Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Dozier’s Days Numbered, Then What?


    Ted Schwerzler

    Despite sweeping the hapless Baltimore Orioles, and then taking a series from the equally terrible Kansas City Royals, the Minnesota Twins are still trending towards being sellers in 2018. With a couple more weeks before the July 31 non-waiver trade deadline, Derek Falvey and Thad Levine are coming down to crunch time in terms of stockpiling assets. Minnesota doesn’t have much in the form of big pieces, Kyle Gibson and Eduardo Escobar potentially chief among those, but arguably the most intriguing name remains Brian Dozier.

    Image courtesy of © Bruce Kluckhohn-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    A late-bloomer, Dozier didn’t reach the big leagues until 25, and he was initially cast as a shortstop. We saw how that went, and he was quickly sent over to second base. Fast forward two more years, and the 28 year-old was a first time All-Star while being arguably the best power-hitting two-bagger in the sport. Since then, he’s won a Gold Glove and picked up progressing numbers of MVP votes each season. 2018 has hardly been a great start for the Twins star, but it follows along the same path he has blazed plenty of times to this point.

    Now well into July, Dozier is beginning to do Brian-like things, and his second half surge appears to have started. Despite just a .732 OPS on the season, he’s got a .905 mark across his last 21 games. If you shrink the sample size down to just the month of July, Brian is hitting .317/.378/.683 with seven extra-base hits (four home runs) across 11 games. In short, it’s a great time for him to be going well.

    After being the subject of trade talks two winters ago, Minnesota wisely decided that their premium player was worth more than the Jose De Leon return that the Dodgers were willing to part with. Forget that De Leon has since undergone Tommy John surgery after being traded to the Rays, I’m still not convinced Minnesota can’t get an equal or better package at this point. Manny Machado will be the cream of the crop come trading season, but Dozier is capable of being a big get up the middle for a team looking to make a postseason push.

    Concerning the Twins however, Paul Molitor will be tasked with filling his position in the field, as well as the gaping hole in the lineup. From where I stand, I can see only two options in how to handle the days post-Brian Dozier. In my mind, only one of them is right, but that doesn’t necessarily make it any more likely. Let’s explore:

    Option A: It’s Nick Gordon Time

    In dealing Dozier, the Twins essentially wave the white flag on their season. While they could be sellers and pivot as they did a year ago, moving one of their best players is something you wouldn’t expect to come back from. In operating this way, the focus needs to turn from winning games, into focusing on process for 2019.

    Given the expectation that Nick Gordon will become the Twins second basemen of the future, getting him up to the big leagues, and acclimated, should be of the utmost importance. He’s scuffled mightily at Triple-A Rochester, posting an OPS just north of .600. I really don’t care about his production however. He dominated at Double-A, and there’s been some questions surrounding his bat ever since he was drafted. Allowing him to get in the field, settle into a new role, and get used to the rigors of big league baseball is a must. The more high-end pitching he faces now, the less of a learning curve there should be expected in the season ahead.

    The core of Byron Buxton, Miguel Sano, Jose Berrios, Max Kepler, and Eddie Rosario will ultimately determine what this team can accomplish in the next few years. As veterans step aside however, the graduation of top prospects such as Gordon, will need to go smoothly to fill in. Now is not the time to worry about starting his clock or whether he’s going to step in and be all-systems-go right away. Get young Flash in there, and take what you can into the offseason to work on.

    Option B: Utility All Over

    Ehire Adrianza was recently activated from the disabled list, and returns to the Twins having had a nice little hot streak before landing on the shelf. He was going to lose his starting role at SS when Jorge Polanco returned regardless, but now there isn’t a clear avenue to playing time.

    Minnesota has pushed Adrianza out into the outfield at times over his tenure here, but he’s yet to play second base this season (in part because Dozier has been there for 89/90 games). Should Minnesota go this route, Adrianza likely becomes the starter at second. Polanco would stay at short, as it’s his long-term home, and Eduardo Escobar remains at the hot corner.

    In operating this way, the Twins would really be up a creek without a paddle. Adrianza doesn’t figure into the future plans, and they’d be past the point of prioritizing wins. Unfortunately, it’s hard to not see this as a likely scenario, given how much run players like Ryan LaMarre and Bobby Wilson have been given.

    At the end of the day the hope should be that if the Twins do sell, and most importantly regarding Brian Dozier, the position is turned over to the man in waiting. Stephen Gonsalves, John Curtiss, Trevor May, and a handful of other players should make their way up from Triple-A, but Gordon must be chief among them.

    Once a team has decided to close shop on a given season, making sure to learn something and get the most out of every game from a development standpoint needs to be the focus. Selling off assets and failing to capitalize on opportunity- allowing process and ability to drive results could very well have the Twins staring at the next big prospects to be sent back down in hopes of figuring it out.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

     

     

    That is .500 ball over 20 games. That is a modest improvement.  I don't think you throw in the towel just yet.

     

     

     

    They need to play at roughly a 102 win pace for the rest of the season to win 86 games which will catch Cleveland if Cle plays only .500 ball for the rest of the season. .500 ball over 20 games is semi meaningless 

     

    They need to play at roughly a 102 win pace for the rest of the season to win 86 games which will catch Cleveland if Cle plays only .500 ball for the rest of the season. .500 ball over 20 games is semi meaningless 

    You could say that about any 20 games. But if the Twins go on a tear because the 1-8 falter was so embarrassing they woke up.  Looking back 20 games from now, you might say that these meaningless games of yours marked a turning point.  Then it could be said that the 9-2 tear was Yuge. I guess we'll see.

    Edited by Kelly Vance

     

    You could say that about any 20 games. But if the Twins go on a tear because the 1-8 falter was overcome by the 9-2 run, looking back from 20 games from now, you might say that these meaningless games of yours marked a turning point.  Then it could be said that the 9-2 tear was Yuge. 

     

    I was not commenting on what they may do over the next 20 games, I was only commenting that "playing .500 ball" is not "progress" in relation to chasing down Cle. 

     

    I was not commenting on what they may do over the next 20 games, I was only commenting that "playing .500 ball" is not "progress" in relation to chasing down Cle. 

    well, fine. But if you've been playing .480 something, then .500 IS progress, however small. But I think you might be saying it is probably (I say maybe) too little too late. 

     

    Anyone remember the '69 Cubs?  

     

    Bert pointed out today that Doze is batting .294 in July.  You never woulda known it from all his "fans" on TD. 

     

    Yes, because he does this every year (with the exception of 2016 / 2017).  It's not hard to understand those "fans" on TD because he doesn't show up from April - late June sometimes later.  That's half the season and part of the reason our offense was horrid up until a few weeks ago. Sorry no sympathies here.  At least Escobar is more consistent and less expensive. 

     

    I hope they find a way to get better.

    Not arguing, but interested in knowing for what year?

    If you are thinking 2020, I would trade everybody on the team.

    If you are thinking 2018, you trade for guys.

    If you are thinking 2019, Gibson and Dozier probably would need to stay, unless you plan on signing multiple big time free agents, which I am not sure are available.

     

    Uh, no. 

     

    In the reality of Dozier having better slash lines for the past 4 years. Escobar was a better hitter for the first 90 games of 2018, but I'd be willing to bet he isn't by the end of 2018, he won't be for this year, either.

     

    I don't pay much attention to WAR, but since you do, please check Dozier's WAR over the past four years and compare it to Escobar's.

     

    WPA is interesting trivia, but no way to measure worth.

     

    Escobar is 1.5 years younger, and can play on the left side of the infield, so that's a plus. But as a second baseman, Dozier is the better player as of today, and I'd bet for the next couple seasons as well.

     

     

    I very much agree with this, but for me, the much more important point is that Dozier is the more "replaceable" player using existing assets. Escobar can play 2B for the remainder of 2018 without a horrific fall-off (IMO), whereas, without Escobar, if a need arises at any of the infield positions, the fall-off is fairly precipitous from Escobar to Adrianza, Gordon, Petit, et al. I'm hoping for a nice overpay for Dozier and hoping Escobar stays.

     

    I very much agree with this, but for me, the much more important point is that Dozier is the more "replaceable" player using existing assets. Escobar can play 2B for the remainder of 2018 without a horrific fall-off (IMO), whereas, without Escobar, if a need arises at any of the infield positions, the fall-off is fairly precipitous from Escobar to Adrianza, Gordon, Petit, et al. I'm hoping for a nice overpay for Dozier and hoping Escobar stays.

    That's a fair take.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Yes.  They were almost good enough.  But fell short at the end...

     

    It was a huge choke. Yuge!!!!!

     

     

    I am looking for a Cleveland Indians voodoo doll and I am not watching any Major League movies to keep my warpath  (bad choice of words) going. 

     

    Not arguing, but interested in knowing for what year?

    If you are thinking 2020, I would trade everybody on the team.

    If you are thinking 2018, you trade for guys.

    If you are thinking 2019, Gibson and Dozier probably would need to stay, unless you plan on signing multiple big time free agents, which I am not sure are available.

     

    When depends a lot on what happens with Buxton / Sano. I really want to be optimistic but realistically what is the probability they turn into the elite players we need them to contend.  BTW contend (to me) does not mean for the central. Contend means a 50/50 shot at winning a playoff series. What percentage you and other TD followers put on them reaching this status.  50% seems generous. If we say 50%, the probability of both of them contributing at that level is 25%. 

     

    I also have no interest in any approach that is focused on a 1-2 year window and requires we part with assets that are likely to extend the window for several years. I would be fine with keeping Gibson if we extend him or if we don't get an enticing offer. With Dozier, I am just not confident he with him going forward but I also have no idea what the minor league staff. Of course, he is a FA so I guess what we do short-term simply depends on the offer.

     

    Next question is what can we pull off in FA. We can't just sign whomever we want unless the overpay is just nuts which is always a bad idea. Players want to go to certain teams and the FA market is a mechanism for them to get the best offer they can on one of a handful of teams they want to play on.  

     

    I disagree with the sentiment that we should just trade everyone if we don't believe Sano / Buxton will lead us to the promise land next year. Why do that today? Whats to be gained? 

     

    It was a huge choke. Yuge!!!!!

     

     

    I am looking for a Cleveland Indians voodoo doll and I am not watching any Major League movies to keep my warpath  (bad choice of words) going. 


    Even if Cleveland chokes, the Twins will need to beat two of the Yankees, Red Sox, and Astros. 

     

    Good.Luck.

     

    The irrational purveyor of fairy dust actually likes Dozier and has rooted for the guy. All you say, the surprising rise to a top MLB player, is true and commendable. When he came out of the gate playing well this year I thought now we might have something. A Dozier who plays well all year but then we were disappointed again. If you weren't disappointed by his first half performance you are delusional. As the events of the last couple days show he may lead us to postseason this year too. I just don't understand how someone can play so well and also appear so lost at times. If he can do it for months why not more consistently? That is the disappointment.
    Polanco if he establishes himself won't have this problem. For crying out loud obviously he is not a better player than Dozier right now and obviously has not contributed more this month. Thanks for the help on that. What I do see with him is a great addition to the lineup who has the potential to be a better all around hitter than Dozier and a tougher out. That is where Dozier has trouble. There are holes in his swing that keep him from contributing more with RISP.

     

    That is my thought as well. How can a guy do this every single year? Is he simply not prepared in April and it takes him three months to heat up FINALLY? Escobar is not a better player then Dozier during his hot spells but he is certainly a better player during Dozier's down periods, which end up being half the season.  

     

    Sorry I'd rather have Escobar and his consistency.  What good is it to have players who play half a season of baseball and only show up after the team is 8-10 games out of it.  This is what used to drive me crazy about Gibson as well.  

     

    Trade Dozier.  Get what you can for him unless he is willing to sign a team friendly deal which he won't.

    Edited by laloesch

     


    I disagree with the sentiment that we should just trade everyone if we don't believe Sano / Buxton will lead us to the promise land next year. Why do that today? Whats to be gained? 

    My point on that is if Buxton and Sano are not really good next year, the Twins really have nothing next year. Rosario, Kepler and Polanco are the core. No 1B, 2B, or 3B and no real close prospects. Maybe Gordon and Rooker but the odds say no.

    Berrios, then you have 2 pitchers in the last year of their contract in Gibson and Jake.

    Then a bunch of young guys in Romero, Gonzo, Meija, etc...

    The next group of prospects are likely to start coming up in 2019 and hopefully are decent in 20, but really 21 should be more realistic.

     

    And I am sorry but if that is the case were the Twins are building for 2021 and beyond good luck filling target field.

     

     

    I really don't understand where some of you are getting Escobar's "consistency".

     

    OPS by year:

     

    2015: .754

    2016: .618

    2017: .758

    2018: .834

     

    First/Second half OPS splits:

     

    2015: .688/.816

    2016: .658/.573

    2017: .759/.757

    2018: ??

     

    In only one year was Escobar pretty consistently okay... unless you also want to give him credit for "consistency" the year he was consistently awful. But even in that consistently "okay" season, he was so far below Dozier's season line that the two are not comparable in value.

     

    I like Escobar but let's not build fake narratives to support keeping him.

    My point on that is if Buxton and Sano are not really good next year, the Twins really have nothing next year. Rosario, Kepler and Polanco are the core. No 1B, 2B, or 3B and no real close prospects. Maybe Gordon and Rooker but the odds say no.

    Berrios, then you have 2 pitchers in the last year of their contract in Gibson and Jake.

    Then a bunch of young guys in Romero, Gonzo, Meija, etc...

    The next group of prospects are likely to start coming up in 2019 and hopefully are decent in 20, but really 21 should be more realistic.

     

    And I am sorry but if that is the case were the Twins are building for 2021 and beyond good luck filling target field.

    Why be pessimistic?

     

    If that’s how it works out the Twins can flip anyone they sign or extend when the best opportunity arises. What is the rush to get any deal possible? The trade deadline creates an artificial sense of urgency that typically results in a depressed market for sellers because there are invariably more sellers than serious buyers. The only times a seller would have an edge is if they hold an elite asset that several teams want, a situation that doesn’t apply to the Twins.

     

    My point on that is if Buxton and Sano are not really good next year, the Twins really have nothing next year. Rosario, Kepler and Polanco are the core. No 1B, 2B, or 3B and no real close prospects. Maybe Gordon and Rooker but the odds say no.

    Berrios, then you have 2 pitchers in the last year of their contract in Gibson and Jake.

    Then a bunch of young guys in Romero, Gonzo, Meija, etc...

    The next group of prospects are likely to start coming up in 2019 and hopefully are decent in 20, but really 21 should be more realistic.

     

    And I am sorry but if that is the case were the Twins are building for 2021 and beyond good luck filling target field.

     

    You make several good points. My position trading away prospects is based on many of the things you point out. I just think we should ride it out until at least this point next year before we do anything drastic. 

    I wonder if it is consistency or variation due to sample. SLG and OBP stabilize near a full season and batting average around 900 plate appearances. Any conclusion drawn from slash stat splits or partial seasons is on shaky ground.

    I am all about extending Dozier at this point, he is underrated in what he's done in recent years.  he's the kind of guy you might not really miss till he's gone, but he hits lots of dingers, plays decent defense, good runner, and typically has a decent BA.

     

    I’ll keep saying this because no one seems to agree, you just CAN’T do that in this era of 13 man pitching staffs. It simply isn’t workable to have a guy who you know won’t be available (but still be on your active roster) for upwards of 1/3 of the games. Especially when that player’s production is FAR lower than average for his position.

    Even Joe Mauer at his best over the last 5 years (2017) was a below average first baseman offensively. He posted a 116 wRC+ last year which was 19th of 28 qualified first basemen. And that is the BEST he has been in 5 years.

    Keeping him would be foolish IMO. I would seriously rather roll with Cave at DH until Rooker is ready.

    That's why there are horse races. 

     

    I think that no matter what some fans think, Joe will play next year if he wants to. He will inch closer to 3000 hits, and a HOF five years from when he hangs them up. People still come to see Joe play.

    Even when he is sitting I'd much rather have him as a pinch hitter on his off days than anybody else we got. And speaking for myself, I just like watching Joe play. 

     

    That's why there are horse races. 

     

    I think that no matter what some fans think, Joe will play next year if he wants to. He will inch closer to 3000 hits, and a HOF five years from when he hangs them up. People still come to see Joe play.

    Even when he is sitting I'd much rather have him as a pinch hitter on his off days than anybody else we got. And speaking for myself, I just like watching Joe play. 

    If "Joe wants to play" when he's 60, should the Twins still offer him a contract?

     

    If the FO thinks he'll help them win, sign him.

     

    If it's anything else, don't sign him. There's no room for sentiment or nostalgia on a 25 man MLB roster. If you want to win, at least.

     

    If "Joe wants to play" when he's 60, should the Twins still offer him a contract?

     

    If the FO thinks he'll help them win, sign him.

     

    If it's anything else, don't sign him. There's no room for sentiment or nostalgia on a 25 man MLB roster. If you want to win, at least.

    When he is 60?  Maybe he will have 3000 hits by then.

    Even Joe Mauer at his best over the last 5 years (2017) was a below average first baseman offensively. He posted a 116 wRC+ last year which was 19th of 28 qualified first basemen. And that is the BEST he has been in 5 years.

    I don’t agree with your use of statistics.

     

    I am pretty sure that there couldn’t be 28 qualified first basemen though there could be 28 guys who played at least 1 game at first base and also had enough plate appearances to qualify for the batting title. That list has to include players whose primary position was not 1B.

     

    The wRC+ overall for first basemen in 2017 was 113. It would be fair to note that Mauer hit better than average first base play. In addition wRC+ does not include his contribution in the field which by the eyes of many was better than league average.

     

    There is enough to support your argument for not re-signing Mauer without using statistics in a misleading way (though that may not have been your intent). If fangraphs was your source, you do not get a list of qualified firstbasemen by clicking 1B.

    I don’t agree with your use of statistics.

     

    I am pretty sure that there couldn’t be 28 qualified first basemen though there could be 28 guys who played at least 1 game at first base and also had enough plate appearances to qualify for the batting title. That list has to include players whose primary position was not 1B.

     

    The wRC+ overall for first basemen in 2017 was 113. It would be fair to note that Mauer hit better than average first base play. In addition wRC+ does not include his contribution in the field which by the eyes of many was better than league average.

     

    There is enough to support your argument for not re-signing Mauer without using statistics in a misleading way (though that may not have been your intent). If fangraphs was your source, you do not get a list of qualified firstbasemen by clicking 1B.

    Where's he at this year?

    Where's he at this year?

    I am able to look it up if you like though I don’t think the sample is large enough to be considered meaningful. It really would be mathematically best to combine the 2017 with 2018 for wRC+, OPS+ or other slash stat driven data.

    Edited by jorgenswest

     

    I am able to look it up if you like though I don’t think the sample is large enough to be considered meaningful. It really would be mathematically best to combine the 2017 with 2018 for wRC+, OPS+ or other slas stat driven data.

     

    2017 is his best year in years......

     

    Here is where he is over the last 2.5 years among first baseman with at least 500 ABs over that time (200 per year) since the number of qualifiers is too low to be meaningful:

     

    18th in the majors - remember, that includes his best year in years

     

    Adding in 2015,,,,,

     

    20th.

     

    that's WAR, so it includes defense. Taking out defense:

     

    Mauer is 46th among 1B in offense since 2015....

    31st in offense only since 2016

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...