Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mets- Royals: World Series Predictions

USAFChief

By USAFChief
in Other Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Craig Arko Minnesota Twins

Craig Arko

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

 

Doesn't your team get DQ'd if your starter throws more than 120 pitches?

I'd like a large Cappuccino-Heath Blizzard, please. 

ashbury GOAT

ashbury

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

True. Wouldn't want you working without proper tools.

It's not that I didn't try to think. Just, nothing happened.

 

So here goes nothing. I'll assume your question means I didn't have tickets to games 1 or 2. Then I guess I have to be selfish and hope they come home to finish the Series. Preferably they lead three games to two, and if they can't close the deal in either of two games then it's their fault, not mine for wishing for the situation.

sampleSizeOfOne MVP

sampleSizeOfOne

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

OK sports fans, thought exercise:

 

Lets say the Twins are in the series instead o the Royals, and have just won games one and two at home (I know, I know...far fetched, but work with me here).

 

You have tickets to games six and seven.

 

Do you want the Twins to end it in New York, and fly home for the parade?

 

Or do you want the series to come back home, so you can attend, with, of course, the chance they end up losing the series?

Yes!

 

(er, true as it may be, that just dodges the question...)

 

If i went to the effort of obtaining tickets, i'd be hoping it came back, as that means i'm invested in the game, if that makes sense.

 

But neither would i beat myself up over it.

 

To go for another poser, um, if you only watch 3 innings of a game... which ones?

sampleSizeOfOne MVP

sampleSizeOfOne

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

KC landmarks in Royal blue:

(pictures)

And of course the union station shot is tipped over.

Yeah, if was going to make a bold prediction regarding the post season, i would have predicted that a blue team would win... I might have waited until the Astros lost just to be sure though.

 

Is the second picture one of them funky suspension bridges?

ashbury GOAT

ashbury

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

I'll add to my answer that, "it's just sports". It's entertainment, and I want my entertainment. If the Twins are leading 2 games to 0 in the Series That Cures Cancer, I want them to finish the sweep on the road.

ashbury GOAT

ashbury

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

To go for another poser, um, if you only watch 3 innings of a game... which ones?

Innings number 1, 9, and 14. Though 8 can be good too, and you are guaranteed both a top and a bottom of the inning, unlike 9.

Squirrel GOAT

Squirrel

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted

Yeah, if was going to make a bold prediction regarding the post season, i would have predicted that a blue team would win... I might have waited until the Astros lost just to be sure though.Is the second picture one of them funky suspension bridges?

Yes, but I don't remember the name of it.

Squirrel GOAT

Squirrel

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted

OK sports fans, thought exercise:

Lets say the Twins are in the series instead o the Royals, and have just won games one and two at home (I know, I know...far fetched, but work with me here).

You have tickets to games six and seven.

Do you want the Twins to end it in New York, and fly home for the parade?

Or do you want the series to come back home, so you can attend, with, of course, the chance they end up losing the series?

I want them to win it. That's the goal. That's what they should aspire to do. And while I'd LOVE to be there when they did, at home, I just want them to win it all now more. So win it in New York. Coming home still not champions for my own selfishness just means there's still a chance for them to lose.

 

And then next year I'll make sure I have tickets to all four games. (Or three)

Otto von Ballpark All-Star

Otto von Ballpark

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

 

OK sports fans, thought exercise:

Lets say the Twins are in the series instead o the Royals, and have just won games one and two at home (I know, I know...far fetched, but work with me here).

You have tickets to games six and seven.

Do you want the Twins to end it in New York, and fly home for the parade?

Or do you want the series to come back home, so you can attend, with, of course, the chance they end up losing the series?

Good question!

 

While I don't know that'd root *against* the Twins, I think more and more I find myself rooting *for* entertainment first and foremost.  Generally, that means close games, and close series, even though it increases the chances of an ultimate Twins defeat.

 

An occasional blowout win is nice, of course, but I don't know that I would enjoy a World Series sweep as much as perhaps even a 7 game series loss.  I doubt 1987 or 1991 would be as fondly remembered if the Cardinals or Braves had simply rolled over for us in 4 or 5 games.

 

After a close series loss, like the Royals last year or the Rangers in 2011 etc., I could see the theoretical sweep win looking more attractive.  Before my time, but I get the sense that the 1965 Twins series loss wasn't that disappointing by itself -- the more disappointing events were falling out of the race in '66 (a problem alleviated today by expanded playoffs), falling just short in '67, then getting swept out of the playoffs in '69 and '70.

Willihammer Cedar Rapids Kernels

Willihammer

Provisional Member
Posted
Posted

Nice recovery by Syndergaard, he definitely looked more comfortable than Ventura in the weather tonight. Better velo. Meanwhile the Royals are 5 deep into the bullpen thru 6+

DaveW All-Star

DaveW

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

Daniel Murphy, you got your team to the WS...and you just cost them the WS.

it's so weird and unexpected when average players at best come back to earth....

 

 

Royals are gonna finish it off tomorrow.

Willihammer Cedar Rapids Kernels

Willihammer

Provisional Member
Posted
Posted

 

 

The two costliest errors in World Series history involve the Mets. The biggest and most infamous is the Mookie Wilson grounder that went through Bill Buckner's legs in the 10th inning of Game 6 in 1986. It scored Ray Knight to cost the Red Sox the deciding run, and it created a 40 percent swing in win probability added.

What goes around came back around 29 years later Saturday night, when Murphy booted a slow roller to second with one out in the eighth inning of Game 4, allowing Ben Zobrist to score the tying run. The Royals' 5-3 victory put the Mets down 3-1 in the best-of-seven 2015 World Series. Murphy's error caused a 35 percent swing in win probability added.

They're literally the two biggest errors in World Series history by this measure:

Most costly errors in World Series history, by Win Probability Added: 1. 1986, B. Buckner, -40% 2. 2015, D. Murphy, -35%

 

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/25360054/daniel-murphys-costly-error-up-there-with-bill-buckners-in-86

USAFChief GOAT

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't think Murphy's error is anywhere near Buckner's in terms of impact.

 

The Red Sox would've closed out the series.

 

The ball hit to Murphy was in a series at 2 games to 1. Further, it wasn't a DP ball, there would've been runners on 2nd and 3rd with 2 out, and Moose-taco's base hit puts the Royals up 4-3 anyway.

 

I think the math is bad on the impact of this error.

DaveW All-Star

DaveW

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

 

How the **** is that not an error on Duda? Why does Reynolds just keep talking about Wright? Or, why does Reynolds just keep talking?

Should be an error on Duda, but Wright totally screwed that up as well.

 

Jack Morris >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harvey

Blake All-Star

Blake

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

Again, baseball shows why it is the greatest and cruelest sport.

 

The manager reluctantly leaves Harvey in the game, because Harvey "argued" his way into pitching the ninth.

 

The reality: The Royals appear to have Familia's number and it made sense to let Harvey stay in the game.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    20,599
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    BallseyBall
    Newest Member
    BallseyBall
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...