Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Minor League Coverage

    Gabriel Gonzalez is a Great Hitter, but It Might not Matter

    Let's check in on Gabriel Gonzalez's prospect stock, after an outstanding first half of the 2025 season.

    Jamie Cameron
    Image courtesy of Ed Bailey, Wichita Wind Surge

    Twins Video

    Gabriel Gonzalez is a confounding baseball player. He sits squarely at the intersection of many of my own personal prospect biases. I don’t favor this type of prospect. And yet, he’s raking. Because he’s raking (and because I lost a friendly wager), it’s time to give his performance a more thorough examination. What is he? What might he become?

    Gonzalez was acquired in the Jorge Polanco trade in January 2024. The Twins acquired Anthony DeSclafani, Justin Topa, Darren Bowen, and Gonzalez in return for the longtime fan favorite second baseman. Gonzalez was the headliner of the return on the prospect side for the Twins.

    Originally signed out of Venezuela by the Mariners, Gonzalez came to the Twins with a hyper-aggressive top-100 prospect ranking from MLB Pipeline (#79) entering the 2024 season. Gonzalez missed all of May and a chunk of June 2024 due to injury, and struggled at High A as a 19-year-old, managing a .706 OPS and a 106 wRC+. What had been touted as a potentially plus hit tool didn't look like one at that point.

    What a difference a year makes, eh? After managing a .907 OPS in 34 games during a second stint at Cedar Rapids, Gonzalez has kicked on in Wichita. In 47 games at Double A, he’s hitting .370/.453/.522 with two home runs (22 extra base hits), a 9.7% walk rate, a measly 11.6% strikeout rate, and a healthy 173 wRC+.

    Let’s dig into what Gonzalez does well. I think we can see where the plus hit tool prognostication came from. Gonzalez uses the whole field beautifully. In his emerging Double-A sample, his batted-ball events find the pull side, center of the field, and opposite side 39% of the time, 23.2% of the time, and 37.8% of the time, respectively. You can’t live out the ‘take what you’re given’ hitting adage more aptly than that. Gonzalez has also turned into a line-drive machine. It’s a rate approaching 29% at Wichita, well above his 21% mark at Cedar Rapids in 2024. There are also really good bat-to-ball skills here. His current overall contact rate of 86% is well above average.

    This is undeniably an impressive turnaround from Gonzalez. I think it’s fair to say he’s rediscovered some of his lost shine from 2024. So, am I prepared to admit defeat and buy Gonzalez prospect stock? Not so fast.

    There’s a case to be made that it’s still an extremely narrow pathway for Gonzalez as an MLB regular, for two primary reasons: not enough quality supplementary tools, and questions about his power production relative to his defensive position. At a high level, from this seat, it’s a plus arm, below-average glove, and a below-average run tool for Gonzalez. He has the arm to stick in right field, but the mobility isn’t great, and the routes and defensive actions are a bit raw. That’s not to say he can’t take steps forward, but it is to say that right now, he profiles as a below-average defensive outfielder who doesn’t run well.

    Next, there’s the power. Gonzalez has been a doubles machine at Double A (18 in his first 47 games). He hit 18 home runs in 116 games in Seattle’s farm system in 2023. Since then, though, he's clubbed just 11 home runs in 157 games at High A and Double A. That doesn’t clear the bar for a big-league corner outfielder. His .152 ISO would rank 46th out of 60 qualified MLB outfielders. As currently constructed, it’s fringy power. One final concern that’s worth noting for Gonzalez is his swing rate. It’s come down plenty since his DSL days, but at roughly 52%, he’s still a free swinger. There’s a narrow path to tread for aggressive hitters with good bat-to-ball skills. The potential pitfall is eroding quality of contact, the higher he climbs the ladder.

    How do we square all this? Simply, by saying that Gonzalez has had a tremendous 2025 season. That’s undeniable. Unless some combination of the defense and power ticks up, however, I’ll have a hard time envisioning him as a high-quality MLB regular. The profile ends up feeling a lot like that of Avisaíl García. People loved to dream on García, but in roughly 4,300 career plate appearances, he had a 100 OPS+. Then, too, García debuted in the majors at a younger age than Gonzalez's right now, and he was huge, whereas Gonzalez is a sturdy but compact 5-foot-11. For me, he fits a 'tweener profile, not quite an everyday player. He'd be better as a right-handed platoon bat. For now, all he can do is to continue hitting anything and everything thrown his way, a task he’s taken to with gusto and great success in 2025.


    Interested in learning more about the Minnesota Twins' top prospects? Check out our comprehensive top prospects list that includes up-to-date stats, articles and videos about every prospect, scouting reports, and more!

    View Twins Top Prospects

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Brandon Winokur

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS/CF
    On Sunday, Winokur went 2-for-5 with a homer and five RBI. After hitting .198 in April, the 21-year-old is hitting a robust .364/.453/.564 (1.017) with three homers in May.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, twinstalker said:

    Don't get fooled by Wichita stats...or St. Paul stats, and be very cognizant of age and K rate.

    GG crushed it in Cedar Rapids this season. And for all that Wichita might be a hitter's paradise, the team average is a .777 and the league average for the Texas League is a .704 OPS, so GG is crushing both of those too. He's 3.1 years younger than the league average in AA too. His K-rate has been spectacular. Are we being fooled, or are people maybe looking too hard to find a reason to dismiss GG's performance on the field?

    I mean, hitting .370 with more walks than K's in over 200 ABs for a player in their first taste of AA when they are quite young for the league...at some point maybe it's just that the kid can hit? Heck, he's even hitting into fewer DPs! :)

    9 hours ago, FlyingFinn said:

    At least this year, Gonzalez appears to be the OF version of Luis Arraez.

     

    10 hours ago, ToddlerHarmon said:

    Worry about the HR rate when he's 24

    I couldn’t find a place to start a comment so I piggy backed here. These thought are responsive only to the article. 

    I find it impossible to look at mitigating factors or worry about a guy in any way, when he’s hitting .370 and maintains that .370 for a significant period of time. Doubles are a power factor too. That .370 average plus walks is at about the 99.8% spot on the statistical bell shaped curve.

    I’m finding what he’s doing very exciting and see him as a guy that could possibly replace several of the mediocre to poor hitters on the Twins now, or soon and do better.

    1 hour ago, jorgenswest said:

    Is he a sell high opportunity? Pair him with Coulombe or Bader or Castro and try to get a legit catching prospect. One of them and Gonzalez to the Phillies for Tait?

    They'd rather have Larnach I'd guess, as they are trying to win now and need a corner OF now. 

    55 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    They'd rather have Larnach I'd guess, as they are trying to win now and need a corner OF now. 

    Do you think they would prefer Bader over Larnach? In that case it would have to be Bader plus something. I am wondering if Gonzalez would pry away that catcher prospect.

    1 hour ago, jorgenswest said:

    Do you think they would prefer Bader over Larnach? In that case it would have to be Bader plus something. I am wondering if Gonzalez would pry away that catcher prospect.

    They need offense more than anything else, and RP. Another starter.... As everyone does. I can't see GG for another minor league player if that was your question. Those trades are super rare. 

    13 hours ago, Doctor Gast said:

    You are focusing on 2 opposite things. Oliva had enough raw defensive tools plus proven HR power, fine for RF.

    Shane Mack & Lyman Bostock played a lot of CF & were very good hitters that qualified them w/o being HR hitters.

    Gonzalez's glove at best is a RFer but doesn't hit HRs to profile there. Maybe he was adjusting to a new team so he was apprehensive in RF (which made him appear slow & lazy) maybe he can improve defensively to be a better RFer (not anything more) but I don't see him ever hitting enough HRs to qualify him for a MLB call-up there.

    like Oliva, Wallner has a lot of raw defensive tools to play RF. How many years has he played professional ball & how much has he improved during those years? Oliva started proball in '61, it took him until '66 to obtain a GG. Wallner started in '19. I don't see the same raw defensive tools with Gonzalez.

    There’s a big chasm between not being brought up because you can’t catch/judge a fly ball and becoming a Gold Glove OF, as was the case with Oliva. Oliva wasn’t able to be brought up because his defense was so poor.

    My point is a guy that Slugs at .522 will get playing time, regardless of how many HRs they hit…….my assumption/hope is for .425 Slug in the Show.

    Pretty sure you haven’t seen Gonzalez play defense & it takes a big imagination to think Matt Wallner is anywhere near a good RF. He has OK instincts and a very good arm …….. he struggles getting a jump too often though and he throws to wrong base &/or misses cut-off because he wants to just show off his arm. He has some upside, for sure. I don’t know that there has been much progression as a RF from Wallner over his 6 professional seasons & parts of 3 seasons in college.  Wallner is 6 years older than Gonzalez.

    Gonzalez is awfully young to be writing him off as a guy without enough power to play in the Show……..particularly with the .522 Slug% at AA.

    5 hours ago, JD-TWINS said:

    I don’t know that there has been much progression as a RF from Wallner over his 6 professional seasons & parts of 3 seasons in college.  Wallner is 6 years older than Gonzalez.

    Gonzalez is awfully young to be writing him off as a guy without enough power to play in the Show……..particularly with the .522 Slug% at AA.

    This is my point that you didn't pick up. If the Twins haven't been able to develop Wallner sufficiently, who has all the raw defensive talent to become a very good RFer. How can Gonzalez, who doesn't have that raw talent, be developed into a good RFer?

    When Falvey obtained Gonzalez, I checked him out through an evaluator I trusted & watched defensive clips, I could get my hands on. I like Gonzalez as a hitter. My problem is with the evaluation that is propagated & the ranking that is given to him. I stated that Gonzalez shouldn't make the Twins because of his bat doesn't fit his defensive abilities. But that said, that doesn't mean that Falvey won't force him through over players who are better than him. To the detriment of the Twins. 

    3 minutes ago, Patzky said:

    Perhaps someday we will have 'won' the Polanco trade.. and Justin Topa will have been long forgotten.

    We have already won the Polanco trade.  He was a negative WAR last year.  He then resigned with Seattle.  

    12 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    They need offense more than anything else, and RP. Another starter.... As everyone does. I can't see GG for another minor league player if that was your question. Those trades are super rare. 

    I don’t think Bader is enough to get the catcher so wondering if adding Gonzalez to Bader would be enough. This kind of deal is not unusual. It might be uncommon at the deadline but there likely is a deal like this every year. Last year the Dodgers got a prospect added with Edman. Two years ago the Rays got a prospect with Sampson. The Padres got the Marlins #21 prospect with Garrett Cooper in that deal. Sometimes a team is insisting on a prospect in return and the other team relents by taking back a lesser prospect in the deal.

    2 hours ago, jorgenswest said:

    I don’t think Bader is enough to get the catcher so wondering if adding Gonzalez to Bader would be enough. This kind of deal is not unusual. It might be uncommon at the deadline but there likely is a deal like this every year. Last year the Dodgers got a prospect added with Edman. Two years ago the Rays got a prospect with Sampson. The Padres got the Marlins #21 prospect with Garrett Cooper in that deal. Sometimes a team is insisting on a prospect in return and the other team relents by taking back a lesser prospect in the deal.

    I thought you were suggest prospect for prospect....

    On 7/22/2025 at 3:41 PM, cheeseheadgophfan said:

    .e

    On 7/22/2025 at 3:41 PM, cheeseheadgophfan said:

    Insane take......every team in MLB would take GG for Polanco straight up right now and this is the best Polanco has played since the trade.  

     

    Not insane, but I think you may be on the Kool-Aid. "every team"  is a complete stretch. 

    Polanco was a proven switch-hitter with positional versatility and clubhouse leadership. The Twins gave him up for an injured reliever, a pitcher who’s already off the roster, and a couple of prospects who might pan out.

    Gonzales has been solid lately—credit where it’s due—but saying every team would take him over Polanco “straight up” total exaggeration. 

    What did we get?
     

    Anthony DeSclafani: Never threw a pitch. Out for the season. Gone.

    Justin Topa: Injured. Again. Able to pitch in 2025 after being out most of 2024. FA now. 

    Gabriel Gonzalez: Still in Double-A. Solid tools, but hitting around .250 with questions about plate discipline.

    Dylan Moore? Utility guy, replacement level.


     

    12 minutes ago, BillyBallLives said:

    Gabriel Gonzalez: Still in Double-A. Solid tools, but hitting around .250 with questions about plate discipline.

    Dylan Moore? Utility guy, replacement level.

    Gonzalez is "still" in AA raking with 220 PAs under his belt... pretty good for a 21 year old. And those are his first PAs there, this isn't like Austin Martin floundering there at age 23 or Sabato needing 930 PAs there to move on.

    The other prospect is Darren Bowen, who's currently a starter at AA and not doing particularly well. His only path to the majors is going to be as a reliever and he was just a throw-in for the trade.

    10 hours ago, Rosterman said:

    A call up in 2027. Maybe a regular in 2028?

    I think there are a few variables outside of his performance that will determine when he gets a shot.  Rodriguez is already at AAA.  He is a very good defender, can back-up center field, and hits both LH and RH pitching.  If Rodriguez performs, he is getting a shot ahead of GG.  Jenkins is also a more complete player.  He will probably start 2026 in AAA.  If Jenkins crushes AAA pitching, he could be in the big leagues before GG.  Of course, there is also the possibility they pick-up a major league ready OFer in deadline trades.  I think the emphasis will be in other areas, but you never know.

    Of course, there are areas within his own performance that could expedite his ascension to the big leagues.  He could improve physically in the off-season.  A little more speed and strength would help defensively and could also produce more HRs.  That would change his ceiling.  Like Jenkins, GG most likely is in AAA to start 2026.  A slightly faster / better fielding GG showing a little more power in 2026 could be in the big leagues by the all-star break.

    14 hours ago, Rosterman said:

    A call up in 2027. Maybe a regular in 2028?

    If that's his timeline, this entire conversation is moot because he's not worth talking about. Guys who take 2 years to get from AA to the majors and another year to become a regular aren't actually regulars. Even those of us saying "let's not get too carried away here" aren't talking about a 2027 call up, we're talking cup of coffee this year with real time next year. If he doesn't get a cup of coffee this year it's not crazy, but if he isn't getting real playing time in the majors next year he's taken a step back and he's getting passed up by others. Or should be if they're developing any talent at all.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...