ashbury

Probably set some kind of major league record by going from having 9 runs in the bank to only 2.

And a beta version at that, with plenty of bugs remaining to be found, much less fixed.

You think it's a conspiracy? You think this is all just made up? Sure, sure. That's what they WANT you to think.

Handwriting is on the Wall-ner, heh. Bad luck for him to not have gotten more than 11 PA, but he didn't provide instant offense, next please. Hopefully he keeps up his hitting at AAA and is given a better opportunity next time. Sands clearly seems destined to be sent down to make room for Varland. Apart from the 2 innings yesterday he's barely been used. No confidence from the manager, next please. If Megill ends up being Varland's replacement on the roster I hope he's used the same way Sands has been. He's not simply "break glass in emergency;" if used, he becomes the emergency, next please.

Maybe a visiting team would concede if allowed, I don't know. A home team should never concede. Even if 99% of the paying fans have departed, the ones who remain deserve a show. Maybe a memorable sequence will occur in the bottom of the ninth, even in a losing effort. The fans who want to concede, have left. I'd feel different for low-cost or free contests.

I wondered at the time also whether he was tipping his pitches. The Twins seemed ready to pounce on every offering.

In baseball-reference.com's list of top-10 performers for yesterday, four Twins achieved that ranking - #3 MAT, #5 Correa, #9 Vazquez, #10 Julien. Interestingly, #1 was occupied by old friend Brent Rooker for his day with Oakland. Annoyingly #2 was taken by Anthony Rizzo of the Yankees. I don't know their algorithm for these rankings, but apparently "garbage time" is not a factor. (Of course after one time through the batting order, the Twins' plate appearances also would qualify.) #1 game score for pitchers was Joe Ryan.

It was mentioned in the game thread that the MLB game feed for a time described one of Taylor's homers as "homered softly to center." Which of course is ridiculous, and must have been put up by a Yankees fan. But the phrase rang a bell, and here's my rendition: I heard he swung a good bat I heard he had a style And so I came to see him To watch him play a while And there he was this young man A stranger to my eyes [Chorus] Gripping the bat with his fingers Tapping the ground with his cleats Homering softly to center Homering softly... to center Thrilling the whole crowd with his swing Homering softly... center field.

What a game! A little something for everyone. If Yankee fans prefer their home runs during garbage time, that is.

And if "current market value" had gone up would Diamond be handing over an extra wheelbarrow of cash? ... is the question I'd be asking if I were the bankruptcy judge.

Can't tell you how many times I've been hospitalized after trying to avoid walking into a fellow passenger at the commuter rail station, just that same way. And that was just walking - can't imagine doing it at full speed. So I feel ya, Carlos. ALL the feels.

We should cut him and spend the money we save on someone better. / I'm gonna save this one and use it for every player on the 26-man roster.

Nooooo! Don't tell the other teams about who the good prospects are! Just us!

Hey, I see you lifted this straight from Brewer Fanatic. Expect to hear from their lawyers.

Nobody will ever truly duplicate the formula here at Tw-.... wait, oh.

Got the wrong E-Rod in your link. Are you using ChatGPT to flesh out your articles? / edit - checking something else later, I see the same thing thing happened on Noah Miller's link. WTWhat? It would be an interesting study to try to dig into why some players get opportunities like Yake does, and others don't. With absolutely no evidence to back it up, I'll speculate the team views him as a strong possibility to be a good coach by his late 20s.

If you're going to subtitle this series Personal Cheeseballs you're going to need to explain the terminology in every installment so that people coming into the article cold won't be confused.

Many of us, yours truly included, play armchair GM in these threads. How refreshing to read about the fan experience at a great ballpark!

Get ready to hear Kyle's name mentioned now and then.

Rocco didn't want to get into details, and implied the team is working on an official statement concerning Farmer. But at minimum, some teeth seem to have gotten jarred loose, and there was a major laceration; a "procedure" is planned for today. Scary scary scary. Good luck to you, Kyle.

Which, the 1.35 ERA or the .537 BA?

You know what? Get ready for a surprise. I think you're right, at least about the first part of your argument. I went looking for what a successful team did last year, and by looking first at the Dodgers I stopped because I think I found your "poster team" for running the same starting lineup out there successfully. Indeed, they were so confident in their roster that they went with only 12 position players, meaning one backup catcher, two utility fielders, on Opening Day. 16 pitchers rounded out the opening day 28 man roster. And then they backed up their planning with execution. I looked mainly at April, because that's what we're actually discussing right now in 2023, and the Dodgers' 2022 edition had essentially the same starting 8 (catcher's a special case) day after day. Looking at the players' b-r.com Game Logs, I see leadoff Betts playing 19 out of 20 games in April. Freeman was 20 for 20 as was Trea Turner. Justin Turner was 19 for 20. Muncy was 20 for 20. I expected to see days off as I went down the opening day batting order, but the bottom of the order of Taylor, Bellinger, Lux were in 18, 20, and 17 of April games. And there were next to no "cheap" appearances - occasionally during blowout wins the starters would sit in the 7th inning or whenever, but I think i spotted only one late-inning insertion of a starter who rested. So it's certainly possible if you have the roster for it. I think I have to turn my attention to how FalVine have constructed their roster. To make ends meet, our FO has demonstrated a willingness to assume more injury risk, in the name of acquiring top-tier talent. The Dodgers by contrast have the financial luxury to make all their decisions based on bang, not bang-for-buck. Or else, they've just done a great job at accumulating top-tier ironman talent, but being able to pay all April starters but young'uns Gavin Lux and Will Smith above $10M in 2022 couldn't have hurt. It occurs to me now that the Dodgers might not accept Byron Buxton and his injury history in trade, no matter how small the price. He doesn't fit their profile. It's hard to do an apples-to-apples comparison but I think the discussion of the Twins 2023 roster comes down to how would other teams deal with the individual players in question. If the Dodgers were forced to accept Buxton on their team, would they work him like a rented mule in CF, or let him DH and have an occasional day off during April. I don't know how to answer that because Buxton is a different player than it looks like LA would even choose to have.

Please, never begin a headline with Firstname Lastname. I read slowly and for an instant there I thought I was about to read of some injury for the player. How about New Weapon for Pablo Lopez, instead.