NFL streaming on YouTube was about $350 for, arguably, 17 games. (I am sure many folks watch more than their home team, e.g., gamblers and fantasy football folks).
I would gladly pay $250 for 162 regular season games and a handful of ST games. That is $1.50 a game. Heck, a large Coke at McDonald's is way more than that nowadays.
If 250,000 fans pay that is $62.5M gross revenue, and they could pay production costs and on-air talent and be close to the Bally contract, and that would be ad-free!
If they sell advertisement, they could sell it for something like $99, and then there would be no excuse not to purchase it for 90% of fans. That is less than the cost of attending one game in person, a total bargain.
Conceptually, I see no reason why they can't profit and flourish with a streaming model. Am I missing anything?