Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Riverbrian

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    29,322

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    174

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Riverbrian

  1. Riverbrian
    Which was what I was asking if that was what the OP was stating by declaring that "Trading Polanco to secure his spot on the team was a good decision by the front office". Why would his spot need to be secured unless the OP assumes that Polanco is the better player?
  2. Riverbrian
    If you insist. There are more... but 2 fairly quickly should suffice. April 2 This is true only if the twins were willing to devote a roster to a player who is primarily a DH. Most teams don't want to devote a spot to a DH and if the twins were to do so Martinez made more sense. Who does he replace in the field? Julien is the superior and cheaper player at 2B against RHP. Farmer is the superior player a 2B against LHP. Lewis the much better player at 3B. Kirilloff is the equivalent player at 1B against RHP and much cheaper. Santana is the superior player at 1B against LHP. So, when is he the preferred starter? There is also the issue of having room on the roster for Brooks Lee. April 4 This is your opinion of who he starts over. If the twins agreed with you, Polanco would still be here. They don't want a full-time DH and neither do most teams. And, if they wanted a full-time DH, Martinez would have made much more sense. They would have a better hitter, a good RP, and two good prospects. In addition, he is an inferior choice over Kirilloff against RHP and Inferior to Santana against LHP. The only time he would not be an inferior choice is at DH.
  3. Riverbrian
    Quoting for display purposes.
  4. Riverbrian
    Quoting for display purposes
  5. Riverbrian
  6. Riverbrian
    AND... AND
  7. Riverbrian
    You have consistently used Santana in your model to justify the trading of Polanco.
  8. Riverbrian
    Your editor needs a stern warning
  9. Riverbrian
    First Off - Polanco wRC+ is 110 Things change fast in a small sample size. You gotta try and keep up if small sample size is your weapon of choice. 2nd Off wRC+ - Here are some more numbers. Which ones do you want to ignore? Do you want to ask the question... In what way are any of these players below better than Polanco? Castro 36 Farmer: 18 Santana: 11 Kepler: -62 Crawford: 56 Garver: 46 Julio Rodriquez: 40 Nolan Jones: 47 Devers: 102 Arozarena: 63 Oneil Cruz: 74 Harper: 81 Castellanos: 26 Boegaerts: 69 Santander: 63 Lindor: 48 Jose Ramirez: 98 Matt Chapman: 66 Carroll: 82 Swanson: 93 Bellinger: 54 Arenado: 93 Goldschmidt: 54 Vlad Jr.: 103 Bichette: 79 Bregman: 96 Third off: You and I have had a lot of discussions on this. Show me where I said Polanco is better than Julien. I've said Polanco wouldn't be a bench player! I've said that Polanco and Julien can be on the same roster. I've said that injuries are going to occur I've said your paper lineup of a Julien/Farmer Platoon, Kirilloff/Santana Platoon, Lewis and Correa being better than Polanco won't last before April is done. I've said that Rocco doesn't let Julien hit left handers. I've said that Rocco lets Polanco hit both left handers and right handers. I've said that Santana will play every day. I've said that you put words in other peoples mouths. And you've done that again.
  10. Riverbrian
    I'm calm. I'm participating in the discussion. I understand what article's are. 😎
  11. Riverbrian
  12. Riverbrian
    I don't disagree. I'm a Julien Fan. I won't use small sample size volatile defensive metrics to support my position but I think he is doing well defensively so I don't have any issues with him wearing a glove on his hand. I think his bat is plus plus. I'm happy that Rocco has been forced to give Julien AB's against southpaws so he can improve his game furthur more. What I strongly disagree with is the pretzel logic used to claim that trading Polanco was a good thing to secure a position for Julien.
  13. Riverbrian
    Yes he is still a viable major league bat... his kind of power doesn't grow on trees... just not at the moment. He may have to go down to find himself if he doesn't start figuring it out... much like Miranda last season. I'd say not yet but maybe at the end of the month if he doesn't start putting more balls in play by the time May rolls around. 17 K's in 33 PA's is a real bad start for a player with options remaining. We don't have to tolerate it if it continues. Just not yet in my opinion.
  14. Riverbrian
    Polanco and Julien can exist on the same roster!!! If anyone doesn't believe that. Enjoy your Carlos Santana.
  15. Riverbrian
  16. Riverbrian
    What the hell does this even mean? Are you actually saying Julien is one of the best two-way players because Correa, Kepler and Lewis are hurt and because Buxton is sucking. Otherwise he'd be fifth? Are you saying that Julien's place on the roster wasn't secure because of Polanco? This first or fifth best player isn't secure because of Polanco? Does that mean that Polanco would have been 1st, 2nd 3rd, 4th or 5th... which would have knocked Julien down to 2nd or 6th? So thank heavens we got rid of the better player so Julien can rise up that depth chart?
  17. Riverbrian
  18. Riverbrian
    Cause it was a sure thing... It's April 15th.
  19. Riverbrian
  20. Riverbrian
    If I had to guess and guess is all I can do. I would agree with Chief. I think they went to Seattle in search of a starter but couldn't pry one of the good ones loose so they had to settle to say... hey at least we got one. The part where I would disagree with Chief is: Once DeSclafini became the starter AVAILABLE for a trade. He was no longer the primary in the deal. In other words: A starter was probably the primary catalyst for a trade with Seattle but when it was all said and done. Gonzales became the primary acquisition to complete the trade because the front office knew that a flyer on DeSclafini wasn't enough for Polanco. I could be right... I could be wrong or somewhere in between but no matter how it transpired... one thing is for sure. It did us absolutely no good in 2024. We lost a primary hitter for a sub prime pitcher in 2024.
  21. Riverbrian
    Spot on. Switching Horses after 9 innings and 6 innings of work is... a little impetuous. Take it slow Things will work out fine. All we need is just a little patience.
  22. Riverbrian
    If he is the talent others say he is and if he continues to hit AA pitching to the tune he is currently singing. The Twins have a couple of things brewing where he may be a discussion sooner rather than later. 1. If Wallner can't snap out of this... he will have to be sent down. I wouldn't send him down yet... way too soon but... if he can't pull out of this striking out 50% of the time thing he is currently doing. Something will have to be done for his sake and ours. 2. This is a critical year for Larnach. It's his last option year. He either demonstrates major league ability this year or he is gone. Trevor needs first crack at it. We don't want to throw away Larnach in order to have Rodriquez jump two levels. This is our last year to see if Trevor is worthy. Going into 2025... Larnach has to be rostered or placed on waivers where the A's will claim him. Get healthy quick Trevor... Get healthy quick. Keep pushing Emmanuel... Keep pushing. Figure it out Wallner... Figure it out.
  23. Riverbrian
    Everyone in the world should be able to see the problem that you are illustrating here... yet so many seem to not see it. Farmer and Margot are historically not very good at hitting Right Handed pitchers. They are on the roster to hit left handers so Kirilloff, Julien and Wallner don't have to hit left handers. Once you commit 3 roster spots to three batters whose primarily talent is hitting 25% of the league and not so good at hitting 75% of the league. Once the injuries start and they are going to start... Now you are asking those 3 roster spots to do something that they are historically not good at. This is what we are asking Margot and Farmer to do... right now and this is what we will be asking Margot and Farmer to do... multiple times before the season concludes. Commiting 15.3 Million dollars this season to three players who are not very good at hitting right handed hitters in an off-season spent trimming payroll 31 million dollars is really really really hard to justify. Polanco at 10.5 is actually functional no matter what happens on the injury front.
  24. Riverbrian
    You stand on your own two feet very well and I appreciate the discussion. However when you combine these two statements of yours together. "it was easy to see why Polanco was traded" "No team is going to have solid depth when looking at their starting 3B, SS (especially when they are the two best players on the team), and their top replacement going down and be able to easily cover that depth. You are illustrating exactly what Chia Pet and myself and others are saying. We were recommending that you don't trade that snow blower for a couple of shovels. 10 Feet of Snow just dropped in April so we are shoveling now.
  25. Riverbrian
    I was the one who brought this discussion back to the forefront and the reason I did it was to show foresight. 😉
×
×
  • Create New...