Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Phil Hughes- Is this a Written or Unwritten Rule?

jokin

By jokin
in Minnesota Twins Talk

Recommended Posts

jokin Wichita Wind Surge

jokin

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

A beat writer isn't likely to have just made this up out of whole cloth, but could it possibly be allowable for a major league pitcher to start in the deciding game of a Class A playoff series?

 

 

Mike Berardino ‏@MikeBerardino  17h17 hours ago
Mike Berardino retweeted Jeff Johnson
Making a Monday rehab start for Phil Hughes a little more possible. Second round is best-of-3 too, so no guarantees.

 

Mike Berardino added,
Jeff Johnson @jeje66
Final: Cedar Rapids 3, Quad Cities 1. Kernels win series, 2-0, will play Peoria for Western Division championship Game 1 Sat. at Peoria.

 

 

jokin Wichita Wind Surge

jokin

Old-Timey Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

It's all moot for now.  Hughes will supplant Pelfrey on Tuesday:

 

"Both Class A Cedar Rapids and Double-A Chattanooga could have playoff games on Monday, but (nei)their of those would be guaranteed until Sunday afternoon at the earliest. As a result, the Twins opted to bring Hughes directly back to their rotation after he threw an additional 15 pitches in the bullpen on Wednesday."

 

 

jokin Wichita Wind Surge

jokin

Old-Timey Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Clay Buchholz started a game for AAA Pawtucket in the playoffs in 2013:

http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?t=g_box&sid=milb&gid=2013_09_05_pawaaa_rocaaa_1

 

I'm not sure of the rules or if a major leaguer ever made a single A Playoff start - just had heard of this

 

Thanks Arky.  I was pretty sure it had happened before at some higher MiLB level... and is a part of MLB written rules.  

Not sure how well that would play around a Low A league though- for a top-line pitcher to be starting in the clinching game of a playoff round... unwritten rules and all.

nicksaviking MVP

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted

Just read the article, and it didn't sound like Pelfrey is getting supplanted...

 

 

 

 

For all those people who wanted a 6-man rotation earlier this year, well, here you go.

Hmmm, I'm guessing those folks had a couple other names in mind.

DaveW All-Star

DaveW

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

 

Just read the article, and it didn't sound like Pelfrey is getting supplanted...

 

 

 

For all those people who wanted a 6-man rotation earlier this year, well, here you go.

Not the worst thing in the world, can potentially keep some of the younger guys fresh. I'd prefer that Santana at this point stays on the traditional 5 day schedule though....

jokin Wichita Wind Surge

jokin

Old-Timey Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Just read the article, and it didn't sound like Pelfrey is getting supplanted...

 

 

 

For all those people who wanted a 6-man rotation earlier this year, well, here you go.

 

Yeah, the rotation situation seems a bit fluid, but in point of fact, Pelfrey is being supplanted for one game- bumped from the Tuesday start and isn't scheduled to start again until Saturday and here's the actual headline from the article in question:

 

Twinsights: Phil Hughes to start Tuesday, Mike Pelfrey on ice

 

So... I guess the starting situation has turned a little chilly, too.   And based on the unclear nature of the  clubhouse uncertainty on this matter of the 6-man rotation according to the author, a little foggy, too.

jokin Wichita Wind Surge

jokin

Old-Timey Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Not the worst thing in the world, can potentially keep some of the younger guys fresh. I'd prefer that Santana at this point stays on the traditional 5 day schedule though....

 

The history of success for 6-man rotations isn't too extensive, the latest attempted failure being the Mets.  After defending the 6-man experiment for the first couple months and dealing with the managerial angsting, the internal pissing and moaning and the external second-guessing, here's what Terry Colllins had to say about the 6-man: 

 

 

 

 “I’ve pretty much had my fill of this 6-man rotation stuff. I may go to a two man — it’s been a pain in the (butt),” Collins said. “(pitching coach) Dan Warthen and (GM) John Ricco and I just met, Dan I met earlier today, Dan and I met last night.

“I like Dan a lot, but I am tired of sitting with him.”

 

 

Funny stufff by Collins, I think I could be persuaded to pull for the Mets in the NL in the postseason.

 

Meanwhile, back to the Twins, this sounds more like a game of 5-seated musical chairs... the music is bound to stop for someone.  Hughes, Duffey, and especially Pelfrey, are all major question marks as to their level of effectiveness going into the stretch run.

 

I like your thinking about Santana, though.  The Twins talk about resting young and tired arms, but Santana doesn't need any rest, skip another Duffey/Pelfrey turn if either is ineffective. Under the current 6-man set-up, Santana would pitch in Game 162 to close out the season.vs. Kansas City  I'd rather he get one extra start before then, thus setting him up for throwing in Game 159 on October 1 vs. Cleveland, and setting him up for a possible Game 163 one-game playoff start, or helping to clinch the wild card in a relief role on short rest in game 162, on October 4 vs.  the aforementioned Royals.

Brock Beauchamp GOAT

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
Posted
Posted

Not the worst thing in the world, can potentially keep some of the younger guys fresh. I'd prefer that Santana at this point stays on the traditional 5 day schedule though....

Yep. I think it's a pretty good idea. at this point in the season, most guys are feeling some kind of pain. Given the overall equity of all the pitchers in the rotation, swapping out guys who are wearing down isn't going to have much of an impact.
Otto von Ballpark All-Star

Otto von Ballpark

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

I know Berardino reported earlier that Santana would be ineligible for any game 163 tiebreakers too. Did that get corrected? I think it makes sense -- MLB doesn't want to confer an advantage to any suspended player over another suspended player, in terms of availability beyond the scheduled 162 game season, based on the timing of their suspension.

Brock Beauchamp GOAT

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
Posted
Posted

I know Berardino reported earlier that Santana would be ineligible for any game 163 tiebreakers too. Did that get corrected? I think it makes sense -- MLB doesn't want to confer an advantage to any suspended player, in terms of availability beyond the scheduled 162 game season, based on the timing of their suspension.

Still up in the air AFAIK but personally, I'm convinced Berardino is wrong. I can't find any mention of that policy in the MLB rule book.
DJL44 St Paul Saints

DJL44

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

Glad they've decided they don't want Pelfrey pitching in the playoffs. That would mean playoff rotation of Milone for the WC game, then Gibson, Duffey and Hughes if everyone keeps taking their regular turn. I think I'd try to use the off day to give the WC game to Gibson.

jokin Wichita Wind Surge

jokin

Old-Timey Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

I know Berardino reported earlier that Santana would be ineligible for any game 163 tiebreakers too. Did that get corrected? I think it makes sense -- MLB doesn't want to confer an advantage to any suspended player over another suspended player, in terms of availability beyond the scheduled 162 game season, based on the timing of their suspension.

 

Still up in the air AFAIK but personally, I'm convinced Berardino is wrong. I can't find any mention of that policy in the MLB rule book.

 

Corrected by Berardino via Twitter:

 

 

JB
‏
@MikeBerardino could Ervin Santana pitch in a game 163? Or is that considered postseason?

 

 

Mike Berardino ‏@MikeBerardino  10m10 minutes ago
Mike Berardino retweeted JB
He could pitch a 1-game tiebreaker on that Monday. He could not not pitch in WC game or beyond. Mike Berardino added,

 

 

stringer bell Cooperstown

stringer bell

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

Corrected by Berardino via Twitter:

 

 

JB
‏
@MikeBerardino could Ervin Santana pitch in a game 163? Or is that considered postseason?

 

 

Mike Berardino ‏@MikeBerardino  10m10 minutes ago
Mike Berardino retweeted JB
He could pitch a 1-game tiebreaker on that Monday. He could not not pitch in WC game or beyond. Mike Berardino added,

Makes sense. A Game 163 would be a regular season game. IIRC, expanded rosters are available for such a game. It just wouldn't figure that a guy who has served his suspension would be excluded from a Game 163.

jokin Wichita Wind Surge

jokin

Old-Timey Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Makes sense. A Game 163 would be a regular season game. IIRC, expanded rosters are available for such a game. It just wouldn't figure that a guy who has served his suspension would be excluded from a Game 163.

 

Berardino has been known to be wrong before.  Partly a function in that he is a prolific shoot from the hip tweeter.  At least he made the correction when proven to be wrong.

mnfireman Ft Myers Mighty Mussels

mnfireman

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

IF all 6 guys can pitch effectively down the stretch, Molitor should try to get them set up for the post-season. That and get his starting line-ups set and working together. Gotta love it, a "rookie" manager thrown right into the thick of a play-off race, with a rookie pitching coach. Hope they can pull it off and get the team there.

Brock Beauchamp GOAT

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
Posted
Posted

 

Berardino has been known to be wrong before.  Partly a function in that he is a prolific shoot from the hip tweeter.  At least he made the correction when proven to be wrong.

It was an easy mistake to make. The game 163 stipulation exists but only for players under a 162 game suspension, which makes sense. A player can't be suspended for an entire season and then get to appear for a single game playoff.

Seth Stohs GOAT

Seth Stohs

Site Manager
Posted
Posted

I remember Eric Milton once started a playoff game for Ft. Myers, probably 12 years ago or so. I believe he gave up one run in 4 innings and took a loss. I am not going to go back and look, but I think they lost 1-0. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    20,440
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    Sublime33
    Newest Member
    Sublime33
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...