Dan Engebretson

If Jackson makes it through waivers and Jeffers accepts a QO (if made), the Twins could trade Caratini and roll with Jeffers/Jackson in 2027. This would effectively reduce Jeffers’ contract by $7M (I think this is what Caratini is owed next year). That may be more palatable.

If I recall correctly, the ESPN folks give the Orioles about a 50% chance of making the postseason. That tells me the Orioles are a good team. The Twins lost to a good team at home 2-1. While you never want to lose, losses happen and this was not a terrible loss, the wheels did not fall off any stage of the game. Ryan pitched wonderfully, and it would have been great if Funderburk and Topa had pitched as well, but they did not. It is entirely unreasonable to demand pitchers be perfect. They did ok. More (most?) troubling to me is the 1-12 RISP. The upside, of course, is the 12 opportunities, the downside, is they failed in all of them. If my memory is correct, the one hit was with a runner on second base and the hit was a dribbler that could not advance the runner. As already mentioned, this is a trend carrying over for several years. What I saw as an upside and definitely different from the beginning of last year, but carrying over from where last year finished is better base-stealing. Martin’s aggressive theft of second, prevented a double-play that almost certainly would have resulted when Buxton dribbled an easy double-play. I am looking forward to more baseball, and frankly hope that the Twins continue to play like they did yesterday (though, I suspect they will not).

Vazquez’ fWAR has always been above zero and the last two years have been 0.8 and 0.9. He is consistently above replacement level (and if he were “full time” catcher, his fWAR would likely be higher because it is a counting stat). This is in contrast with catchers like Sandy Leon, who rarely had fWAR above zero. While I agree (and the stats support) that Vazquez is a bit overpaid for his output, he is not a scrap-heap catcher. He brings real value that cannot be easily replaced and I don’t believe the Twins should just throw him by the wayside for nothing. (Though I would not have a problem with a rational trade that improved the team for next year).

Kepler got a ball 4 gift.

Haven’t said this for years. Good baserunning Twins!

Silver lining — the Twins have not missed any opportunities with runners in scoring position.

It looks like Martin might be the only one whose batting average exceeds their weight, and this is only because Martin is a pretty small guy.

I'm not sure fun is the f-word you're looking for there.

Here are some Fangraphs data I posted earlier this year comparing Kepler's first halves versus second halve throughout his career. With the exception of 2018, Kepler has been an above average hitter (by Fangraph's wRC+ stat), whereas he has been below average in the second half with the exceptions of 2018 and 2019. On his career, he has had more first-half plate appearances and is an 11% above average hitter. In my original post from January (I cannot figure out how to include it here), I speculated that Kepler may be worn down or injured in the second half (we know this was the case last year, but my memory fails me for earlier years) and I hoped that the new training staff will help either maintain his strength or better recover from injury. Both may be helped by the Twins depth of corner outfielders allowing Kepler more time to recover while there is an adequate replacement. Last year, with injuries to Larnach and Kirilof and a pretty bare cupboard, Kepler played when frankly, he should have been on the IL (at least in my opinion) recovering from a broken toe. While I don't think Kepler will ever achieve the lofty goals set by his 2019 performance, I wholeheartedly agree that his performance is worthy of "regular starter" status. Given the shear number of young, inexpensive corner outfield options the Twins have, I do expect them to shop Kepler at the trade deadline, and I expect they will get good value (assuming he continues to produce), because a 2 fWAR player at $10M is a good deal. Similarly, I will not be at all disappointed if the Twins keep Kepler, because his contract is still a good value for a very good player.

Data from Fangraphs (below) shows that Kepler's first half numbers are solid, but routinely (and sometimes catastrophically) fall off in the second half. I know last year he broke a toe in June and struggled after that. I wonder if Kepler wears down or plays through/with injury and it hurts his offensive productivity. Perhaps changes in the training staff will help. First Half numbers: Second Half:

I would add "player development" as a weakness. Examples of poor player development that are too frequently seen include poor baserunning. Grabbing a recent example, in Sunday's 10th inning loss, Kepler should have stayed near the bag on the Miranda's ball hit to the center field so Kepler could tag and advance to third. Rather, he went half-way on contact and had to retreat to second and lost the chance to advance to third. Gordon's groundout could have scored a smart baserunning Kepler from third, instead the poor baserunning Kepler could only get to third. In an earlier post in this thread, tarheeltwinsfan nicely articulated differences between "good clutch hitters" and "poor clutch hitters." The last few weeks not withstanding, most of the Twins hitters are really quite good; focusing on pre-All Star numbers, the Twins had the fifth highest OPS in MLB and 3rd highest in the AL. That's a team that knows how to hit a baseball (they have the talent). However, those numbers tank with RISP and particularly RISP with two out. I think well-developed hitters are aware of the situtation and rather than swinging for the fences in those situations, htey focus on advancing the runner, not getting out, and particularly not striking out (particularly with two out).

To build on Old Twins Cap a bit, I think we look too much at the shortcomings of the Twins pitching staff and not enough at the shortcomings of the Twins offense and mistake-prone play. To grab a recent example -- June 29th's 10th inning loss. At the end of 9 innings the Twins were 1-8 w/RISP and had left six on base. The Twins ranks near the bottom of MLB of OPS w/RISP *(particularly with 2-outs); you cannot expect to consistently win games when you routinely leave baserunners on the bags. Additionally, the Twins seem to make lots mistakes -- not necessarily errors -- think wild pitches, passed balls, dropped fly balls in foul territory, poor baserunning, etc. Specific examples from game #2 of the doubleheader include Jeffers sloppy early-home-run-that-wan't trot that resulted in an out at second, which was immediately followed by the Celestino/Miranda confusion of suicide vs. safety squeeze that eliminated a runner a third. Granted, the Twins won 6-0 so the lost runs are moot, but sloppy play is sloppy play. Also in that game, the Twins were 1-9 w/RISP (so you can win with poor performances w/RISP). In terms of problems, I think the pitching problems are more solvable than the clutch hitting and mistake-prone play. You can buy your way out of the pitching problems (I don't know the Twins appetite for spending more or trading assets), but poor clutch hitting and mistake-prone play seems like a development problem that likely starts early in the minors and will take years to fix. To summarize, I agree that Twins have pitching problems, but I think the bigger, and more difficult to solve problems are poor clutch hitting and generally sloppy play. I think these problems have plagued the Twins for years and are at the heart of the 0-`18 playoff streak. Until these problems are resolved, I don't think the Twins can be an elite team.

So, I go to preview today's game and see Astudillo listed among Twins batters? I don't see any roster move. Any insight?

Simmons is on the restricted list because he cannot travel to Canada (more accurately, cannot travel outside the US) without resetting the progress he has made in becoming a permanent US resident.

Thank you for poor baserunning.