Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    It's Time to Move Byron Buxton to a Corner Outfield Spot

    According to the metrics, Byron Buxton is still a serviceable center fielder. However, the Twins would be wise to begin converting him into a corner outfielder—a move that could greatly benefit the All-Star and the organization in the short-, mid-, and long-term future.

    Cody Schoenmann
    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    In 6,721 defensive innings over his 11-season major-league career, Byron Buxton has only ever played center field. The last time he played a position other than center in affiliated ball was in 2014, when he notched 14 innings in right field at High-A. This development shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone who follows the Twins—or baseball, for that matter. Buxton has long been a world-class athlete, with elite sprint speed and a feel for making late adjustments when needed.

    That athleticism resulted in him winning a Platinum Glove Award in 2017, when he was arguably the rangiest center fielder of the 2010s. Nine years later, however, the 32-year-old is no longer one of the sport’s best center fielders. That's no knock against Buxton; him still being one of the fastest players in baseball 11 seasons into his career is a remarkable feat. Despite maintaining that speed on the bases, though, Buxton has regressed in multiple defensive metrics over the past two seasons. He still makes all the routine plays, but he no longer takes away should-be hits.
     
    Of course, Buxton doesn’t have to be an elite defender to remain at center field. He's still playable there, with 3 Outs Above Average (OAA) over 193 attempts this season. Cracks are still forming beneath the surface, however. He’s remained elite at tracking balls hit in front of and behind him this season. However, his ability to reach balls on which he has to range far to his left or right has steadily regressed over the past couple of seasons, with 2026 as a low point.
     
    Moving toward third base, Buxton has generated 1 OAA. At the same time, he has manufactured 0 OAA moving toward first. His combined 1 OAA while moving laterally would be the lowest mark of his career (save his 2018 campaign, when he played only 28 games). Can you guess his second-worst season getting to balls hit laterally? Great job, valued reader! You’re correct. It was 2025. Buxton has steadily regressed in his ability to reach balls hit in the gap over the past two seasons, and at this point in his career, it's extremely likely that he'll continue to fade.
     
    Again, nobody is holding Buxton to the same standard as Pete Crow-Armstrong or Ceddanne Rafaela. Twins decision-makers would be more than justified in finishing the 2026 season with Buxton as the club’s primary center fielder; his regression doesn’t require immediate attention. Still, Minnesota would be wise to have a succession plan in place for 2027. Luckily, the organization’s top solution is knocking on the door of the majors in Triple-A: first-ranked prospect Walker Jenkins.
     
    I’m not advocating that Minnesota call up Jenkins right now. He's a 21-year-old enjoying his first extended success against Triple-A pitching. He is still a platoon liability against left-handed pitching, netting a .277 xwOBA over 80 plate appearances at Triple-A. He is undeniably at the parent club’s door, preparing to rush through, with intentions of immediately becoming one of Minnesota’s best position players. That time will come, but there’s a strong chance it won’t be until 2027. Whenever Jenkins does get his contract selected from Triple-A St. Paul, the Twins should make him their primary center fielder, moving Buxton to the corner outfield.
     
    Jenkins has played center field in most of his appearances at Triple-A, with 370 innings at the position. He's been solid, with no errors and good range. Right now, Buxton is probably as good or better in center than Jenkins is. However, by this time next year, that won't be true. What separates Jenkins from Buxton now is the top prospect’s elite arm value, an area in which Buxton has declined more obviously and sharply.
     
    Buxton sports a -1 Arm Value over 168 advancement attempts in 2026, placing him in the bottom third of the league. Runners have been able to take extra bases on him, a trend that has become significantly worse since 2024, when Buxton was toward the top of the league. Jenkins, however, has one of the best arms in the minors.
     
    Whether Buxton moves to left or right field is largely inconsequential. Right field is higher on the defensive spectrum, with clubs often placing stronger-armed fielders there in order to reduce a runner’s likelihood of advancing from first to third on a single or tagging up from second to third on a flyout to right. Buxton is probably better-suited to left, particularly given that left-center is deeper than right-center at Target Field. One way or another, though, it's time to start making a succession plan—which, in this case, is also a relocation plan.
    Want more Twins in your Google results? Add us as a preferred source.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Brandon Winokur

    Wichita Wind Surge - AA, 3B/CF
    Winokur drove in 2 of the Wind Surge's 3 runs in Thursday night's 3-1 win against Frisco. The 21-year-old has hit .251/.339/.429 (.768) with 15 doubles, 4 triples, and 21 homers in 124 total games this year.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 minutes ago, Whammy said:

    I'm not super interested in witnessing Larnach's regression for $7M, when we have Buxton, Keashcall, Emma, and Jenkins who will all almost certainly be on the Twins and playing OF most of next year (though I could see an Emma trade).

    Seems like he could have some value to an org that's not so log jammed with lefty corner OF. If you can move him for some middling bullpen help or a minor league lottery ticket, I'd do that. If not, then I personally would non-tender him.

    I have always liked Larnach, so from that standpoint I would like to see him stay.  But in reality like you said he should be moved or non tendered.

    38 minutes ago, Woof Bronzer said:

    This is such a strange comment.  Of course he's been injured a lot.  But he's still been their best player this year, and the best player on the team for several years now.  

    And, like, PR?  He has never come across as someone who loves or even likes the camera (he's no Carlos Correa).  What PR are you referring to?  

    If you keep getting "blasted" for suggesting that the team's WAR leader hasn't contributed on the field, it's probably because that take is factually just not true.  

    The PR is the team using him as the face of the team. They sell thousands of jerseys with his name on them. His face is everywhere. Except on the field. "Best players" play more than half the games. 

    4 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    I have always liked Larnach, so from that standpoint I would like to see him stay.  But in reality like you said he should be moved or non tendered.

    Yeah. He's been better than probably anyone on here could have hoped for this year, but we're already seeing some regression (74 wRC+ since the all star break) and for ~$7M with a crowded 2027 OF, it just doesn't seem to make much sense. 

    58 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    How are you doing him a favor when he says he wants to be here for his whole career and has the power at least until his contract is up to say where he will play.

    It is a BUSINESS !!  By trading him while he can still play CF you are extracting maximum value from an Asset.  Once he moves to RF, his asset value is diminished.

    2 minutes ago, Jacksson said:

    It is a BUSINESS !!  By trading him while he can still play CF you are extracting maximum value from an Asset.  Once he moves to RF, his asset value is diminished.

    In this business they give players who have played 10 years in the league and 5 years with the same team veto rights on any trade.  And Buxton has said he wants to stay here.  So no they can't just trade him because they want to, Buxton has to approve.  That is the business rule for baseball.

    It is August 19th and teams will add 1 position player and 1 pitcher September 1st. That is when you will see Jenkins and Ryan will be back. As far as Buxton goes who really cares if he is in CF or 1 of the other outfield positions. He plays 100 games or less in 162 game season. At his age and health history who thinks he will be on the field for more games go forward. It's time to move forward next year with a whole new outfield.

    Could not disagree more; I think Buxton's defense is his greatest strength. We all know that he's streaky at the plate, but if he's in the outfield that ball is going to be caught. Absolutely bring Jenkins up - whether this year or next, he'll be great to play when Buck isn't able to. But keeping Buck in center remains the best choice defensively.

    14 minutes ago, Jacksson said:

    It is a BUSINESS !!  By trading him while he can still play CF you are extracting maximum value from an Asset.  Once he moves to RF, his asset value is diminished.

    That's a totally different answer than your original "do him a favor" statement. Buxton has said over and over and over that he doesn't want to be traded. Trading him wouldn't be "doing him a favor," it'd be making the business decision you find best for your business. I'd argue that trading him is no longer the best business decision, but that's neither here nor there. Your original comment was that they should do Buxton a favor. Trading somebody who doesn't want to be traded is not doing them a favor. And as has been pointed out, they can't trade him without his OK, anyways. They haven't been able to since he signed his extension.

    Buxton would have to be consulted on any trade discussions due to his NTA.  That does not mean that it cannot be floated that Buxton is available.  In those discussions with Buxton in which he is informed that the Twins would, at least, listen to trade offers, just that would convey the idea to Buxton that the organization no longer regards him as a fixture and lead Buxton to conclude himself that the remainder of his career may be best spent elsewhere.  His loyalty to the organization can also be made apparent by Buxton's own realization that his departure by trade could reward the organization he holds so dear. 

    8 minutes ago, David Maro said:

    It is August 19th and teams will add 1 position player and 1 pitcher September 1st. That is when you will see Jenkins and Ryan will be back. As far as Buxton goes who really cares if he is in CF or 1 of the other outfield positions. He plays 100 games or less in 162 game season. At his age and health history who thinks he will be on the field for more games go forward. It's time to move forward next year with a whole new outfield.

    I will never understand the argument of "0 games of Buxton is better than 100 games of Buxton." Yeah, it sucks he hasn't been able to stay healthy. The team YEARS ago needed to start doing a significantly better job of having another starting quality CFer on the roster. They did it here and there, but not consistently enough. But having an all star for 100 games is better than not having that all star.

    The Twins will not be better in 2027 with "a whole new outfield."

    37 minutes ago, Jacksson said:

    It is a BUSINESS !!  By trading him while he can still play CF you are extracting maximum value from an Asset.  Once he moves to RF, his asset value is diminished.

    So the "do the guy a favor" comment was just BS you thought sounded good then?

    18 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    I will never understand the argument of "0 games of Buxton is better than 100 games of Buxton." Yeah, it sucks he hasn't been able to stay healthy. The team YEARS ago needed to start doing a significantly better job of having another starting quality CFer on the roster. They did it here and there, but not consistently enough. But having an all star for 100 games is better than not having that all star.

    The Twins will not be better in 2027 with "a whole new outfield."

    This is exactly why I've had him on my fantasy baseball team for like 5 straight years.

    "But he's injured too much to be valuable in fantasy." Nope. Incorrect. I get to put him on the IL when he's injured and start a replacement level CF for those games. When you combine his 100 games with the 60 from the replacement CF, it's a very productive 9th round pick at a position that doesn't have great offensive options

    The key for the Twins is to have a replacement level CF (or LF if he moves positions) on the roster for the times he's on the IL. Because his per-game numbers and rate stats are still mostly fantastic (this recent slump not withstanding)

    27 minutes ago, Jacksson said:

    Buxton would have to be consulted on any trade discussions due to his NTA.  That does not mean that it cannot be floated that Buxton is available.  In those discussions with Buxton in which he is informed that the Twins would, at least, listen to trade offers, just that would convey the idea to Buxton that the organization no longer regards him as a fixture and lead Buxton to conclude himself that the remainder of his career may be best spent elsewhere.  His loyalty to the organization can also be made apparent by Buxton's own realization that his departure by trade could reward the organization he holds so dear. 

    So you think the Twins should move on from Buxton, that is fair.  But state that then saying they should do him a favor or that this is a business.

    I think the Twins made it pretty clear that Buxton is not going to be traded and they are not approaching him about him.  And I doubt anything will change this offseason.  Quite frankly, I think this is a situation Tom P. will give input to if they even think about approaching him.  I am just as frustrated as anyone that he isn't out there for 140 games but I enjoy every game he is out there because he is an exciting player to watch.  And that is what the casual fan says and sees as well.  And based on Tom P. comments about winning back fans, I don't think he would want to take the PR nightmare that would come with moving Buxton.

    I'm for moving Buck to a corner spot for the mere fact that LF & RF are a lot less wear and tear on the legs than CF. Buxton's repeated labrum injuries are probably an indicator that the Twins should reduce his milage. Especially at his age. The farther north of 30 you get, the easier it is to get those strains and the longer they take to heal.

    Once again, the clickbaity headline is way more extreme than the body of the article or its conclusion. I'm honestly tired of it.

    Quote

    It's Time to Move Byron Buxton to a Corner Outfield Spot

    Quote

    One way or another, though, it's time to start making a succession plan

    I came into reading this with an eye toward what I wanted to say, and then found that it wasn't necessary.

    24 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    Once again, the clickbaity headline is way more extreme than the body of the article or its conclusion. I'm honestly tired of it.

    I came into reading this with an eye toward what I wanted to say, and then found that it wasn't necessary.

    Amen.  

    3 hours ago, Twins GFP said:

    Assuming the Twins have no intention of bringing up Jenkins this year, this should be their off-season plan. Opening day 2027 (yes that is optimistic) should put Jenkins in CF, Buxton in LF, [insert player here] in RF. Could be a very strong OF, especially on defense if it is Rodriguez.

    I'm with you except there is no "insert player here" for RF. Luke Keaschall is our best hitter. Period. Has been since May 1. He has to play, every day, somewhere, and will probably get 600 ABs as the leadoff man next year. I too wish he could play 2B so we could make Clemens a UTl, but that experiment did not work. At all. The only other places are LF or RF. Royce Lewis is the starting 1B for the rest of this decade. Same for Lee at 3B. Locking those 2 spots down is one of the things that's happened this year. 

    I really think next year's roster is pretty close to set already after the try out camp that started Aug 1, 2025. The only open spots are 2B, one starting OF spot, and one or two bench OF spots. The starting IF is Lewis (1B), Culpepper (SS), Lee (3B), and either Clemens at 2B or Clemens as a super UTL if we can acquire a 2B. There's no one in the Minors ready for that job - Houston is at least a season away.  Buxton and Keaschall start in the OF.  Jeffers is he C if the heavens part and we re-sign him (I could see them offering 3-4 years at roughly $15-18M a year, but he might get more elsewhere), otherwise it's Caratini and Jackson in a time share. Kriedler is the glove first UTL that can play SS. Martin, Roden, Jenkins, ERod, GG and Mendez are either fighting for the 3, 4, and 5 OF spots, or for those plus a DH spot but I bet they bring Bell back as a fulltime DH so it's 6 guys for 3 spots.  My money is on Martin as a 4th OF/RH platoon guy who hits RH, Jenkins because he looks like the best of the 6, and then either Roden if he hits well the rest of 2026 and/or EmRod is traded, or EmRod because he's out of options. We either trade for a 2b or there's one more UTL/bench bat spot with Clemens at 2B. Done. 

    You can't move Buxton until you have another CF on hand. They used to sign very good ones (Taylor, Bader) but they didn't this year, either because they thought one of the kids would be up or they thought the 140 games played last year meant Byron would be around most of this year.  Whichever, it seems they miscalculated and we've been playing some bad gloves out there.

    I think it's way too late to start working on this in 2026, but I've been indicating that they will begin the process as soon as Jenkins or Erod or Fedko or my little sister proves she can hit enough and field enough to take over out there.  That can't really be until after spring training next year since we won't have a read on the kids until then. 

    I expect Byron will approach the discussion with dignity, but I also expect a players' manager like Shelton to be generous in how it gets implemented. So I would expect to see #25 in CF well into 2028 with a lot of the transition occurring during injury breaks.

    EDIT: One other thing: Buxton still does have a good arm and should go to RF, the harder of the two spots in Target Field. It'll play to his professional vanity and leave the easier throws to Keaschall.

     

    4 hours ago, HeresWaldo said:

    Personally I value speed over arm in center, and health permitting I'm pretty sure Buxton will be faster than Jenkins even a year from now. Candidly I don't think the next quality center fielder is in the organization right now, so I'd say stick with Buxton until it really becomes a problem or a more obvious candidate arrives. Now, if Buxton shows up to spring training next year with 75th percentile sprint speed that would be different, but at least for now I'm pretty confident he's faster and has more range than Jenkins or Rodriguez.

    Buxton also has the advantage of being a sprint speed outlier. There are too few of them in the Statcast era for super compelling conclusions to be drawn yet, but there is some evidence that the player type Buxton is a part of really do age better (at least as runners) into their mid-30s, so I wouldn't be super confident that Jenkins will surpass Buxton next season. Downside is if this research is right, once it starts to go for Buxton it'll go quickly, but he may very well be able to put up similar numbers to his current ones in center 2 years from now, again health permitting.

    Buxton's very fast but he has some of the slowest reads in MLB. Jenkins is no where near as fast as Buxton, but the word is he has great instincts/jumps/routes that make up for his borderline speed.

    7 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I'm with you except there is no "insert player here" for RF. Luke Keaschall is our best hitter. Period. Has been since May 1. He has to play, every day, somewhere, and will probably get 600 ABs as the leadoff man next year. I too wish he could play 2B so we could make Clemens a UTl, but that experiment did not work. At all. The only other places are LF or RF. Royce Lewis is the starting 1B for the rest of this decade. Same for Lee at 3B. Locking those 2 spots down is one of the things that's happened this year. 

    I really think next year's roster is pretty close to set already after the try out camp that started Aug 1, 2025. The only open spots are 2B, one starting OF spot, and one or two bench OF spots. The starting IF is Lewis (1B), Culpepper (SS), Lee (3B), and either Clemens at 2B or Clemens as a super UTL if we can acquire a 2B. There's no one in the Minors ready for that job - Houston is at least a season away.  Buxton and Keaschall start in the OF.  Jeffers is he C if the heavens part and we re-sign him (I could see them offering 3-4 years at roughly $15-18M a year, but he might get more elsewhere), otherwise it's Caratini and Jackson in a time share. Kriedler is the glove first UTL that can play SS. Martin, Roden, Jenkins, ERod, GG and Mendez are either fighting for the 3, 4, and 5 OF spots, or for those plus a DH spot but I bet they bring Bell back as a fulltime DH so it's 6 guys for 3 spots.  My money is on Martin as a 4th OF/RH platoon guy who hits RH, Jenkins because he looks like the best of the 6, and then either Roden if he hits well the rest of 2026 and/or EmRod is traded, or EmRod because he's out of options. We either trade for a 2b or there's one more UTL/bench bat spot with Clemens at 2B. Done. 

    I agree with all that. here's a few thoughts to go with it.

    I expect Ross to get a long look at 2B next spring, and it may turn out that if his SS glove is up to the task he could displace Kreidler. 

    I think there's going to be a long talk about Bell vs Larnach in the DH spot. The dollars are close, Bell can face lefties and actually has power, but Shelton loves Bell in the locker room, so it's going to involve more than just stats. It'll be interesting to watch, but I expect to see Bell here.

    Martin may just be out of luck, or at least this could be the spring when the music stops and he and Roden  are the two fighting for the last OF spot.  Much of his fate is tied to Larnach's, but if both Jenkins and ERod break camp he could be down to a RH pinch hitter role.  

    The catcher is Caratini playing a ton with Jackson behind him. I think they'll get another veteran to cover for Caratini's inevitable injuries rather than let one of the Saints' catchers darken the far end of the bench. Cardenas and Banuelos are not answers to any MLB question. 

    I kind of think there will be some significant trades this winter to shake out the AAA backlog. Maybe Mendez or Erod or Gabby plus pitching to get something shiny and large and controlled for multiple years. An infielder maybe? Xavier Edwards? 

    32 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I'm with you except there is no "insert player here" for RF. Luke Keaschall is our best hitter. Period. Has been since May 1. He has to play, every day, somewhere, and will probably get 600 ABs as the leadoff man next year. I too wish he could play 2B so we could make Clemens a UTl, but that experiment did not work. At all. The only other places are LF or RF. Royce Lewis is the starting 1B for the rest of this decade. Same for Lee at 3B. Locking those 2 spots down is one of the things that's happened this year. 

    I really think next year's roster is pretty close to set already after the try out camp that started Aug 1, 2025. The only open spots are 2B, one starting OF spot, and one or two bench OF spots. The starting IF is Lewis (1B), Culpepper (SS), Lee (3B), and either Clemens at 2B or Clemens as a super UTL if we can acquire a 2B. There's no one in the Minors ready for that job - Houston is at least a season away.  Buxton and Keaschall start in the OF.  Jeffers is he C if the heavens part and we re-sign him (I could see them offering 3-4 years at roughly $15-18M a year, but he might get more elsewhere), otherwise it's Caratini and Jackson in a time share. Kriedler is the glove first UTL that can play SS. Martin, Roden, Jenkins, ERod, GG and Mendez are either fighting for the 3, 4, and 5 OF spots, or for those plus a DH spot but I bet they bring Bell back as a fulltime DH so it's 6 guys for 3 spots.  My money is on Martin as a 4th OF/RH platoon guy who hits RH, Jenkins because he looks like the best of the 6, and then either Roden if he hits well the rest of 2026 and/or EmRod is traded, or EmRod because he's out of options. We either trade for a 2b or there's one more UTL/bench bat spot with Clemens at 2B. Done. 

    I am close to your roster, but I am guessing they use Wallner as the DH until he proves he can’t do it. Keaschall or Buxton is the DH vs LHP with Martin getting time in the outfield.

    There are several 2B available as free agents and a few others obtainable in trades.

    42 minutes ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I'm with you except there is no "insert player here" for RF. Luke Keaschall is our best hitter. Period. Has been since May 1. He has to play, every day, somewhere, and will probably get 600 ABs as the leadoff man next year. I too wish he could play 2B so we could make Clemens a UTl, but that experiment did not work. At all. The only other places are LF or RF. Royce Lewis is the starting 1B for the rest of this decade. Same for Lee at 3B. Locking those 2 spots down is one of the things that's happened this year. 

    I really think next year's roster is pretty close to set already after the try out camp that started Aug 1, 2025. The only open spots are 2B, one starting OF spot, and one or two bench OF spots. The starting IF is Lewis (1B), Culpepper (SS), Lee (3B), and either Clemens at 2B or Clemens as a super UTL if we can acquire a 2B. There's no one in the Minors ready for that job - Houston is at least a season away.  Buxton and Keaschall start in the OF.  Jeffers is he C if the heavens part and we re-sign him (I could see them offering 3-4 years at roughly $15-18M a year, but he might get more elsewhere), otherwise it's Caratini and Jackson in a time share. Kriedler is the glove first UTL that can play SS. Martin, Roden, Jenkins, ERod, GG and Mendez are either fighting for the 3, 4, and 5 OF spots, or for those plus a DH spot but I bet they bring Bell back as a fulltime DH so it's 6 guys for 3 spots.  My money is on Martin as a 4th OF/RH platoon guy who hits RH, Jenkins because he looks like the best of the 6, and then either Roden if he hits well the rest of 2026 and/or EmRod is traded, or EmRod because he's out of options. We either trade for a 2b or there's one more UTL/bench bat spot with Clemens at 2B. Done. 

    I believe RF may be a little more open than you, but I can see Keaschall getting first chance at it. I also think Jenkins is a virtual lock in the Opening Day lineup, the question is where in the outfield he will be playing.

    Not arguing too much with the rest of your analysis. Lee and Culpepper are written in pencil, not pen. Clemens will stick, if only because he is solid defensively in positions of need. If there wasn't going to be a shutdown, I could see a few trades/moves being made, especially if the Pohlads were serious about increasing payroll.

    So many either/or comments when it doesn't have to be...

    Virtually every great defensive CF moves out of CF at some point in their career. The transition for Buxton to LF could be gradual, with Buxton playing CF on Jenkins off days, injuries, etc. Having two CF worthy defensive outfielders is a good problem to have (Soul patrol allowed the wheels-spinning Cuddyer to basically play 10 feet off the RF line most nights).

    34 minutes ago, djvang said:

    50 out of what? 1,000?

    It's a FanGraphs scale used to measure prospects' tools. 50 is essentially average for an MLB regular.

    I think we can agree that Keaschall's arm is WELL below average now.

    I suspect  lingering effects of the TJ surgery

    Buck has battled a sore hip for a good part of the season, so his defensive stats would indicate that. Even with a sore hip, he's not that bad & does not justify moving him off CF, especially when we don't have anyone, yet who can replace him.

    I'm going to disagree with the OP somewhat strenously. The Buxton in CF we're seeing now isn't the Buxton of the past. But he's still damned good. And the defensive numbers indicate he's still good, according to the OP, but I still have a hard time conseptionalizing most defensive metrics where there are so many, and they often disagree.

    I haven't watched as many games lately as I normally due for various reasons. But throughout this season I've seen him continue to chase down balls that seemed destined for the gap that fell in to his glove.

    He's still QUALITY in CF from everything I've watched this season. He STILL belongs there. His sprint speed is still amazing. The fact that he holds up once in a while to preserve his body might mess with a few metrics, but it's also something he's learned, with the advice of the Twins and Hunter as well.

    For those worried about injury, both corner OF still have the wall to consider. In fact, corner OF have 2 walls to consider. So there is no saving grace there.

    I DO think Buck might move to a corner OF beyond 2027. And I DO think he might DH a little more in 2027 just to preserve his legs/hip, but he's still the best CF for the Twins in general, but also a quality CF, in general at the ML level.

    So NO, not now.

    3 hours ago, Twins GFP said:

    I believe RF may be a little more open than you, but I can see Keaschall getting first chance at it.

    What does Keaschall have to do to be considered basically a lock for a starting position next year.  We know about his defense, but some of this is on the coaching to get him competent at a position.  He has been our best hitter since May, he needs to be in the starting lineup day 1 next year.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...