Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
  • Posts

    41,087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    463

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. Depends on how you define top prospect, but the off-season after he was drafted the MLB ranking had him 7th among all players, 2nd among pitchers, in the Mets system.
  2. 6'2", 240 pounds. Once Smith has gotten a head of steam, he may not be fast but I would not want to stand in his way. His running style in the video could be described as "earnest."
  3. It feels misleading to me. 1) The Rays are having a good season. Their run-scoring is about the same as the Twins. They've been shut out 3 times. But they've been held to 1 run only five times. Our Twins have been shut out just once, but they've scored 1 run ten times. Not much difference in win probability, 0 versus 1 run. The Rays happened to pitch a shutout one of the times I mentioned, the Twins won none of their 1-run offense games, "as expected". Bottom line, there's not much difference in scoring a run versus not, if we're looking at shutouts only. 1a) Atlanta is right up at the top with the Nationals and Dodgers, in runs scored. They've been shut out five times this season, and scored 1 run five other times. Lost 'em all, "as expected." As for the Nationals and Dodgerts, two shutouts and six 1-run games, for each of them - no wins. Anyway, none of these offenses have demonstrated the same kind of futility as often as our Twins have. To be "impressive", I'd want to see the Twins be on more of a par with the big boys, in avoiding the no-chance-to-win games. 2) The eye test tells me this is just not a reliable offense. I realize their runs per game are a titch above league average. They racks up runs, like any team does, when the opposition is weak in some way. But it "feels" to me like it's more of a factor with this team than average. The eye test also tells me a lot of times they score meaningless runs to avert the shutout; that's hard to define a metric for and I certainly don't know how. It's perplexing that now and then they'll score against top opposing pitchers, and I don't know how to separate out "good pitcher having a bad day" versus "good pitcher unable to shut our unstoppable guys down," either.
  4. He's responding tongue-in-cheek to my joke about it amounting to a three-team trade. Or am I joking? 😁
  5. Full circle would have been back to the Mets, no? (Or else Kempner HS in Sugar Land, TX, but when's the last time you saw a high school make a significant trade?) Here's my eccentric report in another thread thirty minutes ago: Breaking news: BLOCKBUSTER THREE-TEAM TRADE Blue Jays receive Simeon Woods Richardson Twins receive Justin Lawrence Pirates receive cash Initial speculation has Pittsburgh being the big winner in this transaction. More on this exciting development as we learn about it!
  6. The commentary? Yes. The actual pieces moving? No joke. SWR is reported going to Toronto for cash. Unless the difference is substantial, the money Minnesota sent to Pittsburgh is (in effect) Toronto money. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2026/06/twins-to-trade-simeon-woods-richardson-to-blue-jays.html
  7. Breaking news: BLOCKBUSTER THREE-TEAM TRADE Blue Jays receive Simeon Woods Richardson Twins receive Justin Lawrence Pirates receive cash Initial speculation has Pittsburgh being the big winner in this transaction. More on this exciting development as we learn about it!
  8. Tune In Again to tomorrow's game thread to find out!!!
  9. I was thinking merely of an alternative verb when I saw the headline, but making it a game is the next step.
  10. In that case I have been misleading people by suggesting we'll have closure by Saturday morning. Could be Monday morning instead.
  11. That's the slight detail I'm unclear on. Can the player be off DFA and on waivers? Then the total time in limbo could be nine days. I don't think that's so, but maybe?
  12. I'm sorry. The correct answer was 8-0. Vanna will see you off with a nice parting gift.
  13. Austin Martin on first. The comeback begins!
  14. What are you talking about? He got the job done. Just a little unconventional, is all. No problem! The ninth inning belongs to him!
  15. Just seems like the time between pitches is small.
  16. I'm just following on Gameday but is Lawrence working fast?
  17. Ninth inning, even. We'll find out if he can handle the pressure.
  18. We get to find out what our new Ninth Inning Guy has!
  19. If I have it right, the waiver claim period is only 48 hours, but it has to fit somewhere within the 7-day DFA period. The Twins have the choice when to start that 48-hour clock. That part of the rule allows a team to try to work out a trade, for example. Had the Twins begun the waiver process on Saturday when they DFA'ed him, we'd have our answer already. It's possible they don't plan to ask waivers until Thursday morning, in which case we won't know until Saturday. Other options, such as a trade being announced Thursday morning or earlier, reside between these two endpoints.
  20. This is not allowed here. The site Moderators will be in touch with you shortly. 😁
×
×
  • Create New...