Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Hosken Bombo Disco

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    17,709
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Hosken Bombo Disco

  1. Whether they are trading for a good starter with a year and a half team control, or trading away a good starter with a year and a half team control, the Twins are usually doing the smart thing either way.
  2. Which means he’ll be available when we need him again soon! ?
  3. Agreed. At least one reliever is needed, but I am starting to lean towards acquiring a starter here and hoping this new starter just has a good second half. Imagine going into a postseason series with Gray/Ryan/ and ??? again. And some people might think “how dare you” when I say this, but I wonder if Miranda is playing the best he can possibly play right at this moment. So that might be your best trade chip.
  4. Jealous of all of you who were in San Diego this weekend!
  5. Should the Twins trade Brian Dozier, Eduardo Escobar, or Ryan Pressly. Should the Twins trade Nick Gordon and Stephen Gonsalves for Gerrit Cole. Should the Twins trade Alex Kirilloff and Trevor Larnach for Noah Syndergaard. Should the Twins trade Jose Berrios for Austin Martin and Simeon Woods-Richardson. Should the Twins trade Taylor Rogers for Chris Paddack and Emil Pagan. The soothseers commenting in this thread seem to say, "No" to a Correa trade (and I agree, however ask me again on Sept. 9 when my hindsight kicks in)
  6. Thanks for posting! This is one of those enduring questions, with random sampling playing a role and variables that can be argued for either side. For example, when a starting pitcher is physically fit and is “making his pitches” that day, so to speak, and is already a high quality starting pitcher to begin with, I think the third and fourth time through the order can actually favor the pitcher. The pitcher has that data on what the batter is doing and swinging at, on that particular day. what do you think?
  7. Luis Arraez is very deserving, as is Buxton, and maybe a better success story than Buxton. Signed internationally for a modest bonus, an ACL injury wiped out his age 20 season while in high A, and give this front office credit for something, they shot him up through the system and he was in the majors in 2019. Cheers, Luis ?
  8. Sure! We are definitely encroaching into “the 5th Beatle” discussion territory here, with any number of extra peripheral individuals who were integral to the success beyond the top four
  9. I’d argue Gladden belongs, despite his numbers he was truly a catalyst. I would also argue for Gaetti, even though his last season was 90 and actually split away from the other hellraisers before that. 87 just doesn’t happen without Gaetti. Or Gagne, for that matter. So now you have core five, which does not rhyme, undermining the entire premise (also Bernie Williams wtf)
  10. Nice win! This team can flat out hit. Baserunning for Dum Dums! Pinch runner comes in and completely loses his mind lol. I do agree that was definitely the difference in the game. Someone could go look at win expectancy and compare "tie game, top of eighth" to what it should have been, first and third one out, bottom of seventh. Another fun fact - Remember that so-called "4th out" play from last week between Pittsburgh and Washington? (link) Well two big IFs: I think IF there had been one out instead of zero outs, and IF Engel had for some reason kept running and crossed home, he would have gotten there before Urshela tagged the trail runner and the run would have counted - the same situation as that other play. I think. But don't quote me. Just a fun observation. Let's see how the White Sox respond and if the Twins can tease out a good plan for how to pitch to them tonight. The White Sox seem like a team that will hang their heads. Meanwhile, another strength for this Twins team is its rebounding and resilience. If the Twins had run into this triple play, I really think they would just put it behind them and move on.
  11. i mean, same old same old, but could you at least confer with the other writers and give us a current status update in your little article on Woods-Richardson he was on the active list for two weeks without making a start then place on IL last week @Ted Schwerzler @Seth Stohs
  12. Excellent points, and maybe I need to do a better job keeping up with the game recaps. Haranguing the manager is a time-honored baseball tradition but yeah I can see how people take it way too far in this day and age.
  13. I’m pretty sure I said the offense was to blame. These are scenarios that many of us fans play in our heads, in real time, as it’s happening. It is not ridiculous at all to question why the Twins didn’t bunt in that inning. I am not manufacturing anything. Why do you assume I am? Why do you assume we are?
  14. A lot of posters are rallying to the defense of Rocco and rightly pointing out the lack of offense last night, but I gotta side with @Nashvilletwin and @Mark G and others this time, I think Rocco miscalculated on a chance to manufacture a run in the 8th after the Jeffers lead off walk. Dan Gladden pointed it out about the same time I started thinking it. In short, pinch run Buxton and ask Celestino to bunt. Or to take it one further— my preference— ask Celestino to bunt, and if the sacrifice is successful and Jeffers makes it to second with one out, then that’s when you insert Buxton as a pinch runner. If Buxton is healthy enough to pinch hit, and presumably leg out a double, then I assume he is healthy enough to run the bases for an inning or score from second on a single. I actually didn’t see the Arraez fly ball if it would have been deep enough to get Buxton to third with two outs. Rocco seemed better with Shelton as his wingman. It’s little opportunities like this that have been missed since then. I’m sure Rocco is doing fine and executing the plan in other ways besides game situations. And In no way was this the overriding reason the Twins lost last night.
  15. Well he’s probably not unhappy anymore (performance notwithstanding), but after the trade, yeah, he was absolutely shattered. By the way, I’d guess he is tipping pitches, and he knows he is, but is having trouble getting his grips and deliveries straightened back out. In other words, probably just a really bad stretch for him. Thanks for your support!
  16. Not to single out any particular Twins Daily writer, but there always feels to me to be a “finger to the wind” aspect to these articles. Since Berrios was my favorite player, I will pose these questions: Is it really worth wondering what happened to Berrios? Are we really not sure about him? Do we really not think he’ll be just fine and pitching in the postseason? Can we name the Twins top three pitchers for a postseason series? Maybe we should be asking what happened to the two we traded for? A position player starting to profile as a light-hitting corner outfielder, and a starting pitcher with promise but who vanishes for long periods? thanks for listening!
  17. And the other throw-in piece that I liked, Calvin Faucher, was fast-tracked to the majors by Tampa Bay and they are giving him bigger spots to pitch in, though he is not one of their top bullpen arms.
  18. I appreciate the first hand accounts from @RochesterDave and @ashbury - thanks! Nice commentary as usual, Matt. Indeed, Gordon was a nice trade piece back in the the 2016-2019 years. Gordon was also not the first middle infielder to be called up in early 2021 (Blankenhorn who threw that ball away in Oakland and at least one other name we have all forgotten already) were called to the big leagues ahead of Gordon. But this is 2022 and Gordon can continue to be a nice player off the bench or to spot start for this team.
  19. I remember last summer saying that I wanted to see Calvin Faucher promoted to MLB, give some unheralded guys like Faucher a look for 2022, since the bullpen was so bad last year and I figured they would move on from a bunch of guys. As it turns out, Tampa Bay got Faucher in the Cruz deal and now he is on the 26-man roster tonight for the Rays! Not saying this guy is going to light the world on fire, but still, nice to know I wasn't completely insane at the time.
  20. That’s where my mind went as well! My list would be: 1) Lewis, 2) Arraez, 3) Polanco, 4) Correa, 5) Larnach
  21. I’m not taking a side on this, and don’t know how Buxton reaggravated his knee, but according to the article it’s a lingering issue from last season? As mentioned by @Rosterman and @Chachi — Buxton’s performance incentives — my understanding is that they don’t kick in until next season. With this new load management program, if this is how it’s going to be going forward, I have to wonder if Buxton will have trouble reaching even the lowest bonus step of 502 PA even when he’s healthy for a full season, which puts serious MVP considerations (his other pay incentive) pretty much out of reach, which means… I have no idea what any of this means. We need him on the field, for sure.
  22. It seems a little contradictory given that Woods-Richarson’s stats are not too bad, but as part of any future deal he would be an over-traded prospect at that point. (Drafted by Mets, traded to Jays, traded to Twins, traded to next team.) So unless there is a team or scout out there still in love with him from his amateur days, I would think his status as being traded multiple times would raise questions on a negotiation call.
×
×
  • Create New...