Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
  • Posts

    41,429
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    465

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. "Acquire Jake Cave's backup." Another checklist item marked Complete.
  2. Six years is not concerning to me. He still hasn't reached his 23rd birthday. If you ever run a team, I suggest not signing* 16 year olds from the Dominican Republic, unless you are sure they will be future Hall of Famers who will reach the majors at age 21 or 22 hitting like a veteran. * Okay, "trading for."
  3. Saved the best for last in this list! As Casey Stengel or Yogi Berra or Mark Twain said, you can sum up baseball in one word: "you never know".
  4. Just pushing back a little on that line of thinking. Might have been a little too mocking in the pursuit of humor.
  5. The most recent successful World Series run the Twins had, Greg Gagne was our SS. Let's bring him back.
  6. Grade: D. Buxton contract being the only positive to bring it up from an F.. They are apparently "betting on themselves" in the sense of relying on a pipeline of pitching prospects, but one that can't seem to stay healthy for even a minor league season.
  7. I seem to remember Donaldson injuring himself more on the basepaths than playing defense but that may be selective based on Opening Day.
  8. Carefully. Very, exceedingly, carefully.
  9. That Ayala/Conger video is great! NOW I know how to be a big league catcher!
  10. The problem is our organization can't seem to keep the young cinnamon rolls from getting injured.
  11. I am content with the 40-man catching situation, with two young'uns still having minor league options so that you can stash a (hopefully) good replacement at AAA in case of injury, and/or go with the hot bat between those two at any given moment in the long season. Barring major injury, we're set for 2022-23. I like having an unfair advantage over the opposing team at as many spots in the lineup as possible, and I think there's a good argument that we have that at catcher - particularly on days when the other team plays their backup. Someone would have to knock me over with blue chip starting pitching, to interest me in a trade. The FO needs to continue seeding higher-end catching prospects at the lower levels of the farm system. The 40-man is good but we're thin at the higher minor league levels - neither Hamilton nor Banuelos inspires me - and it's best to build from within. Two years of potential stability on the big club should not be wasted. Cardenas and Winkel are potentially a good start. I wanna see two more.
  12. ??? Does not the word "steroid" ring a bell? For example Erickson's 1996 ERA was 5.02 - but the league as a whole was 4.99, so he was basically average that season, even before taking into account that relievers generally have lower ERA than starters (4.67 vs 5.17 respectively). This year's AL inflated ERA was 4.32, for reference. Starting in 2000 he was bad, sure. He showed seven years of stick-to-itiveness which I find difficult to fathom but give him great credit for.
  13. Hosmer is by now established as a well-below average player at a defensive position where you like to have flexibility; he hurts the team each inning he plays. And you'd be stuck with him for 4 years. If you take him off the Padres hands, you might as well just cut him, eating $60M of total salary, You'd better be getting back an absolute stud of a prospect, maybe two, for your $60M. I'm not convinced a team really will let go of a prized top-tier prospect just for money. A couple of second-tier guys, yes. The salary floor is a factor, and I like the creative thinking, but some of the guys being discussed are pretty extreme.
  14. Just when I was thinking, nope, no Spring Training for me this time around either, not even if the greedy owners open things back up in time, a photo like this melts my cold, cold heart.
  15. Oof. I just got done looking at this idea posed in another thread, and when you get down to actual names it looks scary. Is there a definitive list of who is available in the Rule 5? Or, if you have some specific players to propose then it could be worth discussing. But guys with good gloves who spent their 2021 hitting .220 at high-A could be a disaster in the majors in 2022.
  16. No further drying up will occur during the lockout.
  17. Hurrah! Let the game continue to find ways to celebrate its distinguished players.
  18. It's the teams' collective responsibility to do what's best for the fans, and for the long-term health of the game. Each player has just one life to live. The franchise lives on for generations, if run successfully. When the game is healthy and a player retires, the baseball world gives him a hearty handshake and its thanks - maybe even a HoF nod eventually . When the game is healthy and an owner "retires", he (or his heirs) gets significant capital gains. So, who has the real incentive and responsibility? Propaganda equating the two sides is deceptive and pernicious, and comes mainly from the ownership side. There's a lockout on, and gee whiz, look at which side of the line the majority of PR people stand.
  19. A nice picnic breakfast at Loring Park followed by a leisurely stroll to the ballpark to watch the afternoon's game?
  20. Trevor Story has never OPSed .800 on the road in any season. Get him away from Coors, and he's not a top-tier offensive player. He's still a solid major league hitter, and very valuable because he's a good shortstop, but I'm afraid he will be underappreciated by whichever fan base gets him. He might end up like Greg Gagne, a very underrated member of the Twins championship teams, or probably a notch higher. There's a shortage of such players, thus an "overpay" - but that's the Stupidity Tax for not having developed a player of this caliber for ourselves.
  21. Revenue sharing was billed one way, and has turned out to be just another variation on collusion. "You don't spend, I don't spend, and we solidify our profit margins." From the players' perspective, better to just let the large market teams spend those sums on player contracts. I expect this negotiation point to be one the players association lets go of first, because indeed the big-time free agents are being paid well anyway. I'm ready for another try at the 1890 Players League. So I'm not feeling too immersed in this present negotiation.
  22. "Know your place." Always sage advice in life.
  23. HOF is for celebrating the game's best and most beloved players. I would love for a Hall big enough to include Justin. Sadly I don't think he gets there, and he probably falls off the ballot quickly.
  24. You've described the intended role of a bottom feeder team, to a tee. It's not even as if the contract can't work out. It can. Bundy surely won't reach the heights, for the Twins, expected when he was younger. But he may have a productive and successful season. But this is the type of deal the Dodgers or Yankees are pleased to farm out. If Bundy pans out but the 2022 Twins don't, they'll make a nice trade deadline offer. For true contenders, the 40-man roster and the 26-man roster are the constraining factors. For us farm teams, money is always the constraint, but there is room on the roster for low cost investments that possibly will pay off.
  25. Now what kind of ticker tape parade is that? I ask you.
×
×
  • Create New...