Can Buxton be Worth $100M Playing 100 Games?

I long have been a supporter of Buck, but also stated he would not play a full season, as he never has.  The contract he reached really accounts for his lack of health, and pays him more if he can stay healthy.  It was actually a good contract for the Twins and Buck.  When on the field he is worth one of the highest paid player in the game. 

However, we knew he would not play even 150 games a year.  I also feel when he plays DH his value is dropped a ton as much of his value is on his defense.  However, he is worth the contract as he will play about half a season each year.  

One comment on the counting stats versus antilytic stats.  No one stat tells a full story.  They need to always be taken into context.  Also no stat predicts future outcomes either, they can only be compared to see if they are in line with expected results.  I could go off for a long time about that issue, but I do agree WAR as a whole is best to look at as an overall looking at most stats, but it is not predictive either.

I think (hope) the 100 game plan is just for this year and did not come into play until he hurt his knee.

Going forward Buxton himself needs to figure out how to stay on the field. He has started to dial in the recklessness in the field that led to running into walls and teammates, now he needs to figure out how to not get hurt on the bases. If he had been running hard on that pop-up, he gets second standing up. Since he didn't (nor do many MLB players), he should have been content to stay at first instead of having to awkwardly slide into second and jam his knee (like many MLB players have done).

We also don't know how much of his hip problems are related to running to first, stepping on the bag (creating a jamming force on the ankles, knees and hips), and coming to an abrupt stop from full-speed. I do love the hustle, but sometimes you need to let the routine grounder to the pitcher or second baseman be routine and just jog to first. Groundballs to short and third are potential infield hits and you gotta go hard to first!!

1 hour ago, se7799 said:

I guess my question is...who came up with the goal of 100 games?  A doctor?  Him?  FO?  Would 122 games cause injury?  Would. 87 played mean he has more in the tank?  Is it a random number?  Either way I love watching him play and is well worth it to me.

Sometimes you have to just pick a number as a starting point. 100 is a nice round number and accounts for about 4-5 10 day IL visits with Rocco's generous rest day policy. 81 would be half the games 100 games is roughly 62% of games. I know both parties would love more, but somewhere to start. 

The incentives laden contract for Mvp awards and placing in the top 5 or so in MVP votes, getting 500 or more ABs, we're all agreed to since last season. It's hard to imagine he would be considered for Mvp if he's only playing 100 games and it seems a stretch to get to 500 ABs. I think the ABs incentives were in $500k increments. 

Seems a little odd to me they came up with this plan in the spring (according to Souhan) before he hurt anything, but after the incentive packed contract was signed in December. 

8 hours ago, Eris said:

The one stat that is most important is the W-L of the team when Byron Buxton is playing. There have been some variations of this stat on the other Buxton threads. 
 

https://calltothepen.com/2021/09/25/importance-byron-buxton-minnesota-twins/amp/

Taking that argument to its logical conclusion, wouldn't it also be important to look at the W-L records of the opposing teams in the games he plays in?  If he plays much of his games in a weak division, Detroit, KC, etc., and we win our share of those games, how many games does he play against NY, Houston, etc.?  What is our record in those games?  I say that because it is these teams we see in the playoffs.  So far this year we have played only 8 games against teams that are over .500, and we are 2-6 in those games.  And, again, these are the caliber of teams we will see in the playoffs.   This is not to discount the stat you presented, I would just be curious to see a breakdown of the opponents records he is playing against before I get too carried away with our record in the games he plays in.  

This is just a thought, and I hope ya all don't yell at me too loud, but what would be so wrong with Buck being our next Nelson Cruz?  Full time DH?  If Cellestino is for real, he can handle center much of the time with Gordon and Kepler as back ups.  Put Buck in the cleanup spot behind Arraez, Correa, and Polanco and let him swing away 500-600 times a year.  Tell him to back off the sprints that get him hurt so much of the time and run at a pace he knows is safe for his body.  The damage he could do at the plate would be immense, and he stays safe (or at least safer).  If he hurts himself in that role we know we are cursed.  Might be worth a try.  His bat in the lineup every day will more than compensate for the difference in defense by the others.  And since he is only playing center part time now, how much difference could it make?  Just a thought at 4:00 am after work.     (think I should have slept on it?)

I love Buxton, when he plays.  I'm glad he's on the team and hope he does well.  However, I'm of the opinion that paying a part time player $15 mill per season after this year's measly 9 mill, for 7 years is ridiculously high.  He has been and continues to be a part time player.  He has proven to be great when he plays.  But he is unreliable.  They can't play him because of his nagging injuries and fear that if he plays he might get hurt.  There's not too many players that I recall that are more brittle and fragile than Buxton.  He hurts the team when he cannot play which is way too often.  He should be happy because he was able to coax $100 million guaranteed over 7 years whether he plays or not.  He's good but not worth $100 million if you can't count on him to play and contribute.

What are the variables that measure WAR. I don't believe it's accurate at all. I think the Twins are 10 games over .500 with Buxton and 3 or 4 games under .500. So how to you get a factor of 1.6 when that's a 13 or 14 game difference. I never quite figured that one out. 

1 minute ago, Schmoeman5 said:

What are the variables that measure WAR. I don't believe it's accurate at all. I think the Twins are 10 games over .500 with Buxton and 3 or 4 games under .500. So how to you get a factor of 1.6 when that's a 13 or 14 game difference. I never quite figured that one out. 

And yes I think he's worth it. 100 games is less than 2/3 of a season. Harper Trout Betts etc are all making 30 million plus. So if he's effective for 100 games or more then he's worth it. IF Buxton had mostly good health in his career, he'd be gone because there's no way the Twins would offer him say 7 years for 250 million

Yes. Easily. 
Relax and enjoy that this hard working young man left a pile on the table to be a Minnesota Twin. 

Not paying for past production.  Paying for future production.  If he plays 700 games over those 7 years, $100 Million is a steal.

On 5/18/2022 at 11:34 AM, mnfireman said:

I think (hope) the 100 game plan is just for this year and did not come into play until he hurt his knee.

Going forward Buxton himself needs to figure out how to stay on the field. He has started to dial in the recklessness in the field that led to running into walls and teammates, now he needs to figure out how to not get hurt on the bases. If he had been running hard on that pop-up, he gets second standing up. Since he didn't (nor do many MLB players), he should have been content to stay at first instead of having to awkwardly slide into second and jam his knee (like many MLB players have done).

We also don't know how much of his hip problems are related to running to first, stepping on the bag (creating a jamming force on the ankles, knees and hips), and coming to an abrupt stop from full-speed. I do love the hustle, but sometimes you need to let the routine grounder to the pitcher or second baseman be routine and just jog to first. Groundballs to short and third are potential infield hits and you gotta go hard to first!!

I don't think "figuring out how to stay on the field" is something that a ball player has control over.  Either you do or you don't.  Not really something that can be controlled.  Guy can be totally healthy all season and still get hurt at any point.  I do like the possibility of playing him less earlier in the season and more later, hopefully in the post-season.