Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Hardball, the Twins, and Byron Buxton


    Ted Schwerzler

    Byron Buxton was activated off the Triple A disabled list in mid-August and returned to game action for the Rochester Red Wings on August 14. He’s played in 10 games since that point, but the Twins don’t seem willing to commit to the idea that he’ll be a big leaguer come September. Make no mistake about it, this is a service time issue, and a silly one at that.

    UPDATE: Darren Wolfson of KSTP shared on Twitter that he has been told Buxton will be heading home at the conclusion of the minor league season.

    Twins Video

    Friday evening update: Wolfson shared that Buxton would not be joining the Twins tomorrow, as the rosters expand to 40. He later confirmed that the plan, at least at the moment, is that Byron will shut it down as soon as Rochester's season ends Monday.

    ccs-8747-0-47662100-1535775252.png

    In 2018 Buxton has played in just 28 games with the Twins, and his .383 OPS is third worst among all players with at least 90 plate appearances. Due to migraines, a broken toe, and a wrist injury, he’s missed a considerable chunk of the season. Calling 2018 a lost year would be defining it well, but there’s still opportunity to get something of value from the remaining slate.

    At the crux of Buxton’s issues is the fact that he simply needs exposure. Playing time and competition against the best in the sport are the avenue to getting him back on track. A season ago, he was the Platinum Glove winner, a Gold Glove winner, and he garnered MVP votes in the American League. The bat still wasn’t where Minnesota had hoped, but the reality is that his defense is so good that there’s significant margin for error.

    From this writer’s vantage point, the Twins have made some peculiar decisions with Buxton in 2018. Not sending him out on a rehab assignment following his time missed with migraines was fine in my estimation. After completing his rehab assignment revolving around his broken toe, demoting him to Triple A was nothing short of confusing. Regardless of standing, Minnesota went from suggesting that Buxton’s defense was so imperative to the team’s success that they needed him here, to believing he couldn’t hit MLB pitching and Triple A was the place for a jump-start.

    Since rejoining Rochester from his latest stint on the disabled list, Buxton is slashing .386/.413/.659 with nine extra-base hits. He has a less than ideal 10/1 K/BB rate, but it’s again clear that he’s well above the level he's currently tasked with. Although he didn’t voice it publicly, I’d imagine Buxton would echo his wife’s sentiments when it comes to the oddity that the training wheels of Triple A seem necessary at this point in his career.

    ccs-6683-0-84712000-1535641199.png

    As far as I’m concerned, confidence issues are real, but they only carry so much weight. Thus far Minnesota has opted to look at Triple A as a breeding ground for Byron to feast and “find confidence” at the major league level. That’s all fine and well in theory, but if the results don’t translate to the highest level, nothing accomplished on the farm really matters. Instead of facing far inferior competition, having Byron working with James Rowson on a daily basis and getting acclimated to a consistent dose of the best competition seems like a much more fundamentally sound plan.

    Legally the Twins can’t publicly say that Byron Buxton won’t be up in September because of service time considerations. Per Jeremy Nygaard’s calculations, Minnesota can save a year of service time if Buxton is held back beyond September 18. The Rochester Red Wings end their season on September 3, and from that point on there’d be nowhere else for him to go play. Byron not being in Houston with the Twins on September 4 would signify nothing short of service time manipulation.

    The idea of service time value doesn’t typically come into play with an established big leaguer. A prospect like Eloy Jimenez or Vlad Guerrero Jr. being held back through September to gain a year in a lost season makes some sense. The Twins manipulating service time for a guy they think needs Triple A to jump-start his big-league bat every time it slumps, or he misses time is an entirely different scenario. Arguably nothing could be more important for the star center fielder than exposure. Getting at-bats, getting into games, and making up lost time in the big leagues is a must. Giving up those opportunities under the guise of future considerations seems laughable at the current juncture.

    I had hoped Buxton would be in a Twins uniform by now. He could’ve gotten in a couple of games with Rochester and then begun to re-establish himself through the remainder of the MLB schedule. It’s fine that the move hasn’t been made yet, but that won’t be the case if it doesn’t happen when September 4th rolls around.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Outside of the Yankees and Houston, Buxton will be facing AAAA pitching up here in September.  Will anyone learn anything from that?  With hearing in the Star Tribune his wrist may still be a minor issue (this may be FO doubletalk), shutting him down does not seem that unreasonable.

     

    This is a wild exagerration. Yes, there are some bad teams, but there are still a lot of players on those teams above "AAAA" talent. (And September callups don't usually pitch many innings, and honestly aren't that different from the staff the rest of the year -- in some cases, they might be inprovements!)

    Look at the Tigers, they still have 3 SP with 104-113 ERA+, plus Fulmer having a down year at 94, plus Greene and Wilson in their pen. Those are all pitchers for whom it would be valuable for Buxton to face.

    The Royals are worse, but they still have Duffy, Junis, and Keller starting.

    The White Sox have Rodon and Kopech who have looked great so far, plus Shields and Lopez having competent seasons.

    Not to mention we have 30% of our remaining games against NYY, HOU, and OAK where we could encounter a nice playoff atmosphere.

    The Tigers have 0 starting pitchers with an ERA under 4.  FIP and XFIP disagree on the year Boyd is having.    I am not agreeing on the AAAA pitching bit. AAAA pitching is Slegers. That is not what a team sees in September. They may see a few innings from players close to the major leagues who have had ok seasons. I don't recall the lifer minor league pitchers getting a reward call up playing. other than a mop up It doesn't mean they don't exist. It is just highly unlikely

    I urge all Twins fans to step back, look at the offensive stats, and pretend you are looking at a guy who plays for the Padres or Marlins.

    ...

    Ok, I've done your little mental exercise using another player, and pretending he is on the Padres or Marlins, I can't for the life of me understand why they are calling up Johnny Field over Byron Buxton :) Edited by Hosken Bombo Disco

    Just read that Buxton is still “battling soreness in his wrist”.

    is there a link to a news source citing an uninterested party, or did you just read this from another anonymous poster? Oy :) Edited by Hosken Bombo Disco

    It is a business and it should be. It is the front office’s obligation to protect the interests of the organization. I haven’t seen an argument that a month this year is better than a full season in his prime. I haven’t seen an argument that a month of this losing season is better than a few weeks next April.

     

    I am not convinced that the at bats he will get this month are critical to his success. I also am not convinced that his reaction to the decision will have an impact on his future performance.

     

    Will the White Sox call up Eloy Jimenez who has destroyed minor league pitching and has shown solid pitch recognition in his strike out rates? Probably not. It is in the best interest of the organization to keep control an additional year of his prime.

     

    It is a business and it should be. It is the front office’s obligation to protect the interests of the organization. I haven’t seen an argument that a month this year is better than a full season in his prime. I haven’t seen an argument that a month of this losing season is better than a few weeks next April.

    I am not convinced that the at bats he will get this month are critical to his success. I also am not convinced that his reaction to the decision will have an impact on his future performance.

    Will the White Sox call up Eloy Jimenez who has destroyed minor league pitching and has shown solid pitch recognition in his strike out rates? Probably not. It is in the best interest of the organization to keep control an additional year of his prime.

     

    giphy.gif

     

    He's not the best player right now. If he was even close to major league quality. We are not having this discussion. I want the year back because he has been wasting mine. 

     

    The spirit was negotiated between the Commissioners Office and the Players Union. Ask yourself why Super-Two is even necessary and you'll realize that they were aware of each other's tendencies during the negotiation. 

     

    Also keep in mind that, the same CBA also protects Byron Buxton and he was bad enough that he needed that protection. 

     

    The players have representation, I wouldn't be worried about Byron Buxton. 

     

    If you want to worry about ethics... you need to focus on the players not on the 40 man.

     

    The players that don't have representation are in the bowels of the minor league system, players are making $1,160 a month down on the farm. The Commissioners office has representation now in Washington and they spent enough money funding election campaigns, that they can really slap those unrepresented players (that we have never heard of) silly. 

     

    The Consolidated Appropriations Act. (H.R. 1625) was a 1.3 trillion dollar spending bill that managed to avoid a government shut down at the last minute. The MLB Commissioners office was able to lobby enough influence, fund enough election campaigns to get a provision attached on page 1,967 of the 2,232 page spending bill stating that minor league baseball players are exempt from federal labor standards. If you are not on the 40 man roster... major league baseball can pay you poverty wages and our government gives that the thumps up as long as they get funding for re-election. 

     

    Buxton has representation... If you want to worry about Buxton... I'd worry that if he doesn't start playing better. He will have H.R. 1625 to worry about. 

    Brian, you and I are never going to agree. I think there is an ethical conundrum here. You don't. You're fine with it. I'm not. Yes, it's the way it is and we have to live with it. I just don't believe in maximizing profits at the cost of labor, even if that labor force is a bunch of millionaires. But I find cheering for it and hoping for it, well, wrong, from a human being standpoint. And I understand the frustration of wanting the year back, but this is the thing with prospects becoming 'sure thing' MLB stars ... it's not a sure thing and it's not guaranteed. I still don't agree with 'taking it out' on him because that's how I see some of the comments that have been made.

     

    That said, I don't have one single issue with him not being promoted because they think that he needs to work at it, is not ready, and it's better for him, his career and his development, to not bring him up. I don't necessarily agree with that decision, but that I understand. But I don't agree and will never agree, that not bringing him up for the sole purpose of ... let me repeat that ... for the sole purpose of manipulating service time. That that happens, that that's the 'gain' for making the decision to keep him down for development purposes? Okay, that's what it is and that I don't have issues with that but I don't think it should be a consideration. But so many have put the service time issue as primary, and that I don't agree with. Service time manipulation isn't what's best for anyone's development, imo. I just think it's ethically questionable to maximize profits at the cost of labor ... even if that labor makes more than I'd even have a clue what to do with. Management is taking advantage of a loophole. Yeah ... many would. Still doesn't make it something that isn't questionable.

     

    Feel free to keep debating ... but you're debating to a wall on this one. Enjoy! :)

     

    Just read that Buxton is still “battling soreness in his wrist”. Sounds like a reason to not bring him up.

    I’ve read the back and forth and both sides make very good points. To me, we may be missing the most important issue - has he earned a call up by excelling at AAA? He’s had a few good games recently after stinking the joint up or being hurt all year. My view is forget the service time, don’t overestimate the value of 50-75 ABs mostly against September cannon fodder and decide if he’s earned a call up. I guess it’s a reasonably close call but think the answer is No and if he’s still got a bad wrist his health way overrides these ABs so it’s a definitely no.

    And that is the issue, and should be the only issue, imo. I may not agree with him not being called up, but I understand if there are questions on whether or not he's ready -- physically, mentally, developmentally. If you are reading about Buxton still having health/wellness issues, then no, he stays put and goes home to get healthy and get ready for next season.

    Please. Don’t talk about the financial hardship of Byron Buxton. He received a six million dollar signing bonus. Even if he never makes another dime, he should be set for life.

    I didn’t say anything about financial hardship. He’s earning his money honestly, and not calling him up to keep him another year away from free agency would not be honest. It’s bad form, and the Twins should be better than that.

     

    Brian, you and I are never going to agree. I think there is an ethical conundrum here. You don't. You're fine with it. I'm not. Yes, it's the way it is and we have to live with it. 

     

    Yeah probably not and that's ok. 

     

    However, Just so you don't mistake my passion for the subject as being fine with it. 

     

    I'm really not. The Players get screwed by the CBA in my opinion. The players association needs to do a better job representing the players so they are not in this situation in the next one. 

     

    However... If I'm in a cookie baking contest with 29 other bakers. If the other 29 bakers while operating under rules are unethically using sugar. I'm not sure how my ethics are going to help me.  :)

    I didn’t say anything about financial hardship. He’s earning his money honestly, and not calling him up to keep him another year away from free agency would not be honest. It’s bad form, and the Twins should be better than that.

    And if Buxton had gotten the service year, and decided to sign elsewhere when he hit free agency...despite the Twins having made a ‘fair’ offer and having ‘stuck with him’ during his months/seasons of struggling....

     

    would that then be poor form on the part of Buxton? Or would that be Buxton exercising his rights under the terms of the CBA? It’s a business, has been forever.

     

    Yeah probably not and that's ok. 

     

    However, Just so you don't mistake my passion for the subject as being fine with it. 

     

    I'm really not. The Players get screwed by the CBA in my opinion. The players association needs to do a better job representing the players so they are not in this situation in the next one. 

     

    However... If I'm in a cookie baking contest with 29 other bakers. If the other 29 bakers while operating under rules are unethically using sugar. I'm not sure how my ethics are going to help me.  :)

    Lol, well ... not sure I can argue that logic. But ... when it comes to cookie baking, I'm pretty serious, and I wouldn't want to win in an ethically questionable way. ;)

     

    And if Buxton had gotten the service year, and decided to sign elsewhere when he hit free agency...despite the Twins having made a ‘fair’ offer and having ‘stuck with him’ during his months/seasons of struggling....

    would that then be poor form on the part of Buxton? Or would that be Buxton exercising his rights under the terms of the CBA? It’s a business, has been forever.

    giphy.gif

    And if Buxton had gotten the service year, and decided to sign elsewhere when he hit free agency...despite the Twins having made a ‘fair’ offer and having ‘stuck with him’ during his months/seasons of struggling....

     

    would that then be poor form on the part of Buxton? Or would that be Buxton exercising his rights under the terms of the CBA? It’s a business, has been forever.

    That hasn’t happened. So there’s no analogy there. And I would think Buxton walking is more likely if the Twins aren’t honest with him.

     

    It is a business. That doesn’t mean it’s okay to be dishonest. In fact most people in business act ethically. It’s generally better for business.

     

    ...

     

    Buxton is not going to transform into Ted Williams in 3 weeks playing against other September call ups. The Twins are doing the right thing by not recalling him in 2018.

    I'd be impressed if he hit like Ted Uhleander.

    There is no human right to reach MLB arbitration as early as possible. The Twins are under no kind of ethical obligation to call up a struggling, banged up player so that, in the event he actually becomes good, the player gets to free agency sooner. The logic behind this complaint escapes me entirely.

    It is a business and it should be. It is the front office’s obligation to protect the interests of the organization. I haven’t seen an argument that a month this year is better than a full season in his prime. I haven’t seen an argument that a month of this losing season is better than a few weeks next April.

    I am not convinced that the at bats he will get this month are critical to his success. I also am not convinced that his reaction to the decision will have an impact on his future performance.

    Will the White Sox call up Eloy Jimenez who has destroyed minor league pitching and has shown solid pitch recognition in his strike out rates? Probably not. It is in the best interest of the organization to keep control an additional year of his prime.

    The comparison between the situations of Jimenez and Buxton is very weak. Jimenez has not made his debut. Jimenez's situation is more akin to Berrios in 2015.

    I urge all Twins fans to step back, look at the offensive stats, and pretend you are looking at a guy who plays for the Padres or Marlins.

     

    What the Twins have is a 25 year-old career .230 hitter who has played parts of 4 seasons with the team. He has great speed, gold-glove defense, and a terrible strikeout rate. He's prone to prolonged slumps and injuries. That's what Buxton IS. An amazing defensive player who cannot hit MLB pitching right now. He also appears to be a great human being but that doesn't count right now.

     

    Buxton is not going to transform into Ted Williams in 3 weeks playing against other September call ups. The Twins are doing the right thing by not recalling him in 2018.

    I want players to succeed upon callup and this is a good post. First of all I think people need to reassess their expectations of Byron Buxton. He's not Mike Trout and probably never going to be. That said if he can develop better pitch recognition ability he has a future at the major league level as a starting center fielder. I am somewhat disturbed by how many people who continue to insist that he just battle through these woes at the major league when he has shown that he can't CONSISTENTLY hit major league pitching.

     

    Marching orders for the offseason. Get stronger, stay healthy and really work on pitch recognition and bunting. Let Buxton focus on those things the entire offseason and reassess next spring. Cave has earned an extended look for the remainder of the season which Buxton has not. Just my opinion.

     

    There is no human right to reach MLB arbitration as early as possible. The Twins are under no kind of ethical obligation to call up a struggling, banged up player so that, in the event he actually becomes good, the player gets to free agency sooner. The logic behind this complaint escapes me entirely.

    Again, then, you didn't read the complaint. I have no issues with him not being called up due to health and performance issues. I just don't think service time manipulation should be the only or primary reason to not call him up. That alone is my point.

    There is no human right to reach MLB arbitration as early as possible. The Twins are under no kind of ethical obligation to call up a struggling, banged up player so that, in the event he actually becomes good, the player gets to free agency sooner. The logic behind this complaint escapes me entirely.

    Setting aside the ethicality of it, you are misrepresenting details here. Buxton is neither struggling nor "banged up" right now.

     

    Again, then, you didn't read the complaint. I have no issues with him not being called up due to health and performance issues. I just don't think service time manipulation should be the only or primary reason to not call him up. That alone is my point.

     

    If he didn't have health and performance issues, he never would have been in AAA. 

     

    There is no human right to reach MLB arbitration as early as possible. The Twins are under no kind of ethical obligation to call up a struggling, banged up player so that, in the event he actually becomes good, the player gets to free agency sooner. The logic behind this complaint escapes me entirely.

    Not one poster here has said it's a human right to reach arbitration. However, the Twins and Buxton are in a contractual relationship. If one party to a contract does something to prevent the other party from reaping the benefits of the agreement, it's a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

     

    You may believe Buxton doesn't deserve to be called up based on performance. That's fine, and that's a legitimate reason to not call him up. I disagree. I believe Buxton deserves to be called up, and that not calling him up would be a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It would be dishonest and unethical, in my opinion. And I don't want the organization I root for to conduct its business in that way.

     

    I felt this way when the Cubs held back Bryant as well, and I expect he and Mr. Boras won't be giving any loyalty discounts when the Cubs seek to extend him.

     

    Again, then, you didn't read the complaint. I have no issues with him not being called up due to health and performance issues. I just don't think service time manipulation should be the only or primary reason to not call him up. That alone is my point.

     

    You got nothing to worry about then.  :)

     

    The Twins will claim that it is due to health and performance issues.  :)

     

    You got nothing to worry about then.  :)

     

    The Twins will claim that it is due to health and performance issues.  :)

    Heh, true that ... and no one can no for sure what's what ... so it's all moot and we should delete this thread of opposing opinions. :) ;) :P

    Setting aside the ethicality of it, you are misrepresenting details here. Buxton is neither struggling nor "banged up" right now.

    Some reports indicate the wrist is still an issue. And while he may not be struggling, he is far from dominating.

     

    He hasn't forced the Twins hand and the games are meaningless. There is no good reason to call him up IMO.

     

    All the reasons listed are about keeping up appearances. Nuts to that.

    Not one poster here has said it's a human right to reach arbitration. However, the Twins and Buxton are in a contractual relationship. If one party to a contract does something to prevent the other party from reaping the benefits of the agreement, it's a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

     

    You may believe Buxton doesn't deserve to be called up based on performance. That's fine, and that's a legitimate reason to not call him up. I disagree. I believe Buxton deserves to be called up, and that not calling him up would be a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It would be dishonest and unethical, in my opinion. And I don't want the organization I root for to conduct its business in that way.

     

    I felt this way when the Cubs held back Bryant as well, and I expect he and Mr. Boras won't be giving any loyalty discounts when the Cubs seek to extend him.

    I expect he and Mr Boras wouldn’t have given any discounts no matter how the Cubs acted.

     

    Not one poster here has said it's a human right to reach arbitration. However, the Twins and Buxton are in a contractual relationship. If one party to a contract does something to prevent the other party from reaping the benefits of the agreement, it's a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

     

    You may believe Buxton doesn't deserve to be called up based on performance. That's fine, and that's a legitimate reason to not call him up. I disagree. I believe Buxton deserves to be called up, and that not calling him up would be a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It would be dishonest and unethical, in my opinion. And I don't want the organization I root for to conduct its business in that way.

     

    I felt this way when the Cubs held back Bryant as well, and I expect he and Mr. Boras won't be giving any loyalty discounts when the Cubs seek to extend him.

     

    You are correct... If I sign a contract that provides a 100 Grand Bonus for selling 1 million crayons for the year and then forces me to do nothing but clean toilets in December when I'm sitting at 999,980 Crayons on December 1st. I have the right to call my lawyer because of a clear breach of the covenant of good faith. 

     

    However... you are going to have a hard time finding a team to root for. 

     

    I'm being Honest... as a fan... I want the year back and I am under no legal obligation to disguise my intentions.  :)

     

     

     

    You are correct... If I sign a contract that provides a 100 Grand Bonus for selling 1 million crayons for the year and then forces me to do nothing but clean toilets in December when I'm sitting at 999,980 Crayons on December 1st. I have the right to call my lawyer because of a clear breach of the covenant of good faith. 

     

    However... you are going to have a hard time finding a team to root for. 

     

    I'm being Honest... as a fan... I want the year back and I am under no legal obligation to disguise my intentions.  :)

    As a fan, I want to see the best players playing. Buxton is among our best players, and he is, if not the most entertaining, among the three or four most entertaining players to watch. I also want to see the players get paid fairly, and it doesn't bother me at all that Buxton will get a better deal on an extension if the Twins don't jerk him around for the rest of the year.

    This is so maddening. 

     

    I know I'm late to the party, but I sure hope Doogie is wrong. Not bringing up Buxton can only be seen as a service time issue. Even if it isn't, everybody is going to THINK it is and that's not a good thing, either.

     

    If his wrist still has issues, he should not be playing. I don't care if it's Rochester or Minnesota or Fort Myers.

     

    If he's healthy enough to swing a bat, he should be up here testing out his swing on major league breaking balls. 

     

    My view of the front office is completely different now because of this. As I said, I hope Doogie is wrong. But one year of service time doesn't matter if the player isn't very good. 

     

    If he's not wrong, then the Twins deserve every bit of criticism for being "cheap" that they get because of this. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...