Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, dxpavelka said:

Again with the "this year."  The point is that Larnach staying helps "this year" but delays big league progression for Jenkins and / or Rodriguez and / or Mendez for future years.  Throw in Rhoden & Martin, and Wallner for good measure and you're up to a half dozen guys being impacted.  I'm just fine with Martin, Rhoden & Wallner being impacted.  But I DO want to see as much of Jenkins / Rodriguez / Mendez before the end of this year as we can, considering that if we don't it might well be March of 2028 before we do.  Or later.

 

My "this year" was purely in regards to the performance of those 3 players "this year" as in spin the roulette wheel and any one of those guys looks passable at different parts of the last few years. If anything, it's nice to see that at least one of them has panned out enough to hold the spot (for now).   Do we see "what we got" in Jenkins and "start the clock"? We do need to shed a couple guys though and I'd rather see it based on performance vs. pocketbook (within sensibility).

Posted
16 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

I get trading Larnach, but why for a rental? I’m starting to become gravely concerned this team cares most about making a token playoff appearance this year and has no eyes on  being a legit contender next year and beyond.

Hard to tell based on the past few days because the moves have been measured.  However, Tom Pohlad seems to have been in the mode you describe since the day he took over.  He has had an exaggerated sense of this team's relative ability to contend and a major emphasis on the right now versus building a legit contender.  I just hope they don't do something dumb.   

Posted
1 hour ago, JD-TWINS said:

THIS year, with a weak A.L., may be the BEST or as good of a chance Team will have for next few years, IMO.

Get Bell & or Caratini or Roden or Jackson out of the way, fine……to get space and an arm or prospects.

Rodriguez has averaged 53 games per year for last 4 years ……. the only one blocking him is Emma!

Martin has been up and playing for 3-4 years, when he’s stayed healthy. He played in  platoon with Larnach for 10 weeks - actually displaced Wallner, until his bat went cold.

How in the hexx is Larnach blocking Wallner?? They are the same age & Wallner was playing RF every day with Larnach on the same roster. Wallner sucked, that’s why he’s back down in St Paul for the 3rd time in 4 years (hurt last year).

If Team thought Mendez was better than Roden, he would have been promoted.

Jenkins for Roden & Culpepper for Gray over next 2-3 weeks, outstanding!!

Larnach IS the 2nd best hitter on the Team. He is under control next year. He’s ideal for DH….. platoon with Buxton/Keaschall. He can play defense if needed, unlike current DH. Again, Larnach IS the 2nd best hitter on roster and he too, was a highly touted, first round draft pick. Now he’s performing and people want to trade him to see IF someone else may be able to hit. No sense to that thinking:

Only took Larnach five years to prove he might belong.  Seems like if the next guy can do it in three that would be progress.

Posted
1 hour ago, Original_JB said:

My "this year" was purely in regards to the performance of those 3 players "this year" as in spin the roulette wheel and any one of those guys looks passable at different parts of the last few years. If anything, it's nice to see that at least one of them has panned out enough to hold the spot (for now).   Do we see "what we got" in Jenkins and "start the clock"? We do need to shed a couple guys though and I'd rather see it based on performance vs. pocketbook (within sensibility).

Any Larnach decision has little to do with pocketbook.  I have no issue "starting the clock" on Jenkins.  Also wouldn't mind seeing "what we got" on the others as well.  May well not get the opportunity in 2027.  Might also be playing by different CBA rules by the next time we see guys on the field after October.  One of which might be a five year "clock" rather than six years.  Decisions might need to be accelerated.  Not something we've been good at. 

Posted

Astros on a six game winning streak and Abreu pitching well. Add that to plays like the one in left from today’s first inning and you can see why Crane vetoed this trade.

Posted

The Twins offense has been struggling lately, trading Larnach away would hurt quite a bit. Abreu would be nice, but Larnach is an everyday starter and overall the trade would make the team worse. I'm not sure I believe the report, given the source isn't said to be entirely credible.

Posted
1 hour ago, Danchat said:

The Twins offense has been struggling lately, trading Larnach away would hurt quite a bit. Abreu would be nice, but Larnach is an everyday starter and overall the trade would make the team worse. I'm not sure I believe the report, given the source isn't said to be entirely credible.

The Twins addressed the issue with Larnach so he doesn’t quit on the organization. So I think it was real and clearly the Astros owner is the real GM. He negotiated the Correa deal last year too. Thank goodness he did to take on the remainder of C4’s salary 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...