Jump to content
The 2026 MLB Draft is THIS WEEK. Click here to view our latest mock draft board! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    41,383

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    465

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    One can construct balanced trade proposals that both teams would say no to. This seems like such a proposal.
  2. ashbury
  3. ashbury
    I find it hard to envision a contending team looking at him as a third baseman; it's the same arm there as got him booted off of shortstop. Even at second base his arm makes every grounder an adventure for the poor guy covering first. The bat's good, if the health holds up, but I find it also hard to see a team offering a major league ready starting pitcher for him as a centerpiece; as Cory says above, significant additional pieces would have to accompany Jorge.
  4. ashbury
    On that inaugural Twins team in '61, Billy Martin's first name was only a nickname. His name at birth was Alfred Manuel Pesano, Jr.. He got the nickname "Billy" because it sounded like "Bello" or handsome, as I recall it. His mom took the last name Martin later on. Camilo Pascual was mistakenly thought to be Little Potato, due to a mis-translation of his Havana nickname of Shorty. You could add "Kitty" Kaat to the list.
  5. ashbury
    20/20 hindsight. Some injuries are "obvious" what needs to be done, say when you tear an ACL or break a bone. But many others are in a gray area where "let's try rest first" is the physician's recommendation. In Buxton's case they tried light/partial duty, and it didn't work, but this outcome doesn't mean it was "obvious" in April or May or June or July, whatever you consider to be "early." I'll say that if I were in charge, I wouldn't repeat the same approach in 2024. If he's not good to go in CF, then he DHes for one game and otherwise sits, and if he sits for more than a couple days then he goes to the IL. The DH-to-save-him-for-October approach did not work. But that's not because it was obvious going into 2023; we have 2023 to go from, now.
  6. ashbury
    According to b-r.com he was never traded in his entire career. Granted free agency five off-seasons in a row. I would "hate" getting released, too.
  7. ashbury
    Ha ha, mention a New York team in your headline and watch the page hits roll in, ha ha.
  8. ashbury
    The resolution I would ask of the team is to teach the young lefty batters how to cope with lefty pitchers, at least as well as Max Kepler and (yes) Joey Gallo were able to do last season. All of Kirilloff, Wallner, Larnach and Julien put up putrid numbers (OPS below .500) against left handed opponents, and I remain convinced that those numbers do not truly reflect their talent, merely a missing bit of coaching on how to deal with challenging pitches coming from that direction. Wallner in particular I know is a very tough guy, from observation at the Arizona Fall League with Chief a few Novembers ago when he took a pitch on the jaw* and yet came back to play some more in the AFL with no decrease in performance; there is no reason he can't learn and the others should be able to too. Left handed hitters you don't have to platoon for would raise the floor for this team by a lot. They already murderized righty pitchers for the most part. * No more tough than Kyle Farmer this season, just a bit luckier
  9. ashbury
    Thank you for referencing SkiUMah Toilet. I just wasted ten minutes viewing a selection of those TikTube videos.
  10. ashbury
    So among lefty-hitting, early-draft outfield picks, there are good players, and bad players, and others in between, and with luck Jenkins could be one of those types. All righty then!
  11. ashbury
    Each Caretaker probably has their own reasons and reasoning, but I personally pony up because I believe in the site's mission. Examining the Return on Investment in terms of caretaker articles is to me a bit like donating to NPR for the sweet, sweet tote bag they will send me as a thank-you gift.
  12. ashbury
    As I mentioned in that Staumont article, I fired off a comment after reading only the teaser, not even realizing there was more content. I come to almost all content via the site's Unread Content tool, which means everything is treated as being in a "Forum", so I don't see official articles in their "native" environment. And every article, whether Caretaker or not, has "View full article" at the bottom, so I have trained myself to not even notice that as a cue there might be more (because with regular articles, there isn't). Previously the site irritated non-paying readers with too much of an indicator every time that they were missing out on the good part of the content. That's been fixed perhaps, but there's an equal and opposite problem. I don't have a solution to propose. But I admire the conundrum.
  13. ashbury
    Ha, and sometimes Caretakers fail to even notice until after commenting that there is a lot more content to be had by clicking on "View full article" when they come in via the Unread Content page.
  14. ashbury
    I'm probably more lamenting the situation about the 40-man which you spelled out. I forget if it's been mentioned but Staumont does appear to have a minor league option remaining. If he's not on the injured list but isn't performing, at least he can be sent to St Paul without waivers, if that's what they want. Someone clogging the 26-man is just as much a factor as the 40, but he isn't that.
  15. ashbury
    Staumont had a successful 2020-2021, built on a BABIP of .261 across the two years. When that ability to make batters hit the ball right at fielders went away, so did his success. Oh, and in fairness there was that unpleasantness about neck soreness and thoracic outlet, too. This signing is portrayed as low-risk high-reward, and I don't really see the latter, just "a guy." And the risk is from taking up one of the team's 40-man spots. Apparently they see no better use for that scarce resource at this time. Even lowly KC had a better use for a spot on theirs. There are only 1200 spots in the majors, and somehow Josh Staumont has one, rather than a minor league commitment.
  16. ashbury
    The genius part of this signing is that when they DFA him and put him on waivers, no other team will claim him because he's making more than major league minimum* and they can stash him at AAA to make room for the next waiver-wire pickup! Genius, I tell you. * By a few hundred thousand dollars.
  17. ashbury
    You used an exclamation point, so I guess the adrenaline is pumping a little.
  18. ashbury
  19. ashbury
    What happens to the GM at the other team who makes the mistake of trading for Buxton?
  20. ashbury
    You brought up the status, so accept the correction gracefully. Or not, but then accept the pushback. Your choice. First Rule of Holes: when you find yourself in one, stop digging.
  21. ashbury
    You can write whatever book you want, but he is ineligible for the Rookie of the Year award going forward, so using a word differently than MLB does is begging for misunderstanding.
  22. ashbury
    Not to mention, it would be difficult to attract top talent, given that the player might be playing second fiddle in one way or another.
  23. ashbury
    Varland needs to go to St Paul as a starter and demonstrate he can dominate AAA hitters, and that he is ready to compete against the major leaguers, better than he did in 2023. This in turn means acquiring someone else who already projects to do better than 2023 Varland. I'm not down on Varland, but it's an assumption that he will still improve, and 2023 wasn't championship caliber yet.
  24. ashbury
    Good catch. I took my totals from fielding starts listed on b-r.com, but that overlooks games DHing.
  25. ashbury
    No Twin player has started 140 games since Paul Molitor was manager. Expectations for raw/counting totals should be kept in check. "Full season" doesn't mean what it used to. / edit - thanks to the correction below, I should note that this pertains to starts at a position. DH starts raise the number to 150. I think my point remains that 150 is a stretch for any Twins player, especially one who had trouble staying on the field in 2023 even after coming off the 60-day IL for his knee surgery.
×
×
  • Create New...