Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Curious to hear what others thought about the shape of water...

Just got back from seeing it. Since I liked La La Land very much, I probably should have felt the same way about this one, but for me it was too realistic to be a fantasy, and far too silly to be taken at face value.* The symbolism and moral values were administered with anything but a light touch. That said, it's good, and probably benefits more from the big screen than the average (non-"action") film - with regard to Carole's comment about waiting for Netflix. I'll also say that, for someone with exactly the right mindset, it might be the most genuinely erotic movie of the year. Unfortunately, that exact mindset isn't mine. :)

 

* My one-iine review is probably that it's a Donald Trump movie: meant to be taken seriously, but not literally.

Posted

I'll also say that, for someone with exactly the right mindset, it might be the most genuinely erotic movie of the year. Unfortunately, that exact mindset isn't mine. :)

tmi

Posted

Fair warning, more like. It's rated R for several reasons.

I think Dinger’s post made that pretty clear. But I just noticed it’s Golden Globe nominated for best picture, so I might go see it despite seeing a relationship between a woman and a fish man not really my thing, either.

Community Moderator
Posted

I saw Shape of Water tonight and overall I liked it. I was with my wife and two other women and they liked it more than I did. 

 

Things that I liked included the early 1960's setting (especially the cars) and the character development. The story was solid but... [spoiler omitted]

 

On the downside, some of the violence made me close my eyes. Also, I agree with ash that a lighter touch would have been better, but I am told that the movie falls into the genre of "magical realism", so maybe that explains it. 

 

As for the erotic elements, I am told that a lot of money spent on the creature costume to make it erotic, but without any hint of male genitalia. My sense is that a significant percentage of women will find the movie erotic. 

Posted

I think Dinger’s post made that pretty clear.

Only if one equates "romantic" with "erotic". I think there's quite a line separating the two. Glunn elaborated further in that vein. The comparison to Beauty and the Beast goes only so far.

 

And this hard-R movie contains many triggers for different people, as glunn also alluded to, so I don't think it's especially wrong to spell those out a little. Someone who likes cats an awful, awful lot might want to be forewarned, for instance. (That's a mild spoiler, but not a crucial plot point.) And, like glunn probably, I was moved to tears by (another mild spoiler, sorry) the sight of a pristine vintage Cadillac getting mutilated in an unfortunate accident, in a scene gratuitously set up by this edgy director. Isn't there a concept called Chekhov's Chevy, where a car featured early in the film is bound to figure into the denouement?

Posted

Only if one equates "romantic" with "erotic". I think there's quite a line separating the two. Glunn elaborated further in that vein. The comparison to Beauty and the Beast goes only so far.

 

And this hard-R movie contains many triggers for different people, as glunn also alluded to, so I don't think it's especially wrong to spell those out a little. Someone who likes cats an awful, awful lot might want to be forewarned, for instance. (That's a mild spoiler, but not a crucial plot point.) And, like glunn probably, I was moved to tears by (another mild spoiler, sorry) the sight of a pristine vintage Cadillac getting mutilated in an unfortunate accident, in a scene gratuitously set up by this edgy director. Isn't there a concept called Chekhov's Chevy, where a car featured early in the film is bound to figure into the denouement?

Well, now I’m back to ‘Meh, this is sounding more and more like something that would not interest me.’ Unless I have no other options and just have to see a movie, maybe I’ll see it.

Posted

For helping in your decision process.

If you recall, I had my mind already made up after Dinger’s very efficient review. You just muddied things until I came back to a decision already made.

 

And now, between you and glunn, we’ve spent way more time on a movie that really doesn’t seem worth it. :)

Community Moderator
Posted

 

If you recall, I had my mind already made up after Dinger’s very efficient review. You just muddied things until I came back to a decision already made.

And now, between you and glunn, we’ve spent way more time on a movie that really doesn’t seem worth it. :)

I will not be surprised if it wins some major awards. Now that I have slept on it, I see more meaning than I did last night.

 

Maybe this article will change your mind -- https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/23/movies/the-shape-of-water-meet-guillermo-del-toro-doug-jones.html?action=click&contentCollection=Movies&module=RelatedCoverage%C2%AEion=Marginalia&pgtype=article

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Good to know about the Greatest Showman. My family's going to the movies this weekend and we're deciding between that and Three Billboards.

Mrs Ash and I saw Three Billboards last night. Not necessarily an easy movie to watch, but very rewarding for the performances.

Posted

Miss Vanimal and I went to The Post earlier tonight. It's definitely worth your time and money.

 

The acting is fantastic - which I expected with Hanks, Streep, and sneaky star power mixed in throughout (Carrie Coon, Bob Odenkirk, Jesse Plemons)

 

And the plot is effectively relevant today... Given that political figures threaten freedom of the press on a near daily basis.

 

Go see it.

Posted

Just saw Phantom Thread. I thought it was a terrible waste of talent.

I might still go see it as Daniel Day Lewis has said this was his last movie.

 

Side story, when the CSO made the soundtrack for Lincoln, both Spielberg and Daniel Day Lewis were there during recording. Was pretty cool.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

 

Just saw Phantom Thread. I thought it was a terrible waste of talent.

 

I saw this Sunday (wanted to see the Post or Darkest Hour, but my friend had seen them - said they were great), and yes, well acted, and someone spent a lot of time getting the look of the 1950's upper class.   Other than that by the end of the seemingly 8 hour movie the whole cast could have been eaten by sharks and I would not have cared.   Not that people need to be likable in a movie, but you need to care about them someone even if it is hoping to see them get their just desserts.

 

It might be worth seeing for Lewis's last performance, but I would be tempted to wait until you can rent it and watch it at home.

 

My friend hosts an Oscar party and always tries to see all the movies.   She said in a way, she might have enjoyed Get Out the most, but that a number of the movies were good (although she did not care for Phantom Thread).

Edited by D. Hocking
  • 2 weeks later...
Community Moderator
Posted

 

Well, now I’m back to ‘Meh, this is sounding more and more like something that would not interest me.’ Unless I have no other options and just have to see a movie, maybe I’ll see it.

Lol ... well, so much for listening to all your reviews ... I never saw 'Shape of Water' and I see that it won for best picture ... not sure how that is possible after seeing 'Three Billboards ...' but now I'm intrigued again but will have to wait, unless it's still in a theatre somewhere.

Posted

Lol ... well, so much for listening to all your reviews ... I never saw 'Shape of Water' and I see that it won for best picture ... not sure how that is possible after seeing 'Three Billboards ...' but now I'm intrigued again but will have to wait, unless it's still in a theatre somewhere.

These nominated movies are all so different that I find it impossible to rank them. Just see Shape of Water and enjoy it for the vision the creators delivered, rather than try to compare.

Community Moderator
Posted

 

These nominated movies are all so different that I find it impossible to rank them. Just see Shape of Water and enjoy it for the vision the creators delivered, rather than try to compare.

My only comparison is the degree I liked the whole thing, because there are other categories for all those other things. Unfortunately, I can't see every single one. Each year I say 'I'm going to see every good movie out there' and then I go months without seeing one.

Posted

I just saw Get Out on Sunday - figured it would be a good one to see in a dark theater.  I thought it was good, but am not sure it was "best picture" good.  Better than average - good - but not as great as some of its hype.

Posted

Well, winning an Oscar doesn't always mean the movie is good

We're dealing with fuzzy terms now, but a Best Picture film is unlikely to be not well written, not well directed, not well acted, etc, so at worst it's likely a film worth seeing unless it's in a genre you detest or you have learned it contains triggers or something like that. It's virtually certain to be "good", in fact usually quite good.

 

Winning an Oscar in some category, sure, the other parts of the movie could conceivably be unwatchable.

 

I harken back to when The Sting won Best Picture. I thought it was not that great, and was very surprised, although I don't remember now what would have been a better choice. But, it was good.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...