Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Michael A. Taylor is the Insurance Policy Minnesota Needed


    The Minnesota Twins employ one of the best centerfielders in baseball, but unfortunately, he often isn’t able to field the position. Byron Buxton is one of the most prolific players in the sport, but his roster spot always has to be paired with a worthy backup. Enter Michael A. Taylor.

     

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    When the Minnesota Twins front office signed Byron Buxton to a team-friendly $100 million contract extension, it was able to take place only because he is so rarely available for an extended period of time. When he’s at his best, Buxton is both raking at the dish and providing web gems from the grass. His best, though, is often hampered by any number of maladies.

    Time and time again this has played out over the course of Buxton’s career. He has found his swing and is long-removed from the slap hitter that Paul Molitor once managed him as. While his bat plays, and that includes the gargantuan Miguel Sano-esque peaks and valleys, it has never translated into more consistent availability.

    The front office hasn’t ever truly had a backup plan for Buxton. His injuries have put players like Nick Gordon out of position. They have forced Ian Miller, Rob Refsnyder, Ryan LaMarre, Johnny Field, Taylor Motter, and a host of others into unnecessary action. Gilberto Celestino has emerged as an internal possibility capable of playing the backup role, but he wasn’t a sure thing this year. Instead, the Twins got aggressive.

    Dealing for the former Kansas City Royals Gold Glove winner, Michael A. Taylor, was acquired to provide an insurance policy Minnesota desperately needed.

    Taylor has hit well just once in his career, back in 2017 as a 26-year-old for the Washington Nationals. The peak of his offensive existence results in numbers just four percent better than the league average. Minnesota likely had hopes of capturing that, but they knew this was a player with a career OPS+ of just 81.

    Now fast forward to where we are at this point in the 2023 season, Buxton has remained healthy (for the most part) by being the full-time designated hitter. His inclusion there has hampered lineup flexibility extensively, but it’s been Taylor that has manned the most important position in the outfield. When Rocco Baldelli has had his best teams, they have been able to play strong defense. Not needing to rely on revolving doors in key spots, Taylor has quarterbacked a group of corner outfielders that have been in flux.

    At times, Taylor has also come through offensively. While he doesn’t have any true skillset of note at the plate, his speed still plays. He has stolen seven bases this season, and surprisingly he’s run into a few balls. Taylor’s six doubles put him on pace to surpass the ten he had a season ago, and his seven home runs to this point put the teens in play for just the third time in his career.

    Despite providing next to no offensive value, Taylor owns a 0.8 fWAR on the season. He should be able to surpass his 2022 value with Kansas City, and could challenge for a top-two fWAR over the course of his career. Taylor’s three outs above average put him on pace to surpass where he was a season ago, and while he isn’t the same elite defender he has been previously, he also isn’t far off.

    There is plenty to be disappointed in when it comes to how the Twins have utilized Buxton. Although he has been available, it’s clear he’s not healthy. He may get there eventually, but even in a limited capacity of action, it doesn’t seem like this blueprint is making that happen any faster. For as long as it remains a reality, Taylor is the answer.

    Minnesota will need to figure out plans going forward considering Taylor is a free agent following this season. He is making just $4.5 million in 2023, which seems like a bargain for someone so valuable defensively to a fit as necessary as Minnesota has. No matter what they do, it stands to reason that a continued insurance policy for Buxton is a must any time when filling out the 26-man collection.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    16 minutes ago, twins_89 said:

    Taylor would be great in the role as Buxton's backup in centerfield. Unfortunately, he has been and continues to be the starter, a role that is too big for him.

    I agree that he is really stretched as a starter on a good team (that needs offense!), but imagine where we would be without him.  I suppose we could trade for Jake Cave!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So we're using Taylors awful offensive career as the benchmark and celebrating any marginal projected uptick? What are we doing here? The guy has been the starting CF'er all year, and there's nothing to suggest that's going to change, i.e. he should be judged as such. He's sitting at a .683 OPS with a near career high in K% and career low in BB%, but hey if we feed him enough ABs he'll maybe surpass the ten (ten!) doubles he hit last year during another miserable offensive campaign. Oh and about those SBs, he's tied for 33rd in baseball with noted speed demons JT Realmuto and Freddie Freeman. I mean c'mon....

    At what point do articles like this and others currently on the front page just become trolling? Honestly. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, USAFChief said:

    There is no world in which MAT is an asset as your full time center fielder.

     

     

     

    If you have all stars at the other 8 lineup spots and only need really good defense in CF I think he's an asset as one of the best fielders in baseball. 😀

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    So we're using Taylors awful offensive career as the benchmark and celebrating any marginal projected uptick? What are we doing here? The guy has been the starting CF'er all year, and there's nothing to suggest that's going to change, i.e. he should be judged as such. He's sitting at a .683 OPS with a near career high in K% and career low in BB%, but hey if we feed him enough ABs he'll maybe surpass the ten (ten!) doubles he hit last year during another miserable offensive campaign. Oh and about those SBs, he's tied for 33rd in baseball with noted speed demons JT Realmuto and Freddie Freeman. I mean c'mon....

    At what point do articles like this and others currently on the front page just become trolling? Honestly. 

    Hey now, JT stole 21 bags last year. That was 14th most in all of baseball.

    And Freeman got 13, which was good for 34th in baseball.

    If you're in the top 15 in any category in the entire league you're doing something right. Top 35 is pretty solid, too. Don't hate on the big boys and their base stealing skills.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    If you have all stars at the other 8 lineup spots and only need really good defense in CF I think he's an asset as one of the best fielders in baseball. 😀

    I don't see one of the best defenders in baseball, but even if he is, he's not an asset.

    You don't become better because the guy standing next to you is really good.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, USAFChief said:

    I don't see one of the best defenders in baseball, but even if he is, he's not an asset.

    You don't become better because the guy standing next to you is really good.

    I was joking with the general idea, but it's been pretty widely accepted that he's been one of the best defenders in baseball for years. Being amongst the best in the league at anything is an asset in same way, shape, or form. Being one of the best defenders in baseball makes him a "useful or valuable thing, person, or quality." You don't have to be a 5 tool star to be an asset. He's certainly not the ideal starting CFer, but he's got some value.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Taylor has good value as a 4th outfielder/defensive sub and pinch runner.  Unfortunately the team is not using him in that role - he has played in the most games of any position player this year.    I'll say one thing for him unique to this team - he can stay healthy - well at least until we overexpose him and wear him out.        

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Minnesota Twins employ one of the best centerfielders in baseball, but unfortunately, he often isn’t able to field the position.

    And now, even when he is, he isn't given the chance. Where is he now? On the IL again and it is not due to playing centerfield. His last 3 IL stints had nothing to do with Buck playing defense but the powers that are in control are protecting him from injury. How's that working out? Is it insanity, stupidity or both? Face it, the guy is made of glass. A full bodycast of bubblewrap or medieval body armor are the only things that will keep him in the lineup AND on the field for a full season. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 hours ago, Ted Schwerzler said:

    his roster spot always has to be paired with a worthy backup. Enter Michael A. Taylor.

    ???

    Taylor has played in 54 games in CF.

    No player has played as many games at any position. Correa is 2nd with 51 games at SS. 

    Just out of curiosity When does he lose the "backup" designation? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    Hey now, JT stole 21 bags last year. That was 14th most in all of baseball.

    And Freeman got 13, which was good for 34th in baseball.

    If you're in the top 15 in any category in the entire league you're doing something right. Top 35 is pretty solid, too. Don't hate on the big boys and their base stealing skills.

    Of f****ing course he swipes two tonight...

    No offense to the big boys but on the whole I think we're reaching to justify Taylor's consistent presence in the starting lineup.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    To me, it begs the question where is the depth in the organization?  We seem to push out corner outfielders by the dozen, but if Celestino is in the equation as depth in center, we don't have much.  Why so may corners guys, and no one coming up in center?

    Actually, same could be said for 1st base and catcher.  How many of those has the organization produced recently?  

    We seem to be very deep at certain positions, having to move guys around to get them all in sometimes, but have nothing at other positions.  Lots of infielders (minus 1st base), and lots of corner outfielders.  Is it a priority for this FO, or just a coincidence?  I have wondered for awhile now.  🤔

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @Mark Git is a good question, I think it is a rare attribute to have both elite speed and a good hit tool (and the ability to run efficient routes). In the Twins organization Buxton, Castro, Gordon, Taylor and Lewis have elite speed. Of these only Lewis might have an above average hit tool. 
     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    Of f****ing course he swipes two tonight...

    No offense to the big boys but on the whole I think we're reaching to justify Taylor's consistent presence in the starting lineup.

    Yeah, I'm not suggesting Taylor is an answer to the CF problems here. Just that his SB numbers, and those of the 2 guys you mentioned, are awfully respectable. 

    Overall, the Twins lack CF options right now. I wouldn't mind seeing Castro there more, but his defense out there is quite questionable. He's learning it, and not a butcher, but at this point this team needs to win games 1-0, 2-1, or 3-2 most nights. I don't think Castro brings enough offense above what MAT does to justify the loss in defense in CF. I don't think MAT, or Castro, are answers to anything, but I also don't think they're the biggest questions we have. I'd replace Kepler before I replaced MAT. I'd stop pinch hitting for Kirilloff with Garlick just because Kirilloff is the first lefty to face a lefty (I'd DFA Garlick and never invite him back, actually). I'd drop Correa to the bottom of the order. I'd play Jeffers over Vazquez 65% of the time. I think those are all bigger answers to the Twins questions than MAT in CF.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Buxton getting a team friendly deal?  Come on 100 mil for an 8 year part time player isn't bad.  Buxton has been an overall bust.  Sure he has his streaks where he hits very well then longer streaks when he looks like a minor leaguer.  I think Buck negotiated a good deal for himself.  He's been a huge frustrating disappointment.  I wouldn't count on much help from h I m this year ( again)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, Whitey333 said:

    Buxton getting a team friendly deal?  Come on 100 mil for an 8 year part time player isn't bad.  Buxton has been an overall bust.  Sure he has his streaks where he hits very well then longer streaks when he looks like a minor leaguer.  I think Buck negotiated a good deal for himself.  He's been a huge frustrating disappointment.  I wouldn't count on much help from h I m this year ( again)

    Agreed.  He does have power; last year and so far this year he has hit 38 home runs combined, but they have resulted in 74 RBI's combined.  His low average and high strike out rate do not make up for the occasional solo home run.  His golf swing (sorry, "launch angle") he is married to will bring home runs when he truly squares up, but it doesn't allow him to square up often enough to be an overall effective hitter.  And someone should tell him that.  Preferably a coach or two, as he has stopped taking my calls.  😏

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    Yeah, I'm not suggesting Taylor is an answer to the CF problems here. Just that his SB numbers, and those of the 2 guys you mentioned, are awfully respectable. 

    Overall, the Twins lack CF options right now. I wouldn't mind seeing Castro there more, but his defense out there is quite questionable. He's learning it, and not a butcher, but at this point this team needs to win games 1-0, 2-1, or 3-2 most nights. I don't think Castro brings enough offense above what MAT does to justify the loss in defense in CF. I don't think MAT, or Castro, are answers to anything, but I also don't think they're the biggest questions we have. I'd replace Kepler before I replaced MAT. I'd stop pinch hitting for Kirilloff with Garlick just because Kirilloff is the first lefty to face a lefty (I'd DFA Garlick and never invite him back, actually). I'd drop Correa to the bottom of the order. I'd play Jeffers over Vazquez 65% of the time. I think those are all bigger answers to the Twins questions than MAT in CF.

    Yeah I get that, my point was just that Taylor swiping a few bags, especially on this team (and with his paltry offensive output) isn't enough of a silver lining to justify running him out there every day. 

    Agreed, the article was about Taylor so I'm really only commenting on him. I'm not a big Castro fan despite his recent tear, so yeah if that's my only option then Taylor ftw. I'd force Kepler into CF, and if he refuses he's DFA'd. He has little to no value in MN and there's no reason to run him out there hoping some contender is willing to give you anything for a late inning defensive replacement. 100% on Kirilloff too, I can't stand watching him be platooned. I don't understand it. Yes to Correa dropping. I'm fine with more Jeffers but that means he's going to see a lot more RHP so adjust expectations accordingly, but it can't be that much worse than Vazquez right now. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    Yeah I get that, my point was just that Taylor swiping a few bags, especially on this team (and with his paltry offensive output) isn't enough of a silver lining to justify running him out there every day. 

    Agreed, the article was about Taylor so I'm really only commenting on him. I'm not a big Castro fan despite his recent tear, so yeah if that's my only option then Taylor ftw. I'd force Kepler into CF, and if he refuses he's DFA'd. He has little to no value in MN and there's no reason to run him out there hoping some contender is willing to give you anything for a late inning defensive replacement. 100% on Kirilloff too, I can't stand watching him be platooned. I don't understand it. Yes to Correa dropping. I'm fine with more Jeffers but that means he's going to see a lot more RHP so adjust expectations accordingly, but it can't be that much worse than Vazquez right now. 

    I wouldn't ask Kepler about CF at all. I don't think he brings any value there either. He's a worse fielder, and no better hitter, than Taylor. I think they should DFA Kepler no matter what. The mindless platooning drives me nuts. It's to the point where I seriously think other managers/FOs sit in pre-series meetings and actively laugh at how easy it's going to be to manipulate the Twins lineup however they want. I can't imagine there's ever been a team in MLB history that pinch hits for the top 4 players in their lineup as frequently as the Twins. Makes me want to cry. As for Jeffers, I just think he's turned an actual corner, and he's a solid hitter. He was drafted for his bat, and made some legit changes to his swing, and approach, this offseason. His OPS vs lefties this year is .690 (35 PAs) while his OPS vs righties is .917 (72 PAs). I don't think he'll maintain a .917 OPS against righties, but I think he's significantly better in the box than Vazquez.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    8 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I wouldn't ask Kepler about CF at all. I don't think he brings any value there either. He's a worse fielder, and no better hitter, than Taylor. I think they should DFA Kepler no matter what. The mindless platooning drives me nuts. It's to the point where I seriously think other managers/FOs sit in pre-series meetings and actively laugh at how easy it's going to be to manipulate the Twins lineup however they want. I can't imagine there's ever been a team in MLB history that pinch hits for the top 4 players in their lineup as frequently as the Twins. Makes me want to cry. As for Jeffers, I just think he's turned an actual corner, and he's a solid hitter. He was drafted for his bat, and made some legit changes to his swing, and approach, this offseason. His OPS vs lefties this year is .690 (35 PAs) while his OPS vs righties is .917 (72 PAs). I don't think he'll maintain a .917 OPS against righties, but I think he's significantly better in the box than Vazquez.

    If they're each hitting strong side maybe you eek out some production, Idk, but I only suggested it because I have no faith this FO makes the necessary move and cuts bait. I'm not shedding any tears if Kepler just goes. Yep, some of these early game substitutions are infuriating. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He’s got more CF starts than any other Twin has games played regardless of position. The starter has zero. Batting a little better than his career norm…so, there’s that. It could have been worse.

    I’m just waiting for Rocco to DH him. You KNOW it’s coming. If you can DH a 35-year old Donovan Solano (5 times so far), you can DH Michael Taylor

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    12 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    I wouldn't ask Kepler about CF at all. I don't think he brings any value there either. He's a worse fielder, and no better hitter, than Taylor. I think they should DFA Kepler no matter what. The mindless platooning drives me nuts. It's to the point where I seriously think other managers/FOs sit in pre-series meetings and actively laugh at how easy it's going to be to manipulate the Twins lineup however they want. I can't imagine there's ever been a team in MLB history that pinch hits for the top 4 players in their lineup as frequently as the Twins. Makes me want to cry. As for Jeffers, I just think he's turned an actual corner, and he's a solid hitter. He was drafted for his bat, and made some legit changes to his swing, and approach, this offseason. His OPS vs lefties this year is .690 (35 PAs) while his OPS vs righties is .917 (72 PAs). I don't think he'll maintain a .917 OPS against righties, but I think he's significantly better in the box than Vazquez.

    I hate to stray too far from the article, but speaking of catchers do you know who would be considered the emergency 3rd catcher if one was ever needed?  I ask, because I have seen so many games this year where Rocco will pinch hit our back up catcher for someone else, leaving no catcher on the bench in case of an injury.  Crap, one game he put Jeffers in as a pinch RUNNER.  Do we have an option if the worst should happen and, let's say, Jeffers pinch hits and is now out of the game and Vazquez gets hurt?  I don't remember even Rocco using both catchers in a game as often as he does, much less any other manager.  If it hit the fan, do we have a plan C?  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Mark G said:

    I hate to stray too far from the article, but speaking of catchers do you know who would be considered the emergency 3rd catcher if one was ever needed?  I ask, because I have seen so many games this year where Rocco will pinch hit our back up catcher for someone else, leaving no catcher on the bench in case of an injury.  Crap, one game he put Jeffers in as a pinch RUNNER.  Do we have an option if the worst should happen and, let's say, Jeffers pinch hits and is now out of the game and Vazquez gets hurt?  I don't remember even Rocco using both catchers in a game as often as he does, much less any other manager.  If it hit the fan, do we have a plan C?  

    Farmer is the emergency catcher from what I heard when we acquired him ...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 hours ago, Mark G said:

    I hate to stray too far from the article, but speaking of catchers do you know who would be considered the emergency 3rd catcher if one was ever needed?  I ask, because I have seen so many games this year where Rocco will pinch hit our back up catcher for someone else, leaving no catcher on the bench in case of an injury.  Crap, one game he put Jeffers in as a pinch RUNNER.  Do we have an option if the worst should happen and, let's say, Jeffers pinch hits and is now out of the game and Vazquez gets hurt?  I don't remember even Rocco using both catchers in a game as often as he does, much less any other manager.  If it hit the fan, do we have a plan C?  

    @Blyleven2011 Is correct, Kyle Farmer is the emergency catcher. And he's an awfully good option considering he was drafted as a catcher, and came up through the Dodgers system as a catcher. He has only caught 19 games in the majors, but I'd guess that's about 19 more than anybody else's emergency catcher. He has 363 professional games behind the plate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...