Just graduating from college means you weren't around for the "3 magical weeks" in 87 & 91. As such, you have no clue of which you speak. If the Twins never win another game, I'll die happy. Now get the hell off my grass.
The Twins used 14 different starting pitchers in 2022. ONE of them performed at a similar level as Berrios. How might things look in 9 months if attempts to replace Berrios hadn't necessitated losing Chase Petty, Spencer Steer, Steve Hajjar & Christian Encarnancion-Strand?
Your 3 most successful teams have combined for ONE World Series win in the last 47 years. Twins have two. Maybe we have different definitions of success.
If the NFL would follow suit and reduce the number of division games it's entirely possible that somebody other than the Packers would have handed the Vikings their asses today.
If Woods Richardson produces as well as Berrios over the next 6-7 years he'll likely be on the move in 3-4. This team is never going to compete for big name free agent talent. But when they grow their own the can compete to keep it. They NEED to compete to keep it.
For the record I'm fairly certain that the Moneyball board pictured is a free agent board and not a draft board. I don't recall the draft even being mentioned in that movie. So what is your recommendation for if BOTH Freight Train Figueroa & Warts Murphey are available at 5?
I don't care if they make trades with the moon and Mars to get pitching. Angst from the Berrios trade (at least mine) stems from the fact that we're now a year and a half in to it and we have FIVE big league innings pitched to show for it. AND the fact that we traded away the best (only?) home grown pitching talent we've home grown in a generation AND the fact that the team we traded him to signed him to an extension that we easily should have been able to sign him to.
The fairy tale ending would be one of the two spending significant time in the rotation and the other being blocked by Ryan, Gray, Mahle, Maeda, Ober, Winder & Paddack. Hey, a guy can dream.
My original thought was that we should offer him $275 Million for 8 years. When the Giants deal buckled my thought was that we should go to $313 Million for 11 years. If the Mets deal doesn't go, maybe something like $294 Million for 10 years?
Actually, I believe the data would indicate that teams that make BETTER tradesget better faster. But feel free to present conflicting data if available.