Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

terrydactyls

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,895
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by terrydactyls

  1. I have been thinking that this series of articles about possible trades is pretty much an attempt to provide non-caretakers with something to read as the first snow gets closer. Two days ago, it was trade Jax because he's so valuable and replace him with one of the very similar relievers that are abundantly available. That makes no sense. Today, it's trade Duran because he might decline in a year or two. MIGHT??? And then the article goes on to say that the best return might be a high-ranked prospect. But in order to get this "prospect", the Twins would have to also include a high-ranked prospect from their own farm system. So the trade comes down to a prospect for a prospect, but the Twins would throw in one of the top relievers in baseball who might regress? That seems to me to say that Duran ain't that valuable. I think I'll just concentrate on the crossword puzzle until something actually happens.
  2. There is an interesting contradiction in this article (if I'm reading it correctly). In the section where you outline the case for trading Jax, you say that relievers like Jax "don't grow on trees". But then continue that sentence saying that relievers of Jax caliber "can generally be plucked from other organizations fairly cheaply". If the second part is accurate, why would the Twins trade him? They should just keep him and pluck a few more relievers just like him from other teams.
  3. I'm amazed that Mercedes is just turning 20. It seems like I've read about him for over five years now. I'm looking forward to following Prielipp, Mercedes, Oliver and Canterino next summer. That should be more fun than watching the Pohlad Poor House team in Minneapolis.
  4. I think the best trade option would be trading the Pohlad family for any competent ownership.
  5. Once again, you stole my idea and posted it before I could. 😇. So let me expand that brilliant comment by adding that hard throwing (but not performing well) pitchers in the minors should also be signed (to MiLB contracts). If you sign 10 or 12 of these, maybe one or two might work out.
  6. A couple minutes of research and I found the following pitchers that didn't pitch in AA or AAA ball (or even A ball for some): Jim Abbott, Catfish Hunter, Mike Morgan, Garrett Crochet, Burt Hooten, and Mike Leake. I could have added Eddie Bane but choose not to. And if you want to add position players, how about Dave Winfield, Pete Incavglia, Bob Horner, and John Olerud? I'm thinking that your statement might be incorrect.
  7. Interesting article. The first paragraph poses a question. The next six paragraphs provide a year-by-year history of Baldelli's tenure - with which anyone who occasionally reads Twins Daily is intimately familiar. And the last paragraph repeats the question asked in paragraph one. My question is: Was there a point to this article or was it just filler because there has to be some content every day?
  8. In addition to playing lineup merry-go-round, the other big issue I have is scheduled days off to keep players fresh. With all the complaints lately attributed to players about how worn out they are, I would have to assume that scheduled days off isn't working. So I did a little digging into the numbers, 145 players played 130 or more games in 2024. Only 2 were Twins (Castro and Santana). Another 7 Twins were in the group of 129 players who played between 100 and 129 games (Margot - 129, Jeffers - 122, Miranda - 121, Larnach - 112, Farmer - 107 {but only 215 AB}, Kepler - 105, and Buxton - 102. The 66 players that played over 150 games averaged .258 BA, .331 OBP, .440 Slug and .773 OPS. It sure seems like playing nearly every day didn't hurt their performance. Among those who played 158 games or more were Matt Olson, Marcell Ozuna, Bobby Witt, Elly De La Cruz, Vladimir Guerrero, Shohei Ohtani Corbin Carroll, and Aaron Judge. This group averaged 29 HR, 93 RBI, .269 AVG, .346 OPS, .484 SLUG, and .831 OPS. No scheduled days off didn't seem to impact their performance - especially in the last few weeks of the season. Set a lineup and let them play until they tell you they need a day off.
  9. Thank God the White Sox are in the Central Division. If not, the Twins would looking at last place finishes for the foreseeable future.
  10. With a crowded and competitive field vying for the 2B job, I see trade possibilities for pitching help.
  11. Signed, The Twins Front Office P.S. It's your fault, not ours.
  12. I was listening to the Tigers game this afternoon and heard the announcers commenting on how the Tigers put up a couple runs in one inning. "Three hits up the middle and one to the opposite field. They are putting the ball in play and not trying to pull everything." Too bad the Twins don't try that philosophy.
  13. I know that many of you want the front office gone immediately. But given the salary makeup of the current team and the promise from ownership of not raising payroll, if I were Falvey and Levine, I would happily leave the Twins and sign on with a team who's owner actually wants to win. I know that throwing big money at players doesn't guarantee success, but it sure would be fun to try that method rather than dumpster diving. And if they did leave, who would come here under these conditions? I would guess that only a team of unknowns wanting to prove themselves would step in to the Twins front office. A new front office might mean the end of Baldelli's tenure as manager (a positive thing for many of you), but (again) who would the job under a tight-fisted owner and an inexperienced front office with absolutely no background. To paraphrase a great song from the musical "Hair", I'm afraid "this is the dawning of the Age of Indifference."
  14. Excellent point! A player can't take ground balls at 3B, 2B, SS, and then go chase flyballs in all three OF positions before a game. It's nearly impossible to learn how to play balls off the outfield walls if you don't get the opportunity to practice. And before someone says "a ground ball is the same regardless of where you play in the infield", that is completely false. Add to that the difficulty of turning a double play without practice time, and you have a team unprepared to play.
  15. I also live in an area where the Twins are unknown. Everything here is Red Sox (not that the Sox are worth talking about). Outside of this website, the only time I hear the Twins mentioned is on MLB radio (and then it's followed by a chuckle). Anyway, I'm looking forward to the "You be the Front Office" article with all the salaries and contract information. Then I can figure a way to cut another $10M to $20M from the payroll and still tell fans that we got a good chance to win the Central Division.
  16. Devon Kirby? At age 25 already? He can't be considered as a prospect at this "advanced age", at least according to some posters on this sight. 😉
  17. I didn't see that as a death stare at all. I thought Correa was thinking: "You poor sap. Saddled with this team."
  18. I think there is more than enough blame so that the ownership can be included.
  19. Does anyone know when the TD staff will publish their annual "If You Were the Front Office" spreadsheet? I think it's time to get started on the off season.
×
×
  • Create New...