Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Cris E

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    876

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Cris E

  1. Cris E
    Have you seen what the Yankees are planning on running out there next year? JUDGE! and Hicks when he's healthy and Stanton when he's healthy and Bader and some kids. And let's be honest, Judge has some injury history as well, missing 50 games in 2018 and 60 in 2019. Kepler can field all the OF spots, might hit better with next year's rules, isn't expensive, is an adult so he won't be a distraction, and MN Twins fans are the only ones spoiled enough to want to get rid of him. Again, the whole league crashed last year, not just Kepler. He had his worst season, true, but it was a 93 OPS+. Who else did you want? Pollack from CHW had a 91 OPS+, Cleveland's Franmil Reyes was 73, KC's Hunter Dozier had a 90. Heck, Detroit's whole starting lineup only had one person ahead of him, and Kepler would have tied Baez for second at 93. A lot of teams would have been thrilled to be running Max out there.
  2. Cris E
    At this point I could see trading Kepler to NYY for IKF and some young arms.
  3. Cris E
    Move ahead with Vasquez at C, Go get Bassett and then call Correa back and tell him we're serious. I think he wants to see what sort of team he'll be on for a decade before signing. If there's time they can trade for someone to hit from the right side and mess around on calls regarding Kepler and Pagan.
  4. Cris E
    The top couple prospects in the Yankees' system are SS, so while Correa does fit their model for ultra-professional grown-ups (vs petulant disasters like Tatis) I think they have other ways to spend their money right now.
  5. Cris E
    The thing about these ultra-huge contracts is that the number of years is almost irrelevant. 8x$35m=$280m is not a ton different from 10 for $300m if you think about tossing a couple $10m years on the end of such a huge deal and how little $10m might be in 2032. I'd be comfortable telling him the $340m Lindor and Tatis deals are not going to be comps, and letting him go at that point if he presses the point. The Twins' roster is not awash with guys needing to make $15m or more so they can handle a $35m ticket without getting the vapors.
  6. Cris E
    The trick to trading Kepler at a point where his value is low is finding a team who REALLY believes in his chances for a bounce-back next year. Someone who is certain the death of the shift or a new home field will let him blossom, or at least find 2019 again. You're not going to hear teams saying something like that out loud in the papers, but if you talk to enough of them you'll get a couple who direct the conversation around to him to see if they can pick him up cheap. Sorting through those talks to get one GM hooked and eventually willing to pay what you want is the game in a deal for Max. Not sure that it's actually out there, but working your way through the other teams is what it'll take (unless TOR or MIA leap at him in talks for the guys we want to get.)
  7. Cris E
    Two points: PIT has been standing pat on Reynolds with a preposterously high asking price for a long time. It's well-established that they are happy to hang on to him for a while yet. But make a call anyway, throw some names around, listen for something unexpected to be said. They may be completely in love with Arreaez or something. It's not the best run franchise out there, you could get lucky. I wouldn't be averse to sending one of our Totally Awesome Except They're Always Hurt corner guys out for him.
  8. Cris E
    One thing that's changing next year that might work against MN luring FAs is the balanced schedule. Back in the day (ie last year) the competition was harsh on the coasts but CLE/CHW/MIN and CHC/STL/MIL got to beat up on the weak kids in the Centrals to get a ticket to the post-season. In the new world the Padres and Dodgers will be spending less time beating on each other and more time stalking the weak sisters in fly-over country. We'll still get a division spot, but there's little chance of a wild-card anymore. FAs that want a short trip to the post-season will be paying attention.
  9. Cris E
    https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/12/twins-rumors-christian-vazquez-offer.html
  10. Cris E
    I think the big game shortstops are in a completely different category than the catcher search. Trading with OAK or TOR or picking up a lesser FA like Vazquez isn't going to change the budget around a $25-35m contract. A larger FA like a Rodon might have to wait until the big stuff is resolved, but a $8-12m catcher is going to fit easily. But regardless of what the Twins want, the people holding the papers on the big prizes (Boras, TOR, OAK) are going to draw things out a bit and let the market develop. As the pressure on team officials to Do Something keeps building in immoderate places like NY and BOS, there will come a point where someone just throws down to take the hand, and that's worth waiting for when you're the seller.
  11. Cris E
    Having a SS solution in place before you go shopping makes your initial bargaining position better (you're not sitting across the table from Boras desperate for a guy) and removes the danger of trying to nail something down in March. It's like eating before you go grocery shopping, just smart and helps avoid dumb purchases. I don't think they trade Gordon until Celestino proves he can actually play CF at the major league level. He showed some knuckleheaded moves on the basepaths, they did figure him out at the plate and he wasn't great about throwing to the right base, so there's substantial work to be done before he deserves a spot as large as Buxton's caddy.
  12. Cris E
    All the incentives in Maedas's contract are around starting. His contract is 8/$25m so his base salary isn't high but he gets more for starts and innings pitched. Moving to the pen is going to cost him half his paycheck and he will be cranky, as would any of us. Contract Notes: Innings Pitched Bonus $250,000 each for: 90, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200 Games Started Bonus $1M each for: 15, 20, $1.5M each for 25, 30, 32 Trade Assignment Bonus: $1M Opening Day Roster Bonus: $150,000 Per 2/9/20 trade, Dodgers retain $10M (assumed to be 2020-2022 salary + trade bonus)
  13. Cris E
    Dave Winfield, 15 minute King of the GWRBI. Long Live the King!
  14. Cris E
    I was kind of hoping he'd get it at first base, like the gold glove nomination. Those 8 hr would have looked sweeeet up there next to all those stats from previous winners.
  15. Cris E
    Even if Colome and Pagan had been effective and stayed in the Closer With A Captiol C role in 2022 it was the smart play because Duran was the better pitcher and was moved around to the hot spots rather than relegated to the ninth.
  16. Cris E
    This is great work, and not just because I agree with your underlying premise. If I'm Falvine I spent all my time since last spring digging into injury risk factors and trying to figure out how to keep the guys I have on the field and how to identify the individuals or types of players that are likely to have trouble. This was ridiculous, but it'll happen again if we have the same guys do the same things. For every freak HBP injury there were a bunch of recurring things that felt kind of avoidable: hamstrings, core, weak shoulders, etc. It's not related to us either, as many teams lost a lot of time to injury this year. NYY were a hot mess for a bunch of the summer, to name just one. Some of this might have just been poor prep due to the lockout, but that's not what you hang your hat on after a year like 2022. And in a way you can tell they were thinking this way since they did fire and hire the trainer about as quickly as possible once the year ended. It'll be interesting to see what they do for new acquisitions. Correa has a history of injury and Bogaerts has been a rock, for example. (And they both have Boras as rep so it'll be easy to work with both of them. Ha!)
  17. Cris E
    I have been pretty easy on the front office regarding 2022 because of the preposterous number of injuries. Most of their plans were shredded early and the year devolved into patching and promoting pretty quickly. BUT they did plan a rotation around Bundy and Archer and at least one youngster (Grey, Ryan, Archer, Bundy, kids) and that was always going to put a load on the pen. Even in a world where Archer and Bundy slowly grow strong and healthy there should have been a lot more structure around the swing role for the first half of the season. Those guys never improved, just kept slinging 4+ innings of decent starts, but the pen never changed to cover that many innings. The Falvine can wear that part of the outcomes as a direct result of not designing innings 4-6..
  18. Cris E
    People don't get pressed into starting without being stretched out first. Otherwise you just get a bullpen game and they don't need to go to the minors to find that. Winder has always been a starter, and a good one, but he's had some injury problems recently. I think they should let him start until he proves he can't before making him into a reliver. It's harder to find good starters than relievers and he's been on a great path so far, so let him grow.
  19. Cris E
    + The Twins were not doing what the others were doing regardless of what they had planned. The Twins had 14 different people start games, including seven who made between 1 and 5 starts. Many of them were not MLB-quality guys, either callow youth or waiver wire refugees, who were covering for an injury hole. Even their good starters all hit the DL at one or more points and needed to work themselves back to full strength. The plans were in tatters by April 1.
  20. Cris E
    Hedges hits like me, and I bat sixth on our softball team. He cannot be an option. Find someone who can pretty much play both ways but don't insist on outstanding in either. Jeffers is OK doing what he does well and we need someone who can cover for what he doesn't do well. That means find someone who can hit RH pitching and control the running game a little. These people exist: Murphy, Jansen, Vasquez to name a few. Just go get one, and don't dilly dally or they'll all be gone.
  21. Cris E
    https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/2022-starter-pitching.shtml The MLB-wide IP/GS was 5.2 innings. The Astros led everyone at 5.9 and the Twins were below average at 4.7, but not as far below as some seem to imply. That half inning below average is two outs, so not a ton different from the rest of baseball. What was really different was that we had our 12th and 22nd and 33rd best pitchers out there more than just about every other team and anyone's 30th pitcher is almost always going to be terrible or unprepared. There were plenty of arms in the plans for 2022 that were largely missing: Maeda, Alcala, Stashak, and big acquisitions Mahle and Paddack only made a hand full of starts. They have the bones of a good bullpen: Duran, Lopez, Thielbar, Jax and Moran are good pitchers. Pick through some of the kids, only use Pagan before the seventh and maybe re-sign Fulmer and you could be a swingman or two away from adequacy without changing too much. Mostly things hinge on being able to limit your staff to the top 15-20 guys in the org rather than finding 38 arms to run out there.
  22. Cris E
    I'm with the others: teams that are tanking have different agendas from teams trying to compete. There's no shame in it anymore, you just need a high tolerance for how little your fans care to see your face in public. If you want to want to force more teams to compete then you have to make it less lucrative to suck. That might take the form of reducing your rev sharing if your payroll stays low for too long or reducing other rewards like making the draft less secure. That stuff seems to be on the table already. I guess my question back is after decades of revenue sharing and consistent payroll patterns anyone expects anything to change unless changes to the fundamental rev sharing rules are considered. Dancing around the top draft pick is nonsense, as those guys just turn into trade bait in 4-6 years for the small-rev teams anyway. I think the salary floor idea is probably the best way out of this, but I'm unclear how to entice owners to spend more money. How do you get them to vote against the interests of one of their own? It's no more money in the pocket of the rich teams, and it costs the little/terrible/cheap ones more cash to finish last. Maybe the metric should be percentage of revenues returned to the field, and you can't be below some ratio (40% ??) for more than three years in a row, or two in five. They have the rev numbers used for sharing, so either use gross or shared revenue only, but make a certain chunk appear on the field or lose it next year. Say what you want to about the big playoff teams, but they are spending to win. There has to be a little temptation to just take home $200m+ instead of spending like the Dodgers.
  23. Cris E
    Where did all this negativity about the FO's rigidity in bullpen design come from? They are trying a ton of things to get effective arms out there, and it still ended up a lost season. The list below from the article doesn't include Fulmer (trade for good performer) or Joe Smith (FA signing that worked until he suddenly stopped being effective (hurt?) and was cut) or the swarm of anonymous minor league soldiers that shuffled through the roster this summer. That said, I am disappointed that we haven't moved to a different pitching coach. I am usually one of the most forgiving people you'll meet when playing the injury card, but after a year where we were having such difficulty I hoped they'd make a move to shore up the coaching.
  24. Cris E
    Ever since his first injury in 2016 he's had only one year where he's been healthy and taken the ball every start (2019 31 GS, 175 IP.) Other than that he hit 162 IP one time and then it seems you're only going to get about 130-135 IP in a couple dozens starts, much like this past season. They are pretty good starts, so that's great production if you price in the fact that he's going to miss 20% or more of a full season. The Falvine were able to get that type of contract with Buxton, and they should extend Sonny as well if he's willing to meet them out there in the middle, land of Games Started incentives.
  25. Cris E
    All of this x 2. Jeffers isn't terrible, he's just bad against the running game and doesn't hit RH very well. But you don't dump a guy like that, you play him against lefties to rest your starting catcher. Oh, and you get a catcher to play against righties. But when shopping for catchers you have to balance a bunch of stuff in ways you don't for other positions. Catching beats the heck out of a body, meaning that these guys can't play their position 140 games a year, and that even when resting they are often diminished at the plate, and they get hurt at crazy rates. So while you can ty to build around a catcher, you really do need a couple of them to anticipate the inevitable DL trips and leave room for their offensive sag. With that in mind I'd try to grow my own Mauers whenever possible, but while working on that I'd pick up a lot of glove-first platoon guys since they're cheaper and more available. We just need a guy that can hold his own against RH pitching and catch a good game and hopefully stay on the field for 100-115 games a year.
×
×
  • Create New...