Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Image courtesy of © Geoff Burke-Imagn Images

For the past five years, Torii Hunter has hovered around the edges of the Hall of Fame conversation, without gaining the traction needed for a serious push. His candidacy has lived in that tricky gray area where voters clearly respect his career, but hesitate to elevate him into Cooperstown territory. That uncertainty is common with players whose value extends beyond the numbers, and Hunter’s résumé has long walked that line.

But the current voting cycle may finally give him the opening he needs. With a historically thin ballot for 2026, voters may begin reassessing holdover candidates, especially those whose contributions to the sport transcend simple statistical comparison. Hunter fits that mold better than almost anyone still on the ballot, and the timing has never been more favorable.

Reviewing the 2026 Ballot
The 2026 ballot is shaping up to be one of the weakest in recent memory. According to Jay Jaffe, this will be the first time since 2008 that six or fewer candidates on the ballot carry a JAWS score of at least 50.

JAWS is an acronym for the Jaffe Wins Above Replacement Score, a system created to evaluate a baseball player's worthiness for induction into the National Baseball Hall of Fame. It compares a candidate's statistics to the average Hall of Famer at their position by averaging their career WAR (Wins Above Replacement) with the total WAR from their best seven seasons (peak WAR). The goal is to identify players who are at least as good as the average Hall of Famer, using a metric that balances career value with peak performance. It is rare for a ballot to lack clear-cut newcomers, and that scarcity could shift attention toward long-term holdovers like Hunter.

None of the first-time players is projected to gain significant traction. The 12 newcomers include Ryan Braun, Shin-Soo Choo, Edwin Encarnacion, Gio Gonzalez, Alex Gordon, Cole Hamels, Matt Kemp, Howie Kendrick, Nick Markakis, Daniel Murphy, Hunter Pence, and Rick Porcello. While many of those names bring strong careers and memorable moments, they fall short of the typical Hall of Fame profile.

Hamels is the most compelling. He finished his 15-year career with a 3.43 ERA, a 123 ERA+, and 2,560 strikeouts. He owns a World Series MVP trophy and had several ace-level seasons, but analysts remain split on whether that résumé will launch him toward the Hall.

Among position players, Braun is the headliner, based strictly on production. He won Rookie of the Year and an MVP, made six All-Star teams, and hit 352 home runs with six 30-homer seasons. He even posted back-to-back 30/30 campaigns in 2011 and 2012. However, multiple suspensions for performance-enhancing drugs complicate (and likely sink) his candidacy.

With no overpowering newcomers and few returning candidates separating themselves in recent years, the subsequent two cycles could create space for overlooked players to climb. That includes Hunter.

Hunter’s Hall of Fame History
Hunter debuted on the Hall of Fame ballot in 2021 and has remained on the edge of survival ever since. Candidates must receive at least five percent of the vote to stay on the ballot, and Hunter has flirted dangerously with that cutoff multiple times. His results so far:

  • 2021 BBWAA: 9.5 percent
  • 2022 BBWAA: 5.3 percent
  • 2023 BBWAA: 6.9 percent
  • 2024 BBWAA: 7.3 percent
  • 2025 BBWAA: 5.1 percent

He has never received double-digit support, and recent slippage might concern some Twins fans. Yet hovering between five and ten percent can also signal that a player has a loyal block of voters and could expand their support under the right ballot conditions.

The Case For Hunter
Hunter’s defining skill was his game-changing defense. Nicknamed “Spider-Man” for his leaping robberies at the wall, he collected nine Gold Gloves over a 10-year stretch. Few outfielders of his era controlled center field as completely as Hunter did, and his highlight-reel plays remain essential vignettes of early 2000s baseball. Only seven players in MLB history have hit 350 or more home runs while also winning at least nine Gold Gloves, an exclusive group that underscores his rare two-way impact.

His offensive résumé, while not elite by Hall standards, is undeniably strong. Hunter finished with 353 home runs, 498 doubles, over 2,400 hits, and 195 stolen bases. He earned two Silver Sluggers and became a five-time All-Star. Hunter blended power, speed, and creativity in a way that made him a constant threat and a difficult matchup for pitchers.

Beyond the numbers, Hunter’s leadership and personality left a lasting mark everywhere he played. From Minnesota to Anaheim to Detroit, he was viewed as a franchise culture setter, an ambassador for the sport, and a respected veteran who influenced winning clubs. Voters who prioritize intangibles often keep players like Hunter in the conversation longer than the metrics alone suggest.

The Case Against Hunter
Hunter’s overall offensive profile falls short of Cooperstown norms. His career .277 average with a .331 on-base percentage and .461 slugging average places him comfortably above average, but not close to the offensive standard for Hall of Fame outfielders. His 110 career OPS+ means he was just 10% better than average over a long career.

Defensively, the numbers diverge sharply from the reputation. While Hunter’s early career metrics were exceptional, the second half of his career tells a different story. From 2006 through his retirement in 2015, advanced metrics rated him as a below-average defender, even after moving to right field. His total defensive rating lands at -7.9, a reminder that defensive value can erode quickly and dramatically in a player’s thirties.

His postseason record does little to bolster his candidacy. In 48 playoff games, Hunter hit .274/.340/.414 with four home runs, three of which came as a Twin. While those numbers are respectable, they lack signature October moments and include several defensive miscues that fans still remember. Voters often look for postseason excellence to elevate borderline candidates, and Hunter does not benefit from that boost.

One of the biggest challenges for Hunter is how voters interpret the two halves of his career. From 1997 through 2007, he was a premier center fielder with elite defensive value and above-average hitting. From 2008 through 2015, his bat improved while his glove declined, making him a good but no longer great two-way player. His placement at 35th among center fielders in JAWS, trailing players like Curtis Granderson, Bernie Williams, and Andrew McCutchen, creates another hurdle. All three names are widely viewed as excellent players but not Hall of Famers, which impacts how Hunter’s case is perceived.

The Path Ahead
The Hall of Fame ballot is always competitive, and Hunter still faces a steep climb. But with the 2026 ballot featuring few compelling options and the current cycle offering voters a chance to reevaluate candidates in the middle tier of support, the environment could be shifting in his favor. Ballots like these have historically helped overlooked players make incremental gains, sometimes setting the stage for long-term campaigns.


Do you believe Hunter deserves more support on the Hall of Fame ballot? How do you evaluate players with careers that blend elite peaks and uneven longevity? Leave a comment and start the discussion.


View full article

Posted

I think it's too late in the process for Hunter to gain any real momentum for election.  His time on the ballot is already half over and he hasn't gotten anywhere.  Last year was actually his lowest vote total he's received thus far.  The guys that have grown their way from low initial vote totals to eventual induction generally have shown yearly progress with their vote totals.  I think the lack of frontline candidates just guarantees that he'll survive for another year.  Beltran/Jones/Utley, on the other hand, have real shots at riding this effect to election - especially Beltran and Jones, who were within shouting distance of getting elected last year. 

Hunter will eventually be with a group of players (including Johan) that will be on some pretty strong Veterans/Eras/Old Timers/Whatevers Committe ballots created by the side effects of steroids era HOF voting trends.

Back when Mauer was a HOF candidate, I actually thought this would be the year he got elected for the same reasons listed above.  I thought he was a HOFer, but that his candidacy hinged on being viewed as a catcher from a national perspective as opposed to a C/1B.  His numbers played a lot better as a C than as a 1B.  I thought it would take some time for him to build enough support, and that the vacuum of slam dunk candidates this year would push him over the line.  But I was pleasantly surprised by the initial support he got.

Posted

Why would I care to see Torii Hunter in the Hall of Fame? 

The Twins already have a CF in the HOF that most other fans suggest wasn't really worthy in Kirby Puckett. Do Twins fans really want two? 

And however you feel about Kirby Puckett's Hall of Fame credentials - myself thinking he needs a lot of extra credit for his playoff heroics in order to justify his inclusion - Hunter's own resume is nowhere near Kirbys. 

I'll instead be hoping Jones and Beltran get voted in. 

 

Posted
21 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

I'll instead be hoping Jones and Beltran get voted in. 

Exactly. Torii isn't the best or even the second-best CF available on the ballot. He's not one of the 10 best players on the ballot. They passed over Jim Edmonds and Kenny Lofton who are both better candidates than Torii Hunter.

Posted

I think the main thing this year's weak ballot does for Hunter is help keep him on the ballot another year or two. Hunter's a good example of a guy who got a few first-year votes from people willing to give him another year on the ballot, which they often do to get a handle on how other voters view the player.

Given that he maxed out at 9.5 percent on his first ballot and has been below that the next four years (when viable candidates always go the opposite direction), there's a great likelihood he would have fallen off if he had more competition than Shin Soo Choo and Howie Kendrick.

I'll predict 7 percent this year, followed by less than 5 percent next year, although next year's newcomers may be even weaker and the ballot may have also lost Beltran and Jones. I think Utley is the guy who is most going to benefit by these two weaker classes. 

Posted

I don't think re-examination of Hunter's case for the Hall gets him any closer to induction. It's a really long road to go from where he sits to the 75% needed for induction, and he'd need a really substantial jump right now to build enough momentum to get anywhere close.

Beyond that, as much as I loved Torii as a player for the Twins, he's the classic example of the Hall of Very Good. He was never really bad (probably just played too much the last two seasons) once he got established in MLB, but he also wasn't consistently great. he got 4 all-star nods which was quite frankly...very fair. It's hard to say he deserved more of them just maybe that he got the nods in some years he maybe shouldn't have and was passed over in some years where he was deserving. It even out. He never had the big MVP season; the one time he finished in the top 10 for AL MVP he easily had the worst season of anyone in the top 10 voting (it probably should have gone to A-Rod that year but Texas stunk). It's hard to say he was overlooked in MVP voting. He's remembered for his defense, but his defense had slipped long before he stopped getting Gold Gloves.

A very good player, who was very good for a really long time. But not better than Lofton or Edmonds (who were contemporaries), or Andruw Jones (another contemporary) who had a much higher peak. You have to rate Hunter's late career consistency pretty high (and it is impressive how he stayed a very good player well into his 30's) to push him up.

Loved watching him play (although the yahoo hero-ball play he tried and failed to make against the A's in the Dome still drives me crazy all these years later), and he's a Twins Hall of Famer for sure. But not MLB Hall of Famer.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

Torri just does not have that HOF feel.  If the hall wants to keep the standard high, I doubt he gets in, but weird things happen like Harold Baines getting into the hall in 2019 so one never knows.

The standards haven't been super high since they elected Herb Pennock in 1948.

I expect Cole Hamels to get overlooked this year even though he was a MUCH, MUCH better pitcher than Billy Wagner who was elected last season. The Hall of Fame has done a terrible job inducting pitchers for the past 25 years as they pass over starters to induct relievers of much lower talent.

Posted

Torii was an above average player, and beloved by many Twins fans, but I just don't see him as a Hall of Fame player. Plenty of other players, such as Lofton, are more deserving. 

Posted

Hunter wouldn't get my nod for HoF
2yrs 5.0+ WAR
4yrs 4.0+ WAR
12yrs 3.0+ WAR

Basically, he was a very good player (borderline All Star) consistently for a very long time. He had a couple peak years where he was lock for All Star caliber, but nothing really above that IMHO.

Posted

I wouldn't be surprised if he gets a boost to 15-20% this year, but I don't think that his career stats quite merit a hall of Fame election. I think he stays on the ballot all 10 years, but ends up falling short by about 10-15 percent.

Posted

Torii might hit double digits this year just because it's a weak ballot and likely only one player gets 75%.  Torii was a great MN Twin, but not a hall of famer.  This year will likely be his best year (maybe 10%) on the ballot and after this year, I doubt he maintains the 5% necessary to remain on the ballot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...