Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    What was Rocco Baldelli Thinking?!


    Matthew Taylor

    The Minnesota Twins suffered one of the most discouraging losses you are ever going to see on Wednesday afternoon. There is plenty of blame to go around for what happened, but the Minnesota Twins’ skipper deserves some of it.

    Image courtesy of © Neville E. Guard-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins again suffered a loss in a game in which they were in a prime position to win. Kenta Maeda had an uncharacteristically rough start, the bottom of the Twins’ order was inept, and the defense failed to convert routine plays. Additionally, though, Rocco Baldelli made some questionable decisions that contributed greatly to the Twins losing Wednesday’s series finale in Oakland. Let’s dive into the three head scratching moves.

    Questionable Move #1: Letting Alexander Colomé Throw 49 Pitches

    Though he had been shaky to start the season, bringing in Alexander Colomé in the ninth inning for the save was the clear move for Rocco Baldelli. Colomé was signed to the club to close out games and was the last high-leverage arm that Baldelli had remaining in his bullpen. Even bringing Colomé back in the 10th inning was defendable. Although he blew the save, Colomé threw 19 pitches in the ninth inning, and two right handed hitters were due up in the 10th for Oakland with the Twins owning a two-run lead.

    The problem with Rocco’s decision-making was just how long he allowed Colomé to stay in the game in the 10th. After Colomé got the first two righties to make outs in the 10th inning, left hander Seth Brown was due up with Colomé now at 29 pitches. After cruising through the first two batters, Colomé began to show some clear signs of tiring, throwing a five-pitch walk to Brown to put the tying run on base. Left in to face Elvis Andrus, Colomé, clearly exhausted, walked his second straight batter to load up the bases. After not having walked a batter all season, Colomé just walked two consecutive batters and was now at 40 pitches. Although ineffective and running on total fumes, Baldelli inexplicably left Colomé in the game with the bases loaded to face Matt Chapman, arguably Oakland’s best hitter. At this point Colomé was now throwing the most pitches he had thrown in an appearance since 2015 (!!) when he was still a starting pitcher.

    In Devin Smeltzer and Jorge Alcala, Baldelli may not have had the greatest options remaining in the bullpen, but it was clear to everyone that Colomé was tiring quickly and that a lesser name would give the Twins a better chance at that point than Colomé throwing a pitch count that he hadn’t thrown since Barack Obama left office.

    Colomé was clearly going to be in the game until the end, and while he did produce grounders that should have turned into outs, the reckless handling of allowing a tired Colomé to walk the bases loaded and continue facing the heart of the Oakland order was inexcusable.

    Questionable Move #2: Pinch Running Travis Blankenhorn for Josh Donaldson

    Heading into the top of the 10th inning with the “Runner on second” rule in effect, Rocco Baldelli made the questionable move to swap out his Gold Glove-winning third baseman in favor of utilityman Travis Blankenhorn as a pinch runner. This move was questionable from the jump as Blankenhorn, a well-built corner position fielder, is not exactly the fleetest of foot and is only marginally faster than Josh Donaldson on the basepaths. If a play occurred where there was a blooper into the outfield and Blankenhorn were to need to score on a bang-bang play at the plate, then any speed advantage you can get on the basepaths is an advantage. Majority of the time, though, that runner on second will score in a different manner, and one where a very marginal difference in speed isn’t going to make a huge difference. That runner on second could score easily on a double in the gap. Or on a couple of sacrifices. Or a home run (like was the case on Wednesday). Or potentially not even get a chance to score at all.

    There were so many variables at play that substituting a pinch runner in that spot for a very minimal gain in speed was not worth the subsequent consequence of taking Donaldson’s glove out of the game for the bottom half of the inning with a pitch-to-contact pitcher on the mound and plenty of ground balls incoming. While it didn’t come to fruition, the swap also removed Donaldson’s bat for a potential later inning, should extras have continued past the 10th inning.

    The decision came back to haunt the Twins in a big way, too, as the domino effect of Josh Donaldson’s removal from the game caused two new players to enter the field on defense, each of them making consecutive errors that caused three runs and lost the Twins the ballgame. Which leads to questionable decision number three...

    Questionable Decision #3: Moving Luis Arraez to Third Base and Putting Blankenhorn at Second

    Rather than making the clean swap with putting Travis Blankenhorn in the field at third base for the bottom of the 10th, Baldelli decided to completely mix up the defensive alignment in extra innings by moving Luis Arraez to third base and slotting Travis Blankenhorn in at second. This now put the Twins in a situation where they were not only without their Gold Glove third baseman, but they had two defensive players playing in a totally new position that day, one of them completely cold, in a high leverage situation with a tiring pitch-to-contact player on the mound.

    This decision reared its ugly head quickly as Blankenhorn botched a ground ball to second base to allow one run to score before Luis Arraez made a throwing error on the next at-bat to allow the tying and winning runs to score.

    Sure, Major League Baseball players should convert those plays 95% of the time, but in a high leverage situation with all of the pressure in the world, a manager is not setting up his team for the best chance at success by taking out his Gold Glove veteran in favor of two young, stretched defensive players.

    Rocco Baldelli was not the only reason that the Minnesota Twins lost to the Oakland Athletics on Wendesday afternoon. Baldelli is still the best manager for this ballclub, and better days and decisions are ahead. He did make some poor decisions, though, that contributed to the Twins losing Wednesday’s ball game, and does deserve some of the criticism for those decisions.

    What did you think of Rocco Baldelli’s decision-making on Wednesday afternoon? Were there any other questionable decisions that stuck out to you? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY

    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers

    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums

    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    "There is a massive difference between "Rocco is bad at his job" and "Those two plays weren't his fault". Massive."

     

    If two fielding plays were the only issues with this club we wouldn't be trailing in the ALC and there wouldn't be so much angst in the comments. 

     

     

     

     

    "There is a massive difference between "Rocco is bad at his job" and "Those two plays weren't his fault". Massive."

     

    If two fielding plays were the only issues with this club we wouldn't be trailing in the ALC and there wouldn't be so much angst in the comments. 

     

    Trailing in the ALC? That is kind. How about last place in the American League, and 1/2 game from the worst record in Major League Baseball!

    His monotonous, oleaginous post-game remarks are insipid. He's like a wind-up doll who only utters cheery platitudes. He is a woeful failure in playoff games. He frequently gives the impression he has dopey set rules, no matter the way the game is playing out. There has to be somebody better out there. Someone not afraid to show a little emotion.

    If the Twins right the ship, fine.  If not and they miss the playoffs, Rocco could be on the hot seat. Most of what has happened may be out of his control, but when has that ever made a difference.  When a team under performs dramatically, the front office cannot fire the players.  So the manager gets the blame.

    I hate this as much as anyone. I hate it. I couldn't even watch the second half of the game yesterday. Why go through misery when I could do something else?

     

    With that said, look at who is in last place in each division in the American League. Yankees, Astros, and Twins. The three teams predicted by most to finish atop their divisions. So ... it's early.

     

    I shall watch them again. If they don't perform better, I shall not watch. At this point they are unwatchable. Things change. Or things can change. Things often change. Even that big ship in the Suez Canal finally got turned around!

    The entire relief strategy after Maeda's breakdown is mystifying. If you trust the bats, how do you position the arms to get through a very long afternoon?

    • Duffey enters with score 4 - 7 in 4th; 1 IP, 4 batters, 11 P, 1 BB
    • Score is tied in the bottom of the 5th - it is a new game, 15 outs long, next day is an off day
    • Duffey is already committed and half the A's batting order hasn't seen him yet - unless there is an incredibly bad matchup, why not ask him for another three outs? (rule of thumb - dance with them that brung ya)
    • Instead, Dobnak faces 3 batters in the 5th and retires them on 10 pitches
    • Bottom of the 6th, 10 - 7: Again, barring a bad matchup, why not ask The Driver to hold that lead when there are still 12 outs needed? If he allows runners on base, the high-leverage arms will be there; if he doesn't, those arms will only be needed for 9 outs (same applied to Duffey)
    • Robles gets only two batters before running into trouble; now two arms (three with the unused Alcala) remain to get 10 tough outs

    Bottom line: Can't be a good end game if without a better middle game.

    The one excuse I haven't seen yet that might actually fly is the loss of the former bench coach. I don't know what that interaction looks like in practice, but if the manager typically receives opinions from other coaches (bench, bullpen, pitching, etc) and decides which opinion to implement I can see the sudden loss of that coach having a big impact on his performance. We had a traumatic disruption to the staff before the season and that could explain a lot. 

     

    That said, it's still on Rocco to turn it around. 

    My concern is that Rocco just doesn't seem to have a feel for in game decisions.

     

    It's almost like he has a predetermined algorithm for each game when there are just way too many in game variables to do that.

     

    Many unanticipated adjustments are needed.

     

    I don't think that he is dumb or bad or lacks competitive fire or is not passionate about the game.

     

    But I DO think that he is ill equipped for in game management which is of course SUPER important.

     

    I think he would excel much more as a bench coach or in the FO helping with analytics and PRE-GAME prep or both.

     

    He will not be a long term manager, nor manage again for another team after the Twins, but he will have a long and successful career in baseball in another position.

    "Bottom of the 6th, 10 - 7: Again, barring a bad matchup, why not ask The Driver to hold that lead when there are still 12 outs needed? If he allows runners on base, the high-leverage arms will be there; if he doesn't, those arms will only be needed for 9 outs (same applied to Duffey)"  VivaBombaRivera

     

    The Driver - I like that!

     

    And your argument makes a lot of sense.

     

    They need to play the game on the field and NOT on a spreadsheet somewhere that says something. I agree analytics are a great tool but it can't be something that is used 100% of the time.

    If Baldelli was truly using analytics 100% of the time, there'd be no way in heck that Colome should be throwing pitches in the 10th inning. His usage of Colome as the closer no matter what despite the "we haven't named a closer" statement is quite the old school move and it's costing him. 

     

    Baldelli's moves constantly imploding like this reminds me of Molitor in the 2016 Total System Failure season. Decently high expectations followed by a season filled with bad play, bad managing, and some bad luck (don't misconstrue this, it was mostly bad play), the team had an abysmal season. Fans criticized him for being behind the times, using the bullpen poorly, and failing to show passion like Gardy did. And he did have a much worse roster than Rocco's got, I'll give you that. But I'm seeing some comparisons here.

     

    Let's not forget that Molitor got two more seasons after the total system failure... Gardy had 4 90+ loss seasons in a row. This FO may be different, but Rocco is their guy. He ain't close to being fired.

    Rocco is fine, a decent manager and makes mistakes like everyone. People should relax a little. Perhaps Twins fans have become too used to the likes of Tom Kelly, Ron Gardenhire, and Paul Molitor, but in time Rocco will make a name for himself as well. There are two division banners already and this squad still has time to correct its early struggles. Marwin and Ehire were very special players and we miss them, but it is time to move forward because they are gone; those decisions are past. If the Twins can evade too many injuries their season will turn out fine and Rocco will keep us guessing.

    A lot of comments here about the use of the bullpen are spot on. When your starter has a short outing you should be following him up with your long-relief guy. If that is Dobnak then he should have got brought in next, not Duffey. Then you let Dobnak pitch for as long as he is effectively getting guys out. What does this do? It gives you less innings needed for guys like Duffey, Rogers, Robles and Colome. It makes NO SENSE to only use Dobnak for 10 pitches then have your closer throw 49. So far, Colome has lost 2 games and blown 3 Saves. He is not Closer material for any team. Stop using him as such. If this is analytics at it's finest I am done watching Twins baseball. 

    You try with all your resources and effort to win the contest you are currently participating in. Until you show a willingness to do that your squad will be complacent and lack urgency.

     

    Go ahead and tell them to not worry about today's performance and focus on the process. That's a great way to earn a certificate of participation.

    Well I can't say much since my free speech rights are basically taken away on this site, but I will say some key points with tact. I drove to Anaheim from Phoenix to see the entire series.

    What the hell was Thorpe doing starting any of those games? That's on Falvine not Baldelli. We all know who calls the shots. Ok, what the hell is Dobnak doing on the roster if he isn't going to make those spot starts. Their defense was Crap last friday night....Thorpe against Trout, Rendon, Pujols, Upton, Fletcher, and (do they have any left handed hitters at all?) They weren't ready to play and they embarassred us all.

    The next two games got postponed because of what? The 10.5 million dollar defensive savior tested positive for Co-Vid 4,5,6, or ten players got infected subsequently. Everyone or a vast majority lambasted me for criticizing him for being three weeks late for work...hmmmm never heard an explanation for that...now he wont take the vaccine....hmmm okay then.

    There's enough blame to go around to be sure....I was against letting Rosario go, I was against letting Adrianza go, and I have always loved Marwin Gonzalez. Those dudes played defense and were tough outs...Everybody wanted to change everything. I know Gonzalez would have taken a pay cut to stay. Are we really better off? I doubt it.

    The bullpen will be fine, The rotation will be okay. The lineup has a glaring hole out in left field. As injury prone as this team is we may have a repeat of 2018....or even 2016. If that happens I wonder how many geniuses will be singing the praises of the Falvey administration then? We should be worried about winning two in a row, not beating the Yankees in the playoffs. What a joke.

    My concern is that Rocco just doesn't seem to have a feel for in game decisions.

     

    It's almost like he has a predetermined algorithm for each game when there are just way too many in game variables to do that.

     

    Many unanticipated adjustments are needed.

     

    I don't think that he is dumb or bad or lacks competitive fire or is not passionate about the game.

     

    But I DO think that he is ill equipped for in game management which is of course SUPER important.

     

    I think he would excel much more as a bench coach or in the FO helping with analytics and PRE-GAME prep or both.

     

    He will not be a long term manager, nor manage again for another team after the Twins, but he will have a long and successful career in baseball in another position.

    You make it sound like he calls any shots or something....He does not. He doesn't need a bench coach, and all the moves ARE pre-determined by Falvey and Levine. Thats why they need 2,ooo office workers...so they can micro manage every on field decision. Whatever happens is on them not Baldelli. They will have their mugs on tv to take the credits and make Baldelli take all the blames.
    If Baldelli was truly using analytics 100% of the time, there'd be no way in heck that Colome should be throwing pitches in the 10th inning. His usage of Colome as the closer no matter what despite the "we haven't named a closer" statement is quite the old school move and it's costing him. 

     

    Baldelli's moves constantly imploding like this reminds me of Molitor in the 2016 Total System Failure season. Decently high expectations followed by a season filled with bad play, bad managing, and some bad luck (don't misconstrue this, it was mostly bad play), the team had an abysmal season. Fans criticized him for being behind the times, using the bullpen poorly, and failing to show passion like Gardy did. And he did have a much worse roster than Rocco's got, I'll give you that. But I'm seeing some comparisons here.

     

    Let's not forget that Molitor got two more seasons after the total system failure... Gardy had 4 90+ loss seasons in a row. This FO may be different, but Rocco is their guy. He ain't close to being fired.

    yeah lets hear it for analytics...way to go FO!!

    As others have mentioned, I also was surprised when Dobnak only pitched the one quick inning midway through the game.

    It seems to me that Rogers doesn't do his best when coming into the middle of an inning with someone else's runners on base (and this goes back a couple of years as well). I think Robles would agree with me. It was nice to see Rogers pitch two clean innings after that, and I didn't expect him out their that long.

    Rocco has gotten burned many times over his tenure by not having a pitcher warming up at early signs of trouble. It seems to be a situation where he wants to go inning to inning with one pitcher at a time, whether the pitcher is going well or not.

     

    In terms of the pitching move, I would more so question not letting Dobnak pitch more than 1 inning, which left you with limited options later in the game.  I have little issue with using Colome in 10th, although I am not a fan so far of him this year at all.  If we remove him and the new guy gives up a hit an we lose, we would question the choice to bring in someone else.  Colome got the job done over all by getting to ground outs that were not completed.  

     

    The move to take out Donaldson I agree is much more in question.  It is not like Blackenhorn is a speedster.  I know Twins do not want Donaldson to push things based on leg issues, but taking Donaldson glove out of game proved to be a huge issue.  I have always been huge on having good defense.  This game showed how much defense can impact a game.  Not just the errors, but Buxton made amazing play to keep the lead earlier in game.  

     

    Didn't they win the division the last two years?

    Yes they have, in which we barely won last year. With the amount of talent this team has there is no reason they shouldn't be running away with the division and making some loud noise in the playoffs. This team is built to win now, entire team is aging. buxton sano kepler berrios not young anymore so no excuse for not living up to the potential they should be. Something has drastically happened with the hitting the last two years and getting no development out of our pitching throughout minor leagues




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...