Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

killertwinfan

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    272

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by killertwinfan

  1. killertwinfan
    Why is anyone surprised. They told us their plans last season.
  2. killertwinfan
    Why, he’s a huge value player at that price. If you can get him for Vasquez and Paddack and some talent from your pipeline, maybe. BUT, we won’t pay him next year, at least with this ownership group so why raid your pipeline? in the end it’s just a narrative to tempt fans to believe we are trying to build a winning roster. However in reality, self imposed salary constraints make it impossible to do so.
  3. killertwinfan
    Buxton should fear this as well as swinging at too many pitches out of the strike zone.
  4. killertwinfan
    If he was worth anything he wouldn’t want to come back to an ownership group that routinely underinvests in its roster. Frankly I don’t care if he comes back or not.
  5. killertwinfan
    Prolly signaling we’ll dump a catcher. Honestly, if it’s Vazquez we’ll have to give away something to move him and If it’s Jeffers it’s disappointing cuz we won’t get anything back.
  6. killertwinfan
    Help me out. I thought we had no money.
  7. killertwinfan
    So we are down grading from Castro to this dude and we are going to like it? BTW, current salary projection is $136m and our cap is $130 so we are dumping before we are adding.
  8. killertwinfan
    No thanks.
  9. killertwinfan
    Welcome your 2025 MN Twins. 🤐
  10. killertwinfan
    While the thought of that change makes me want to puke, it would be a way to level the salary disparity across the league. Technically depth would be a little less important if your best batsman took the biggest at bat in the game.
  11. killertwinfan
    Maybe it’s good for him as a player. He certainly could earn more. Giving him a shot could be the right thing to do if you are trying to develop a culture of growth. Dude has worked hard, he deserves a chance to grow even if he flames out and it hurts the team.
  12. killertwinfan
    Unfortunately I don’t think any of this matters for the next few seasons. Sure you want to protect your assets, but until this team spends the way they could/should our roster is going almost nowhere.
  13. killertwinfan
    Signing Correa to a long term deal when your best prospect is a SS and close to being ready is not great. Add to that the $30m payroll slash and in makes no sense. The twinkies made it clear they are not serious about fielding a competitive team and have no strategy shaping personnel decisions.
  14. killertwinfan
    Tough assignment with this bag of clowns.
  15. killertwinfan
    Thank you for pointing out one of Rocco’s strengths. I didn’t know he had any! Unfortunately, I am not convinced this is a strength. Boo Twins! Especially the ownership and front office.
  16. killertwinfan
    I think our best players are up. They need to play better. Terrible AB’s in high leverage situations have become a theme for this team. Work on approach and mindset. Not so far this year but we hit a lot of HR’s but our RBI totals are down.
  17. killertwinfan
    If Larnach figures out off speed pitches, look out!
  18. killertwinfan
    Aptly written. There is literally nothing of value to say about this team. We are who we were with a few changes. From a year ago we have diluted our starting pitching. Buttressed that with a thin bullpen and patched together the field with a mixed bag of players who’s first line of their bio starts with “If they stay healthy…”.
  19. killertwinfan
    Issue number 1 is they are cheap. They do not spend at the level most teams do relative to market size. So new ownership would help more than anything else. I understand the strategy, you know the player can perform if healthy. They are buying cheap because the player is hurt. Unfortunately this strategy has not returned the results they desired.
  20. killertwinfan
    I am not sure I am right, but my belief is that Kepler is getting a raise at the end of this contract and that is why he has low trade value. That being said, it doesn’t make sense for the Twins to spend the money on him when they have a lot of young outfielders that have a higher upside. I am a little puzzled by this viewpoint and even if Kepler breaks out this season, it’s only one season and I wouldn’t take the risk of paying him to consistently perform at that level.
  21. killertwinfan
    I am mostly puzzled by this narrative. Neither Bailey nor Ryan are in the bottom quartile of starting pitching in MLB. Yes, our starters, as a group, will take a step back with the loss of Gray but that doesn’t take away anything from either of these guys, who are quality bottom to middle rotation pitchers.
  22. killertwinfan
    There is still plenty of time for a trade. But, If we roll with this lineup, or less should we trade Polanco and/or Farmer for prospects, I will not be renewing MLB extra innings.
  23. killertwinfan
    Actually, the major implication of my suggestion is that we have both and use different assets to acquire Lopez. So, pick your poison at second base and enjoy both bats in the line up as well as Lopez.
  24. killertwinfan
    Wow, interesting narrative. Just imagine if we had this wisdom last year. Arraez would be firmly entrenched as our second baseman and we would have had to use different assets to acquire Lopez.
  25. killertwinfan
    Poor plate discipline fueled by over aggressiveness. Painful to watch. Not proud of this team collectively in any way.
×
×
  • Create New...