Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

MGX

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    323

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by MGX

  1. MGX
    We don't know what the Twins intentions are this year - are they in full rebuild or are they trying to compete? If the answer is rebuilding, then I hope they don't sign any free agents & see what they have internally. If they're trying to compete then at a minimum they need to upgrade SS & the bullpen through FA/trades. A couple of additional upgrades beyond that would be nice, but that may be hoping for too much. As for blocking players like Culpepper, Jenkins or Rodriguez. I'm not concerned about, when those players kick the door down, they'll get an opportunity.
  2. MGX
    I would have liked Laweryson to slip through so we could see more. With that said he is a 27 year old reliever with all of 7 IP at the MLB level. In his 76 IP at AAA he had a WHIP north 1.4 & gave up 13 HR's. His numbers were a bit better at AA, but come on they can't keep everyone. I believe someone mentioned this earlier, relievers like him will be readily available throughout the off-season. He may have some success with the Angels & that would be great for him, but it still won't change the fact that the Twins made the right decision at this point.
  3. MGX
    Seems like a big over reaction to introductory press conference. Maybe we should allow him to manage for a season before passing judgement. This is about what I expected in an introductory press conference.
  4. MGX
    I like Soderstrom, he provides an impact bat for our lineup. He could play 1B though the A's moved him to LF so Kurtz could play 1B & he played well defensively in LF (a GG finalist in LF) so he also provides flexibility. I think it's possible we could get more than than him for Ryan, but I like the idea.
  5. MGX
    No thanks on the trade offer in the article. In fact the Red Sox don't even look like a good fit. Why focus on the same teams when they can't offer what we need. A good trade partner for Joe Ryan is the A's, they have a lot of young talented, MLB ready position players & are or 1 or 2 pitchers away from being a contender for the playoffs. Hopefully, the FO looks for trade partners that can offer what we need.
  6. MGX
    To me the Twins could easily have a winning team in '26. Of course that's if... 1. They don't bottom out the payroll 2. They keep at least one of Lopez & Ryan & hopefully both 3. They address the high leverage roles in the bullpen 4. They address the starting SS position Other upgrades would be nice, but the above list is already asking for more than I believe they'll be willing to do. The issue is we have to rely the ownership & the FO & it's hard to believe they will at this point. The only silver lining in my mind is Falvey's job has to be on the line & he has to know it. So at least from his perspective there should be incentive to win in '26. Of course the owners still call the shots with the player payroll so it may not matter.
  7. MGX
    We had previously discussed the A's & I like Soderstrom as a young hitter, he could step in as our starting 1B. IMO Joe Ryan gets us more than Soderstrom. I like where you're going because as mentioned before, the A's should be a good trade partner for the Twins if we move either Lopez or Ryan. With all of the talented young position players they have & likely only 1 or 2 pitchers away it seems to be a good match. Who knows what the Twins FO is thinking though. Maybe they're looking to compete in '26, which is actually what I'd like to see. If they can invest in the on field product they're not nearly as far away from being competitive as many seem to think. Of course the ownership & FO don't inspire much confidence that they will spend & if they do, they'll make good decisions.
  8. MGX
    For me #1 is easy - Greg Gagne. After that it's closer - 2. Smalley 3. Versailles 4. Correa 5. Guzman
  9. MGX
    As someone said above I hope not. No interest at all in signing Hoskins.
  10. MGX
    Unless a good offer comes in for Wallner, this isn't even a question? He is the starting RF until someone takes that job from him. If Emma or Jenkins or anyone really steps up & proves to be a better option then they should move him to DH or trade him. Until then he is the starting RF.
  11. MGX
    If the Twins consider moving Ryan they should be looking at teams like the A's who are loaded with young MLB position player talent & need pitching. Yet we hear teams like the Mets & the Red Sox mentioned even though they seem like poor fits for a Ryan trade. Who knows what our front office thinks though.
  12. MGX
    While I agree the Mets aren't going to trade McLean (therefore the Mets are out IMO). It's a stretch to call McLean a proven MLB pitcher after 48 IP. He certainly looks promising, but 48 IP doesn't scream proven MLB pitcher.
  13. MGX
    Kyle Schwarber barely plays in the field any more. They play Castellanos over him who put up a -12 OAA this year in RF. In Kyle Schwarber's last two seasons that he played in the OF he was -18 & -19 OAA. Matt Wallner has been -2 in each of his last two seasons. That comp is off by a long ways. When someone like Emma, Jenkins or anyone (Roden or another prospect) kicks the door down & proves to be a better option, then they should move Wallner to DH or trade him. Until that point Wallner is the best option we have in RF. Hopefully, Buxton has another healthy season in CF & Martin continues his stellar play from the last two months. An outfield of Buxton, Martin & Wallner is not going to keep the Twins from winning games. They have work to do in the IF & bullpen, but that's not for this discussion.
  14. MGX
    The deadline deals did two things they reduced payroll and added additional prospects to our system. If we keep both Lopez & Ryan our player payroll will still be at it's lowest point in many years so the financial side has already been addressed. If we trade one or both of them what do we get? More prospects & the possibility of a lost season (or 2 or more) with fan loyalty already at a low point. IMO trading either one is unnecessary, & a big risk of further alienating the fan base. With a small investment on the position player side & revamping the bullpen they could put a competitive team on the field. It's the Pohlad's we're talking about & they decided to "right size" the payroll when fan excitement was at it's highest in recent years so who knows what they're thinking. Falvey is the one who should be pushing to keep both & add some talent since his job has to be the next one on the line if things don't improve.
  15. MGX
    IMO the biggest infield need is at SS. There are affordable options out there. My pick would be a deal for Jose Caballero, contractually he should be reasonably priced & with the Yankees he's likely a backup/utility player with Volpe the starter at SS. Adding his speed & defense & utilizing Lee in a utility role & giving reps at 3B in a competition with Lewis would be a boost.
  16. MGX
    If the Twins could get Jose Caballero I'd be happy with him as our everyday SS for the time being, From a contract standpoint he wouldn't be expensive & the Yankees probably don't view him as their starter with Volpe there.
  17. MGX
    While I may not be in 100% agreement, have to love the optimism.
  18. MGX
    I said it would be tough to rank him ahead of anyone. Oh and I did see the Ray Miller experience as you call it. Attended plenty of games back in the mid 80's. Rocco doesn't impress me in any way as a manager. If you disagree that's fine.
  19. MGX
    There have been 14 Twins managers - it would be tough to rank Rocco ahead of any of them. Certainly not in the top 10. Top 3 IMO 1. Kelly 2. Mele 3. Mauch
  20. MGX
    In 109 games & 350 PA's Clemens has produced 1.4 WAR. I can't imagine any team in MLB has 13 position players who have produced 1.4 WAR so far this season.
  21. MGX
    Fielding run value for RF - 24 players have more than 500 innings in RF Matt Wallner -2 ranked 14th out of 24 - wOBA .335 Nick Castellanos -13 - wOBA .303 Juan Soto -11 - wOBA .390 Teoscar Hernandez -9 - wOBA .331 Ronald Acuna -8 - wOBA .388 Jordan Walker -5 - wOBA .257 Josh Lowe -4 - wOBA .296 Bryan Reynolds -3 - wOBA .311 Dominic Canzone -4 - wOBA .342 Nolan Jones -2 - wOBA .272 Mike Tauchman -1 - wOBA .332 2 players at 0 11 players with a positive rating Based on some of the comments we should be seeing the Mets, Dodgers & Braves restricting Soto, T Hernandez & Acuna to DH only.
  22. MGX
    Matt Wallner WRC+ over the last 3 seasons - 142, 155 & 115. On a team that consistently struggles on offense why would we be anxious to get rid of one of the few productive hitters we have.
  23. MGX
    Clemens OPS with the Twins by month - .985, .625, .805, .536 & after his bag game 1.113 in September. I'm pretty sure every hitter in MLB is inconsistent. The thing I take notice of is his continual improvement since his debut - 2022 - 127 PA's - .505 OPS, 2023 - 148 PA's - .644 OPS, 2024 - 120 PA's - .706 OPS, 2025 - 335 PA's - .741 OPS. Hitting at the MLB level is difficult, improving in 3 consecutive seasons is especially difficult. I'm not advocating he should be the starting 1B in '26, but he absolutely has earned a spot on the roster. He's a solid defensive player at multiple positions, he definitely has value.
  24. MGX
    So signing 1 player is enough of an investment in the team??? It's not to me, invest to put an entertaining, competitive team on the field consistently & see what happens. When the Twins have had consistent success in the past they've had good attendance. Investing in one player after more than a decade with very little in the way of competitive baseball teams isn't enough IMO.
  25. MGX
    There is one clear way to fix the issue - sell the team. Anything short of this is problematic. The fans have had enough of the Pohlads BS & I don't see them coming back unless the team is sold. Sadly, I think everything we've seen is only part of the reset. This organization is being fully reset to sell the team. They ran into issues in their attempt to sell this past year(because they're out of touch) thinking new owners would give them the sales price they wanted & take on the debt. This typical of the Pohlads who are completely out of touch with the fan base. The bad thing is they could compete as soon as next season with competent management in place. I mean at all levels, from ownership to the FO to the on field manager. Looking at our current management I hold very little hope they will compete & expect more of a reset next season. It's amazing that they can't see the potential for profits if they would invest in the team. They own an entertainment business & are unwilling to invest in providing the best entertainers they can get. I'd think that should be a priority in this business if you want to maximize profitability. The bottom line for me is the team needs to sold & it can't happen fast enough.
×
×
  • Create New...