Really. OK. Well, it wasn't officially ruled an error, but according to Kepler, it was, and he is not proud or happy about his performance, and he is certainly taking it into account. So could a player have 40 errors and still be considered a good defender? (Is there an arbitrary number in this evaluation system that errors do matter?) I have tried not to see this particular play, but it just keeps being real, and it did happen. I will work on the selective ignoring. It just might make me a happier fan.