Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
  • Posts

    40,844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    463

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. IOW they've been playing roughly .500 ball for a while. Better than they started out - but still, big whoop, from my vantage point.
  2. While true, it doesn't mean there has been any inning where he's been actually, you know, good. Second inning has a 4.76 ERA in 17 tries for the season (.844 OPS so if anything he's been lucky), all the other frames are worse. And it's likely that in the second inning, a pitcher faces batters lower in the lineup than any other inning, unless he faces the minimum in the first two innings and gets to pitch to the 7-8-9 batters in the third.
  3. Physicists, not physicians, should have been consulted on this question. The effect of a singularity when they come within a certain radius, such as a tag play outlined in the article, could start a chain reaction resulting in the Universe as we know it being extinguished, or at the very least a spell of even worse weather.
  4. I can't believe he has much trade value. He remains my sleeper candidate for Rooker of the Year, though.
  5. This line of reasoning completely overlooks the value he brings while he is on someone's roster. That value for 2021 is low for the Twins and and any other team out of contention, but for a team trying to make the post-season there is value he can deliver in the coming couple of months, and then for the post-season there are additional teams with stronger credentials who will also find him of use when trying to win one short series after another. And then, for a contending team, the logic starts all over again in 2022. Two bites at the apple before he departs. You think that doesn't have value to a select group of teams?
  6. ... in which case we're suddenly asking the moon for him in trade.
  7. Twins 3, White Sox 2 Seems so very, very long ago.
  8. This game just brought us a new way to drain our resolve. Abandon hope all ye who watch the 2021 Twins.
  9. Had the Twins offense scored 6 runs they would have lost. There can be plenty of blame to go around.
  10. I was hoping for either wins or clarity as we approach the trade deadline. Guess I'm getting the latter. No false hopes being raised!
  11. There's rough and then there's rough. It's one thing to say that once contention for the post-season is out the window, it doesn't matter how many losses there are. But finishing strong versus finishing in abject failure could be the difference in millions of dollars of season-ticket sales during the coming off-season. The FO has to take many things into account besides just roster management to avoid a death-spiral on a par with Pittsburgh and Baltimore. Finishing with 90 losses is rough but finishing with 100+ is rougher.
  12. Couldn't help noticing that all our hits in game 2 were from guys who might be gone by the end of the month, with the exception of Polanco, while all the o-fers were guys discussed to be the future/young core, with the exception of Kepler. Going with the kids could be rough the rest of the way.
  13. Hamilton's not on the 40 man. I think he was waived already once this season, so if they bring him up and then need to send him down again, they lose him. I may be shaky on the rules and someone will correct me, but all in all I suspect it comes down to roster stewardship. By contrast they can add Minaya and DFA him without fear of losing him, because hey he's Minaya and no one's going to lodge a waiver claim, or something like that. MLB roster rules sometimes work against a particular player.
  14. When you phrase it that way, the question kind of answers itself, doesn't it?
  15. It would be exciting if he shines in this audition. If he disguises his pitches, the changeup can be devastating.
  16. FalVine have yet to demonstrate they can put together the "sustainable" pitching staff that their words in 2016 suggested we'd have by now. For them to deal away both Berrios and Rogers would be, as the trope (which I used once already today) goes, "a bold move, Cotton," moving them farther from the goal rather than closer. They really would be gambling that their heretofore unproven prowess was about to be triumphally confirmed.
  17. Isn't that going to be the case for literally every pick after the first handful? There is a lot of group-think in baseball's scouting circles and front offices, but there will also be shades and variability. So the teams will rank prospects in subtly different ways, and whoever a team happens to pick wasn't at the top of the (remaining) list for anyone else before them when it was their turn to pick, pretty much by definition. "It's just math!" Of course there is also the other side of the coin, related to the "winner's paradox" or something like that. "If the guy we've decided on is so great, how come none of the other geniuses picking earlier than us snapped him up?" Comes with the territory, I'm basically saying.
  18. I seem to remember that when he was sent down earlier this season, Rocco or someone said that his defense needed to improve. Maybe his bat is what's improved enough, but bat-only is a really high hurdle in the major leagues. Has he shown any ability to play an acceptable defensive game?
  19. A ton of Physics majors do.
  20. Anybody here know with certainty how to pronounce his last name? The online sources I found for the word in general would make it sound like "hah-YAR". If he's of Arabic extraction that might be about right, but the draft day announcer had it as "HAD-jer", and it wouldn't surprise me if it was something like "HEY-jar'.
  21. I love watching two evenly matched teams play. I've been known to pull over on the road when I spot a game in progress at a town park with no spectators, in case there might be entertainment. Or, two last-place major league teams? Could be a good battle, with a little less taken for granted and thus more surprises. Seesaw lead changes can be great. But when it's my team, which was supposed to be putting together a roster for a deep post-season run? I don't enjoy watching them get clobbered by the good teams, and I don't enjoy a contest between them and another "evenly matched" bottom-dweller team, because it just hurts too much. The game the other day when they had a walk-off win against a mediocre team after blowing the lead meant absolutely nothing to me except further pain. I've been watching the games on radio with the sound off, mostly.
  22. His stats at AAA are still riding on the coattails of his insane first game. Good for him, but take that game out and his AAA OPS is around .660 and dropping. I can't imagine the front office is contemplating an imminent trade of Donaldson just to accommodate the prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...