JB_Iowa Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 8m BREAKING: Tanaka to #Yankees, seven years, $155M, opt-out after fourth year.
TRex Provisional Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Wow, a 7-year contract at what amounts to $25 million/year! That is quite a bit more risky that I am comfortable with, and am glad the Twins didn't take that gamble.
iTwins Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 The good news is the free agent market should come to life again. Garza, Santana and company will finally find homes - and there will be actual baseball news stories to read again!
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Wow, a 7-year contract at what amounts to $25 million/year! That is quite a bit more risky that I am comfortable with, and am glad the Twins didn't take that gamble. This is the same deal Felix Hernandez received when you add in the $20M post fee, I think only Verlander and Kershaw make more. For a guy that has never pitched here and who scouts say does not compare to Darvish Felix Hernandez has a career 3.20 in 9 seasons. 3 seasons with an ERA under 2.67. 8.4 K per 9. The other thing that hasn't been talked about, Yu Darvish's success here certainly made this guy more attractive, but Yu has only been here two years. Nomo and Dice-K had two very good years as well. Nomo first two years 2.90 ERA, he ended at 4.24 Dice-K first two years 3.73 ERA, he ended at 4.52 Yu's first two years, 3.34 ERA, he ended at ????? We should be applauding this. I think this guys opt out may be laughable in four years.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 It's just money. Some teams spend it to win. Others, not so much. Anyone still think Ellsbury's contract will keep them from adding players?
Winston Smith Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Twins were in on him until it went over 2 years @ 8 mill. Terry just couldn't get him to take his money!
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 This is the same deal Felix Hernandez received when you add in the $20M post fee, I think only Verlander and Kershaw make more. For a guy that has never pitched here and who scouts say does not compare to Darvish Felix Hernandez has a career 3.20 in 9 seasons. 3 seasons with an ERA under 2.67. 8.4 K per 9. The other thing that hasn't been talked about, Yu Darvish's success here certainly made this guy more attractive, but Yu has only been here two years. Nomo and Dice-K had two very good years as well. Nomo first two years 2.90 ERA, he ended at 4.24 Dice-K first two years 3.73 ERA, he ended at 4.52 Yu's first two years, 3.34 ERA, he ended at ????? We should be applauding this. I think this guys opt out may be laughable in four years. If you have a billion a year in tv revenue, what does the money matter? They just showed the $189MM number has no meaning. So, they bought a number 2-4 pitcher. I don't get how that is bad/wrong/evil for them. I bet they go sign another pitcher now too. They have money, they had an open position, they spent money to fill the position. Seems like a good idea to me.
BigTrane Provisional Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 As noted, it's their money, and this is how the Yanquis roll, so whatever.Finally unblocking the FA logjam seems more interesting by far. We face them in May, June & July, so let's hope for an "interesting" & extended transition.Not to be negative, but I'm sick of being their whipping boys.
Kwak Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 This thread illustrates the difference between "NY way of thinking" and "Minnesota way of thinking". Wildcatters do have dry holes--but the winners make up for them.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Yankees have spent half a BILLION dollars this winter & still have Kelly Johnson likely starting at 3B & Brian Roberts at 2B, plus the farm system is a mess and nearly everyone is an injury waiting to happen in their lineup. This signing is just another bad move for a franchise that clearly has no idea what it is doing year in and year out.
dgwills Provisional Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 It seems like a lot of money, but if he doesn't live up to the contract the Yankees know ways of getting out of it.
IdahoPilgrim Provisional Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Twins were in on him until it went over 2 years @ 8 mill. Terry just couldn't get him to take his money! I know. It's so frustrating, this parsimony we have here in this organization. A mere $160 million and we could have had him...
thetank Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 A few of the Yanks signings won't pan out. Beltran slumped in the 2nd half the past 2 years. Tanaka will be interesting.
jm3319 Provisional Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 This thread illustrates the difference between "NY way of thinking" and "Minnesota way of thinking". Wildcatters do have dry holes--but the winners make up for them. I think it's more about budgets and revenue flows....There's just simply no way the Twins can compete with the Uber-markets like New York and LA. Those teams get more in their TV deals than the Twins bring in total per year. It's just simply not a level playing field. I'd love to see a hard salary cap in baseball, but know it has no chance of happening anytime soon.
Winston Smith Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Yankees have spent half a BILLION dollars this winter & still have Kelly Johnson likely starting at 3B & Brian Roberts at 2B, plus the farm system is a mess and nearly everyone is an injury waiting to happen in their lineup. This signing is just another bad move for a franchise that clearly has no idea what it is doing year in and year out. Yes in the playoffs 17 out of the last 20 years with 5 world series titles they clearly have no idea of what they are doing!
JB_Iowa Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Author Posted January 22, 2014 I'd love to see a hard salary cap in baseball, but know it has no chance of happening anytime soon. Nope. And despite all the earlier chatter in the media about the Yankees staying under the luxury tax threshold, that was apparently blown apart, too: Buster Olney @Buster_ESPN Yankees were already slightly over the $189m luxury tax threshold before Tanaka signing... so, that # is in the rear-view mirror. 7:56 AM - 22 Jan 2014
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Nope. And despite all the earlier chatter in the media about the Yankees staying under the luxury tax threshold, that was apparently blown apart, too: Buster Olney @Buster_ESPN Yankees were already slightly over the $189m luxury tax threshold before Tanaka signing... so, that # is in the rear-view mirror. 7:56 AM - 22 Jan 2014 Slightly over means they still could have found a way to get under the threshold. That is the crazy thing about the Tanaka signing, its not costing them $25 mil a year, its costing closer to $35 million a year with the luxury tax.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Yes in the playoffs 17 out of the last 20 years with 5 world series titles they clearly have no idea of what they are doing!Let's talk recent history, they are clearly falling behind. What lead to the 5 world series titles was an infusion of in house talent that came through the minors and became the key pieces to those teams: Rivera, Pettite, Jeter, Cano, Posada etc. Now the cupboard is bare and other teams are starting to reap the benefits of TV deals (LA Dodgers, LA Angels, Seattle Mariners etc) so now they can't simply "sign everybody" Also they have won only 1 title in the last 13 years...yes that is better than the Twins, but let's not pretend the Yankees have somehow been DOMINATING baseball the past decade or so.
Badsmerf Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Great move for the Twins! I've watched him and not a big fan of him. Glad he will be pitching for he Yankees at a super high price.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 So if the minor league system is barren, they should NOT sign free agents? I'm confused how that would make them better.....
Craig Arko Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 "You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em,Know when to walk away and know when to run."
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 To me, judging success only on Titles is off....they have been in teh playoffs A LOT. When did they last lose 90+ games three years in a row?
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 This is a great move in my book. I was all for signing Tanaka but as the off-season went on and his price started rising as did reports about how much abuse his arm has taken, I became happy the Twins weren't going to be in on him. He could work out and be servicable, but there's likely an equally decent chance his arm gives out. Let the Yankees keep cycling these bad contracts. I wouldn't be surprised if both this and the Ellsbury contract look terrible by 2016.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 So what? In them meantime, they had 3 or more good years from the players. Again, why does the money matter if it does not keep them from signing players? Do people think salaries are going down over the next 3 years?
whosafraidofluigirussolo Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 FWIW, 7/$155M works out to $22M per year, not $25.It's still a ton of money but that difference is not meaningless.
Kwak Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Why should we be upset with what the Yankees spend? Their fans spend a great deal of money to watch the Yankee BB team to be entertained and the owners invest much of that money in players so their fans can maximize (their) enjoyment. Are you advocating that Yankee owners slash their player budget and pocket as much of that cash as possible?--So other teams can win and have other fans be happy? Hmm, sounds rather short-term thinking to me.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 FWIW, 7/$155M works out to $22M per year, not $25.It's still a ton of money but that difference is not meaningless.+ 20 mil posting fee.
halfchest Provisional Member Posted January 22, 2014 Posted January 22, 2014 Glad the Twins weren't in on this one. That's a lot of money and time for a guy who's never pitched in MLB. Not a bad signing for a team like the Yankees but I the kind of deal that could hamstring a team like the Twins in the future.
JB_Iowa Verified Member Posted January 22, 2014 Author Posted January 22, 2014 It is just money. And taking each team as a separate business (no comments about the relative wealth of the owners), the Yankees can simply afford to take a lot bigger $$$$ risks than the Twins. So can the Dodgers, Angels, Rangers and a number of other teams. Could the Twins have afforded to pay Tanaka? Yes. Would it have been a smart risk? No. It may work out for the Yankees. It may not. Even if it doesn't, a bad $155 million ($175 million investment w/posting fee) isn't back-breaking for them given their revenues. It would be awfully hard to stomach for the Twins (and their fans).
Dasan Hill Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+ SP Dasan Hill was the key piece heading to the Toronto Blue Jays organization in the Jeff Hoffman trade. Explore Dasan Hill News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.