Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

old nurse

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,469
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by old nurse

  1. The price paid for the collapse of 2024 was paid by Levine who was the architect of a flawed roster. Baldelli, or any other manager, is only as good as the talent they have to work see. See Tom Kelly
  2. For Keaschall to use up his rookie status would mean that 4 out of 6 things have happened. Julian o, Miranda, r Lee have failed, Castro is traded, Correa or Lewis are hurt. Not necessarily a rosy outlook Morris right now lines up as the eight pitcher behind Lopez,Ober,Ryan, SWR, Festa, and Matthews. Converting Jax back to a starter drops him further. Again, not a rosy outlook
  3. As we were typing at the same time, should there be a contest to see how many people can state the obvious about the bullpen
  4. Given their injury history it would seem foolish to count on Topa or Stewart for anything more than that it is a bonus that they are healthy. I thought the discussion in the recent past was Jax to starter. So if the team trades Duran for a catcher to start it could leave a hole in the bullpen. The Dodgers would have to also take a player of excess contract for the Twins for Margot being worse than. Expected.
  5. Gasper was on the Boston 40 man roster. They need a spot for the pitcher they signed.. Had they not traded him they could have DFAd him and lost I’m on a claim by the Twins. I am not sure why the Twins needed to give up something. The year before every team passed on Gasper in the rule 5 major league portion. Boston took him in the minor league portion.. it is not like there would be a demand
  6. There would be a premise that someone would want Vazquez at 10 million and not McCann at somewhat less money. When Jansen and Sanchez can get 8.5 million McCann can probably be close to that. It makes no sense to shuffle catchers
  7. Yup, always have excuse for not going
  8. There will always be excuses for why fans are not going to games.
  9. They more or less have as Falvey has his duties
  10. The announcement does not mean that anything happened suddenly. After 30 some years they might have figured out that everything has to fall just right to go out on top. There are many factors that could cause them to want to sell. Many in the family not being interested is one good excuse put forth, The future of baseball as a cash cow for the family is another. The eventual failure of RNS being the large profit center for mid market teams could be a good reason to sell. Could there be other business losses to cover? Possibly. Possibly they see a better return for the money elsewhere. Owning a business valued at over 1.5 billion and have people pillory the family for wanting a profit from it is probably not enjoyable.
  11. The people here do not seem to understand that concept.. the lack of contracts did not appear to make the Royals or Orioles more valuable.
  12. The notion that having contracts on the books is a bad thing is a false premise. Having bad contracts on the books is a bad thing for a mid market team regardless if there is a sale or not. A long term contract is a risk reward kind of thing. Correa’s contract is through his age 34 season. That is not an unreasonable length of time. There is always the risk for injury. Trevor Story has had his share of structural injuries Wrist fracture, elbow then labrum in each of the last three years. Those are unforeseeable occurrences. . That is part of the risk of baseball, not bad contracts Stanton has also been part of injuries affecting his career. Bad contract is paying a corner outfielder 75 million without having a recent great reason, the Cano contract that was to be into his 40’s when the aging curve for middle infielders are done by 35 The absence of contracts of players that are going to be part of the core going forward actually costs the new owner money. They can depreciate the contracts over time. Unlike the depreciation on the team, there is no paying later when the team is sold. The maximal tax rate is what? 30% ? On 100 million 30 million gets paid by the taxpayer.
  13. Yes, some fans need to have trades for the sake of trades. It becomes a new person to mock, hate or cheer for. The people then can lament for years how great the player traded was while complaining about the replacements
  14. I have said it is difficult to replace the 7-8 best shortstop. There is a perfectly reasonable way to clear money in Correas contract to sign players that won’t cost the Pohlads a dime if they are going to sell the team.
  15. Not never is not all of the time. The better en d of a deal. Lose a player in free agency and get a comp pick or trade and get something the team really likes. There is more factors than just player x was better than player Y. The the traded away player was a better player than what they got only works for fantasy baseball teams. There are more moving parts than that In regards to other teams figuring out their players better than the trading for team, Joe Ryan is an example, Cano would be another.
  16. CC Sabithia netted them Brantly Lindor netted them Gimenez, Cliff Lee netted them Carasco Alomar never had a decent season after being traded Colon netted them Brandon Phillips, Cliff Lee and Grady Sizemore I gave up oozing at the rest. I don’t think Cleveland lost any trade for a player who would soon be a free agent
  17. Not never, the scouts have to be better at assessing talent than the other team. Then the GM has to play the other team’s win now mode
  18. So now you want to make it a personal attack. Okay. Your premise on scrap heap players all being bad is a false one. That was a black and white premise on your part. Mid tier plays. Gallo was considered a mid tier player at the time, as was Vazquez. Saying that mid tier free agents would solve the problem of the Twins is black and white thinking Now if you want to attack my nursing you can just **** off
  19. I think yu have a section for that called just for fun. Not front page news
  20. Stating the obvious in an article does not inflame the base, there used to be a little discussion on nuance of baseball by the writers. Now it is flame bait
  21. You complained about the Twins signing scrap heap players I pointed out 3 players who were failures and were picked off the scrap heap that did fine. There is something that you do not seem to understand here. Ho, they are not now scrap heap players, but they were at one point in their career. What is so hard about understanding that? Still waiting on the proof that mid tier free agents are the panacea to all baseball problems
  22. Taylor was signed after being cut by the Giants, Muncy was cut by the A’s. The Dodgers signed the as scrap heap players Success levels. Of mid tier free agents. Perhaps you would. Like to prove it is a commonplace success story for franchises before insisting on it
×
×
  • Create New...