Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
  • Posts

    36,746
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    580

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. Right. But they aren't reflected in FIP. Because fWAR ignores defense. (Except for infield pop-ups, for some reason .) So, while I agree the Twins were a poor defensive team in 2024, that's irrelevant to anything fWAR related for pitchers. FWAR doesn't care if Colorado turned 1 million double plays and the Twins zero. And just another reason fWAR is a really poor way to measure pitchers.
  2. False. fWAR for pitchers ignores defense. Completely. That's kinda the point of FIP. Except, of course....for infield fly balls. Which fWAR treats as strikeouts. For some odd reason. Of course...when just calculating regular old FIP, they DON'T treat infield fly balls as K's. Weird, to be kind. Like I said, fWAR for pitchers is...a poor measure. https://library.fangraphs.com/war/calculating-war-pitchers/
  3. fWAR is intended to be a backward looking measure. Using "Ignore what actually happened. This is what we THINK should have happened" seems to me like a poor method of measuring what happened. And that's fWAR for pitching. "What we think should have happened."
  4. fWAR is a ridiculously poor way to measure pitching.
  5. Not a HOFer, but easily one of my all time favorite Twins. A winner. The kind of player you need, and the kind of player I happily pay to see.
  6. It's become really difficult to carry a rule 5 catcher on the 26 man roster. Any position player is difficult, because the guy has to play. You only have 13 spots. You can get away with that if the guy is a spare outfielder, or maybe a middle infielder. Carrying 3 catchers for any length of time is just too hard. They're not losing a C, particularly the low talent ones left unprotected.
  7. Like everything Twins related lately, even Randball appears to be phoning it in with a half hearted attempt at remaining relevant.
  8. His contract is guaranteed either way
  9. Wow. Might be the all time worst trade proposal* in TD history. *non Brian Duensing category
  10. The trade made the 2024 Twins weaker. That much cannot be refuted. As I and a few others said at the time.
  11. I don't understand the love for Miranda as a regular first baseman. What is the best case scenario there? .750 OPS? That's gonna get us back into the postseason??
  12. Martin is extremely unlikely to ever have much value in the big leagues. He has no defensive value, and isn't never going to have an impact bat. He can and probably will be a part time bench player for a few years because he'll be cheap and roughly equivalent to a couple hundred similar guys floating around the margins of pro ball. Not the type of player who actually drives any kind of long term success. Just another example of why "top 50 overall prospect" is way overrated by many fans.
  13. A few teams always ending up with the best players is GOOD for baseball? Holy cow that's a bad take. Incredibly bad.
  14. Can they get the roof replaced in time for opening day, even if they start now? That seems to me like more than a six month project.
  15. March to May and September through November are the busiest times in Vegas. But it doesn't really matter. Baseball will do great in Vegas.
  16. $1.96M, per spotrac. https://twinstrivia.com/salaries-2/ Ever hear of google?
  17. There is no sport as good as baseball.
  18. **** the mother******* Yankees. Go Cleveland!
  19. That "competitive runs" category is simply the number of times they measured that player in situations which should result in a sprint. It's not any kind of measure of the quality of a baserunner. All this measures is sprint speed. "How fast does this player run when he's running full speed?" The players with the higher "competitive runs" numbers reflect the players that were measured while running more often, not that they were good or bad baserunners.
  20. That's what I said. And one of those two is one too many.
×
×
  • Create New...