on my patience. Y'all hold the fort!
Nine of twelve Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 1 minute ago, Mill1634 said: What a play by Jose. That was very similar to a 3B charging a ball and throwing accurately across his body to first.
Nine of twelve Verified Member Posted May 26, 2021 Posted May 26, 2021 1 minute ago, sampleSizeOfOne said: Wandeirn' off to forage for sustenance, by way of either a drive through, or a supermarket, depending on my patience. Y'all hold the fort! Did the Taco Bell commercial get to you?
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS On Saturday, Houston went 3-for-5 and scored two runs. After a short slump, he is now back over .290 on the season. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.