Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Minor League Coverage

    Coming Soon: Starting Pitching (But How Soon?)


    Seth Stohs

    Anyone who is reading this site is a big Minnesota Twins fan. Anyone who is a big Twins fan realizes that this team needs pitching. A lot of pitching. The bullpen has certainly had its fair share of implosions this season. At the same time, it seems those bullpen implosions have had some direct relation to a short start.

    The Twins have called up a couple of solid relief pitcher prospects in the last ten days (Alan Busenitz and Trevor Hildenberger). But they need starting pitching. Right now, it’s Jose Berrios, Ervin Santana and question mark after question mark.

    Hector Santiago will return to the rotation on Tuesday after spending the last three weeks on the DL. Kyle Gibson has been better in his last three or four starts, but he remains inconsistent. Adalberto Mejia has shown us glimpses of what will potentially be a reliable mid-rotation starter. At just 23, he’s got a chance. Adam Wilk. Nik Turley. Dillon Gee. The revolving door continues.

    Image courtesy of Seth Stohs, Twins Daily (photos of Stephen Gonsalves, Fernando Romero, Felix Jorge)

    Twins Video

    Unfortunately, there aren’t really AAA starting pitchers that are ready yet. There are three guys in Chattanooga who have fans talking, and for good reason. They may not be ready today, but in a month, it could be a different story.

    The Lookouts have had three starting pitchers who have been really good in the past month or so. Today we’ll talk about them and try to figure out if they are close to being ready to contribute in 2017, or if we’ll have to wait.

    Fernando Romero

    The hard-throwing righty who was chosen the Twins #1 prospect by Twins Daily before the season has been solid for the Lookouts. In 14 games this season, he is 7-5 with a 2.97 ERA and a 1.27 WHIP. In 78.2 innings, he has given up 70 hits, walked 30 and struck out 76. These are solid numbers, especially when you consider that 84% of his batters faced this season have been older than he is. He won’t turn 23 until Christmas Eve.

    In his last six starts, he is 5-0 with a 1.16 ERA and a 1.01 WHIP. Opponents are hitting .183/.266/.282 (.548) off of him in that stretch.

    We know about Romero’s stuff. He’s got a big fastball that sits 95-96 and touches 98 at times. He’s got a terrific slider that can be devastating at times. He also has worked on his changeup, which remains inconsistent, but it’s something he really works at.

    The nice thing has been seeing improvement. Opponents’ OPS against him by month shows it. Opponents posted an .656 OPS off him in April, then .632 in May, and so far he’s at .617 in June.

    Last year, he was shut down at 90.1 innings (Between Ft. Myers and Cedar Rapids). Let’s assume he threw another 25 innings in extended spring training. That’s a total of 115 innings. If there are some who subscribe to there being concern when a young pitcher throws more than 25% more innings from year-to-year, then Romero should be shut down when he reaches about 143 innings in 2017. He is currently at 78.2 which means he has approximately 60-65 innings to work with before the end of the season. If he averages six innings, he could make 10-11 more starts which puts them right to playoff time.

    Romero was added to the 40-man roster last November and is on his first option year. One way to keep or control his innings may be calling him up to the Twins as a relief pitcher for the last month or two of the season, if the Twins are competing. There may also be value in having him pitch in the Southern League playoffs if the Twins are out of contention at that time.

    Felix Jorge

    Jorge turned 23 years old in January, a little over a month after being added to the Twins 40-man roster. The Twins were able to sneak him through a Rule 5 draft a year earlier, but would have lost him had he not been protected this year. He had a strong season in 2016 between Ft. Myers and Chattanooga.

    After a slow start this year, Jorge has taken off. Overall in 14 starts, he is 8-1 with a 3.26 ERA and a 1.30 WHIP. In 85.2 innings, he has given up 89 hits, walked 22 and struck out 61. Seventy percent of his batters faced have been older than him. Like Romero, Jorge has continued to put up better numbers each month. The OPS against him in April was .853. In May, that dropped to .705, and in June so far, it’s just .676.

    While he is not a strikeout guy, Jorge attacks the strike zone. He has a good three-pitch mix and is able to throw strikes with each of them. His fastball sits 91-92 and touches 93. He has a good curve and a good changeup. He will give up some hits because of how many strikes he throws, but he doesn’t hurt himself with walks. He also is able to work deeper into games consistently.

    In his last six starts, he is 4-0 with a 2.41 ERA. He’s walked just 1.3 per nine (2.3 overall) and struck out 7.0 per nine (6.4 overall). Oppenents have hit just .178/.229/.326 (.555) off him during that time frame.

    Jorge has been remarkably durable and consistent the last three years. In 2017, left-handed batters have hit .272/.320/.411 (.731) off of him. Right-handers have hit .271/.322/.406 (.728).

    A year ago, he threw a combined 167.1 innings so he should have no limitations in 2017. If he continues to pitch well, he could make some starts late in the season for the Twins since he’s on the 40-man roster. Again, he can remain in Chattanooga if the Twins are not in contention and pitch in the playoffs for the Lookouts.

    Stephen Gonsalves

    Gonsalves was the Twins (and Twins Daily’s) choice for Pitcher of the Year in 2016 when he put up remarkable numbers between Ft. Myers and Chattanooga. He was Twins Daily’s #2 prospect in the preseason. He was invited to Twins big league spring training where he impressed until a shoulder injury cost him the last few weeks of spring training and the first six of seven weeks of the regular season.

    However, since he has returned, he has been very good. He has made seven starts. He’s 3-3 with a 2.85 ERA and a 0.85 WHIP. In 41 innings, he has given up just 26 hits, walked nine and struck out 51.

    The left-hander understands how to pitch and makes quick adjustments even during a game, or within an at-bat. The one concern with him last year, even while dominating at AA, was a high walk total. To this point, he has really reduced his walk rate, down to just 2.0 BB/9.

    His fastball has been between 91 and 94 this spring. His changeup is talked about as being great, and it gets swings and misses. He added a slider/cutter before the 2016 season, and that has been a swing-and-miss pitch for him as well. It has also helped him against right-handers. While lefties are hitting .257/.316/.429 (.744) off of him in just 38 plate appearances, right-handers have hit .149/.198/.307 off of him (121 plate appearances).

    LAST SIX STARTS

    I’m going to post this here again, just so they’re right next to each other:

    Jorge: 4-0, 2.41 ERA, 1.09 WHIP, 1.3 BB/9, 7.0 K/9, .247/.279/.361 (.640)

    Romero: 5-0, 1.16 ERA, 1.01 WHIP, 3.0 BB/9, 9.1 K/9, .183/.266/.282 (.548)

    Gonsalves: 3-2, 2.68 ERA, 0.86 WHIP, 1.9 BB/9, 11.7 K/9, .178/.229/.326 (.555)

    0N 40-MAN:

    Jorge and Romero

    Not on 40-man:

    Gonsalves

    SUMMARY

    After some early-season inconsistency Fernando Romero has been quite strong the last six weeks. He’s been dominant. Opponents haven’t hit him. He’s been keeping runners off base. His stuff continues to improve.

    Jorge has been good too. He’s been pretty consistent, and while he doesn’t strike out too many, and gives up some hits, he doesn’t hurt himself.

    Gonsalves is a good combination of stuff and stats. He’s left-handed and sitting in the low 90s. He’s got the three-plus pitches. He has come back and started right where he left off.

    In my opinion, Gonsalves is the closest to MLB ready. He’s also the one who isn’t on the 40-man roster. Romero is likely the one with the highest ceiling because of the velocity, but he has work to do, pitches to improve. Meanwhile, I think Jorge has to be a step-by-step type. He can become a mid-rotation type of starter, more likely a back-end type. He needs time at AAA whereas you might be able to make a case that Romero and Gonsalves could be guys promoted right from AA.

    But then again, two years ago at this time, we all wanted Jose Berrios called up directly from AA Chattanooga, saying that he was clearly ready based on his statistics. Instead, he went to AAA, and for longer than we all thought he should or wanted him to. Just now this year, he has become what we thought he could become. So there is a cautionary tale of us assuming a guy can make the jump from AA to the big leagues… or even from AAA to the big leagues. This game is hard. Big leaguers are really good.

    But all three of these pitchers will likely pitch in the big leagues. They have different ceilings, but all three of them will get their time. Like I said, I feel like Jorge could be best served by spending the full season in Chattanooga. I think that Romero should spend the full season starting in Chattanooga, unless the Twins are competing and he can contribute out of the bullpen. With Gonsalves, I think a couple more starts in AA and he should move up to AAA. If the Twins pitching situation isn’t much improved, I could see him making starts for the Twins by early August.

    These three are exciting prospects. What do you think their paths should be?


    Interested in learning more about the Minnesota Twins' top prospects? Check out our comprehensive top prospects list that includes up-to-date stats, articles and videos about every prospect, scouting reports, and more!

    View Twins Top Prospects

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    They're all individual cases, of course. Radke obviously did alright in his jump from AA to the big leagues, though that took a little time too.

     

    My point with that paragraph is that all we have are stats and numbers and a few scouting reports... and so much more goes into evaluating when a player is ready to come up. Some of it is the "intangibles."  So, I just don't think we can look at the numbers and say "yes, he's ready," or, to be fair, "No, he's not ready." 

    I agree completely.    I am not really pushing that any or all of them get promoted to the Twins.    All three appear to be pitching fantastic in their last handful of starts which kind of shouts "I can do better than Nick Turley!"    but if there are good reasons for them to be where they are then so be it.    I just don't like the idea of saying "Hey, this guy has great command, three plus pitches, has thrown 6 great starts in a row but he is not ready.   If he does the exact same thing for X number or more games, then he will be ready"   Just appears arbitrary.    If its not arbitrary then fine.   If it is arbitrary then they might as well be getting over their major league jitters period rather than Turley.

     

    I wouldn't be opposed to placing Romero in the bullpen so he gets 15-20 innings of MLB experience this year.  

     

    What I don't want is to head into the off-season thinking there's no need to sign quality pitchers because Romero, Jorge, and Gonsalves are all coming up soon. Ideally I'd want those guys to be options #7-9 on the depth chart. If they do well and force the Twins' hand to call them up, even better. 

     

    If they are willing to move on from Hughes as a starter, then I can see adding a FA or a SP in a trade. Even w/o him....you have:

     

    Santana

    Berrios

    Santiago

    Mejia

    Gibson

    May

    Gonsalves

    Jorge

    Romero

     

    Assuming you let one of Gibson/Santiago go....you think they'd let them both go?......do you think they'll go get one?

     

    I'm a bit jaded by the lack of success from other recent SP call-ups... And don't want to rely on prospects like Gonsalves, Romero, or Jorge having immediate success while the team is trying to contend. 

    I would be right with you if we hadn't given Nick Turley 3 starts.    In 2006 we promoted Matt Garza, arguably before he was ready but he still gave us a 3-6 record and a 5 ERA  but it still might have given us one win over what the next guy would have done and I don't think it did him any permanent harm.   It wouldn't have surprised me if they had said Liriano needs three more starts before he is ready for promotion but if they had we would have had three less awesome starts before he went down to injury.   

     

    Its not a blanket statement that pitchers can't succeed right away, but what if they see some of the same things in these guys that they saw in Berrios before he came up?

    I was all for keeping Berrios in the minors because he had command issues even though still successful.   Legitimate reason for not promoting.    If there are legitimate reasons and things they are working on then that is the place to do it.   No argument.     As Seth said, they are just stats.     I am not making a blanket statement in either direction.  I just don't like it to be arbitrary or formulaic.    

    I would move Jorge up to AAA fairly soon and see how he does pounding the strike zone against a little more advanced hitters and keep him in the mix to be pulled up to the MLB level should he stay effective and we continue to have collapses in the rotation. The concern on him is going to be whether his stuff will play against the higher levels of competition, so it's probably going to be a good idea to see if he can move up a level before testing him at MLB.

     

    Romero is a guy whose stuff I love, but I'd like to see him get a better handle on a third pitch, and AA is a reasonable place to do it. Getting him through a full minor league season and increasing his innings is also a good goal for someone like him so he'll be ready to operate at AAA next season and maybe compete for a MLB job. Until he gets a third pitch, he's Tyler Duffey and I'd like for him to be a starter instead of a bullpen guy.

     

    Gonsalves is the guy I really like, but the health worries me. He lost some development time this year and I do not want to blow out his damn shoulder by pressing too hard.

     

    I'm more on the patience approach with these guys. Keep them moving along, but I'm not seeing a compelling reason for their development to be super-accelerated by promoting them directly from AA this season.

     

    If they are willing to move on from Hughes as a starter, then I can see adding a FA or a SP in a trade. Even w/o him....you have:

     

    Santana

    Berrios

    Santiago

    Mejia

    Gibson

    May

    Gonsalves

    Jorge

    Romero

     

    Assuming you let one of Gibson/Santiago go....you think they'd let them both go?......do you think they'll go get one?

     

    Hmm, with this depth chart, I would try to upgrade Gibson with a better FA or trade acquisition. Santiago I guess I'd offer him another contract. Not sure what to think about May for next season. Will he be fully recovered by April? Or will he need to rehab in the minors until June/July?

     

    I'd feel comfortable with Berrios at the top of the rotation since he's trending up in his career. Erv probably shouldn't be counted on to be anything more than a #3/4 next season entering his age 35 season. The rest look like back-end of the rotation types. My hope is they make a splash for a pitcher who can slot into the top of the rotation.  

     

    Given that Romero will at some point be shut down due to innings, the pen actually does make sense. He may learn a thing or two and collect a major league check for a couple months. Not a bad deal.

    I told him pretty much the same thing this spring training.  He had a big smile on his face and said we'll see.  From conversations with him, he'd love to stay a starter but he'd be happy as hell just to be in the big leagues.

     

    If they are willing to move on from Hughes as a starter, then I can see adding a FA or a SP in a trade. Even w/o him....you have:

     

    Santana

    Berrios

    Santiago

    Mejia

    Gibson

    May

    Gonsalves

    Jorge

    Romero

     

    Assuming you let one of Gibson/Santiago go....you think they'd let them both go?......do you think they'll go get one?

    Santiago's 2018 salary + Gibson's 2018 would make one very good pitcher, if signed for about $16 million a year.  Gibson should get about $5 million and Santiago should be able to get at least 10-13 million a year for 3 years.  That is the price of starting pitching now.  I would rather let both walk and sign 1 very good pitcher for the combination money, than to keep 2 OK or less starting pitchers.

    Gibson is a fine pitcher at cheap value, if you are not a contending club.  Otherwise your starting pitching needs to be better(even if you do not ever plan on Gibson starting a playoff game). 

    I would love to hear a straight answer from Twins player development as to what those three need to work on. It seems Twins Daily has the connections to get that answer.

     

    Who is blocking those guys in AAA? Not Slegers and certainly not Gee, Pino, Tepesch, Melville, or Turley.

     

    Without the player development insight, I would promote Gonsalves and Romero to AAA now. Jorge can stay where he is at and work on missing bats.

     

    If Gonsalves pitches well in AAA, the Twins could burn an option on him this year if/when he is needed. Or he could come up and stick without burning an option. He certainly would be a consideration in September, depending on how the playoff race plays out.

     

    If Romero pitches well in AAA, he could come up in August and stick in the bullpen for the rest of the year.

     

    I don't put much stock in Slegers unless his velo picks up 2-3 ticks in the bullpen or he develops an out pitch like a splitter. With his control and long fingers, he could possibly develop a heck of a splitter.

     

    and I'm the opposite.

     

    next year, when they don't punt the bullpen, and buxton doesn't hit -50 the first month, next year they should be legit contenders maybe.

     

    Get these guys experience THIS YEAR, so they are ready next year. Otherwise, we get to not see them next year, because "you can't count on rookies", or some other nonsense.

     

    As for the 25% rule, that's been shown to not be real, but teams think it is real, so they act that way. 

     

    I'd put Romero in the bullpen in a month or so. I'd put Gonsalves in AAA (like, a month ago), and then have him in MN in August.

    Isn't this a both-and situation? The bottom three in the rotation are so bad that there will be room for Gonsalves/Jorge/Romero even if they trade for a decent starter. So they can get big-league innings. But at the same time, I think it is completely crazy to rely on any of those three to be an effective contributor in late September or in playoffs, both from a performance and workload standpoint. Going out and getting a legitimate #2-3 starter does not preclude them from giving innings to the young guys.

     

    Personally, I think jerking Romero back and forth between the rotation and the bullpen is a bad idea.

     

    Isn't this a both-and situation? The bottom three in the rotation are so bad that there will be room for Gonsalves/Jorge/Romero even if they trade for a decent starter. So they can get big-league innings. But at the same time, I think it is completely crazy to rely on any of those three to be an effective contributor in late September or in playoffs, both from a performance and workload standpoint. Going out and getting a legitimate #2-3 starter does not preclude them from giving innings to the young guys.

     

    Personally, I think jerking Romero back and forth between the rotation and the bullpen is a bad idea.

     

    It's not jerking him back and forth, it's what some teams do with young players to get them some time in the majors, w/o putting them in the rotation the first 2 months they are there. Especially if they are on an innings limit, as is likely in this case. It's a move for 2 months, to keep him pitching, and to get his feet wet.

    If you wait until someone is 100% ready (how would you ever know, btw?) to give them an assignment, you aren't running your business the right way. people need to be stretched and challenged to grow. There may be legit things these guys need to work on, but waiting for some mythical time when they are 100%/developed is not how the world works.

     

    I would be right with you if we hadn't given Nick Turley 3 starts.    In 2006 we promoted Matt Garza, arguably before he was ready but he still gave us a 3-6 record and a 5 ERA  but it still might have given us one win over what the next guy would have done and I don't think it did him any permanent harm.   It wouldn't have surprised me if they had said Liriano needs three more starts before he is ready for promotion but if they had we would have had three less awesome starts before he went down to injury.   

     

    And the funny thing is that everyone on these boards were clamoring for Turley to be given a shot because of the dominance he showed in AA, and in that last start in AAA before the call up. That's why I still think that Turley can be a decent reliever. Even in his good minor league starts, his command and number of strikeouts meant he wasn't going to eat many innings. And I'm not saying that we should compare Turley's AA numbers to Romero, Gonsalves and Jorge, but it is a good illustration that it has to be more than just about the stats. 

     

    And the funny thing is that everyone on these boards were clamoring for Turley to be given a shot because of the dominance he showed in AA, and in that last start in AAA before the call up. That's why I still think that Turley can be a decent reliever. Even in his good minor league starts, his command and number of strikeouts meant he wasn't going to eat many innings. And I'm not saying that we should compare Turley's AA numbers to Romero, Gonsalves and Jorge, but it is a good illustration that it has to be more than just about the stats. 

     

    I would really, really, like to see him in relief. 

    Last year, he was shut down at 90.1 innings (Between Ft. Myers and Cedar Rapids). Let’s assume he threw another 25 innings in extended spring training. That’s a total of 115 innings. If there are some who subscribe to there being concern when a young pitcher throws more than 25% more innings from year-to-year, then Romero should be shut down when he reaches about 143 innings in 2017. He is currently at 78.2 which means he has approximately 60-65 innings to work with before the end of the season. If he averages six innings, he could make 10-11 more starts which puts them right to playoff time.

     

    Why would they shut down or limit Romero to 90 innings last year, just to give him more in instructs? Wouldn't they rather those innings came in actual games?

     

    Also, if you are weighting instruct innings equally, don't you also have to weight major and minor league spring training innings? He probably had more of those in 2017 than 2016, given his late start last year.

     

    I don't know much about instructs either, so I am not sure of the numbers or how they should be weighted.

     

    Isn't this a both-and situation? The bottom three in the rotation are so bad that there will be room for Gonsalves/Jorge/Romero even if they trade for a decent starter. So they can get big-league innings. But at the same time, I think it is completely crazy to rely on any of those three to be an effective contributor in late September or in playoffs, both from a performance and workload standpoint. Going out and getting a legitimate #2-3 starter does not preclude them from giving innings to the young guys.

     

    Personally, I think jerking Romero back and forth between the rotation and the bullpen is a bad idea.

     

    Its not a choice of switching him back and forth between relieving and starting.  I'd be an innings limit thing.  Its entirely possible that with an innings limit, he only has 7 or 8 starts left this season and he would be shut down.  Would it make more sense to give him 4 or 5 more starts, then 10-15 relief appearances at the majors?  Other big time starters have gone that route (Price, Sale, Scherzer).  It wouldn't be the craziest thing in the world. 

     

    Why would they shut down or limit Romero to 90 innings last year, just to give him more in instructs? Wouldn't they rather those innings came in actual games?

    Also, if you are weighting instruct innings equally, don't you also have to weight major and minor league spring training innings? He probably had more of those in 2017 than 2016, given his late start last year.

    I don't know much about instructs either, so I am not sure of the numbers or how they should be weighted.

     

    I imagine there are a lot of reasons they'd put more in instructionals.  Maybe they wanted him working on another pitch and didn't want that happening in real games.  Maybe they wanted to give him 6, 7 or 8 days rest between pitching, which would really hamper the roster of a minor league team.  Who knows.

     

    Why would they shut down or limit Romero to 90 innings last year, just to give him more in instructs? Wouldn't they rather those innings came in actual games?

    Also, if you are weighting instruct innings equally, don't you also have to weight major and minor league spring training innings? He probably had more of those in 2017 than 2016, given his late start last year.

    I don't know much about instructs either, so I am not sure of the numbers or how they should be weighted.

     

    I did include Extended Spring. I didn't mention Instructs, though that probably fits into an equation as well. 

    A quick search on limits of pitches or innings produces very little scientific evidence one way or another.     It seems that the real reason for it is CYA.     If you don't baby a pitcher and he needs surgery you can be blamed but if you do baby him and he needs surgery you can say "look at how I did everything I could to protect him".   It sure seems like a pitcher  that is shut down due to innings ends up tearing something the next Spring Training often enough any way.  

     

     The only scientific evidence I saw   suggested that it is not pitch count or number of starts or batters faced but rather innings worked that counts with the reasonable conclusion of sitting 10 minutes each half inning before having to go out there again being the critical factor.    This makes some sense since when I am golfing and moving I am fine but if I have to wait 10 minutes for the group ahead of me and I sit while I wait, I definitely notice the difference in my muscles and joints.    If I am active while waiting I might lose my swing rhythm but not out of stiffness.    Maybe the very best way to protect arms is as simple as having the pitcher soft toss in between innings. 

    I did include Extended Spring. I didn't mention Instructs, though that probably fits into an equation as well.

    Thanks, sorry, I somehow misread.

     

    In any case, if you count extended spring from 2016, don't you have to count actual spring from 2017?

     

    It would be cool to get a range from the Twins, because as much as they will hem and haw about not having a hard limit, you know they have a fairly firm range.

     

    And the funny thing is that everyone on these boards were clamoring for Turley to be given a shot because of the dominance he showed in AA, and in that last start in AAA before the call up. That's why I still think that Turley can be a decent reliever. Even in his good minor league starts, his command and number of strikeouts meant he wasn't going to eat many innings. And I'm not saying that we should compare Turley's AA numbers to Romero, Gonsalves and Jorge, but it is a good illustration that it has to be more than just about the stats. 

    Maybe I was unfair and definitely ignorant.   I   missed the clamoring for Turley so was thinking he was just another of the not best options put out there for other political or operational reasons.

     

    If you wait until someone is 100% ready (how would you ever know, btw?) to give them an assignment, you aren't running your business the right way. people need to be stretched and challenged to grow. There may be legit things these guys need to work on, but waiting for some mythical time when they are 100%/developed is not how the world works.

     

    There's also the other side of the coin, which is putting a person in the wrong seat. A person may be really good as an individual contributor sales person, and the next step to challenge them is to give them a team of people to manage. That may not be the right seat for them, and the company already filled the seat that person was in before. Now they're in a tough spot. 

     

    Promoting Gonsalves/Romero/Jorge right now may be putting them in the wrong seat, with no one else to fill that spot when they fail. 

     

    There's also the other side of the coin, which is putting a person in the wrong seat. A person may be really good as an individual contributor sales person, and the next step to challenge them is to give them a team of people to manage. That may not be the right seat for them, and the company already filled the seat that person was in before. Now they're in a tough spot. 

     

    Promoting Gonsalves/Romero/Jorge right now may be putting them in the wrong seat, with no one else to fill that spot when they fail. 

     

    It's why management is harder than people think....but at least in baseball, you can send a guy down and keep him in the organization....




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...