jmlease1

Rocco sneaks in (he's over 40 and the early 80's still had teams that arguably had 4-man rotations and 10 pitchers on the active roster; look at the 1982 Orioles for an example) but by the mid-80's you're right that concept had gone away, along with the idea of using your best reliever as a fireman, and multi-inning relievers who weren't the mop-up guy. It's been a long, long time and certainly none of our players were alive for when the 4-man rotation was a significant thing.

Hard to say. He's still got value as a player, but if he's not hitting and not an option in CF, then you basically need a team who thinks "we can fix him" and who knows if that team is out there at his price on contract. Feels like they're trying to get to the trade deadline and maybe move him then. Wallner is overqualified for AAA, but his defense is shaky and until the Twins decide to move on from Kepler, he's going to have to fight his way up. Good to see Miranda making good contact again. Hope he finds some power in his bat as well and gets back his plate discipline.

I think you've got this backwards. 28 games in 30 days isn't where you need an additional starter unless we end up with a double-header. It's the bullpen where we could get overstretched, especially if we get a couple of short starts. And adding a starter to the roster means one less reliever (remember, we're capped at 13 pitchers now). Maeda makes much more sense in relief right now, especially if as a former starter he could consistently take 2 innings every three days. Really good start from Varland. I think I would have let him try the 8th; as much as giving Lopez a shot in low leverage makes sense, it was also an opportunity to see how Varland does 3rd time through the order and seeing how his stamina holds up pushing 100 pitches. But I don't have a big objection to giving him 7 shut-out and having him call it a night. (There's almost no chance of him throwing a complete game in this situation, so taking it off the table after 7 is fine) Really good hitting last night overall too. Seems like every time I get down on Solano and start suggesting it's time to move on from him he has a good game. Castro is having an excellent stretch and is proving to be better that I thought for sure. He played nice defense at 3B too. I love winning a series against Houston.

I'd argue pretty strongly that these were not our best trade chips, but our most tradable chips. It stinks that we didn't end up getting the value for them that we did when we dealt Petty for Gray, but that's the risk.

I just wish the shady-ass media company (Sinclair? Think was those scumbags) that bought up all the regional Fox Sports Networks and rebranded them into Bally's and spun them off into this Diamond Sports Group could be held to account for this. They vastly overpaid for the networks and everyone knew it at the time. Now, saddled with all of that debt, they're trying to get out of paying their bills. It's pretty pathetic that they're also trying to get MLB to hand them streaming rights in exchange for fulfilling their contractual obligations. they've been broadcasting the games, collecting the ad revenues, and not paying the rights and think they're entitled to extort baseball for additional assets to add to their bankruptcy pile? Twins may face a similar fate this season, but it's my understanding that their rights fees aren't as out of whack with the revenue generation that they had with SD. So that one might still get paid, at least until all of the other debt calls wipe out the rest of this fraudulent company's cash.

I think this is right. We'll see if Steer really can hit enough consistently to stick at 1B; he loses a fair amount of value if he can't play 3B. But it's also possible that he's only over there because they don't have anyone else at 1B right now. Without Votto it's pretty thin at 1B for Cincy. CES was the player I least wanted to lose because I thought his bat might be special, but you never know how guys like him are going to go when they get to MLB. He's looking like a bad 1B or a DH, so I think chpettit19 is right: he's going to have to hit a LOT in order to make us be "haunted" by him. let's see if he can hit MLB sliders before we decide he's the next David Ortiz. They rolled the dice on Tyler Mahle being healthy enough to stabilize the rotation last season and be a real contributor this year and crapped out. It's a mark against the front office in their ledger (and maybe they learned a lesson about how some players can't be trusted to tell you the truth about their health?) but I don't think they were wrong in the evaluations of Steer, CES, or Hajjar and how much prospect capital they gave up. If the expectation is that we never trade away any prospect that could be good, or even really good, but still expect the front office to bring back real talent in trades, then we have an expectations problem as well. there was a non-zero part of this board that wanted to deal Royce Lewis for pitching last year, and Brooks Lee's name has been thrown around too.

I have to wonder if the Twins don't generally prefer college players overall, not just bats? Last 2 drafts the only HS players they've taken in the first 10 rounds were Petty and Miller and they've already traded Petty. I would be a little concerned if the Twins having been gifted a top 5 pick decide to ignore the CW if a consensus top 5 player were to fall to them. Of course, I seem to recall that at the time the draft order was announced that Max Clark was a consensus top 5 pick and the top prep prospect. Skenes has been a beast at LSU this year after a very good season with Air Force. Hard to see them passing on him if available, unless they have some inside information that he elbow is about to explode or something.

I don't know that they've had more issues with 1st round picks than other teams under this regime. They've made 9 picks in the first round since 2017. 4 of them have made it to MLB under the Twins (Lewis, Rooker, Larnach, and Wallner) and 3 of those are still with the franchise. 2 are looking like busts (Cavaco and Sabato), though they are still with the franchise. 1 was dealt for was has to be considered a win in Sonny Gray (Petty) who has been excellent for 2 seasons and will likely net us a similar draft pick next year. Miller looks good enough defensively to make the majors even if his hit tool doesn't develop, and Brooks Lee looks like a potential star. Potential Stars: Lewis, Lee Solid MLB players: Larnach, Wallner Made it to MLB: Rooker Should make it to MLB: Miller Traded for quality MLB asset: Petty Bust: Cavcao, Sabato Look at say, the White Sox in a similar time period. They've only had 6 picks (no compensatory picks), but have also picked a bit higher than the Twins over the last 6 years. (average pick for Twins: 16. ChiSox: 13.) Potential Stars: Montgomery Solid MLB players: Madrigal, Burger, Vaughn Made it to MLB: Crochet Schultz is basically exactly where Petty was for the Twins: HS pitcher with talent, not a top 100 prospect. Chicago hasn't had the misses the Twins did with Cavaco and Sabato, but they've also picked a bit higher overall and had fewer bites at the apple. (I understand if people think I'm overestimating Larnach or Wallner by calling them "solid MLB players" right now...but I do think it's reasonable to lump them in with players like Burger/Madrigal/Vaughn)

He's got the arm to be a quality corner OF, but he needs to keep working on his recognition and route-running because right now he's a liability in the OF. (the throw he made while up with the Twins to nail the runner at 2B was brilliant, but it was also on a ball that most OF simply catch without too much difficulty and he twisted himself around trying to get a line on it and let it hit the wall) He also still has deeply concerning contact numbers that aren't all that much of an issue against AAA pitching, but are problematic at the majors. Maybe he won't K in MLB like he did in 2022 next time he's up, but expecting him to hit like he did in his first stint(s) this season for an extended period and not pile up huge K numbers is overly-optimistic. That said, he's over-qualified for AAA at this point and the only thing holding him back from pushing kepler is his fairly awful defense. Severino is doing a great job this season. It really looks like he's figured it out; ever since getting out of the FSL he's hit pretty darn well, and when he's repeated a level he's improved his performance since then as well. I think that's meaningful. The real question is: does he have a defensive home, or is he a player whose best position is "hitter"?

Still not really sure how to rate Matthews or Lewis; they're doing everything asked of them, but as college pitchers in A-ball I don't exactly know if it's that meaningful against this level of competition. I do love the fact that Lewis throws a knuckleball. Cossetti is a little bit in this boat too; if he can stick at catcher and keep hitting now that he's been promoted he could be an interesting riser in Twins Prospect Rankings (but he's basically never going to make a national prospect list unless he starts putting up extreme video game stats; they always downgrade older players) Kala'i Rosario is someone I thought should have been pushed back into the prospect rankings when the update was done, and he's only confirmed that opinion. He's hitting well, he's only 20, and all the numbers around him look good. K's are more manageable, walks are up, power is looking good and might project to more, and he's making good contact.

It does seem to be more often and more impactful this year, but maybe I'm just remembering the bad calls on the strike zone more readily this season. It feels like there's more inconsistency (which is bigger problem than just having a wide or high zone), especially late in games. The Twins rough and unlucky record in 1-run games magnifies it all, of course.

Making a change on players who signed at 16 wouldn't impact any of the players you've listed, though. I think it would be a mixed bag for the players: it would reduce some of the freedom (fewer players getting minor-league free agency at age 22), but also might position younger players to have a better development track if teams aren't having to make a decision on a low-A ball guy as early. I'm literally only suggesting this be considered as an adjustment for players who sign before they are age 18. Ober, Wallner, Ryan, Varland, and Julien all were college players, which is the biggest reason they got their later starts in pro ball. But none of them were super-high picks either (Wallner was the only 1st round pick in the bunch and he was a supplemental pick; none of the others went above round 7) whereas Buxton and Correa were two of the absolute best prospects in the country, being the 1st and 2nd overall picks in their draft. So the comp is a little out of whack: Buxton and Correa didn't just get more cracks at paydays because they started at 18. they got it because they were the absolute best talents.

There's a reasonable argument that the clock maybe shouldn't start ticking on them for Rule 5 service time until they hit 18 or something. Because it can be pretty tough on the roster spots to protect a guy in A-ball who is still 2-3 years away, but is already pushing his service time because he was signed internationally at 16. Especially when they haven't played full-season pro ball for their first 2-3 seasons.

they also had 14 hits? (and took 5 more walks. walks are "boring" too, though) Difficult spot for Rocco with the pitching in the 7th. Gray was really good to that point, and then started to lose the plot. If you leave him in and he gives up the Big Fly, you get buried for it. If you pull him and the bullpen can put out the fire, you get buried for it (like he's getting slammed here). It's something of a no-win situation: if the players can't get the job done, the manager is going to get whacked (especially by the people who have been gunning for the manager all season). Storybook return for Royce indeed. Love to see it. Everything we know about him to date says "good dude", and he deserves this. Looking forward to watching Royce Lewis more.

Murphy looked like he could be a league-average hitter and decent defender at catcher, and those are hard to find. Turns out, he had already reached his hitting peak at age 24. Trading Hicks was a reasonable move, but the return turned out to be dreadful, and maybe the old FO should have known better. There's a pretty good argument that they should have had an idea that his 2015 performance was a fluke rather than an indicator of his future. The BABIP was unsustainable, he wasn't hitting the ball particularly hard, his xBA and xSLG suggested he was getting lucky too, and he'd never had a really great hitting season in the minors either. (excepting a 9 game cup of coffee in rookie ball in 2009, he never topped an .800 OPS for a full season at any level) It's a definite miss in player evaluation for that front office. Moving Hicks at the time was a smart decision at the time; there was a real question if he was going to hit enough, but had solid value as a defender and still had some upside offensively. They were trading from strength and depth and moving a player that wasn't going to be in their plans as more than a 4th OF before he got expensive while his value looked pretty solid. The thought process there was good, but the failure was in player evaluation on the other end. And you have to wonder if they were trading for need rather than trying to get the best player they could. Suzuki was solid, but they had basically nothing behind him...and they appear to have over-estimated the level of talent the 2015 team had, despite their record. Rough period of talent evaluation here for the Twins; this was also the year they signed Byungho Park too. There's a reason they cleaned house in the front office.

Severino is having himself a very nice season. He's an interesting prospect. The Ks are a little worrisome, but he's hit at every level for the Twins (excepting a brief power outage in the FSL, but considering he immediately started pounding the ball when he got promoted, it looks very much like a FSL blip not a problem). The power looks real, he gets on base...does he have a defensive position? Looks a little wobbly at 3B, unfortunately. Brooks Lee seems to have gotten himself back on track. Wasn't too worried about him, but it's good to see a young player dig himself back out after a tough couple of weeks at the plate. Kala'i Rosario keeps on hitting. He's going to be pushing for promotion this season at this rate. (also, anyone else find these 6 and 7 game series in the minors to be a bit weird? I guess it cuts down on travel costs for the clubs a bit, but it's got to be a bit odd to face the same team that many times in a row)

Wild day for Wallner, who looked excellent at the plate and a bit lost in the field. The throw to get the runner at second was fantastic, but it was also on a ball he should have caught. Jorge Lopez is definitely in a bit of a bad patch right now, which is too bad; this team needs him to be his shutdown self, especially with Jax scrabbling. We're definitely in a bit of a pinch with both of those guys out of sorts, and I'm not sure we want to be too reliant on Brock Stewart (who has done the job, though). Nice to see Julien looking comfortable at the plate. His bat is a nice boon. Props to Willi Castro for doing the job wherever he's been asked to go and whatever he's been asked to do. I wasn't thrilled about his signing, but he's turning out to be a useful utility guy and the flexibility is a real asset.

I'm on record as saying that baseball managers have less overall impact on the game than a lot of other pro sports. A lot of the impact that a manager has is behind the scenes in keeping the clubhouse together and managing all the personalities...which is something we mostly don't see and can't know for sure if he's doing a great job or not at, unless something bad breaks out and someone talks to a reporter. We haven't really seen anything like that where there have been anonymous comments in the press crapping on the manager; the closest has been the Sonny Gray stuff about wanting to pitch deeper in games...and that's been pretty overblown (IMHO) in terms of how much actual criticism of the manager it really was (perhaps by people who already had an agenda against Rocco?). The overall quality of managing in MLB is better now that it was 20 or 30 years ago, but that's also flattened out the impact of managers, I think. There's a handful in the league that are superior, showing a consistent ability to not only keep their clubhouse in order, but also manipulate their lineups to their advantage, handle the bullpens well, not make mistakes in game management, etc. There's a handful that seem to step in it often, can't get out of their own way, and aren't up to the task. Most of them fall into a muddled middle where most outsiders look at them and think they're probably fine, but will have some quirks that drive the locals batty, or become focal points for the fans when things are going perfectly, but are maybe only noticeable to people watching the team every day. Rocco lands in the middle for me. He's doing what the front office wants in terms of general strategy and approach. He seems to handle the clubhouse well, and does a better job of managing his lineup and bullpen than some other Twins managers. He's been more conservative than I'd like in some things and overly aggressive in others...but in the final analysis he's been generally fine. When his teams have talent and health, he's won. When they don't, he's not likely to manufacture it out of nothing. I don't think Rocco has done anything worth firing him; unless the front office gets swept out at the same time a lot of the stuff people find deeply offensive about Rocco as a manager will still be happening under the next guy. They're still not going to be playing a lot of small ball, they're unlikely to be stealing tons of bases (until the players turn over more), they won't be bunting a lot, and they're still going to have hitters that strike out a lot. They're still going to take out starters earlier than some people will like, and they're not going to have a 90's era style closer. They're still going to take an analytically-driven approach to baseball. So who are you going to get that will be demonstrably better than Rocco? Firing him will make some fans happy in the short term, but it will take little time for those fans to turn on the next manager for the exact same reasons, so what's the point? If healthy enough, this team should contend for the division this season and if they get in the playoffs anything could happen. (I think they're better positioned to win in the playoffs with this squad than many of their others than have struggled in the playoffs)

I'm not super worried about Rodriguez; he's coming off an injury and not everyone is Royce Lewis. The talent is great and I think he just needs the time to get back into a groove. He's also adjusting to a new level, so the slow start isn't a huge shocker. SWR was the big surprise to me. I really liked the way he was profiling and he did well in his cup of coffee in MLB so to see him struggling in AAA so far this season was not something I saw coming. He's had stretches where his control has wobbled before so hopefully he can get it back together. Salas is hard to know. He's pretty young, and sometimes it takes a while for these toolsy kids to figure it how to translate it into production. But it's a little concerning seeing such a big jump in Ks, no power, and a loss of plate discipline.

He's had some injuries, so it looks like they're trying to build him up slowly. He's very talented, but only 20, so I'm sure they're trying to make sure they do right by him and are being cautious about his development. YMMV on whether they're being too cautious? I would like to see him start going deeper into games, but the other end of the spectrum is Matt Canterino whose arm and MLB career may have been ruined by overwork at a young age at Rice (the poster child college for running up pitch counts).

Love Royce. Seems like a really great guy, love his positive energy and enthusiasm, and looking forward to seeing him show his talent and drive. He's had a really impressive rehab. It would have been totally reasonable for someone who has played as little as he has (because of injury, pandemic, and injury again) to struggle as he got back on the field, at least a little. He just refuses to accept barriers, apparently.

I'm not sure people are really saying he's improved at this point, more that he's healthy and showing his talent again. The HR/9 is a little high, but it doesn't take much to bump that number (the difference between where he is right now and his career average is literally like 2 HRs) so it's not particularly concerning for now. If he stays above 1 HR/9 all year? That will be less great. Honestly, the most important stat for Enlow is right now he's averaging 5+ innings per start. More healthy innings for this kid, please.

I'm a fan of Moran. he's always going to be a little wild at times, but that change-up is ridiculous and can bail himself out of trouble (that he usually creates for himself). He's a risky pitcher to bring in with men on base, but I have a fair amount of confidence in him to hold down any part of an opposing lineup. (I'm less inclined to think Castro has much of a future, despite him doing solid work as a stop-gap lately)

Good to see Lee have a good game since he's been scrabbling a bit at the plate. Royce Lewis is something else. Apparently long layoffs mean little for him! He's definitely putting himself on track for a call-up if and when he gets done with his rehab assignment. Enlow is looking like he's ready to reclaim his prospect status. Good for him.

I think the earlier comment might have been a "the twins offense is garbage right now and so is Brooks Lee at the plate" bit of snark.