Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Comps for Walker Jenkins

Julio Rodriguez 12 years $209M

Jackson Merrill 9 years $135M

Roman Anthony 8 years $130M

Pete Crow Armstrong 6 years $115M

Corbin Carroll 8 years $111M

$14-17M in average annual value.

Offer him the Jackson Merrill deal and call it good.

Posted
5 minutes ago, TheLeviathan said:

The NHL does it right.  Based on the age you're drafted the team is given a certain number of fixed years of control before restricted free agency happens.

The MLBPA would be fools not to be pushing for something like that.

I've been advocating for something like this.  I can't stand service time manipulation that teams pull - it's intentionally not putting your best team out on the field.   Going the age-based route for free agency eligibility eliminates many of the reasons teams pull this type of stuff.

As long as free agency is tied to service time, there will be incentive for teams to manipulate it.  So instead of trying to craft rules around it (there will always be a loophole to exploit), just divorce it from free agency eligibility completely

Posted
34 minutes ago, The Great Hambino said:

I've been advocating for something like this.  I can't stand service time manipulation that teams pull - it's intentionally not putting your best team out on the field.   Going the age-based route for free agency eligibility eliminates many of the reasons teams pull this type of stuff.

As long as free agency is tied to service time, there will be incentive for teams to manipulate it.  So instead of trying to craft rules around it (there will always be a loophole to exploit), just divorce it from free agency eligibility completely

When the NHL adopted a salary cap it was one of the main components that they got in return.  As a result I imagine most long-time NHL players will get multiple FA deals in their career.  In MLB it seems like guys get one unless they have some ironman career ala Verlander.

Verified Member
Posted
5 hours ago, NYCTK said:

I can go sit behind home plate in one of the most expensive metro areas in the world for about $400 ($200 with bad weather) with white glove service and all you can eat and drink inclusive. It's a different product completely. 

If you actually compare apples to apples, tickets haven't grown much faster than inflation. Which you know because I pointed this out last time you starting complaining about ticket prices and how overpaid the players are.

It's good to be you.

Verified Member
Posted
5 hours ago, NYCTK said:

I can go sit behind home plate in one of the most expensive metro areas in the world for about $400 ($200 with bad weather) with white glove service and all you can eat and drink inclusive. It's a different product completely. 

If you actually compare apples to apples, tickets haven't grown much faster than inflation. Which you know because I pointed this out last time you starting complaining about ticket prices and how overpaid the players are.

It's good to be you.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

What does a Keaschall extension look like?

Comps

Lawrence Butler 7 years $65.5M

Michael Harris II 8 years $72M

Ke’Bryan Hayes 8 years $70M

Myles Straw 5 years $25M

Luis Lara 7 years $31M

Somewhere between 5 and 9 million for 5-7 years.

Keaschall is a Super 2 so he gets four rounds of arbitration. Guessing 2/5/9/16 for a total of $33M if they go year to year. I would offer Keaschall 6 years $45M with an $20M team option. 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

Why anyone would think that cutting salaries would lower ticket prices and not result in the owners simply pocketing more money is utterly baffling to me.  Ticket prices are set by what the public is willing to pay.  They cost what they cost because people are willing to pay it.  The ticket market and player labor market are separate markets.

it's not that it will but that it should. somebody in some business somewhere in this United States needs to not live on greed

Old-Timey Member
Posted

MLB trade rumors arbitration estimates 
 

Minnesota Twins (10)

None of these are bad

Posted
3 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

 

MLB trade rumors arbitration estimates 
 

Minnesota Twins (10)

None of these are bad

$5.1M for Royce could be bad if his 2027 is like 2026, but it could be a steal if he humbly makes adjustments.

Posted
12 hours ago, mluebker said:

I think they wait to see what’s in the new CBA before extending anyone. It has the potential to be a game-changer. 

Prices are not going to get cheaper and the floor that the owners want will make have the teams spend nearly a half a billion combined. Yes, the larger markets may drop some, though not nearly that much. 

I am of the opinion that small market teams never extend pitchers with injury history, so that eliminates Abel and Prielipp. If I am the GM, I am trying to lock up Lee, Keaschall and maybe Walker. Walker's nagging injuries and now a surgery, scare me a bit. 

 

The Twins need cost certainty and to try and maximize every dollar spent. 

Old-Timey Member
Posted
14 hours ago, Jeff K said:

Bradley and Keaschall are easy choices to offer extensions.  I think Kaelen Culpepper is the next best choice.

Jenkins before Culpepper.  But both are deserving.

I am definitely not extending Preliepp yet.  He needs to be healthy for 4 or 5 years first

Old-Timey Member
Posted
13 hours ago, DJL44 said:

 

MLB trade rumors arbitration estimates 
 

Minnesota Twins (10)

None of these are bad

Non-tender Banda for sure since we could turn around and sign him for $1MM, if not a MiLB contract. Ober and Kremer are tough calls. Can't have a legitimate contender with both in the rotation, and Ober certainly doesn't warrant $7MM as a reliever. 

So much of the rest depends on the team's strategy.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

So much of direction needs to be based upon what owners expect from the new CBA. Internally, they know what they're willing to accept and what they're not. 

We can speculate under the current CBA, and MLB Trade Rumors estimates are based upon 2024-2025 arbitration rather than considering potential impact from Skubal.

Logan Gilbert $15MM
Joe Ryan $9MM

Lets get real, Gilbert is better than Ryan, it's not like night and day, though. Players like Ryan have nothing to lose by challenging arbitration. Yes I am aware Ryan has a $12MM mutual option, and I think both parties will accept it. It really seems to have worked out great, surprisingly. But players similar to Joe Ryan have no reason not to push the Skubal decision and push for a much higher salary in their final arbitration year.

Old-Timey Member
Posted

I'd consider buying out the arbitration years/extending slightly Walker Jenkins and Taj Bradley. Nobody else.

Keaschall's bat has outperformed metrics, he's got a slow swing and limited power, and he's a DH.
Prielipp could be Ricky Nolasco or Brandon Pfaadt (took years to produce)
Rodriguez has a high likelihood of never being an MLB caliber player
Culpepper has a questionable ceiling of being worth locking up.
 

Posted
22 hours ago, TheLeviathan said:

Young players in MLB deserve to hit free agency much, much sooner than they do.  I imagine this will be a major outcome of the CBA negotiations.

Read: There's no way in hell any agent is signing off on anything in this uncertainty.

It's certainly why I try. The price of players is about to skyrocket. I'm offering Bradley, Keaschell, Culpeper, Jenkins, and Houston long term deals. I think only Bradley and Keaschell might accept..

I agree, it would be bad to accept offers given what's likely coming. 

Posted

Taj & Jenkins are the guys I think would be most likely to get extensions even tho I don't believe twins would actually do it I mean why pay a guy real money when you can pay them minimal money for years this is a the pohlads were talking about family motto is "maximize the business " 

Posted
On 10/2/2026 at 8:30 AM, killercarewoliva said:

…can't any older people respond…?

As an “older guy,”  how can I resist an appeal like that?

First, if you’re a small market team like the Twins, charging more and more for tickets when you’re fielding a mediocre product doesn’t sound like a great strategy for filling the seats. A couple of sources say 2026 was the lowest average crowd size (excluding during COVID) this century, that on average they sold and distributed just 56% of available seats. So I don’t think the problem is the fans, I think it’s the product.

Second, baseball used to be the working man’s game. When you price him and his family out of the stadium, you’re basically telling your (traditionally) most loyal fans they aren’t welcome anymore. Maybe on game days they need to put all unsold tickets on sale for five bucks each and try to fill the seats, instead of having nearly half the stadium empty at game time. Will the people who paid full price for seats in the same section be ticked off? Sure, just like the people who couldn’t afford to pay full price are ticked off when they find themselves priced out of an afternoon or evening at the ballpark. You pick who  you feel sorry for.

Third, they’re trying to sell “the stadium experience” harder than they’re trying to sell watching the team. The stadium experience isn’t a reason to be out there in the stands regularly. It’s a one-off. When your friends ask if you’ve been to Target Field, you can say yes whether it was once or dozens of times. If you’re a fan and care about the pennant race, want to see how Kalen Culpepper looks at short, or you just enjoy sitting in the sun and keeping score, you aren’t coming out to evaluate the ballpark, you’re coming out to watch the team that plays in it.

I spent my younger years going to Met Stadium with my dad, the Metrodome with my friends, and Memorial Stadium in Baltimore with my future wife. We’d go on a whim—“Let’s see the game tonight,” and show up at the box office to buy whatever tickets we could get. This generation of fans, unless they were born with a silver spoon in their mouth, isn’t going to know what that’s like, and nobody who could do anything about it seems to think that’s a problem.

Posted
On 10/2/2026 at 11:13 AM, killercarewoliva said:

I've run seven marathons and I can still run but afterwards I like to have a nap. might keep in mind I have followed the Minnesota twins since 1965. almost religiously because of the type of players that the Minnesota twins like to put on the field. I've only been there one time for 4 days in 1992. I am currently 74 years old but my lady would call me 74 years young. no smoking, no drinking, no illicit drugs. he can live better and look better in your old age. okay one more thought. just for fun 1987 world series. my wife knew somebody in the power business offering me a ticket to a world series game for $100. pricing was different then and I didn't take it. thought it was too much money in hindsight....

there is a few others from you but I can't see them. I can only pick one. everything is gone except the one seven messages total.

Posted
On 10/2/2026 at 11:23 AM, MackMan said:

IDK. This dude is beyond me. If owners really wanted to make more money they would cut salaries and just put out a HS team where these kids would be happy to make $100k/year to lose and play baseball. Now the players union and league would have to step in and prevent this from happening because that would be a stain on baseball. 

I tried mentioning to this guy yesterday that the way to get fans into the park is field a competitive team. A good team will cause fans to come to the game, which in turn the ownership team can raise the prices to tickets to what is needed to get people into the game. But on the other hand if a team is horrible, the ownership needs to cut ticket prices to get people in and hope those fans are going to buy from the merchandise and food. I would rather have a full stadium at 1/2 price tickets than a 1/2 full stadium from full priced tickets. The money is the same, but if people only pay $20/ticket versus $50-60/ticket, they may be more apt to spend on food and merchandise. 

Yes and I think that if you cut the ticket prices in half the owner's not going to make as much money because the ticket prices are half what he was receiving before. not everyone can afford whatever the owner wants to charge. looking at some of the single ticket prices in the lower sections wherever stadium it is that could run about $100,000 to watch baseball. it kind of means that all the four major sports in this country only rich people can go to them and sit close to the field of play. if the reserve clause and the free agency had not been changed, we wouldn't have high ticket prices right now because players would be playing for a lot less and they would be fine with it because of their making half a million dollars a year. most occupations if you even qualify for them isn't going to have that high of salary. then the players that you wanted to see their whole entire career like the three I have mentioned here. Harmon killerbrew Tony Oliva and rod Carew that got traded. they'd all have still been there in a twins uniform. there would be no talk of who we can pay for to put a better position player at first base. That's telling ownership. we're willing to pay a whole lot more money to improve that position per ticket to each game. remember when the Chicago Cubs won the world series, their tickets went way up as if it's worth more it's not worth more well watching a game. I am unable to get to most of the replies that I receive. sometimes it's only one then they're gone.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
18 minutes ago, killercarewoliva said:

Yes and I think that if you cut the ticket prices in half 

If the Twins cut ticket prices in half they’ll be cheaper than Saints tickets.

Verified Member
Posted
8 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

If the Twins cut ticket prices in half they’ll be cheaper than Saints tickets.

I mean the Saints are actually worth watching though...

Its worth the price of admission (to watch the Saints) because these are players that got a taste of the big leagues and want back or are trying to get there for the first time. These games matter to the players, not as much the organization outside of a development standpoint. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, MackMan said:

I mean the Saints are actually worth watching though...

Its worth the price of admission (to watch the Saints) because these are players that got a taste of the big leagues and want back or are trying to get there for the first time. These games matter to the players, not as much the organization outside of a development standpoint. 

what do the saints cost? I've only been in Minneapolis for 4 days in 1992. I'm from the state of Virginia. very close to where the Minnesota twins started at in 1900 as the Washington senators. I think that AAA was Rochester New York and whenever Rochester was in Richmond, Virginia. I would go see them and you could sit behind home plate for $11. now there's a San Francisco Giants AA team there 3,000 miles apart and you can easily spend $40 for minor league baseball. I tried a close by lowest level of minor league ice hockey and the lowest price I could find in that 10,000 seat center was $83. most tickets were $100. the lowest form of minor league hockey and people waste their money doing that. at least that's how I see it. it's just absurd. nobody can say anything to make me think any different because I've seen the changes throughout my 74 years and nothing's even close to how it's been in the last 5 or 10 years. You're paying what you used to pay for national hockey League game for the lowest form of matter league hockey. oh yeah just for fun. I was a Minnesota North Stars fan also like the Vikings and you had a guy named Gump Worsley 49 years old. I think being a goaltender with no mask on the last hockey goalie to not wear a mask. he was kind of scraped up looking so they changed her name from the North Stars to the lone Stars for Dallas. my gosh

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...