Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,844

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    463

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    They're 5-17, but it's just bad luck - scoring 100 runs and giving up 137 should by rights have them more like 8-14.
  2. ashbury
    Yeah, me and my 8th grade classmates being forced to study Art Appreciation had a good laugh when we contemplated paintings of Venetian doges. Funny word, funny clothes. We probably learned something from the experience but I have no idea what, except a bougie ability to name a painter or three. It certainly did not prepare us for important 21st century concepts like memes and cryptocurrency.
  3. ashbury
    You can't bring up as many players on the 40-man in September as used to be possible, so the urgency to add anyone to the 40-man for that purpose, before the off-season/Rule-5, has decreased.
  4. ashbury
    A waiver claim, and a 30-year old minor league off-season signing? Talk about wishful thinking, on two out of three!
  5. ashbury
    I think you're on the right track about that. General managers seem to assign steeper and steeper value to players who are well above average. The value of adding just 2 months (on an expiring contract) of someone average-ish just isn't that high anymore. But the value of adding someone like Scherzer is greatly esteemed. When I think about the constraints front offices have to manage (40-man and 26-man rosters being critical resources), I tend to think these valuations are correct. As for the trades: I like the Cruz trade even if the two MLB-ready prospects turn out like (say) Vance Worley and Trevor May, so give it an A+. I am not as enthusiastic about the Berrios deal, for reasons I won't wax eloquent about here, but it's a high-upside gamble that deserves at least a B+ for its concept. Getting a little something in terms of prospect potential for Hansel Robles is not very meaningful but positive, so call it a C+ for good execution. I think I read that the deal for Happ included the Twins paying a good portion of the remaining contract, and the pitchers in return don't look so good after sleeping on it overnight, so that one is just a Gentleman's C as an addition-by-subtraction move as others have termed it. I think they would have liked to move Donaldson's contract for just a bag of balls, in a vacuum, but didn't want to take the PR hit, I feel I understand his staying. Since I agree with your analysis on why Pineda (and by analogy the others on expiring contracts) wasn't moved, I don't have any major criticisms of the overall moves, so all in all I give the FO an A.
  6. ashbury
    That phrase keeps coming up. Who is to say what is "wishful" thinking? In a year or two, recurrence of injuries could mean that keeping Buxton and Donaldson will look wishful in hindsight. I don't think it's a useful way to characterize differences of opinion.
  7. ashbury
    Outbidding the Yankees and Dodgers on a free agent is your plan of action? Or, getting less for him at the next trading deadline than we got now?
  8. ashbury
    Depending on how the Cardinal rotation is set up and what they want to do, he could be ready for a start on August 1, against... the Twins. Anyone want to predict a 2021-ish outcome to such a game? Nah, that would be on short rest. But, need I repeat, this is 2021.
  9. ashbury
    I hadn't recalled seeing the part about relief pitcher until after the trade. Sobering.
  10. ashbury
    Presumably the agent replied privately to this line of logic, "we don't know what market value is, and we won't know until the Yankees and Dodgers make a bid. Since having them do so now would be Tampering, my client is betting on himself and waiting."
  11. ashbury
    I hope the pitcher the Twins got turns out to be good. Because other teams will sell you a hitting prospect any day of the week to get good starting pitching.
  12. ashbury
    Come on, Tom. As you get older, you need to learn not to bottle things up - you'll give yourself a case of hypertension. No, let it out - tell us what you really think of how this FO has handled the season!
  13. ashbury
    C'mon, glunn. This is the Twins. There is always bad that can come from anything.
  14. ashbury
    Converted from starting and suddenly has strikeout stuff. Hope the pitching coaches can bring him along.
  15. ashbury
    Yes.
  16. ashbury
    I chalk it up to the Twins FO adroitly negotiating through the SuperSecretMLBTradeRumors.com that you and I never see, letting word out that there was steadily increasing interest in JA Happ and teams better get their offers to them in a hurry or risk missing out.
  17. ashbury
    I was prepared to go with the standard "Great trade! (Who'd we get?)" regarding Happ. But it looks like we got a legitimate bullpen arm? I'm impressed. / edit - checking the K%... meh. Still an improvement. / edit^2 - bracing for a 0.1 IP 3 H 2 BB debut from our new bullpen acquisition. Because, Twins. / edit^3 - and a AA fireballer with control problems they presumably think they can fix when the Cardinals couldn't? Alrighty then!
  18. ashbury
    Not a peep that I have seen today about Pineda. Mets? Per yesterday's MLBTR blurb.
  19. ashbury
    I certainly don't see how the Phillies line up for a trade of Buxton.
  20. ashbury
    Indeed. Shortstops with questionable arms almost always do.
  21. ashbury
    Are you looking for certainty, in a world that offers none? Andrelton Simmons was expected to be a known quantity, great glove and acceptable bat, and the bat for sure (the glove arguably) has disappointed. Happ and Shoemaker, no world beaters, could be expected on their records to have provided workmanlike innings at minimum. That's just off the top of my head - no ballplayer offers guarantees.
  22. ashbury
    We got Aston Martin! My heart is beating faster now! These are two highly ranked prospects, no question. But the high-upside comes with questions on both. Big questions about Martin's arm - left field and 2B aren't positions of need now or in the foreseeable future - FalVine's penchant for top bats continues, with the theory that the defensive role will work itself out eventually. SWR's seeming control yips don't bode well. I hope our evaluation guys and our on-field guys are on the same page about developing these two jewels. Call me greedy but I was hoping for a couple of low-minors guys in addition - moderate upside only, but genuine C+ prospects.
  23. ashbury
    If your investment portfolio includes property that could walk away in eighteen months, you might give these guys a second look.
  24. ashbury
    I would only trade an expiring contract to the Sox.
  25. ashbury
    Ryan, you are missing out big time by not investing in B1tc01n and D0gec01n. Contact me for details.
×
×
  • Create New...