Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Community Moderator
Posted
51 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

Just when I thought you were making progress. 😁

We can't compare Nick Gordon to Mookie Betts as a baseball player in total. Of course not... but we are talking about making potentially slight defensive concessions in order to make what is hopefully a significant offensive gain. In that context... Based on experience. Nick Gordon is much less of a defensive risk in the infield than Mookie Betts is so we really can't compare Betts to Gordon because Betts doesn't measure up to Gordon on paper.  

The definition of occasionally is... occasionally. Gordon doesn't have to be the new 3B but Gordon could be an occasional guy.  

If you want to send Miranda down to AAA for Kirilloff to improve the offense. You can do it. But, you got to let Gordon play 3B occasionally and maybe... a me first glider in CF on occasion.  

 

Why is Nick Gordon much less of a defensive risk? Mookie Betts came up as an infielder and moved to RF because of Pedroia. He's continued taking ground balls in fielding practice his whole career. Nick Gordon has fewer than 300 more IF innings in the majors than Mookie. Mookie is a terrible example, and he's superior to Nick Gordon in every way, even on paper.

Is occasional once a week? Once a month? Everyday for a 2 week Miranda demotion? 3 times during a 2 week Miranda demotion? 3 times a week for the rest of the season to rotate everyone through? Occasionally has a pretty big range of what it could mean.

I wouldn't send Miranda down to AAA to get Kirilloff in the lineup. I'd consider DFAing Solano to get Kirilloff up maybe. I'm not happy with the current production from Miranda or Larnach, but I don't think either of them would be served well from a demotion. They need to figure out major league pitching. Can't do that in AAA. They've graduated and they need to make the major league adjustment. But Farmer taking some time from Miranda at 3B starting next week, and Kirilloff taking some time from Larnach in LF starting next week would be a plan I'd endorse. Neither of which include Gordon at 3B, even "occasionally."

Posted
44 minutes ago, IndianaTwin said:

I don't think it's so much about being exposed or not in AAA. I think it's more about SaintsDaily being less active than TD. In other words, it just feels like he's pressing, so actually hitting some balls solidly in a more relaxed situation can build him some confidence that he doesn't have to swing at everything.

There are a lot of players in the same boat as Miranda. AJ Melendez for the Royals looks like a tremendous prospect to me, but he's slumping and fanning much like Miranda. I'm sure there are others. If the Twins can afford to send Miranda down, they probably should do it, but a couple of hits can restore the confidence and change things in a hurry as well. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, stringer bell said:

There are a lot of players in the same boat as Miranda. AJ Melendez for the Royals looks like a tremendous prospect to me, but he's slumping and fanning much like Miranda. I'm sure there are others. If the Twins can afford to send Miranda down, they probably should do it, but a couple of hits can restore the confidence and change things in a hurry as well. 

Agreed throughout, including the comment about perhaps just needing a couple hits. I have to say that it’s great to be in a situation where they could even consider this approach. 

Posted
2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

Why is Nick Gordon much less of a defensive risk? Mookie Betts came up as an infielder and moved to RF because of Pedroia. He's continued taking ground balls in fielding practice his whole career. Nick Gordon has fewer than 300 more IF innings in the majors than Mookie. Mookie is a terrible example, and he's superior to Nick Gordon in every way, even on paper.

Is occasional once a week? Once a month? Everyday for a 2 week Miranda demotion? 3 times during a 2 week Miranda demotion? 3 times a week for the rest of the season to rotate everyone through? Occasionally has a pretty big range of what it could mean.

I wouldn't send Miranda down to AAA to get Kirilloff in the lineup. I'd consider DFAing Solano to get Kirilloff up maybe. I'm not happy with the current production from Miranda or Larnach, but I don't think either of them would be served well from a demotion. They need to figure out major league pitching. Can't do that in AAA. They've graduated and they need to make the major league adjustment. But Farmer taking some time from Miranda at 3B starting next week, and Kirilloff taking some time from Larnach in LF starting next week would be a plan I'd endorse. Neither of which include Gordon at 3B, even "occasionally."

You can't use both "fewer than 300 more IF innings in the majors" against Gordon. While using "Taking ground balls in fielding practice his whole career" in Bett's favor. I hope you understand why I will not accept that. You also can't state (earlier discussion) that Gordon has been slid down the defensive ladder as a sign of defensive issues but yet it's ok for Betts to slide down the defensive ladder without that tag. 

Isn't it better to assume that Gordon was the better OF choice amongst Simmons and Polanco so he grabbed a bigger glove  to get some major league work in and help the club because that was where the team could use him. I'm ok with the assumption that Betts would have been the better choice to slide into OF work to get his bat in the lineup compared to Pedroia or Bogaarts sliding out there. 

Besides if you want to use that logic... why didn't Boston than slide Betts back to 2B when Eduardo Nunez was their 2B or 2019 when Brock Holt was the guy. 

Actually you are making my argument. Boston in an attempt to get a better bat into the lineup... they put Betts in a place where he could immediately help and that is really what I'm talking about and teams do this sort of thing often. I don't have the time to research it but I could come up with quite a large list if I did. Players slide around as needed and fantasy players get multi position eligibility after 10 games of it.  🙌

Gordon has 4,599 Innings of work at SS in the Minors. Gordon has more experience in the IF. Now if you have some defensive metrics that suggests that Boggs had an ultimate zone rating off the charts in those minor league days... I'll take a look before dismissing them due to my zone rating small sample size bias. 😀  Until then, we have two players who are both multi-positional.  

Occasional... As needed. As Earned. I can't predict the future but if Miranda is sent down... someone has to play the position. Farmer can handle the bulk but maybe Rocco is going to want to work Gordon into the game like he is doing now. Gordon will get some occasional games at 3B. Easy Enough. Let's say Gordon starts hitting the crap out of the ball and Farmer is Miranda version #2. At that point... let's make it more than occasional because you are going to want Gordon's bat in the lineup. 

Let's say you are right and Gordon turns out to be a nightmare at 3B like you are worried about. OK... fix that problem if it occurs... just like we are trying to fix the Miranda chasing balls above his head problem right now. We don't have to keep trotting Gordon out to 3B like it is forever. You make another move. How is Kirilloff playing now that we found him a roster spot and playing time? How is Larnach doing? How is Taylor doing? Can Buxton play CF yet? How is Kepler doing? Occasional is defined by what is necessary. Don't know... it's up to the players to show us what is necessary.   

I think your last paragraph is really the crux of the discussion. The Gordon Betts stuff is just an attempt to look beyond position when trying to improve your team as a whole.  

I agree that sending down Miranda and Larnach really doesn't do much for them and I don't believe that Kirilloff waiting his turn in AAA doesn't do much for Alex at this point either. It is what it is. However, letting Miranda and Larnach struggle doesn't do much for us and we are a contending team. Hit or get off the pot. Come back and try again later when we call upon you. 

Having options mean you can be optioned. It isn't entirely fair to the young player but the CBA is an agreed upon document. 

Cutting Solano? If he isn't contributing. I'm behind this. Right now... I don't see Solano as the problem but if he is just going to hang around and be a short side platoon. If Rocco isn't playing him... Bye... See ya Later. Because you are now a roster spot that is preventing us from bringing up a guy who might move the needle. 😎

 

 

 

Community Moderator
Posted
8 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

You can't use both "fewer than 300 more IF innings in the majors" against Gordon. While using "Taking ground balls in fielding practice his whole career" in Bett's favor. I hope you understand why I will not accept that. You also can't state (earlier discussion) that Gordon has been slid down the defensive ladder as a sign of defensive issues but yet it's ok for Betts to slide down the defensive ladder without that tag. 

Isn't it better to assume that Gordon was the better OF choice amongst Simmons and Polanco so he grabbed a bigger glove  to get some major league work in and help the club because that was where the team could use him. I'm ok with the assumption that Betts would have been the better choice to slide into OF work to get his bat in the lineup compared to Pedroia or Bogaarts sliding out there. 

Besides if you want to use that logic... why didn't Boston than slide Betts back to 2B when Eduardo Nunez was their 2B or 2019 when Brock Holt was the guy. 

Actually you are making my argument. Boston in an attempt to get a better bat into the lineup... they put Betts in a place where he could immediately help and that is really what I'm talking about and teams do this sort of thing often. I don't have the time to research it but I could come up with quite a large list if I did. Players slide around as needed and fantasy players like get multi position eligibility after 10 games of it.  🙌

Gordon has 4,599 Innings of work at SS in the Minors. Gordon has more experience in the IF. Now if you have some defensive metrics that suggest that Boggs had an ultimate zone rating off the charts in those minor league days... I'll take a look before dismissing them due to my zone rating small sample size bias. 😀  Until then, we have two players who are both multi-positional.  

Occasional... As needed. As Earned. I can't predict the future but if Miranda is sent down... someone has to play the position. Farmer can handle the bulk but maybe Rocco is going to want to work Gordon into the game like he is doing now. Gordon will get some occasional games at 3B. Easy Enough. Let's say Gordon starts hitting the crap out of the ball and Farmer is Miranda version #2. At that point... let's make it more than occasional because you are going to want Gordon's bat in the lineup. 

Let's say you are right and Gordon turns out to be a nightmare at 3B like you are worried about. OK... fix that problem if it occurs... just like we are trying to fix the Miranda chasing balls above his head problem right now. We don't have to keep trotting Gordon out to 3B like it is forever. You make another move. How is Kirilloff playing now that we found him a roster spot and playing time? How is Larnach doing? How is Taylor doing? Can Buxton play CF yet? How is Kepler doing? Occasional is defined by what is necessary. Don't know... it's hope to the players to show us what is necessary.   

I think your last paragraph is really the crux of the discussion. The Gordon Betts stuff is just an attempt to look beyond position when trying to improve your team as a whole.  

I agree that sending down Miranda and Larnach really doesn't do much for them and I don't believe that Kirilloff waiting his turn in AAA doesn't do much for Alex at this point either. It is what it is. However, letting Miranda and Larnach struggle doesn't do much for us and we are a contending team. Hit or get off the pot. Come back and try again later when we call upon you. 

Having options mean you can be optioned. It isn't entirely fair to the young player but the CBA is an agreed upon document. 

Cutting Solano? If he isn't contributing. I'm behind this. Right now... I don't see Solano as the problem but if he just going to hang around and be a short side platoon. If Rocco isn't playing him... Bye... See ya Later. Because you are now a roster spot that is preventing us from bringing up a guy who might move the needle. 😎

 

 

 

I hope you can understand why I will not accept comparing Nick Gordon to a first ballot HOFer in any way. I hope you can understand why I will not accept suggesting Nick Gordon is better, let alone "much" better, at anything on a baseball field than Mookie Betts. Mookie Betts has been one of the 10 best defenders (and overall players) in baseball for a decade. It wasn't a secret that they were moving Gordon because of defensive concerns. Mookie didn't move because he couldn't play mIF, he was moved because the Red Sox had 2 all stars up the middle already, and he didn't move back because he's a multi-time gold glove winner in RF and there was no need on his teams for him to move. Mookie Betts is faster, has better hands, and a better arm than Nick Gordon. Gordon is not only not "much less of a defensive risk" than Mookie, he's much more of a defensive risk, and it's not even close. Nick Gordon has spent his career struggling to stay on a mediocre MLB roster. Mookie Betts is a first ballot HOFer. They're not the same.

I'd love to see a list of guys who moved to LF and 2B because of arm concerns who then moved to 3B. It'd be a fascinating list.

There's a difference in their ability to be multi-positional. I've played OF in softball in recent years, but I wasn't good at it. I'm technically "multi-positional," (since I'm normally an IFer) but it doesn't mean you should use me in the OF. 

You say "if it's a problem, fix it then" as if they're going into it completely blind. They know Nick's capabilities. He's not some random guy off the streets. They've watched him play 4599 innings of SS. They know if he can handle 3B. There's a reason he's only played 23 innings of it in his career. I'm all for flexibility, and having versatile pieces you can move around. But putting guys in spots they can't play (Gordon at 3B, Gallo or Kepler in CF) on anything other than an emergency basis doesn't win you more ball games. We weigh defense differently, clearly, so simply won't agree on this. I have no desire to have a White Sox style defense. It loses games. It's lost them multiple games to the Twins alone this year.

I don't think Solano is the problem, but I'm not interested in corner defenders who are defensive liabilities and only hit on the short side of a platoon (same reason I don't like when they have Garlick on the roster). He was great for the Twins early, and I have no problem with Solano. He can put the bat on the ball with the best of them. But he's not very important when it comes to the Twins maximizing their win total this year. Miranda and Larnach are, or at least could/should be. Larnach can't adjust to major league pitching in AAA. Either he's going to figure it out, or he isn't. Having him mash AAA pitching and then coming back still needing to adjust to major league pitching doesn't help the team. If I were in charge, he'd have until next week when Kirilloff can be called up to start showing signs of life or I'd put him on the bench as a pinch hitter/part time player and give Kirilloff his ABs. To get Kirilloff on the team you have to remove someone. Castro is going to go for Farmer, I'd expect, and that leaves just Solano for Kirilloff. If Larnach hasn't figured it out by the time Lewis is ready then I'll send him down, and at that point his future with the team is in question as he's 26, has known struggles hitting major league breaking stuff, and they have multiple other lefty bats pushing for playing time. I'm simply not interested in Larnach's ability to hit AAA pitching. He has to adjust to major league pitching, and it's now a question of how long of a leash he has before he starts getting passed up by other players. Right now Kirilloff is his nearest competition. I'm not a big Wallner believe, but he's closing in fast, too.

Posted

A trade at this point seems very unlikely.

However, the Mets, Braves, & Marlins could all really use a corner outfielder. 

I would not be surprised if a trade goes down with one of those teams at some point, particularly the Mets, who are said to have a deep farm system right now.

Posted
7 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

10th Inning:

Vazquez on 2nd

Gordon: Pops up the bunt

Kepler: Walks

Correa: Hits into Double Play

 

11th Inning

Correa on 2nd

Buxton, Polanco and Larnach all go down swinging

 

Just posting this here while we wait for the call up of Alex Kirilloff or while we debate if the team needs him.  

Twins continue to not hit with runners in scoring position and way too many strike outs. What is the hitting coach doing??? With todays technology there has to be a lot of information on every pitcher they face and the hitting coach should be developing a plan for each batter as they face any pitcher.

Posted
6 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

Maturing before TD's very eyes.

Getting older is mandatory. Maturing is optional.  Just ask Mrs Ash.

As for the topic of this thread, I am fine with Kirilloff spending time at AAA.  As has been pointed out, he played 3 consecutive games for the first time; I didn't see anyone mention that his very SSS batting results these 3 games were an emptyish .250 BA.  I don;'t want him simply knocking at the major league door, I want him to kick it down, and he's not there yet.

Posted
1 hour ago, Larry Janisewski said:

Twins continue to not hit with runners in scoring position and way too many strike outs. What is the hitting coach doing??? With todays technology there has to be a lot of information on every pitcher they face and the hitting coach should be developing a plan for each batter as they face any pitcher.

Pretty sure the opposing coaches are developing plans against each of our batters, at the same time, using these same tools.  I'm not happy with current hitting results either, but it's not as simple as you make it out.

Posted
1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

I hope you can understand why I will not accept comparing Nick Gordon to a first ballot HOFer in any way. I hope you can understand why I will not accept suggesting Nick Gordon is better, let alone "much" better, at anything on a baseball field than Mookie Betts. Mookie Betts has been one of the 10 best defenders (and overall players) in baseball for a decade. It wasn't a secret that they were moving Gordon because of defensive concerns. Mookie didn't move because he couldn't play mIF, he was moved because the Red Sox had 2 all stars up the middle already, and he didn't move back because he's a multi-time gold glove winner in RF and there was no need on his teams for him to move. Mookie Betts is faster, has better hands, and a better arm than Nick Gordon. Gordon is not only not "much less of a defensive risk" than Mookie, he's much more of a defensive risk, and it's not even close. Nick Gordon has spent his career struggling to stay on a mediocre MLB roster. Mookie Betts is a first ballot HOFer. They're not the same.

I'd love to see a list of guys who moved to LF and 2B because of arm concerns who then moved to 3B. It'd be a fascinating list.

There's a difference in their ability to be multi-positional. I've played OF in softball in recent years, but I wasn't good at it. I'm technically "multi-positional," (since I'm normally an IFer) but it doesn't mean you should use me in the OF. 

You say "if it's a problem, fix it then" as if they're going into it completely blind. They know Nick's capabilities. He's not some random guy off the streets. They've watched him play 4599 innings of SS. They know if he can handle 3B. There's a reason he's only played 23 innings of it in his career. I'm all for flexibility, and having versatile pieces you can move around. But putting guys in spots they can't play (Gordon at 3B, Gallo or Kepler in CF) on anything other than an emergency basis doesn't win you more ball games. We weigh defense differently, clearly, so simply won't agree on this. I have no desire to have a White Sox style defense. It loses games. It's lost them multiple games to the Twins alone this year.

I don't think Solano is the problem, but I'm not interested in corner defenders who are defensive liabilities and only hit on the short side of a platoon (same reason I don't like when they have Garlick on the roster). He was great for the Twins early, and I have no problem with Solano. He can put the bat on the ball with the best of them. But he's not very important when it comes to the Twins maximizing their win total this year. Miranda and Larnach are, or at least could/should be. Larnach can't adjust to major league pitching in AAA. Either he's going to figure it out, or he isn't. Having him mash AAA pitching and then coming back still needing to adjust to major league pitching doesn't help the team. If I were in charge, he'd have until next week when Kirilloff can be called up to start showing signs of life or I'd put him on the bench as a pinch hitter/part time player and give Kirilloff his ABs. To get Kirilloff on the team you have to remove someone. Castro is going to go for Farmer, I'd expect, and that leaves just Solano for Kirilloff. If Larnach hasn't figured it out by the time Lewis is ready then I'll send him down, and at that point his future with the team is in question as he's 26, has known struggles hitting major league breaking stuff, and they have multiple other lefty bats pushing for playing time. I'm simply not interested in Larnach's ability to hit AAA pitching. He has to adjust to major league pitching, and it's now a question of how long of a leash he has before he starts getting passed up by other players. Right now Kirilloff is his nearest competition. I'm not a big Wallner believe, but he's closing in fast, too.

I never said better. Does he have to be better than Mookie Betts to play some 3B if needed? 

I am saying... Gordon has a lot more infield experience and I am saying that you seem to be holding things against Gordon that you are using to support Betts.    

I was thinking that I might have some time tonight while watching the game to throw a list together of players that have moved around to accommodate team needs. I decided it wasn't necessary because I know that you know that players get moved around. But... thanks for the heads up... You've got specific qualifiers to filter it down before I even start so yeah... no need.  

I understand that not everybody is going to be able to be multi-positional. I hope to God... you don't think that is what I think. Sano in the OF didn't work out. Perhaps your Sano style softball didn't translate either. Just hit your dinger and drink some beer afterwards it's all your softball team is probably asking of you. 

If you think I'm completely outside of the margins suggesting that Gordon could play occasional 3B in order to find a roster spot for a guy who might hit the ball. You say we won't agree... I agree on that... It's a gap that we will never close.       

I'm sure they have a better idea of Nick's capabilities than I do or you do. I won't argue that. They probably have a better idea of Emilio Pagan or Nick Anderson's capabilities as well. I still trust them but let's recognize the margins that we are probably talking about here. 

If it's my call. Kirilloff can hang a bit in AAA but not much longer to get him past Super Two... I don't know if Super Two will matter because I can't predict his future but it could matter quite a bit if he turns into something wonderful.

An injury will shake him loose soon enough but yeah... other than the catcher positions... I do believe that any position player that goes on the DL... We have the position flexibility to make Kirilloff the next call up and improve this club if Kirilloff is indeed capable.   

Solano... Gordon... Larnach... Miranda... Sing for your supper. When I'm looking to add a bat or something that will help us such as Kirilloff... I'm subtracting from the bottom to make it happen.     

Community Moderator
Posted
10 minutes ago, Riverbrian said:

I never said better. Does he have to be better than Mookie Betts to play some 3B if needed? 

I am saying... Gordon has a lot more infield experience and I am saying that you seem to be holding things against Gordon that you are using to support Betts.    

I was thinking that I might have some time tonight while watching the game to throw a list together of players that have moved around to accommodate team needs. I decided it wasn't necessary because I know that you know that players get moved around. But... thanks for the heads up... You've got specific qualifiers to filter it down before I even start so yeah... no need.  

I understand that not everybody is going to be able to be multi-positional. I hope to God... you don't think that is what I think. Sano in the OF didn't work out. Perhaps your Sano style softball didn't translate either. Just hit your dinger and drink some beer afterwards it's all your softball team is probably asking of you. 

If you think I'm completely outside of the margins suggesting that Gordon could play occasional 3B in order to find a roster spot for a guy who might hit the ball. You say we won't agree... I agree on that... It's a gap that we will never close.       

I'm sure they have a better idea of Nick's capabilities than I do or you do. I won't argue that. They probably have a better idea of Emilio Pagan or Nick Anderson's capabilities as well. I still trust them but let's recognize the margins that we are probably talking about here. 

If it's my call. Kirilloff can hang a bit in AAA but not much longer to get him past Super Two... I don't know if Super Two will matter because I can't predict his future but it could matter quite a bit if he turns into something wonderful.

An injury will shake him loose soon enough but yeah... other than the catcher positions... I do believe that any position player that goes on the DL... We have the position flexibility to make Kirilloff the next call up and improve this club if Kirilloff is indeed capable.   

Solano... Gordon... Larnach... Miranda... Sing for your supper. When I'm looking to add a bat or something that will help us such as Kirilloff... I'm subtracting from the bottom to make it happen.     

You said "much less of a defensive risk." I read that as Nick Gordon is a better infield defender than Mookie (Mookie was a 55 grade infielder coming up), and I'm not willing to say there's anything on a baseball field that Nick does better than Mookie. I'll take Mookie swinging left handed over Nick swinging left handed even! (Kidding. Mostly.) I pointed out Mookie taking infield just to point out that an argument that Nick's been playing it in recent years couldn't be used. Not to hold anything against Nick. Mookie has even played game innings in the infield the last few years. All I'm holding against Gordon is that he wasn't as good a fielder coming up, and hasn't been a great fielder since he's been in the majors. Mookie Betts has been. And Mookie was moved for players significantly better than the players that bounced Gordon.

Yeah, I want filters of guys being moved from, and to, specific spots. A guy moving from CF to LF doesn't mean anything in the context of putting Gordon, or a similar player, at 3B. Guys move. I'm not denying that. But a guy moving from 2B to LF doesn't have any baring on guys moving from 2B/LF/CF to 3B. I don't think the list of guys who match Gordon's profile being moved to 3B would be long, or impressive.

I don't think you think that, but when you compare Mookie and Gordon as both "multi-positional" and leave it at that you're missing a whole truck load of context. Solano is "multi-positional," but I'm pretty sure neither of us want him on the left side of the infield. And at this point the team just expects me to drink beer and keep book. Or provide a good laugh by trying to hit a HR. 😄

I think Gordon at 3B for any more than 3 games in a season would be a bad situation. If that's all you're suggesting as "occasionally" then we can agree. I don't think you're crazy for wanting to try him at 3B occasionally, or prioritizing a bat over a glove, but I have a different balance on the bat vs glove scale, and/or a differing opinion on what certain players are capable of. But if we all agreed I'd have to do work at work all day instead of having debates on the internet, and that doesn't sound like fun.

Posted

Larnach demoted (after initially appearing in Friday night's lineup), Kirilloff called up. I'm pretty surprised by the quickness of this and wonder if something specific triggered it, given the way it went down. 

It's gonna be a real bummer for Larnach if he has to sit in Triple-A mashing for weeks and waiting for another chance based on a demotion of questionable merit. But as we always say, these things tend to work themselves out.

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Nick Nelson said:

It's gonna be a real bummer for Larnach if he has to sit in Triple-A mashing for weeks and waiting for another chance

Then don't OPS under .700 as a corner outfielder, Trevor.  Now go OPS above .800 at AAA, kthxbye.

(I think he can do it, but this has been like Waiting for Godot.)

Posted
1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

You said "much less of a defensive risk." I read that as Nick Gordon is a better infield defender than Mookie (Mookie was a 55 grade infielder coming up), and I'm not willing to say there's anything on a baseball field that Nick does better than Mookie. I'll take Mookie swinging left handed over Nick swinging left handed even! (Kidding. Mostly.) I pointed out Mookie taking infield just to point out that an argument that Nick's been playing it in recent years couldn't be used. Not to hold anything against Nick. Mookie has even played game innings in the infield the last few years. All I'm holding against Gordon is that he wasn't as good a fielder coming up, and hasn't been a great fielder since he's been in the majors. Mookie Betts has been. And Mookie was moved for players significantly better than the players that bounced Gordon.

Yeah, I want filters of guys being moved from, and to, specific spots. A guy moving from CF to LF doesn't mean anything in the context of putting Gordon, or a similar player, at 3B. Guys move. I'm not denying that. But a guy moving from 2B to LF doesn't have any baring on guys moving from 2B/LF/CF to 3B. I don't think the list of guys who match Gordon's profile being moved to 3B would be long, or impressive.

I don't think you think that, but when you compare Mookie and Gordon as both "multi-positional" and leave it at that you're missing a whole truck load of context. Solano is "multi-positional," but I'm pretty sure neither of us want him on the left side of the infield. And at this point the team just expects me to drink beer and keep book. Or provide a good laugh by trying to hit a HR. 😄

I think Gordon at 3B for any more than 3 games in a season would be a bad situation. If that's all you're suggesting as "occasionally" then we can agree. I don't think you're crazy for wanting to try him at 3B occasionally, or prioritizing a bat over a glove, but I have a different balance on the bat vs glove scale, and/or a differing opinion on what certain players are capable of. But if we all agreed I'd have to do work at work all day instead of having debates on the internet, and that doesn't sound like fun.

Betts was only brought up as an example of a player adjusting to team needs at the time they need it... much like my idea for Gordon in order to get a better bat onto the roster. 

It was an example for the purpose of implying a potential defensive down tick in order to keep a better overall lineup on the field. I don't know much about Luke Williams or Yonny Hernadez, they could be defensive superstars at SS but they don't appear to be offensive forces at the plate. Betts helping out in the infield allowed them to send sub .200 hitters like Williams and Yonny down to the minors instead of... I don't know... Trayce Thompson because they have a few extra outfielders while the infield is a little hospitalized. If Betts holds firm in the OF with no consideration whatsoever of playing SS or 2B. Now Williams or Hernandez have to stand a post. They are a better team overall if Betts can do this. 

The Twins could do the same thing and that is what I'm suggesting is possible. When we get into Gordon isn't as good as Betts. We start leaving earth. 

It's not that complicated in my head. Yet complicated getting it out of my head toward others it seems. 

It appears we have our answer. Larnach is going across the river. Kirilloff is here. Now we need Kirilloff to be who we are clamoring him to be. If Kirilloff is what he want him to be. Miranda not being who we want him to be... just might matter a little bit less.  

Community Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Riverbrian said:

Betts was only brought up as an example of a player adjusting to team needs at the time they need it... much like my idea for Gordon in order to get a better bat onto the roster. 

It was an example for the purpose of implying a potential defensive down tick in order to keep a better overall lineup on the field. I don't know much about Luke Williams or Yonny Hernadez, they could be defensive superstars at SS but they don't appear to be offensive forces at the plate. Betts helping out in the infield allowed them to send sub .200 hitters like Williams and Yonny down to the minors instead of... I don't know... Trayce Thompson because they have a few extra outfielders while the infield is a little hospitalized. If Betts holds firm in the OF with no consideration whatsoever of playing SS or 2B. Now Williams or Hernandez have to stand a post. They are a better team overall if Betts can do this. 

The Twins could do the same thing and that is what I'm suggesting is possible. When we get into Gordon isn't as good as Betts. We start leaving earth. 

It's not that complicated in my head. Yet complicated getting it out of my head toward others it seems. 

It appears we have our answer. Larnach is going across the river. Kirilloff is here. Now we need Kirilloff to be who we are clamoring him to be. If Kirilloff is what he want him to be. Miranda not being who we want him to be... just might matter a little bit less.  

But my argument is Nick isn't good enough to do it. You disagree, and that's all good. Sano to RF is also an example of a player switching positions to get a better lineup. That's why I point out their difference in talent. I don't think Gordon at 3B is Sano in RF, but it's also not Mookie anywhere. That's why I don't like the comparison. 

I'm excited to see Kirilloff. I think him and Lewis are the keys to this team taking the next step. I fully expect Kirilloff to be a star. And I hope I'm wrong about Larnach to AAA being a fix. Wouldn't be the first time I was wrong. But I'm happy to have Alex back. 

Posted
On 5/4/2023 at 6:54 PM, Eris said:

The Twins lineup in their 12 inning win against the White Sox today (including substitutions) featured 9 players with a batting average below 0.250.  While I don’t know if Alex Kirilloff will recover from his injuries, I find it hard to believe that a lineup this anemic can not find room for some who was once considered one of the best hitting prospects in Twins minor league system. As mentioned in the article, he can get at bats playing LF, RF, 1B and DH. Rotate until there is a better solution.
 

By comparison, the Rays had 3 players in their lineup today with a batting average less than 0.260.  The White Sox had 5 players with a BA less that 0.250.

 

The current batting average for all baseball is .247. There are more useful statistics, particularly OPS. Gallo has a low batting average but hits a lot of extra base hits. He is far above the league average OPS. The Twins, like it or not, are, at the moment, a home run hitting team, so batting average isn't the best measure for them.

That said, I'm in full agreement about bringing up Alex and sending down Trevor - which they did earlier today. Trevor is not driving the ball (hence the significant drop of late in his OPS). 

Posted
8 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

But my argument is Nick isn't good enough to do it. You disagree, and that's all good. Sano to RF is also an example of a player switching positions to get a better lineup. That's why I point out their difference in talent. I don't think Gordon at 3B is Sano in RF, but it's also not Mookie anywhere. That's why I don't like the comparison. 

I'm excited to see Kirilloff. I think him and Lewis are the keys to this team taking the next step. I fully expect Kirilloff to be a star. And I hope I'm wrong about Larnach to AAA being a fix. Wouldn't be the first time I was wrong. But I'm happy to have Alex back. 

A couple of friends of mine... husband and wife... took a weekend trip up to the Northwest Angle to do a little fishing on Lake of the Woods. They got a little bit of money... quite a bit of money actually so they hired a guide service, invited a friend from the university and his daughters.

The guide or guides plural because I guess there were two of them... were going to take them around the lake for about 3 hours but they had some issue with the boat, lost control of it and they end up beaching in on an island deep deep into Canada. Cell phones were useless in the middle of the lake. There was a big argument between the guides because one of them forgot to bring the emergency equipment on to the boat, locator beacons, flares... nothing and apparently this guide was always making mistakes like that because the other guide kept hitting with him his hat and saying that over and over. 

That group of lost boaters... spent a week on that island stranded.

He was telling me the story and I said... that sounds just like Gilligans Island and he thought it was a terrible analogy.   

I thought his analogy standards were too high. Maybe it was me... His wife Lovey agreed with him. So what do I know.  

 

Posted

Congrats to Kirilloff for making it back to the MLB! And Dereck! 

A healthy Kirilloff needs to be in the MLB plain and simple.... the only real discussion is who goes down and it looks like the FO agreed with the majority of us ya-hoos on TD for once! (end of days ?!)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...