Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Finding a Jewel in the Ruins


Twins Video

I have speculated that if the Twins acquire a starting pitcher, he won’t clearly be seen as a top 50 or 60 starter. I would think the guy will be either unproven, an injury risk or coming off a disappointing or unproductive season. Further, I think most teams are placing a high price on pitching, particularly guys under team control.

Teams that have no real hope of contending should be a little more willing to part with starters under team control because by the time they expect to contend, guys in the majors will have moved on. In addition, bad teams might have pitchers whose stats look worse because they are playing for a bad team. Maybe a bad bullpen allowing lots of inherited runners to score, perhaps bad defense behind him or instances where the manager had no choice but to let a team put up crooked numbers because there was nobody available in the bullpen.

There were four 100-loss teams in 2023. Two of them were in the AL Central and thus would be unlikely to deal with the Twins. The other two teams are Oakland and Colorado. In exploring the pitching staffs for those two teams, my first thought was ugh!, there just isn't anything there. However, in looking a little deeper, I found one guy from each staff to consider. From Colorado, Austin Gomber was 29 last year and pitched 139 innings, he is a lefty, something I think the Twins would like to have in their rotation. In looking at Gomber's home-road splits, he compiled a 3.68 ERA on the road, away from Coors Field. I don't know anything about his injury history, but acquiring the road Austin Gomber for prospects might be something to consider. It appears that Coors messes with a lot of pitchers' heads and adjustments made in the high altitude diminish effectiveness when the pitcher is at a normal altitude. 

From Oakland, I nominate JP Sears. Similar to Gomber, he is a lefty in his late 20s. He worked over 170 innings last year and while his numbers weren't good overall, he seems to have worn down over the course of the year and perhaps the wearing down was exacerbated by being on a terrible team. His first half ERA was 3.97 with a 1.044 WHIP. and over 8 Ks per nine innings pitched. The walks and hits soared in the second half, so I will speculate he did wear out. He's not a big guy--5'11"180 lbs.--and this was his first full year of the major leagues. Also, I have to suspect that his manager was forced to work him longer in games because of the rest of the pitching staff being pretty awful. The coming season might allow Sears to handle additional work better and the Twins probably would be better suited to conserve his innings pitched. 

I know very little about either pitcher mentioned other than a quick look at BBRef. For all I know, either or both could already be scheduled for major surgery, but I do think looking for an undervalued asset on a bad team is one way to get value. 

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

tony&rodney

Posted

Both pitchers are decent depth pitchers but not worth putting in the rotation in front of #4 Varland and #5 Paddack. Not a bad thought but they are more needed where they are now.

Karbo

Posted

If they can't get another starter via trade then IMO they will need to get help for the pen. I'm not talking a reclamation project but 1 or 2 decent arms.

arby58

Posted

16 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

Both pitchers are decent depth pitchers but not worth putting in the rotation in front of #4 Varland and #5 Paddack. Not a bad thought but they are more needed where they are now.

IF they get a pitcher who can eat innings (you'd certainly like 170 as Sears provided) and be reasonably effective, they might consider moving either Varland or Paddock to the BP, where they both have the stuff that can make them an effective high leverage pitcher.

specialiststeve

Posted

16 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

Both pitchers are decent depth pitchers but not worth putting in the rotation in front of #4 Varland and #5 Paddack. Not a bad thought but they are more needed where they are now.

Paddock should be the 4 but Varland with his dominance in the Bullpen should stay in the bullpen. His stuff plays WAY better there. As a starter he was ... well not great... actually to be real.. he was really not good as a starter. .

We have some options in our minors for the 5th spot... if not a spring training trade to shore that up would make sense. Sears or Gomber would meet that need and would be inexpensive. 

Rosterman

Posted

Both would be inexpensive, and maybe the Twins could dangle, say, Nick Gordon? Balazovic? Sands? Someone with still some upside for the other team, a cheap contract, but out of options for the Twins.

stringer bell

Posted

1 hour ago, Rosterman said:

Both would be inexpensive, and maybe the Twins could dangle, say, Nick Gordon? Balazovic? Sands? Someone with still some upside for the other team, a cheap contract, but out of options for the Twins.

I don’t think they’d be that inexpensive. Maybe Kala’i Rosario or Schobel. 

stringer bell

Posted

2 hours ago, Old fox said:

I don’t want to give-up Schobel & Rosario this year. 

I wouldn’t want to go any higher on the prospect list than Rosario, Keaschall and Schobel and I wouldn’t want to part with pitching. I think Rosario is behind and below Rodriguez and Jenkins and the Twins have enough infield depth to trade a prospect infielder. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...