Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Matt Wallner Dilemma: Real Progress or More of the Same?

    Matt Wallner has elite raw power. The question is whether he'll ever tap into it properly. After another season of streaks, strikeouts, and subtle progress beneath the surface, 2026 feels like a year that could finally give us answers.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

     

    Matt Wallner is entering his fifth season on the big-league roster. At this point, we kind of know what he is—and we kind of don’t.

    He’s spent time in left field and at DH, but the overwhelming majority of his innings have come in right field for the Twins. That’s not by accident. He has an absolute cannon for an arm. According to Statcast, his arm strength ranked in the 99th percentile of all outfielders in 2025. It was 99th percentile in 2024 and 100th percentile in 2023. That gives him real defensive upside, despite the struggles he's had in properly positioning himself and getting to balls fast enough to let the arm play as well as it should.

    Offensively, it’s been even more of a rollercoaster. In 2025, Wallner hit just .202. That’s the number that jumps off the page, and not in a good way. His on-base percentage was .311, which is respectable for someone barely clearing the Mendoza Line, but when your batting average starts with a “.20,” there’s only so much spin you can put on it. 

    The expected stats don’t bail him out. His expected batting average sat at .205, right in line with the results. This wasn’t a case of screaming line drives right at defenders or terrible luck. He simply didn’t make enough consistent, high-quality contact to deserve much better. It's not exactly a mystery why he struggled; we diagnosed his problems last summer.

    It’s also not the first time we’ve seen this. In 2024, Wallner broke camp with the team, but hit just .213 with 27 strikeouts in 59 plate appearances before being sent down to Triple-A. That’s understandable if you’re 22, but when you’re 26 (with multiple seasons of big-league time), those stretches feel more significant.

    To his credit, he responded. After getting called back up in 2024, he hit .272 with 25 extra-base hits over his final 55 games. The swing decisions improved, and the power played better, without him completely selling out for it. That stretch created real optimism heading into 2025.

    Unfortunately, it didn’t carry over consistently.

    League-wide offense isn’t what it used to be. A .275 hitter today is basically what a .300 hitter was 30 years ago. Pitchers are better, velocity is up, and bullpens are deeper. Context matters. Still, it's rare to see someone hit around .200 and be a truly impactful everyday player. Yes, there are exceptions. Kyle Schwarber has done it with the Philadelphia Phillies, but he’s also launching 45-plus home runs and posting elite on-base numbers. That’s a different tier of production. Arguably, that's the right road map for Wallner, but for all his bat speed and strength, he hasn't shown the same caliber of in-game power Schwarber has.

    Wallner’s 2025 pace over 162 games would’ve put him around 34 home runs, which isn’t bad. But if your profile is built around power, 34 feels more “solid” than “game-changing.” That’s roughly one home run every five games. Fellow age-27 Minnesota native Michael Busch hit 34 homers for the Cubs, but he also had a much lower strikeout rate and showed the ability to hit line drives to all fields. If you’re making your living off the long ball the way Wallner does, you’d hope for quite a bit more.

    image.png

    Here’s where it gets interesting.

    There were real signs of progress under the hood in 2025. His strikeout rate dropped to 29%. That’s still not good, but it’s a significant improvement from the 36.4% mark in 2024. Yes, he made more bad contact, thanks to his flatter bat path, and yes, some of the strikeout decrease had to do with being more aggressive early in counts, but for a player with this much pop, being aggressive is ok.

    The raw power remains very real. His barrel rate stayed comfortably better than average, and his average exit velocity hovered north of 90 mph. Both numbers were lower than in 2024, but that's the cost of making more contact. When he squares it up, it goes a long way. The question is whether he can do so more consistently this season.

    Health hasn’t helped. Wallner got off to a slow start in 2025, then dealt with a midseason injury that stalled any momentum he was building. For a hitter who thrives on rhythm and timing, that matters. It’s hard to make adjustments when you’re constantly resetting.

    I want to believe in Matt Wallner. I want to tell you he’s about to put it together and become a 35-homer, .250 hitter with a .350 OBP and a rocket launcher in right field. But I can’t say that with full confidence. Too many signals are garbled, or pointing in the wrong direction.

    If he can push the batting average back into the .250 range, which he’s flashed before, his profile changes dramatically. A .250 hitter with a 12% walk rate and 30-plus homer power plays. Add elite arm strength (and maybe some better routes, with more experience and instruction) in right field, and now you’re talking about a very valuable player. Maybe the more likely outcome is something frustratingly but usefully in-between. PECOTA projects Wallner to hit .222/.326/.427 in 489 plate appearances this year: not fully available, not fully breaking out, but not struggling the way he did last year, either.

    There’s a lot of volatility with Wallner. His floor is a streaky power bat who doesn’t make enough contact. But the ceiling is a true impact corner outfielder who changes games on both sides of the ball. That’s why 2026 feels pivotal. If he has another season like last year, it'll be hard to muster much enthusiasm next spring. Indeed, it might be some other fan base doing the mustering by then.

     

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    5 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    Wallner had his highest walk rate with high leverage.

    Wallner had his lowest K rate with high leverage.

    Wallner had his highest hard hit rate with high leverage.

    He also owned a .000 BABIP in the whopping 27 at bats he had with "high leverage" last year. 

    image.png.7b6d52e1bab8c4ec56b79dcab75c5a4b.png

     

    What's the excuse for his lack of production in medium leverage? 

    6 hours ago, NYCTK said:

    That low of a sample, I am basically going to ignore the first part of your reply then. To your point though, I don't know why I didn't include those peripherals in that breakdown, so here are those numbers with K and BB rates included: 

     

      PA AVG OBP SLG OPS wOBA BB% K%
    Low Leverage 507 0.267 0.367 0.591 0.958 0.403 11.40% 31.20%
    Med/High Leverage 465 0.191 0.318 0.369 0.687 0.308 9.90% 33.58%

    So it's not like he falls apart. Those declines are what we should kind of expect to see for any player. But there's no denying that he's essentially been a low leverage stat padder in his career THUSFAR, and that while it is a cause for a concern, it's not necessarily predictive. 

    For his career he has 109 PA's with 2 outs & RISP. He's produced a 1.020 OPS in those situations.

    If you like all RISP situations regardless of outs, he's produced an .897 OPS in 222 PA's.

    If you like anytime there are runners on base, he's produced an 885 OPS 392 PA's.

    Any way you slice it he produces. Saying he's a stat padder is just inaccurate.

    He certainly deserves this season before making any judgements. Give him 1200 AB's. In baseball you have to make adjustments and work to strengthen your weak areas. Am always excited to see if there any positive results to those players who work on that in off season. You can call me a "homer" but I am looking forward to see what Brooks Lee, Matt Wallner and Royce Lewis can accomplish this year. 

    1 hour ago, Danchat said:

    When you strike out a lot and walk a lot, it makes sense that he doesn't hit in runners when they are on base. I think we sometimes prioritize OBP over batting average when hitting a single with runners on base is much more likely to get RBIs when a walk can only get you a RBI when the bases are loaded.

    You want to talk batting average? How about we take it up a notch and use SLG? His SLG was .452. 

    5 hours ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    Is wRC+ the only stat that matters?    As others have mentioned he's essentially racked up his numbers in low leverage situations.  

    I think Wallner is fine.  I don't get the desire to either turn him into the worst player in Twins history or an MVP candidate though.  Not every player needs to be a superstar.   He's a 1 tool player, but it's a valuable tool.  Put some high OBP guys in front of him in the lineup and let him swing away.

    I doubt "every single team in baseball" is frantically coming up with trades to find room for Matt Wallner and his 0.6 WAR in the lineup though.  

    Every. Single. Team. Every single team in baseball would want Matt Wallner over one of their corner outfield or DH options right now. They may not be frantically coming up with trade offers, but every team would prefer Wallner at least by a small margin over what they have.

    Dodgers? Yep. They'd happily trade Teoscar to get Wallner.
    Yankees? Yep. They'd gladly trade Stanton and eat salary to get Wallner.
    Mets? Yep. All day the RF starter.
    Red Sox? Absolutely over Yoshida.

    Even straight up contract neutral at least 20 teams would start Wallner over another player on their roster.

    7 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    Wallner had his highest walk rate with high leverage.

    Wallner had his lowest K rate with high leverage.

    Wallner had his highest hard hit rate with high leverage.

    He also owned a .000 BABIP in the whopping 27 at bats he had with "high leverage" last year. 

    image.png.7b6d52e1bab8c4ec56b79dcab75c5a4b.png

     

     

    6 hours ago, NYCTK said:

    That low of a sample, I am basically going to ignore the first part of your reply then. To your point though, I don't know why I didn't include those peripherals in that breakdown, so here are those numbers with K and BB rates included: 

     

      PA AVG OBP SLG OPS wOBA BB% K%
    Low Leverage 507 0.267 0.367 0.591 0.958 0.403 11.40% 31.20%
    Med/High Leverage 465 0.191 0.318 0.369 0.687 0.308 9.90% 33.58%

    So it's not like he falls apart. Those declines are what we should kind of expect to see for any player. But there's no denying that he's essentially been a low leverage stat padder in his career THUSFAR, and that while it is a cause for a concern, it's not necessarily predictive. 

    @NYCTKis playing a game here with Low leverage, so let me play the same game to look at the High.

    Look at the data in that first post and then consider those rate stats if you combine Low/Medium and let High stand alone.  The BB and K rates are wrecked by the Medium  performance, but it's hidden behind that stupendously bad BABIP.  The Av/Ob/Sl numbers are still garbage, but the rate stats sparkle. There's room in there for better luck to turn a lot of this around in the ways @DocBauerwas discussing above.

    7 minutes ago, Cris E said:

     

    @NYCTKis playing a game here with Low leverage, so let me play the same game to look at the High.

    Look at the data in that first post and then consider those rate stats if you combine Low/Medium and let High stand alone.  The BB and K rates are wrecked by the Medium  performance, but it's hidden behind that stupendously bad BABIP.  The Av/Ob/Sl numbers are still garbage, but the rate stats sparkle. There's room in there for better luck to turn a lot of this around in the ways @DocBauerwas discussing above.

    Well then you're looking at something like 10% of his plate appearances and it becomes a lot more noisy than a near 50/50 split.

    I'm even granting the possibility of it being bad luck, but you can't lie and say those splits don't concern you one bit. 

     

    OMG- Wallner sucks, Lee sucks, Lewis sucks, Buxton sucks, everybody on the roster sucks! Enough of this nonsense! Enough of all the stats and analyzing things to death.  Before we toss everybody into the trash let’s see what a new manager with a new perspective and vision can do to get the most out of these players. Lord knows Baldelli hadn’t a clue how to develop players. Maybe, just maybe Shelton does. 

    To be clear, the right move is to play Wallner every day and expect a rebound after what happened in 2025. This is absolutely not the time to trade low on him. 

    1 hour ago, Maybe Next Year said:

    Maybe, just maybe Shelton does. 

    Maybe? Shelton has been a manager for over 5 seasons, he already has an established track record. He may not be the exact same person he was in Pittsburgh, but I'm confused why I'm seeing some talk of Shelton being an unknown quantity. 

    6 hours ago, Mahoning said:

    You win with stars. The Twins need Matt Wallner to be a star and I hope it happens. All the stat-heads prefer Wallner to Larnach, but if you have a runner at second and need an RBI, Larnach is better.

    Career numbers - Matt Wallner & Trevor Larnach

    2 outs, RISP - Wallner - 109 PA's - .281/.413/.607 - 1.020 OPS Larnach - 196 PA's - .275/.383/.419 - .802 OPS
    any outs, RISP - Wallner 222 PA's - .260/.383/.514 - .897 OPS Larnach - 435 PA's - .255/.343/.401 - .744 OPS
    runners on base - Wallner 392 PA's - .264/.372/.512 - .885 OPS Larnach - 742 PA's - .255/.331/.413 - .743 OPS

    Wallner is a more productive hitter in any situation with runners on base.

    I think Larnach is a solid hitter, but so far in their careers Wallner has been better.

    16 hours ago, old nurse said:

    Carlos Mendoza and Minnie Mendoza batted .182 each for their major league career. Mario Mendoza batted .220 for his career and was the inspiration for the term Mendoza Line.  So are people ignoring history or has hitting gotten so poor for average that they do not want to rightfully embarrass players?

    League batting average is around .240 now. It was .270 thirty years ago.

    Y'all can focus on negatives until the cows come home. Knock yourself out. All players have negatives. The ones who don't have negatives are signing 400 million dollar deals with one of the 7 teams who will actually offer a 400 million dollar contract. 

    There is no future when you eat your young. 

    If ownership/front office doesn't have the stomach or patience to develop.  The future will require at least 200 million in payroll just to fill the multiple open spaces left behind by that development failure. 

    If you can't outbid the Phillies or Dodgers for that free agent with no negatives. You'll have to outbid the Rangers for the next guy with a negative or two.

    If you can't do that just to maintain this lifestyle. You will need to trade your young in order to acquire players with no negatives. It's harder to trade your young when they have no trade value because you failed to develop trade value. 

    When it all comes crashing down. The rebuild will be snail like because you have no trade value to hasten it. 

    If the fans don't have the stomach or patience to develop. Good Luck. 

     

     

     

    7 hours ago, Danchat said:

    Maybe? Shelton has been a manager for over 5 seasons, he already has an established track record. He may not be the exact same person he was in Pittsburgh, but I'm confused why I'm seeing some talk of Shelton being an unknown quantity. 

    The mystery is how he will choose to interact with each guy.  People around here complained about coddling or not listening or whatever, so Shelton gets a chance to have a better relationship with some guys. It might be worse with others, but depending on each individual there could be some playing better or some feeling lost. Even when you talk about a distant, top-down control guy like Showalter who more or less treats everyone the same, you can't predict how it might affect each man in the room .  Royce Lewis, for example,  was making all sorts of sounds along these lines at the time of hiring, so we have to wait and see if Derek's new team connects better with him.

    8 hours ago, Mahoning said:

    You win with stars. The Twins need Matt Wallner to be a star and I hope it happens. All the stat-heads prefer Wallner to Larnach, but if you have a runner at second and need an RBI, Larnach is better.

    1 hour ago, MGX said:

    Career numbers - Matt Wallner & Trevor Larnach

    2 outs, RISP - Wallner - 109 PA's - .281/.413/.607 - 1.020 OPS Larnach - 196 PA's - .275/.383/.419 - .802 OPS
    any outs, RISP - Wallner 222 PA's - .260/.383/.514 - .897 OPS Larnach - 435 PA's - .255/.343/.401 - .744 OPS
    runners on base - Wallner 392 PA's - .264/.372/.512 - .885 OPS Larnach - 742 PA's - .255/.331/.413 - .743 OPS

    Wallner is a more productive hitter in any situation with runners on base.

    I think Larnach is a solid hitter, but so far in their careers Wallner has been better.

    @Mahoning Here's the deal: players don't exist in a vacuum and there's no extra points awarded when the High Leverage light is on. You know where RISP situations come from? Some guys, any guys, getting on base ahead of the next guys. Not the right guys, not the ones that play Designated RISP Hitter, but any time the lineup gets something going then the job is keeping things rolling. 

    There's no hitting situation where I prefer Larnach to Wallner. He doesn't set the table and he doesn't cash in when things are there. If you want to judge Wallner by one year rather than his career go ahead, but I think you;re making a mistake.

     

    15 hours ago, DocBauer said:

    So why is everyone so down on him following a single bad year where his OPS was still slightly above league average? He's definitely got something to prove, or re-prove in 2026.

    But why so much vitriol and downcasting for a guy who's been really good before? 

    It's stylistic. There are some people who despise K's and any hitter who generates a lot of them. They'd rather have a guy put the ball in play a lot even if they never walk, slapping singles around and hitting into easy outs, than a player like Wallner, who swings very hard but also whiffs a lot. And for the people that hate that style of play, they want the Wallners of this team gone, and the easiest way to get rid of them is to have them actually stink. If Wallner is actually terrible, they get to point fingers and say "see! I told you he was bad and this kind of player was useless!"

    Keep in mind, there's a fair number of people who refuse to believe that Wallner was actually really good in 2023 or 2024 as well.

    I look at Wallner in terms that he is the same age as Rooker when the Twins gave up on him. The biggest difference is that Wallner has been a whole lot more productive than Rooker was during his Twins tenure. Does this mean Wallner is destined to be a multi time all star and a silver slugger winner? No. I do think it's too soon to write Wallner off or to say he can't make the next step.

    Matt Wallner had a bad year last year and a satisfactory OPS number can't hide that. The cause of his bad year might be an early injury or it might be something else, but producing 40 RBI is historic and not in a good sense.

    Can he come back this year and be a force in the lineup? I think so, mostly because of how hard he hits the ball and that he isn't prone to hitting a lot of ground balls. 

    Much has been written here and in other threads about his defense. I just checked BBRef again and in '23 and '24 he was essentially neutral as a defender, actually slightly above. I don't know what happened in 2025, but the numbers were much worse. I also know that his sprint speed went from slightly above average to bottom third in MLB. Wallner turned 28 in the off-season so he's not slowing because of age. Could it be injury? If so, maybe he comes back this year and is a far better defender. TBH, I thought Wallner looked indecisive and slow in the outfield last year. There's a lot to improve on and I think he has the tools to be far better in the field. Michael Taylor Jr. would earn his pay if he helped The Moose to be an above average defender. It goes without saying that Wallner is more valuable if he is a competent outfielder to go with his hitting profile.

    This is a crucial year for Wallner. Rodriguez and Jenkins (and Gonzalez) aren't far away and there's not room for all those guys on the outfield corners. I'm not sure what will happen, but it should be interesting.

     

    19 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    Wallner has been the subject of rough takes on this site for a while now. It's not a "make or break" year for a guy who has a career batting line of wRC+ 131 and had a bad year last year but was still wRC+ 114. He's made it. 

    If he declines, he declines, but pretty much every single team in baseball would want him in the lineup.

    Then trade him for something the Twins need (which is too lengthy to list).

    12 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    You want to talk batting average? How about we take it up a notch and use SLG? His SLG was .452. 

    Every. Single. Team. Every single team in baseball would want Matt Wallner over one of their corner outfield or DH options right now. They may not be frantically coming up with trade offers, but every team would prefer Wallner at least by a small margin over what they have.

    Dodgers? Yep. They'd happily trade Teoscar to get Wallner.
    Yankees? Yep. They'd gladly trade Stanton and eat salary to get Wallner.
    Mets? Yep. All day the RF starter.
    Red Sox? Absolutely over Yoshida.

    Even straight up contract neutral at least 20 teams would start Wallner over another player on their roster.

    Hahaha sure, sure, the Dodgers are one Matt Wallner away from competing lol and they'd gladly dump their one of their World Series heroes for a guy whose value to date is derived by hitting solo home runs in 6-1 losses when the team is out of the race by June.  Brilliant.  

    Why aren't any of these teams knocking down the Twins' door trying to get him then?  

    Again, Wallner last year was barely replacement level.  I appreciate that you like him, but just because you say dramatic things like "Every. Single. Team" doesn't make them true.  

     

    Seems like 'more of the same' is a recurring theme not just with Wallner but several young Twins' hitters and in the case of players like Julien and Miranda, you get worse than that. Payroll issues are what they are but a team like the Twins can't compete when player development is lacking as much as it has been over the last several years.

    12 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    You want to talk batting average? How about we take it up a notch and use SLG? His SLG was .452. 

    Every. Single. Team. Every single team in baseball would want Matt Wallner over one of their corner outfield or DH options right now. They may not be frantically coming up with trade offers, but every team would prefer Wallner at least by a small margin over what they have.

    Dodgers? Yep. They'd happily trade Teoscar to get Wallner.
    Yankees? Yep. They'd gladly trade Stanton and eat salary to get Wallner.
    Mets? Yep. All day the RF starter.
    Red Sox? Absolutely over Yoshida.

    Even straight up contract neutral at least 20 teams would start Wallner over another player on their roster.

    Bean,

    This is an interesting post. 

    And I'm curious as to what you're basing these trade scenarios on...

    The Dodgers would trade Hernandez for Wallner? Why? 

    The Yankees have been trying to dump Stanton for the last 3+ years so that isn't necessarily an endorsement of Wallner as much an indictment on Stanton.

    The Mets and Red Sox might have the two worst RF situations in baseball, so again, I'm not finding that to be a glowing endorsement of Wallner.

     

    1 hour ago, stringer bell said:

    Matt Wallner had a bad year last year and a satisfactory OPS number can't hide that. The cause of his bad year might be an early injury or it might be something else, but producing 40 RBI is historic and not in a good sense.

    Can he come back this year and be a force in the lineup? I think so, mostly because of hard hard he hits the ball and that he isn't prone to hitting a lot of ground balls. 

    Much has been written here and in other threads about his defense. I just checked BBRef again and in '23 and '24 he was essentially neutral as a defender, actually slightly above. I don't know what happened in 2025, but the numbers were much worse. I also know that his sprint speed went from slightly above average to bottom third in MLB. Wallner turned 28 in the off-season so he's not slowing because of age. Could it be injury? If so, maybe he comes back this year and is a far better defender. TBH, I thought Wallner looked indecisive and slow in the outfield last year. There's a lot to improve on and I think he has the tools to be far better in the field. Michael Taylor Jr. would earn his pay if he helped The Moose to be an above average defender. It goes without saying that Wallner is more valuable if he is a competent outfielder to go with his hitting profile.

    This is a crucial year for Wallner. Rodriguez and Jenkins (and Gonzalez) aren't far away and there's not room for all those guys on the outfield corners. I'm not sure what will happen, but it should be interesting.

     

    Great post, Stringer. Spot on.

    1 hour ago, Riverbrian said:

    The future will require at least 200 million in payroll just to fill the multiple open spaces left behind by that development failure. 

     

    The thing is, $200 million is not a ridiculous payroll. In a few years, that will be the median payroll and the Twins, when trying to be competitive should be sitting around that median. And occasionally, when wanting to actually contend for a title, going up to the 10th highest payroll. 

    In an alternate reality, where the Twins made good decisions after the 2023 season, they are sitting with about a $230 million this season. Maybe that means Sonny Gray is here with Pete Alonso, Duran, Jax, and Carlos Correa are still around, and maybe someone like Harrison Bader still around. I still don't know if that is a very good team, but it's probably good enough to win the AL Central. 

    Anyways, my point is, fans need to EXPECT a $200 Million payroll, not fear it. Not in a year like this, when there's no effort to compete, instead resetting the roster and seeing what sticks, but on a typical year in which they hope to win the AL Central. 

    38 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    The thing is, $200 million is not a ridiculous payroll. In a few years, that will be the median payroll and the Twins, when trying to be competitive should be sitting around that median. And occasionally, when wanting to actually contend for a title, going up to the 10th highest payroll. 

    In an alternate reality, where the Twins made good decisions after the 2023 season, they are sitting with about a $230 million this season. Maybe that means Sonny Gray is here with Pete Alonso, Duran, Jax, and Carlos Correa are still around, and maybe someone like Harrison Bader still around. I still don't know if that is a very good team, but it's probably good enough to win the AL Central. 

    Anyways, my point is, fans need to EXPECT a $200 Million payroll, not fear it. Not in a year like this, when there's no effort to compete, instead resetting the roster and seeing what sticks, but on a typical year in which they hope to win the AL Central. 

    Expecting the Twins to have a 50% increase in payroll in 3 seasons seems unrealistic. While I have zero interest in protecting the Pohlad bank accounts, the issue for the Twins ain't getting to $200M in payroll, it's going up to $150-160M and then ratcheting back to $100M because you're so terrible at business that you somehow managed to claim tens of millions in annual losses. $200M was a top 10 payroll in 2025.

    That made the Correa, Lopez, and Buxton contracts feel unsustainable, when in fact they're market rate for Correa and well below market rate for the others.

    Hells bells, if we'd just managed to make $150M for this season we'd have been in good position to go for a quick turnaround, adding some real thump to the lineup and some proven bullpen options on top of what they did with Bell & Caratini.

    But we have terrible ownership, not just because they're cheap, but because they've been utterly terrible at the business of baseball over the past decade, minimum.

    Anyways. Wallner. Seems like a good dude, and I think he can bounce back and have a quality season slugging for the Twins where he seems like a very reasonable and impactful clean-up hitter. Would like him to move to DH more, especially if he still looks slow and clumsy in the OF like he did last season, which was notably worse than in 2023 or 2024.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...