Jump to content
The MLB Draft starts on Saturday at 1pm Eastern. Check out our mock draft board in the lead-up to the picks! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    41,444

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    465

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    Pineda is an easy yes for me. He's actually good. Health issues, sure, but Rodriguez scares me more.
  2. ashbury
    I was in attendance for the only 2 innings Eddie ever played third base in the majors, so I totally feel qualified to say the Twins missed a trick by signing that stiff Josh Donaldson* and not keeping Eddie. Good for Eddie, this past month or two. He's a major leaguer, and capable of this kind of heroics. * Different off-seasons, I realize
  3. ashbury
    "Home run hitters drive Cadillacs, singles hitters drive Fords." -- Fritz Ostermueller (regarding Ralph Kiner)
  4. ashbury
    That's what scouts mean, when they term a defender "adequate."
  5. ashbury
    Successful teams don't list their good players and then try to determine which has the most trade value. They keep their good players. If we're rebuilding, the clearest signal the FO could send of that is by trading Polanco.
  6. ashbury
    If his finger is going to heal then it's a no brainer to retain his services - the CBA assures that anyone under team control is a relative bargain. If he's never going to be the same due to the finger, then it's a no brainer to release him - $7M can be deployed to some better use. If his prognosis is 50/50, then you have to flip a coin. It all comes down to the medical staff's forecasting ability - I have no such insight so I have no independent opinion.
  7. ashbury
    I liked seeing Broxton jump for joy on the catch in that video against de la Guerra. Considering that Celestino stood to prevent Broxton from getting a call to the majors if he did well, that shows real class.
  8. ashbury
    What's the scouting report on Kala'i's defense? Does he have any speed?
  9. ashbury
    1995 Peoria LaTroy Hawkins, Matt Lawton, Dan Naulty, Jamie Ogden, Kevin Ohme, Mitch Simons, Todd Walker 1996 Scottsdale Jason Bell, JJ Johnson, Jamie Ogden, Mark Redman, Todd Ritchie, Dan Serafini We of course have the benefit of hindsight, a different kind of bias, as to how these careers turned out, knowing that the late 90s were a dreary time for the franchise. Certainly many players sent to the AFL, in general, do not progress, for any number of reasons - that's also a red herring. But at the time, most of the players in those two years looked like real prospects - worth a fan's trip to the Phoenix area for a look-see. E.g. the now-forgotten Jason Bell was a 21-year old who had had success at high-A and was so-so when promoted to AA but with good strikeout numbers for the time. And the unlamented 1996 group as a whole had 3 pitchers who went on to have more than just a cuppajoe in the majors. (I won't bother to defend the FO's two-year fascination with first baseman Ogden.) Does anyone besides Wallner in this year's group, old other than Laweryson and not with much of a track record, look like they have a prayer of that? Digging up the names for these two seasons in the AFL was tedious. I'll pass the baton back to you, if you want to dig out a team with less-compelling prospects than these or, back to the point, less interesting than the crew being sent to Scottsdale for 2021. Nonetheless, I'm going, later this month.
  10. ashbury
    Royce Lewis contributing anything to the big club before September seems beyond "plausible" and more into "so you're tellin' me there's a chance" territory.
  11. ashbury
    I don't want to undersell Story as a hitter. He's not poor. His .200 road BA this year is IMO a fluke, and he hits for power. He's well above average as a hitter among his shortstop peers. But his road OPS has never been above .800, and after a while I have to accept that that's who he is - a very good hitter but not in a class with the elite. A very general comp from Twins history could be Greg Gagne - who was more than good enough in the field and had some underrated pop with the bat, and arguably was the glue that helped solidify those World Series teams, Kirby and Hrby notwithstanding. No chance Story goes for 2 years and $20M total. Even factoring out Coors helium, he's worth a whale of a lot more. I'd rank the choices offered in this article as Correa/Story/Seager/Baez, and give Semien no consideration at SS. But 20 other teams will be bidding too - it's always a sellers market and only 4 teams will come away with a prize, with a good chance that 2 of those end up with regrets relatively quickly.
  12. ashbury
    Understanding what you mean by "decent SS" probably comes from knowing your reaction to hearing, "like, say, Jorge Polanco?"
  13. ashbury
    Probably, but I'm not sure to his benefit. I like him but we should be prepared for a very good defensive SS who doesn't hit as well as Jorge Polanco, not "Coors Field Trevor Story". In addition, we'll have to "overpay" to outbid all the other suitors for any of the topnotch shortstops, but that overpay might be even a little steeper if any of the suitors think they are getting "Coors Field Trevor Story".
  14. ashbury
    ... and if by some miracle they are in contention in June or July, and the draftee is scuffling and seeming to hold them back, they can reverse course and offer him back to the original team. If they aren't contending, then they can put up with a lot less production from that one spot on the roster, if the talent seems there.
  15. ashbury
    Hip hip!
  16. ashbury
    And maybe deservedly. People were flinging facts back and forth, So I decided to toss in a fact that was semi-relevant but really not. All in a spirit of good fun and if someone felt like responding in kind I took it in the same spirit. I think long-time readers are fairly aware by now of my exasperation with 2021's outcome, and its portents for the future. And if not.... it's only a ballgame.
  17. ashbury
    Unless the Twins sign someone for $30M+ a year for a large number of years, then that pitcher is almost by definition not an ace. Because even the top teams can always find a spot in their rotation for a guy of that caliber, and the ones with the deep pockets will not allow themselves to be outbid easily. There's no reason to even bring up that word when talking about the pitchers mentioned here.
  18. ashbury
    49 errors!!!! That's terrible! With a glove like th- .... wait, across 4 years? 12 errors a year? For a shortstop? If SS errors are your thing, you won't enjoy a return of Polanco to the most visible defensive position - he made 18 and 22 errors in his two full-time stints at the position (and he committed 17 this season, mostly at 2B). Gordon was error prone in the minors and the team showed reluctance to even try him there this year. Arraez... no. Just no. We need range in a shortstop, and an arm. Simmons touched the ball over 500 times this season, as did every full-time shortstop in the majors - his rate of plays made per inning was second in the AL among full-timers (though in years past, he usually would be #1). The number of errors that get charged are a drop in the bucket to a shortstop's total picture, in part because the official scorers are directed not to call an error on every play-not-made for statistics-keeping purposes. I'm not going to defend Simmons. He was "only" 31 but played like an old 31. He has slipped defensively to only better than average, and his bat is impossible to support no matter how good the defense - no player can save enough runs to make up for the black hole he was in the lineup. He was below replacement-level and won't be missed IMO. But I like to make roster decisions based on the full resume a player brings, not the superficial aspects. Oh, and, Welcome To Twins Daily. I wound up doing a little deep-dive on one of the supporting points you made, but overall I like the ideas you raised in this article.
  19. ashbury
    Twins had 8 more wins than any other last-place team in 2021. Fact.
  20. ashbury
    I would add deception to the list of qualifications. The fastball has to look for all the world like it could be an off-speed pitch of some kind, until it is too late.
  21. ashbury
    Or to make manifest just how far from genuine competitiveness they really are.
  22. ashbury
    13. What a disappointing article! Each Friday I look forward to a bit of trenchant satire here, and I see now that with RandBalls Stu having been kidnapped and replaced by a swarm of drones it's going to be a long, long winter where I will have to fall back on the creaky old Onion for my LOLs.
  23. ashbury
    Jake Cave IMO has zero to do with decisions the team makes about the glut of marginal pitchers needing attention on the 40-man.
  24. ashbury
    Are you from The Future? Are you here to tell us this won't be his only one?
  25. ashbury
    I wish they had chosen different timing, later on when a flood of players are all hitting the waiver wire at once. I don't think Colina is super unique as a target for acquisition, it's just that this looks to me like a temporary move by the Rangers, who will in turn put Colina on waivers and likely be able to stash him in the minors but off their 40-man. That's the aspect I'd like to have Falvey elaborate on.
×
×
  • Create New...