I'll take great pitching any day. And I'm happy to see a stacked pitching corps. But the team also needs to score runs. I played with some numbers to compare the Twins, Guardians, and Tigers.
The Twins had 61 games where they scored fewer than 3 runs and only won 21.3% of those games. The Guards by comparison had 55 under 3 games of which they won 27.3%. The Tigers, who had great pitching, were in between and had 59 games with 28.8% wins. So in both cases, not only did the other two have fewer low scoring games, but they won more of those low scoring games than the Twins.
Looking at just 1 run games. The Twins had 15, all of which they lost. The Guardians had 11 and lost all of theirs too. The Tigers had 21 1-run games but they won 3 of theirs. Had the Twins won just one of theirs, they would have made the playoffs (EDIT... Royals tied for second, not the Twins... whoops).
A little more shockingly, the Twins had more 2 run games than the other two (25) and lost all but one of those. Meanwhile, Guardians went 5-17 and the Tigers went 7-11.
Interesting that the Twins had a winning percentage of 57.1% on 3 run games, indicating that they DID have good pitching when they needed it, but a full 40 of their games -- almost 25% of games -- they gave their pitchers almost zero chance of getting the win. Bob Gibson wouldn't be able to save them in most of those cases.
So... Yes, better pitching would have made the difference last year (if they were able to scrape even just one more win from a 1 or 2 run game). But had they made the playoffs, the better teams would have likely walked all them when a collapsed offense means your pitchers have to be perfect.
It'll be an interesting year. Small market teams can't have it all. Hopefully they score a couple more runs AND have lights out pitching.