Appreciate the detailed answer. I would probably agree that on a top three basis there are a few years where the top three are better but I was looking at the roster as a whole. That 69 team also with Reese, Cardenas and Tovar was pretty beastly, but well before my personal time. I would bet the current volume of talent on this years team look very good in comparison to most years though.
Just among hitters on the 40 man roster, there are 9 guys who are 1st or 2nd round picks including 2 #1 overall. Every single one, save maybe Jeffers if I'm generous, is performing well under expectations and career norms. And not just slightly poor, objectively horrible. Many reasons for sure, but I'm not sure how we can see the roster construction being the reason for poor performance. The FO might have blame but its not about who is here, other than Kepler, we all agree on that.