Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Were We Possibly This Wrong?


    Seth Stohs

    The Minnesota Twins lost 7-5 to the Toronto Blue Jays on Monday night at Target Field. It was the team's tenth loss in their last 11 games, and it dropped their season record to just 9-16. As the calendar flips from April to May, many Twins fans are likely asking themselves if they could have possibly been this wrong about the Twins.

    We were possibly this wrong about the 2018 Minnesota Twins?

    Image courtesy of Jordan Johnson, USA Today

    Twins Video

    Simply put, there isn't a member of the Minnesota Twins organization, players, coaches or front office, who is happy with the Twins 9-15 record. Even more than the simple record, no one could be happy with the way that the team is playing. Most important maybe to the ownership, fans are already frustrated with the results.

    To this point, an oversimplified summary of the Twins season would include: poor starting pitching, poor relief pitching, poor hitting and poor defense. There are some positives, to be sure, but overall, April was a rough month for the Twins.

    There have been excuses given for the team. Some are legitimate. Others just aren't really appropriate. Here is a quick look at some of the excuses or reasons often given for the Twins awful first month of the season.

    The Weather

    The weather was awful during the first half of the month, through the season's first three weeks. The Twins had a number of scheduled off days, and then there was an unusual amount of snow that fell on Minneapolis (and many other MLB cities). This certainly could not have been easy, but frankly, the Twins were 8-5 during the spotty part of the schedule.

    We mostly assumed that the team would benefit from playing every day. Hitters could get into a routine, and pitchers could get into their normal patterns between starts. That, in theory, should create some sort of consistency.

    Instead, since things returned to normal, the twins have gone 1-10.

    The Front Office Did Nothing

    I hear this a lot, and it's one that is hard to fathom. The Twins were one of the busiest teams during the offseason. The Cubs signed Yu Darvish, who the Twins clearly targeted heavily.

    In the offseason, the Twins signed relievers Fernando Rodney, Zack Duke and Addison Reed. They traded A-ball shortstop Jermaine Palacios for veteran Jake Odorizzi. These were solid moves.

    Many assumed that the money that was not spent on Darvish would just go unspent money. Instead, the front office played the free agent market wisely. The Twins signed Logan Morrison, who hit 38 home runs last year for Tampa Bay, for $6.5 million and an option. Then they signed Lance Lynn, a pitcher who was projected to make $80 million or more in free agency, for one year and $12 million.

    That was the point where many Twins fans nodded and thought, OK, now we can really get excited. Now the Twins have accumulated a roster that could possibly compete with Cleveland for an AL Central title.

    Since the season has started, the front office, unfortunately, has again had to reach down to AAA, and reach out via the waiver wire, to address pitching issues.

    Judging any of those moves after one month would be very short-sighted, whether positively or negatively. Fernando Rodney has not been good. Zack Duke, after struggling early, has been pretty good the last seven outings. Odorizzi has an ERA below four.

    Logan Morrison got off to a very slow start. It will take him some time to make his numbers look presentable. Lance Lynn, frankly, has had five starts that look very similar to the two starts Phil Hughes has had, which pushed Hughes to the bullpen. To attempt to summarize Lynn to this point, he has had no command.

    The Twins Have Missed Byron Buxton

    While his batting average when he went on the disabled list was just shy of .200, the Twins have won just two games since Byron Buxton went down with migraines... and then a fractured toe.

    While Max Kepler can play a solid, adequate centerfield, the loss of Buxton comes in the form of replacing Buxton with Kepler and Kepler with Robbie Grossman. In other words, the defense is weakened in two spots.

    Likewise, it's nice to have Eduardo Escobar's bat in the lineup, but the team also misses Jorge Polanco who will not be able to play for another two months due to his 80-game PED suspension. Now Miguel Sano has a hamstring injury, and the team's infield depth is being stretched.

    Players Gotta Play

    If we're being honest, it's almost completely on the players at this point. Max Kepler is really punishing the baseball. Eduardo Escobar continues to be very good with the bat. Joe Mauer continues to be an on-base machine. Ryan Pressly has seemingly taken a next step. Kyle Gibson, Jake Odorizzi and Jose Berrios have been solid pitchers most times out. Addison Reed has been quite good. As Mitch Garver has played more of late, his bat has heated up.

    The team needs better starting pitching. The team needs better relief pitching. The team needs better hitting overall, but they more specifically need to be better with runners in scoring position.

    Reasons for Optimism

    It might be difficult right now to imagine a scenario where the Twins turn this around and make a playoff push. The team will need to start playing well soon, but there are some things that we do need to remember.

    First, the Twins still are scheduled to play another 138 games. To end the season with 87 wins, the team would need to go 78-60. That means that they would need to win about 56% of their remaining games. That's not an easy task, but it isn't out of the realm of possibility if things change soon.

    The team has played just one game in the American League Central to this point. That means they have another 56 games against the Detroit Tigers, Kansas City Royals and Chicago White Sox. If they go 37-19 in those 56 games, that would mean that they needed to go .500 in their other 82 remaining games to reach that 87 win mark. I don't know if winning 2/3 of their games against those three AL Central teams is realistic, but those games will be very important to the Twins.

    I still believe that the Twins have a good combination of veterans and younger players. Veterans will typically find a way to reach their typical numbers by season's end. Logan Morrison and Lance Lynn can only get better. Fernando Rodney should get better. Taylor Rogers and Trevor Hildenberger will get better.

    The front office has shown they're not going to be afraid to make moves, particularly with the final 25- and 40-man roster spots. Tyler Kinley got some time, and now has been DFAd. They added David Hale. He pitched once, and they DFAd him. They are trying Matt Magill. Gabriel Moya made the Opening Day roster, Alan Busenitz has been up, Tyler Duffey got another shot and now he's been sent back, and John Curtiss is up.

    And finally, the exciting news from Monday was the announcement that Fernando Romero, the team's top pitching prospect, will be called up on Wednesday to make the start for the Twins. It isn't likely to be a one-time spot start as Phil Hughes has been moved to the bullpen. Hughes got two starts upon his return and the club saw enough. And to replace him, they didn't just call up anyone. They called up their top prospect.

    Is Fernando Romero ready? Probably not quite. But he's close, and his stuff can be electric. He's got the upper-90s fastball to go with a slider. He'll need to be more consistent with control and command, and his third pitch (a changeup) is still a work-in progress. But it's the kind of move that tells the organization, we aren't settling and we're going to give this key part of our future a shot.

    If Lance Lynn doesn't soon make some adjustments, he may need a three-week DL stint with some sort of "injury" and someone like Stephen Gonsalves - who will make his first AAA start of 2018 on Tuesday - could get an opportunity.

    If Miguel Sano can't play in the next couple of days, could the Twins decide to promote another highly-touted prospect, Nick Gordon, directly from Double A? Is he big-league ready? Probably not, there are still questions about him and he could use more development time, but that would be a big move. If they feel he's close, which he might be, that would be the possible move.

    So, were we wrong?

    I don't know what everyone who reads this thinks the 2018 Twins team would do or should do. I do think most believed that this team can, should and will compete for a playoff spot. I'm not sure how many thought that the team had made up the 20 win distance between the Twins and Cleveland from last year, but on paper, the team had improved. They had added some solid veterans, and they still had young players capable of getting better and better.

    I am not at the point yet in giving up on the 2018 season. It's FAR too early for that. I still believe that there is too much talent on this roster and that they should turn it around quickly. Getting Byron Buxton back would be huge. Having a healthy Miguel Sano, and preferably one that strikes out less than 40% of the time, would be helpful. Having Lance Lynn show what he's been capable of through his years with the Cardinals would be nice. Logan Morrison figuring out a way to hit five or six home runs a month the rest of the way would be good. A higher percentage of competitive at-bats would be a good start. Eddie Rosario remembering not to swing at pitches he can't drive would be great. Jason Castro performing as he did in 2017 would be good. The bullpen finding its way will be crucial, and obviously the most important thing will be for the starting staff to throw some quality starts onto their stat lines.

    There is reason for hope and optimism. That should not be gone for Twins fans. But right now, little is going right, and they will need to turn things around quickly to encourage fans to show up to Target Field.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I can shrug off bad pitching for a month. It happens.

     

    I can shrug off bad hitting for a month. It happens.

     

    Entire pitching staffs and lineups sometimes flounder at the same time. I can accept those things and not get too worked up about it. I've watched a lot of baseball over the years and sometimes, the stars align in a positive way. Other times, they align in the worst way possible.

     

    So I'll just ride out this bad stretch before demanding a massive roster overhaul.

     

    But what chaps me to no end is the sloppy, SLOPPY play by the defenders. Rodney has been bad but he probably blows two fewer saves if his defense makes routine plays behind him. I can recall at least half a dozen losses that swung against the Twins after someone in the field did something incredibly stupid and/or lazy. And it's not one guy making all the mistakes. It's at least half the friggin' team. On a nightly basis, someone new steps forward and laces up their clownshoes in preparation for an epic night of failure.

     

    And that's unacceptable. If this team was merely competent defensively, they're probably 11-13 or even 12-12 right now. We're a bit disappointed by the month as a whole but are able to look forward to improvement.

     

    Instead, they've dug themselves a six game hole to climb out of in a division that has one of the best teams in the AL sitting on top.

    You'll never hear me questioning effort. I won't do that because there is no way to know.

     

    Rosario had the error last night. That wasn't lack of effort, it was taking his eye off the ball, thinking he was closer to the fence than he was. Dozier didn't have his error after the due to lack of effort. He just didn't field the ball right. Lance Lynn isn't walking hitters because of lack of effort. I don't if it's mechanical or what, but it isn't like he's trying to walk guys. 

     

    And yeah, I know the manager will take blame for the slow start. I get that. But he can't hit with runners in scoring position, and Molitor was never a pitcher, so he can't go out there and pitch for them. He can't field. 

     

    And the team is prepared. We heard last year how they have so much more to digest in terms of stats and analysis. They aren't' suddenly using less of it now. Lineup construction is often overrated, but I don't really have an issue with that at this point. The guys at the top of the order are getting on, but they're not getting knocked in. Bullpen management is something he continues to get questioned on. I personally don't have much issue with it. I wonder about his usage of Duke against strings of righties, but outside of Reed and Pressly, its not like he's had anyone else be reliable. He's given Hildenberger a lot of chances, and hopefully last night's performance will spring him toward his 2017 success. He's used the short-term guys appropriately.  As for motivation, that's always a tough one for me. One form of motivation isn't going to work for everyone. And again, I won't question the players' motivation or effort. If they can't get motivated to play an MLB game, that's on them. 

     

    And also... there is a lot of baseball left. If they go 13-7 in their next 20, they're back to .500 before the end of May. If they go 23-17 in their next 40, they're at .500 in mid-June, and they're well within reach. So, I think we can ask the question (which I did in the article), but it's definitely too early to think we already know the answer.

     

    You think lollygagging after a flyball, not blocking pitches, getting caught off base on third on a fly ball with no outs, not picking up a bunt and tagging home, etc, etc etc, is being prepared? Baseball is the only game around where you have the time to imagine scenarios ahead of them happening, if you want to do the thinking. Stat prep and info have nothing to do with keeping your eye on the ball, or any of the above named deficiencies. A lack of focus does however. You can call it whatever you want, effort, focus, preparedness, interest, or motivation, but whatever you call it, it's missing right now.

     

     

    And also... there is a lot of baseball left. If they go 13-7 in their next 20, they're back to .500 before the end of May. If they go 23-17 in their next 40, they're at .500 in mid-June, and they're well within reach. So, I think we can ask the question (which I did in the article), but it's definitely too early to think we already know the answer. 

     

    "there is a lot of baseball left" could also be a negative. The problem with this statement is that the way the Twins are playing, a 23-17 run over the next 40 games seems highly improbable. Impossible even.

    It's like getting straight Ds and Fs all semester, and then saying:  "Well, if I get straight A's next semester I'll have my GPA back to a 2.0". 

     

    I like the positive attitude and the spin. But let's be honest: we're here to gripe and complain. We're frustrated and ticked off. The only thing that's going to make us feel better are:

     

    1. Twins wins

    2. More cowbell

     

    Pep talks and 'what ifs' aren't my cup o' tea right now, unfortunately! I wish they were.

     

    I like your positive spin. I truly hope the Twins do get on a roll.
     

    I'm hoping this is the woes of small sample size and and some bad luck of so many players struggling at the same time.

     

    The offense has been disappointing so far. Morrison struggled so badly to start the season that he's going to be in a hole for a while. He's looking and hitting much better but the first three weeks of the season he was almost an automatic out. Castro has been rough at the plate, Buxton started slow before getting hurt, Sano hits it a ton when he connects, but isn't connecting enough. Grossman has been awful as a hitter and his usual mess of a fielder. Rosario has taken a step back. That's a lot of hitters not hitting. Mauer, Escobar, Kepler, and Dozier are the only ones getting on base at an acceptable level (and I expect more out of Dozier, frankly)

     

    The pitching...Berrios has been what we hoped, and Odorizzi and Gibson have been serviceable. But Gibson and Odorizzi and getting late enough in games is a problem because the 4th and 5th slots stink so our bullpen is overworked...again. Pressly & Reed have been great, but no one else has been consistent, unless it's been consistently bad. Again, small sample size, especially with relievers, but Rodney has been bad, Hildenberger, Rogers, and Moya all disappointed...maybe Duke has put it back together? He's started to look like he's finding his control.

     

    but I agree: the players need to play their way out of this.

     

    So far, only one of the offseason moves has really worked out: Addison Reed. But come on: not even the people predicting regression on morrison thought he'd be this bad. even the people who were "meh" on Lynn didn't think he'd be a dumpster fire.

     

    They're not as bad as they've been playing. But they need to get it together.

     

    "there is a lot of baseball left" could also be a negative. The problem with this statement is that the way the Twins are playing, a 23-17 run over the next 40 games seems highly improbable. Impossible even.

     

    It's like getting straight Ds and Fs all semester, and then saying:  "Well, if I get straight A's next semester I'll have my GPA back to a 2.0". 

     

    I like the positive attitude and the spin. But let's be honest: we're here to gripe and complain. We're frustrated and ticked off. .....

     

    I like your positive spin. I truly hope the Twins do get on a roll.

    . Could do a 2006, 25-32 on June 7 and then 71-34 the rest of the year.
    If Buxton and Sano bust, this core isn't good enough to win anyway. It was imperative during the rebuild that Buxton and Sano became stars. Kepler and Rosario are good, not great players. Berrios could be great. Without a true star leading the way, the rebuild led by the past regime is a bust.
    . It is possible that we have an emerging star in Kepler, he seems to have a better bat this year. And do we need emerging stars.

     

    . It is possible that we have an emerging star in Kepler, he seems to have a better bat this year. And do we need emerging stars.

     

    I think getting Kepler into the 3rd or 4th spot in the lineup would help the offense significantly. They need better bat control in those spots.

    9-15 is bad, but what compounded it was that we went 4-6 against teams with losing records.  Not just losing records but horrible records.  Some of the worst records in baseball.  That's alarming to me.  When you have a losing record against a number of teams with losing records, you're not good.  Period.  Numbers don't lie.  Records don't lie.  If we had gone 7-3 against those teams, we'd be 12-12...but we didn't and those games count in September.  The reality is that this is a talented but bad baseball team and our record shows that.  Can we turn it around?  I believe the month of May will be the key month in this season.

     

    You think lollygagging after a flyball, not blocking pitches, getting caught off base on third on a fly ball with no outs, not picking up a bunt and tagging home, etc, etc etc, is being prepared? Baseball is the only game around where you have the time to imagine scenarios ahead of them happening, if you want to do the thinking. Stat prep and info have nothing to do with keeping your eye on the ball, or any of the above named deficiencies. A lack of focus does however. You can call it whatever you want, effort, focus, preparedness, interest, or motivation, but whatever you call it, it's missing right now.

     

    I'd' say each was a varying level of mistake. 

    I don't' think Rosario lollygagged on the dropped fly ball. He got there in plenty of time, he just looked to find the wall and took his eye off the ball.

     

    I wont call it effort. I couldn't' tell you if it is about focus. I don't' know how to measure preparedness. You can prepare for everything as much as you want but the players have to do it. I definitely dont' question interest. I'm not going to question motivation. 

     

    They're' losing right now. Its not fun for us to watch. I feel pretty strongly that it''s harder on the players, coaches, manager and front office. 

    I agree, it's too early to give up on this team and they have plenty of talent. But, as I mentioned in another thread, I do think some of these problems are on Molitor and the coaching staff.

     

    We have the talent but the ML coaches have to get the talent out of these guys. I'm flabbergasted that Lynn is this bad. I have no idea why. I know NL pitchers have trouble adjusting to the AL but this is ridiculous. Hopefully it's lack of ST and he gets going soon but, wow, he's been bad.

    That’s why I suggested moving Lynn to AAA or at worst the bullpen until he gets his control/command back. I think Lynn’s struggles are from not having a spring training. If he could take a week or two in a lower pressure situation he might come back sharper and closer to the pitcher he was. We have some depth in the minors to cover until Lynn works his issues out.

     

    But what chaps me to no end is the sloppy, SLOPPY play by the defenders. 

     

    And that's unacceptable. If this team was merely competent defensively, they're probably 11-13 or even 12-12 right now. 

     

    Watching them go 0/6 on double play chances Sunday was very frustrating.  Couple that with Dozier in slo-mo on a couple rollers to the right side, and it just got worse.  

     

    I know a couple of the DP chances were on slower choppers, but the plays didn't look fluid either.

     

    If half of those 8 plays get made, that would have been a completely different ballgame.

     

    I've been one of the biggest Dozier-for-life supporters, but I sure wish he'd play with a bit more hop in his step.  If he's actually slowing down, then maybe, with reference to the article title, I was just possibly that wrong.

    I did not think we should have signed Lynn, because his national league stuff usually did not  translate well to the American league, but Cobb has been worse and his contract is much worse.  

    If the Twins felt Gordon was ready, he should have been in Rochester, there is a reason the FO sent him back to Chattanooga. 

    We have more than a month before we can trade the players we signed last winter, so will see what happens, but at this time the Twins to me are unwatchable.  

    Twins also continue to not be able to develop or fix pitchers, maybe we need to put out a call through all organizations to find a pitching coach who can do this, and fit his approach to the talent they have, Alston seems to be failing the that respect.

    I do agree with the poster who would not have signed Molitor to a new contract, there were coaches and mangers out there who were better, Twins just needed to sign one.

     

     

    I don't recall anyone saying the front office did nothing. I do recall people questioning some of the specific moves.

     

    This core lives and dies in Sano and Buxton. Buxton can't hit or stay healthy. Sano can hit, but not enough, and can't stay healthy. That does not excuse their other issues at all. But they need to fix those two players, badly.

     

    In the meantime, Wade should be in a corner OF spot. I'd consider promoting Gordon.

     

    The FO is not without blame. The kinley move was always a bad idea. There are zero position players in AAA, and no, that isn't normal.

     

    The manager needs to move Dozier to the three hole. He needs to manage the pitchers better.

     

    I have no confidence Rosario will ever figure it out. He's been a professional ballplayer for how long now?

     

    On the plus side, Kepler is legit

    Edited by Mike Sixel

     

    If the Twins felt Gordon was ready, he should have been in Rochester, there is a reason the FO sent him back to Chattanooga. 

     

    To be fair, the Twins often call up their top hitting prospects directly from AA. I don't think Gordon being in Chattanooga affects his call-up timeline if they need/want him in Minnesota.

     

    Yu Darvish is 0-2 with a 5.26 ERA and a 1.44 WHIP. I think if he were on the Twins with those statistics, these columns would be filled with negative comments. It's time to forget about Darvish. It didn't happen and probably never would have happened. Let's deal with reality. I am glad to see Romero given a chance and I hope he's allowed to make several starts before any decisions are made. Curtiss might be the anti-Rodney we need closing games. And I like the idea that Gordon and Gonsalves might also be given an opportunity at the major league level soon.

    He also went 6 innings, 0 ERs, 8 Ks against a good Milwaukee team his last time out.  Reality is that the Twins decided not to make a serious offer and instead opted to spend that money on a handful of lesser players. Those two decisions are linked whether or not people want to acknowledge it. 

     

    At this point Romero and Gonsalves can't be worse than Hughes and Lynn. 

    I'm excited to see who we trade at the deadline and for another top 10 pick next season!

     

    Dozier, Santana and Reed could fetch us some quality prospects in trades.

     

    Anyone not named Buxton,Rosario, Kepler, Romero and Berrios should be on the trade block at the deadline.

     

    To be fair, the Twins often call up their top hitting prospects directly from AA. I don't think Gordon being in Chattanooga affects his call-up timeline if they need/want him in Minnesota.

    You will normally see better offspeed stuff in AAA.  Most of these staffs are AAAA type pitchers, but have enough control to expose holes in a swing.  Gordon needs to see some of that before I feel he is ready.

    First, as many others have already pointed out, this is still a small sample size. Last year, the Twins has 8 different 24-game stretches with a 9-15 record. 

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/play-index/streaks.cgi?request=1&games=24&year=2017&SHOW=TOT&includes=nospan_years&team_id=MIN&orderby=losses

     

    Second, it is hard to be "wrong" about predictions when the team is dealing with injuries/suspensions. The team that was on paper in March is NOT the same team that has been playing the past few weeks. I mean, what kind of prediction for the season would everyone have if you knew that:

    - Buxton was going to play less than half the games.

    - Sano was going to play only 80% of the games.

    - Santana was going to make 0 starts.

    - Polanco was going to play 0 games. 

    If that was was known beforehand, I don't think there is anyone who would have been super confident that the Twins would be above .500. 

     

    Finally, I do think that the front office deserves some criticism. My own bone to pick: Buxton has a pretty extensive injury history at this point. He gets dinged up; he misses time. The fact that they have yet to acquire a legitimate backup centerfielder for the 4th OF spot is unbelievable to me. 

     

    First, as many others have already pointed out, this is still a small sample size. Last year, the Twins has 8 different 24-game stretches with a 9-15 record. 

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/play-index/streaks.cgi?request=1&games=24&year=2017&SHOW=TOT&includes=nospan_years&team_id=MIN&orderby=losses

     

    Second, it is hard to be "wrong" about predictions when the team is dealing with injuries/suspensions. The team that was on paper in March is NOT the same team that has been playing the past few weeks. I mean, what kind of prediction for the season would everyone have if you knew that:

    - Buxton was going to play less than half the games.

    - Sano was going to play only 80% of the games.

    - Santana was going to make 0 starts.

    - Polanco was going to play 0 games. 

    If that was was known beforehand, I don't think there is anyone who would have been super confident that the Twins would be above .500. 

     

    Finally, I do think that the front office deserves some criticism. My own bone to pick: Buxton has a pretty extensive injury history at this point. He gets dinged up; he misses time. The fact that they have yet to acquire a legitimate backup centerfielder for the 4th OF spot is unbelievable to me. 

     

    Any legit backup OF....many here called for them to do so this off season.

     

    Call up Wade already....heck, projection systems think he'll be better on offense than Rosario right now....

    Grossman’s offense is not good enough to make up for his lack of defense in the of. I don’t know who’s decision it is to keep him out there rather than bringing someone up from the minors or from a different team, but the fo needs to address the situation. They should’ve addressed before the season started, since they didn’t they should’ve once Buxton was out on the dL.

     

    Anyone not named Buxton,Rosario, Kepler, Romero and Berrios should be on the trade block at the deadline.

    Isn't that what everybody was saying during the off season?

    As bad as the Twins have been, I think it is a bit earlier to go into tank/trade mode. IMO while you can always use top prospects in the low minors, that isn't really a weak spot of the Twins right now, it is prospects that are ready to contribute.

    If the Twins start trading for low minor prospects they might as well look into trading Sano, Buxton, Kepler and Rosario because by the time the new guys are ready to contribute these four will be free agents.

    I think the team is better. But, also, the play of baseball is better. In any contest, one team wins, one team loses. There is no sure pathway to a victory. Otherwise, you would be able to predict winners over losers easily. But you can't.

     

    Were the Twins cheap? Supposedly, no. But they did BUY to be competitive as a Wild Card team, NOT to take the division today or tomorrow. Still too many factors there. The resurgence of rookies and sophs.  A new bullpen. A better middle-of-the-road rotation. But still, unless you truly think Detroit and Kansas City and Chicago are worse teams, which they very well may be, the Twins still have to say "Are we better than every other team in baseball?

     

    You would think coaching and managing would've figured some things out, from arm usage to line-up construction. SO much of the game is going over stats and film and players just can't throw the ball hard and be tricky anymore, just like batters can't wait for the perfect pitch. 

     

    It is work, on and off the field. The talent is there, but the talent is there on so many other teams, too.

     

    The weather was bad, but the Twins weren't the only team suffering from cancelled games and bad weather.

     

    Target Field is a gem, but how many of the guys on the current team really played the game at Target Field (of course, are biglosses were in Tampa Bay, land of great weather, and Yankee Stadium, which everyone dreams to play). 

     

    I want to have patience. But I also know the front office is sweating the sell of the team, coming out badly in the gate.

     

    Cheap tickets this month, still, folks!

     

     

     

    First, as many others have already pointed out, this is still a small sample size. Last year, the Twins has 8 different 24-game stretches with a 9-15 record. 

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/play-index/streaks.cgi?request=1&games=24&year=2017&SHOW=TOT&includes=nospan_years&team_id=MIN&orderby=losses

     

    Second, it is hard to be "wrong" about predictions when the team is dealing with injuries/suspensions. The team that was on paper in March is NOT the same team that has been playing the past few weeks. I mean, what kind of prediction for the season would everyone have if you knew that:

    - Buxton was going to play less than half the games.

    - Sano was going to play only 80% of the games.

    - Santana was going to make 0 starts.

    - Polanco was going to play 0 games. 

    If that was was known beforehand, I don't think there is anyone who would have been super confident that the Twins would be above .500. 

     

    Finally, I do think that the front office deserves some criticism. My own bone to pick: Buxton has a pretty extensive injury history at this point. He gets dinged up; he misses time. The fact that they have yet to acquire a legitimate backup centerfielder for the 4th OF spot is unbelievable to me. 

     

    The Twins aren't simply below .500. They're regularly getting smoked by mediocre and bad ball clubs and too many games aren't even competitive. Even with those guys out they shouldn't be this bad. Comparisons to last season may help lessen the sting, but this year it might take 90 wins to snag the last wildcard spot. If it takes 2-4 weeks to get healthy and get their head on straight that won't be achievable and we'll be hosting a mid-summer yard sale.

     

    But yeah, the front office didn't do any favors by assuming Buxton & Sano would stay healthy for the first time ever. Going forward the roster should be built to better withstand loss of their playing time (especially in the field) because for them it's clearly a matter of when, not if.

    I have to admit, I'm liking the Lynn signing more and more.

     

    Not because the Twins got him, rather, it's a one year contract.

     

    Which means Lynn is pitching for his next contract and, as of right now, he won't get it.

     

    Contrast that with the contract the Twins have with Hughes....

     

    First, as many others have already pointed out, this is still a small sample size. Last year, the Twins has 8 different 24-game stretches with a 9-15 record. 

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/play-index/streaks.cgi?request=1&games=24&year=2017&SHOW=TOT&includes=nospan_years&team_id=MIN&orderby=losses

    Those aren't 8 separate stretches of 24 games each, that would be over a full season of games. They're double dipping. Just looking at the top two "streaks," the first lasted 7/6 - 8/5 and the second was from 7/8 - 8/7. That's essentially the same streak with a difference of only a game or two on either end. Six of those eight "streaks," cover basically that same time period. There's one stretch from late June to late July, but even that is including a lot of the same games as the July - August "streaks," above. There's only one other distinct stretch and that was from late May to mid June. It's really more like two periods of really bad baseball. 

     

    I guess the silver lining is that the Twins haven't hit the same level of bad as that late June - early August stretch last year, at least in terms of games lost. I think we could make an argument they've hit that low in regards to performance. The season certainly isn't lost, but Twins aren't the kind of team I'd bet on to dig themselves out of big holes. This is a team that should be around .500 a few months and pushing over .500 for the rest to build to 85-86 wins. Finishing a month over .500 is a big deal for this team, and now barring a crazy winning streak, they need to do that for multiple months just to break even. Like I said, this isn't a time to panic, but I do think the work that's required for the Twins to dig themselves out is being a bit understated. 

     

    Just watching Lynn and his pitch count shoot up reminded me that this year will be another long one. 88 pitches through 4 innings. We wonder then about lackluster fielding? Only 10 pitches in the 5th, the Toronto batters were either feeling compassion for Lynn or the players were just getting tired of taking batting practice and probably wanted to face a different pitcher.

     

    Sure does look like the rest of the league and the Twins were colluding against Lynn and swindled him out of a multi-year contract for 100+ million at this point doesn't it? 

    The Kinley thing seems to keep coming up again and again as a hack on the FO and a reason why the twins are in this hole. I have trouble accepting that one: the last spot in your bullpen is going to have marginal impact at best.

     

    Of our Opening Day starters, only 4 have an OBP over .300. Several of them are far worse than that. All of them last year were over .310. Joe Mauer is one of the only guys this year that you can rely on to get on base so far. That's killing the offense.

     

    There were a lot of reasons to be skeptical of Phil Hughes being effective again as a starter. It's proven out so far. I can understand the FO not wanting to just eat the contract if there was a chance of getting some value out of him, though. And that's only 2 starts. So far, Lance Lynn has been a bust, but it's still hard to say it was a bad move: we needed the pitching, his track record is excellent, and it was a one-year deal. Hopefully he pulls out of this mess, but I can't beat up the FO on that one. Odorizzi has been ok. Gibson has been ok. Either would be fine in the back end of the rotation, but because Lynn is awful and Santana is on the DL, we need them to be 2nd & 3rd options and they don't seem to be good enough. The whole pitching staff is walking too many guys; Berrios, Pressly, and Reed are the only guys I'd be happy with there. Funny, they're our three best pitchers this year.

     

    You have to hope this is small sample size at work. Maybe Crash Davis can come get us a rainout.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...