Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Offseason Primer: Who Needs a First Baseman Anyways?


    Tom Froemming
    Image courtesy of © Peter G. Aiken-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The Twins are still waiting for the official word from Joe Mauer on whether or not he’d like to continue his playing career, but anybody who saw the final game of 2018 knows the writing’s on the wall.

    And it’s in big, bold letters.

    Again, nothing’s been decided yet, but let’s just assume Mauer calls it a career. Then what? First base might be the one spot on the diamond in which teams can get the most creative. Just take a look at how a couple of the teams still alive in the postseason treated the position this year.

    The Twins Daily Offseason Handbook can be yours on this coming Tuesday if you preorder here for just $10.

    Not a lot of players who end up at first start their careers there. Mauer’s the perfect example of that himself. These days, it’s also becoming more and more common that teams use some kind of a timeshare at the position. There are a couple of good examples on teams still playing in October.

    Yuli Gurriel was the primary guy at first for Houston, making 99 starts there, but he also started 13 games at third base, another 11 at second and even made a start at shortstop. His flexibility helped the Astros cover for injuries to their other infielders and allowed slugger Tyler White to come up from the minors for regular time at first base.

    Cody Bellinger started 85 games at first base for the Dodgers, but he also made another 50 starts in center field, of all places. That allowed Los Angeles to find playing time for incredible diamond in the rough pickup Max Muncy and his .973 OPS. Muncy made 58 starts at first base.

    In Wednesday night’s NLCS game, the Dodgers used two different first basemen, neither of them Bellinger, and four different players at second base. That team has some pretty incredible flexibility.

    Keeping those two examples in mind, let’s take a look at how the Twins might fill the potential opening at first base.

    Taking a look back at 2018, the player with the most innings at first base behind Mauer was actually Logan Morrison. I guess it’s worth mentioning that the Twins do hold an $8 million option for LoMo with a $1 million buyout, but there are much better investments to be made.

    Tyler Austin was the only other player to see as many as 100 innings at first base for Minnesota last year. He showed impressive power, but he’s also struck out in 36.6 percent of his plate appearances in the majors. On the other hand, Austin has a .937 OPS against lefties, making him at the very least an attractive platoon partner. He played much more outfield than first over his minor league career, but Austin didn’t play a single inning out there in 2018.

    After Austin you’ve got Miguel Sano, who played 87 innings of first base this season. He’s certainly someone to keep in mind, but shifting him across the diamond just creates another hole at third base, which is already a weak spot in the org.

    With Jason Castro expected to return to health and Willians Astudillo establishing himself as a player of interest, there’s a chance the Twins could roll with three catchers next year. In that case, Mitch Garver could be a candidate for regular time at first base. He has some experience there.

    Max Kepler is a very strong defensive outfielder and hasn’t seen time at first since he played there regularly for Chattanooga back in 2015, but he’s a candidate. If Byron Buxton finds his footing and the Twins add another outfielder, Kepler could make a lot of sense as someone who forms a left-right platoon with Austin. Yes, Max did much better against same-sided pitchers last year, but his career splits still show a fairly significant split (.776 OPS vs. RHP, .605 OPS vs. LHP).

    Robbie Grossman’s never played an inning of infield in his entire pro career — majors or minors — but he does throw left handed. Considering how uninspiring his defense is in the outfield, maybe someone ought to buy him a first baseman’s mitt ...

    Down on the farm, Brent Rooker is the big name at the position. It wouldn’t be a shock to see him knocking down the door next season, though he’s certainly not a realistic option for Opening Day. Zander Wiel isn’t as big a name in prospect circles, but he actually had a higher OPS than Rooker last year. Both Rooker and Wiel played quite a bit of outfield, as well.

    If you really want to go outside the box, LaMonte Wade played a lot of first base in his early years at Maryland, but he’s only played outfield these past four years in the Twins org.

    So, as you can see, even if we focus solely on internal options there’s no shortage of options. Since first base is the bottom position on the defensive spectrum, in reality anybody could be thrown out there.

    This is the first time in a very long time that the Twins (appear to) have an opening at first base. Mauer took the reins from Justin Morneau, who succeeded Doug Mientkiewicz. That’s an impressive run of stability — three guys covering 18 seasons — but my suggestion is to end it here.

    Don’t get me wrong, offensive upgrades are needed, but the front office should simply be focused first on adding a bat. They have enough in-house options and players with defensive flexibility to figure out positioning.

    How should the Twins fill the (potential) first base opening? They shouldn’t feel the need to.

    Here’s a look back at what we’ve covered in these Offseason Primers so far:

    Offseason Primer: Corner Infield Free Agents

    Offseason Primer: Twins Need to Be Prepared to Pivot from Buxton and Sano

    Offseason Primer: Building a Badass Bullpen

    Offseason Primer: Twins Should Stick With Jorge Polanco at Shortstop

    Offseason Primer: Can Minnesota Mimic Milwaukee's Success?

    Offseason Primer: The Core Seven (?)

    If you like what you’ve been reading at the site so far, you’re going to LOVE the handbook. One of the key features included is a full organization depth analysis for not just first base, but every position on the diamond plus the pitching staff. Also included are profile on all the free agent options, a discussion regarding potential trade targets and much more.

    Click here for more on the handbook, a sneak peek at the cover and the list of special guest contributors.


    Want to play the role of Twins general manager? Check out our free-to-use "You're The GM" offseason tool and build your own Twins roster!

    Build Your 2027 Roster
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The only reason Kepler plays now is his OF defense his bat doesn't by itself and certainly doesn't play at 1B. No to Myers just another mediocre player we have plenty of them. Anyone thinking about Myers look at his contract coming up.

    Who is the best DEFENSIVE 1B in the organization? Or available via trade? Or available via free agency?

    I disagree with posters who seemingly dismiss the value of a strong defensive 1B. !B handles the ball more often than anyone aside from the pitcher and catcher. A good one digs hurried throws out of the dirt and makes it look easy. I hope Mauer returns for this reason.

    And don't move Sano from 3B. He is much better at 3B than anywhere else. He has a string arm, and has made some very nice plays there. 

    Personally, I hope Mauer comes back and plays at least half-time at 1B.

     

    Didn't we get a new stadium so we could afford a few high level talented players?  Maybe there is no one to get or no one that will come to MN.

     

    Well the free agent class is highlighted by Lucas Duda and Matt Adams. It's just not a strong position any longer. 

     

    I'd guess it's because with today's technology and training the best athletes are typically the best hitters, and the best athletes don't waste their defensive talents at 1B. I'd think the fact that 1B has become a bit of a stale position is very correlated to the fact that shortstop is no longer an offensive black hole.

    Who is the best DEFENSIVE 1B in the organization? Or available via trade? Or available via free agency?

    I disagree with posters who seemingly dismiss the value of a strong defensive 1B. !B handles the ball more often than anyone aside from the pitcher and catcher. A good one digs hurried throws out of the dirt and makes it look easy. I hope Mauer returns for this reason.

    And don't move Sano from 3B. He is much better at 3B than anywhere else. He has a string arm, and has made some very nice plays there.

    Personally, I hope Mauer comes back and plays at least half-time at 1B.

    People that watch every play, and every throw and dig, year after year, disagree with you. This isn't random posters....

    People that watch every play, and every throw and dig, year after year, disagree with you. This isn't random posters....

    This random poster likes watching Joe play first. TE size catch radius! His fellow infielders probably would agree. I like good defense in all sports nothing worse than those college football games where the last team with the ball wins. All that said this low A poster can't back that up with analytics

    People that watch every play, and every throw and dig, year after year, disagree with you. This isn't random posters....

    This random poster likes watching Joe play first. TE size catch radius! His fellow infielders probably would agree. I like good defense in all sports nothing worse than those college football games where the last team with the ball wins. All that said this low A poster can't back that up with analytics

    Because they don't exist. At least not readily or publicly.

    I echo Rosterman in that it makes a difference who you have in the IF in how good a first base glove you should have. Yes, it's a bat first position without a doubt. But in the existing possibility that someone in Twins management still thinks Polanco is a MLB SS, the glove part of the postion does grow somewhat. Hopefully everyone remembers Vargas' play at that corner, and how accepting everyone was of his leather shortcomings. And while his bat never did carry his glove, the comments on his defensive play will likely sound familiar come this summer. I am still trying to get the idea of Robbie Grossman at 1B out of my head. It's doubtful I will be able to sleep tonight, the thought is that disturbing! :(

     

    Who is the best DEFENSIVE 1B in the organization? Or available via trade? Or available via free agency?

    I disagree with posters who seemingly dismiss the value of a strong defensive 1B. !B handles the ball more often than anyone aside from the pitcher and catcher. A good one digs hurried throws out of the dirt and makes it look easy. I hope Mauer returns for this reason.

    And don't move Sano from 3B. He is much better at 3B than anywhere else. He has a string arm, and has made some very nice plays there. 

    Personally, I hope Mauer comes back and plays at least half-time at 1B.

    Gonna be honest here, when it comes to 1B, I really don't think defense should be much of a factor. The Twins badly needed somebody to power the offense from that spot and Morrison couldn't do it... plus with below-average bats like Buxton's and Kepler's in the lineup who are very good defensively, they could use a position to skimp on defense but pick up gains on offense.

     

    We haven't seen Sano much at 1B, how can we say for sure that he's "much better" at 3B? He grades below average according to most defensive metrics I've seen, so he'd have to be pretty terrible at every other position.

    Keps runs too well to waste his defensive OF skills on first base. Austin can play most of the games with Sano and others spelling him.  We need a solid new IF stud at middle infield somewhere and a solid RBI/Homer guy for DH.  Plus pitchers

    Keps runs too well to waste his defensive OF skills on first base. Austin can play most of the games with Sano and others spelling him.  We need a solid new IF stud at middle infield somewhere and a solid RBI/Homer guy for DH.  Plus pitchers

     

    I agree with you on Kepler, getting a new middle infielder, and adding more pitching, but in disagreement, I’d prefer that we move Sano to 1st, sign Nelson Cruz to DH, and then find a new 3rd basemen because I really don’t wanna see Austin starting on a regular basis at 1st unless someone gets hurt (likely Sano).

    What doesn't exist?

     

    Defense is calculated for first base. There just aren't that many opportunities to make plays others rarely do. The data is readily available.

    Data is available.

     

    "THE" data is open to interpretation. Some of us are pretty skeptical of publicly available defensive stats.

    Last season Joe Mauer had 20 scoops in 753 2/3 innings played at first base, per FanGraphs. That's basically one scoop per every four games he played there.

     

    Copy/pasted this over from the comments of the Polanco article I recently wrote. Sorry to those who already saw it, but I feel like it's worth mentioning again.

     

    Yes, you'd much rather have a good defensive player at first, but I'd certainly be willing to sacrifice on defense if it meant more offensive production. While first basemen are involved in a great number of plays throughout a game, the vast majority of them are routine.

    Last season Joe Mauer had 20 scoops in 753 2/3 innings played at first base, per FanGraphs. That's basically one scoop per every four games he played there.

     

    Copy/pasted this over from the comments of the Polanco article I recently wrote. Sorry to those who already saw it, but I feel like it's worth mentioning again.

     

    Yes, you'd much rather have a good defensive player at first, but I'd certainly be willing to sacrifice on defense if it meant more offensive production. While first basemen are involved in a great number of plays throughout a game, the vast majority of them are routine.

    I don't have any specific data to argue yours on the "scoops". But I wondered what a "scoop" is? Any ball in the dirt? And it just does not seem possible that the Twins IF only throw one ball every 4 games into the dirt? I am not saying the data is wrong, but that number seems extraordinary low.

     

    People that watch every play, and every throw and dig, year after year, disagree with you. This isn't random posters....

    Wait a minute.... really? "People disagree with you?"  Sorry, but that is something that I would challenge. 

    What people?  

     

    I don't have any specific data to argue yours on the "scoops". But I wondered what a "scoop" is? Any ball in the dirt? And it just does not seem possible that the Twins IF only throw one ball every 4 games into the dirt? I am not saying the data is wrong, but that number seems extraordinary low.

    Correct, it's any throw that hits the dirt prior to reaching the first baseman. I get what you're saying, I think if you were to ask me to predict how many balls Mauer dug out of the dirt last season I'd probably have guessed double what their number is. But that data comes from Baseball Info Solutions, who assign someone to track that kind of stuff for every MLB game.

     

    I have not been able to audit that information myself/didn't track scoops, so that's the best I've got to go off of. I'll be working on some defensive stuff for a future installment of the 2018 highlights series I've been running. I know I've got a bunch of Mauer scoops in those, I'm interested in tallying them up.

     

    After thinking about how few plays there are on the infield these days, however, that low frequency of scoops doesn't really surprise me all too much. I think on average there are only 10 or 11 ground balls hit per team per game and a couple of those are going to go for hits. That doesn't leave a whole lotta plays to be made in the first place.

    What doesn't exist?

     

    Data on bounced throws to first base. We just don't have that data (we the public) other than that "scoops" column, which doesn't tell us much. Absent the stat cast data, maybe a "scoops missed" column is the next step.

     

    Data on bounced throws to first base. We just don't have that data (we the public) other than that "scoops" column, which doesn't tell us much. Absent the stat cast data, maybe a "scoops missed" column is the next step.

    Scoop runs saved is what you're looking for, it's essentially successful scoop percentage. I don't believe that's available online, though I could be wrong. I think it's in the Fielding Bible, which is available in print each year. Scoop runs saved is a component of Defensive Runs Saved, which is available at FanGraphs.

     

    I'm not out to debate with anybody on whether or not Joe Mauer is a good defensive first baseman. He is. No doubt in my mind. And the metrics back that up, rating him a +3 in DRS last season, so above average. He didn't rank among the top guys in the league at the position, but a big part of that was because he only made 85 starts at first.

     

    My question is how much more valuable is a good defensive player at first base compared to one that may be slightly below average? I'm not sure what the exact answer would be, but there's certainly a point in where a guy can provide enough with the bat to make up for any defensive shortcomings.

    Scoop runs saved is what you're looking for, it's essentially successful scoop percentage. I don't believe that's available online, though I could be wrong. I think it's in the Fielding Bible, which is available in print each year. Scoop runs saved is a component of Defensive Runs Saved, which is available at FanGraphs.

     

    I'm not out to debate with anybody on whether or not Joe Mauer is a good defensive first baseman. He is. No doubt in my mind. And the metrics back that up, rating him a +3 in DRS last season, so above average. He didn't rank among the top guys in the league at the position, but a big part of that was because he only made 85 starts at first.

     

    My question is how much more valuable is a good defensive player at first base compared to one that may be slightly below average? I'm not sure what the exact answer would be, but there's certainly a point in where a guy can provide enough with the bat to make up for any defensive shortcomings.

    And I'm not arguing Mauer is irreplaceable at first base, or that a lot of offense at first base can't make up for subpar fielding there.

     

    My belief is that first base defense matters. As far as scoop data, I think it would be interesting to see the speed of throws, spin of bounce, distance from bag, that sort of thing, and then be able to compare similar throws with how other first baseman picked those, before having all that scoop data interpreted or rolled into another stat category.

     

    I think Mauer was one of the best, but maybe most good first baseman are pretty close. Don't know. I think moving Sano to first base is now under real consideration; he had throwing problems in the minors and to correct that I think he was instructed to throw low. And he throws hard. Mauer could pick his throws better than Morrison could.

     

    I think scooping throws is both an underappreciated skill but also something a first baseman is never charged an error for failing to do. :)

    They need a bat there. The team's failing this year was mostly on offense, a year prior to being one of the better offensive teams in baseball. I have no problems plugging Austin in and seeing if he can drop that K rate over time, but I think the team needs a big bopper. I'm on record saynig to get Nelson Cruz. I still would.

     

    I'd probably go out and get Escobar too, which between him, Garver, and Cave, could probably give Austin days off against tough righties. I'd still want another 2B and CF though.

    My belief is that first base defense matters.

    Defense matters at every position. I appreciate a slick play at 1B as well as the next fan.

     

    But there's a reason a lumbering DH-type is played at 1B - it's the best place to hide him. Guys like Kennys Vargas make scoops too. The differential between what Mauer can do on top of that is pretty small. And not every baserunner from a failed scoop turns into a run. And not every un-prevented run turns into a win.

     

    You need a whale of a lot of defense at 1B to even move the needle.

    Defense matters at every position. I appreciate a slick play at 1B as well as the next fan.

     

    But there's a reason a lumbering DH-type is played at 1B - it's the best place to hide him. Guys like Kennys Vargas make scoops too,. The differential between what Mauer can do on top of that is pretty small. And not every baserunner from a failed scoop turns into a run. And not every un-prevented run turns into a win.

     

    You need a whale of a lot of defense at 1B to even move the needle.

    maybe so, but it might be nice to have that granular data I was mentioning before we decide we can dismiss it. Otherwise it's just a hunch, as hunchy as my hunch or anyone else's :)

     

    This scoop thing came to light right away in April 2018 in Yankee Stadium when Morrison missed a not too difficult short hop throw by Sano in the 9th, which eventually led to the Yankees winning the game. That one helped move the needle the wrong direction.

     

    Keps runs too well to waste his defensive OF skills on first base. Austin can play most of the games with Sano and others spelling him.  We need a solid new IF stud at middle infield somewhere and a solid RBI/Homer guy for DH.  Plus pitchers

     

    I'd say that Target Field's small RF dimensions minimize the benefits of Kepler's speed. In fact, if a groundball pitcher like Gibson is on the mound, his added range covering the infield may be more beneficial than in RF.

     

    Correct, it's any throw that hits the dirt prior to reaching the first baseman. I get what you're saying, I think if you were to ask me to predict how many balls Mauer dug out of the dirt last season I'd probably have guessed double what their number is. But that data comes from Baseball Info Solutions, who assign someone to track that kind of stuff for every MLB game.

     

    I have not been able to audit that information myself/didn't track scoops, so that's the best I've got to go off of. I'll be working on some defensive stuff for a future installment of the 2018 highlights series I've been running. I know I've got a bunch of Mauer scoops in those, I'm interested in tallying them up.

     

    After thinking about how few plays there are on the infield these days, however, that low frequency of scoops doesn't really surprise me all too much. I think on average there are only 10 or 11 ground balls hit per team per game and a couple of those are going to go for hits. That doesn't leave a whole lotta plays to be made in the first place.

     

    seems like the "Scoop" definition could be a little narrow to answer the question asked. The quality of a first baseman's fielding play would be similar to that of a hockey goalie - how many thrown balls did the first baseman stop from getting past them? What was their "save percentage"? What is the WPA to the first baseman standing on their head? How many runs does save failures at first base cost you over a season?

     

    Frequently errors get attributed to the 3B/SS/2B, but what we want to know is how often does the first baseman stop things from getting out of hand.

     

    As Mike said, the data is out there, but the analysis is tricky.

     

    Scoops may be a solid leading indicator. Much like OPS is a leading indicator to contribution to runs created, Scoops might be a leading indicator to runs prevented. I wish I had time to dig in....

     

    I'd say that Target Field's small RF dimensions minimize the benefits of Kepler's speed. In fact, if a groundball pitcher like Gibson is on the mound, his added range covering the infield may be more beneficial than in RF.

     

    Yes but he filled in at center field too when Buxton was injured and he is a good defensive outfielder in general. He has long, athletic strides that would be wasted at first base. Stop the madness! :-) 

    I used to play ball with a first baseman I referred to as "The Refridgerator". Not only because he was the same size, but also the same mobility. If you hit him with a throw, he caught it. Off target by a couple feet? Not a chance. While no one in MLB is on that level, like everything else, it simply based on a sliding scale.

     

    Yes but he filled in at center field too when Buxton was injured and he is a good defensive outfielder in general. He has long, athletic strides that would be wasted at first base. Stop the madness! :-) 

    You're right, you certainly wouldn't want to go out of your way to put Max at first base, where his athleticism would be wasted to some degree, but here's a scenario in which I could see it making sense:

     

    Twins sign Andrew McCutchen and Nelson Cruz. Cruz plugs up the DH, Cutch takes over as the primary right fielder, forcing Max into a sort of super utility role between all three OF positions, 1B and DH. He's there as Buxton insurance, he's there as Austin insurance, he's there as injury insurance. I think even if everyone plays well and stays healthy you could still find Max plenty of reps in that role.

     

    It may seem like overkill, but this is basically what the Brewers did last offseason when they acquired two outfielders despite that not appearing to be a big area of need.

     

    The biggest problem the 2018 Twins had was injuries. Their next biggest problem was having insufficient depth to cover for those injuries. I think it would be ideal to aim for offensive overkill in an effort to be prepared for the worst.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...