Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Could Look Completely Different After the Trade Deadline

    The Twins still have time to climb back into the AL Central race, but if they become sellers, this roster could undergo some major changes over the next month.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    We're already counting down the days until the MLB Trade Deadline on August 3, but there's still a lot of uncertainty surrounding what exactly the Minnesota Twins should do. Depending on who you ask, you'll get a completely different answer.

    A lot of people think the Twins should be sellers once again. At the same time, there's still a sizable group that believes Minnesota should be an aggressive buyer, especially considering how underwhelming the AL Central has been this season. This time of year always makes things difficult. We're just over halfway through the season, but the standings remain incredibly tight. It's hard to know exactly where teams stand when one good week can completely change the outlook of a division race. There's still time for the Twins to gain some clarity, but the pressure is about to ramp up in a hurry.

    So, what should the Twins do at this year's trade deadline? And what would each path mean for the rest of the roster? A lot of that answer, obviously, depends on where they sit in about two weeks. The Twins currently own a 39-44 record, but they're still only 4.5 games behind in the AL Central. That's close enough to keep hope alive, but far enough back that another rough stretch could all but end any realistic postseason aspirations.

    The next 12 games should tell us a lot. Minnesota has three-game series coming up against the Rockies, Astros, Yankees and Guardians. If they somehow manage to go 8-4 during that stretch, the conversation around this team could look drastically different than it does today. On the flip side, if they go 4-8, the front office may not have much of a choice. Regardless of what happens over the next couple weeks, though, I still think the likeliest outcome is that the Twins end up as sellers.

    If that's the route they take, several names should immediately jump to the top of the trade market. Ryan Jeffers, Josh Bell, Trevor Larnach, and Kody Clemens all make a lot of sense. Larnach, in particular, feels like someone who should be moved regardless of where the Twins are in the standings. Minnesota simply has too many young corner outfielders knocking on the door in Triple-A, and eventually they're going to need everyday opportunities. Beyond that, all four players represent guys who are either in the prime of their careers or short-term pieces that probably aren't going to move the needle much for the Twins beyond this season.

    If those four players are traded, though, the lineup would suddenly look dramatically different. Four of the five hitters that typically occupy the top of Minnesota's lineup would be gone. The Twins would need a new catcher, a new primary left fielder, a designated hitter, and someone capable of filling the many different roles Clemens has handled this season. That creates opportunities for younger players.

    Alan Roden feels like one of the biggest beneficiaries. He has the defensive versatility to play either corner outfield spot, and his offensive production at Triple-A has looked more than deserving of a promotion. This would also be the perfect opportunity to finally see exactly what Aaron Sabato can offer at the major league level. The former first-round pick from the 2020 MLB Draft may never become the Twins' long-term answer at first base (and realistically probably won't), but when a player has produced 35 extra-base hits and a .927 OPS in Triple-A, it's worth finding out if there's something there before completely moving on.

    Catcher probably wouldn't change much immediately. Jeffers is already sidelined with a fractured hamate bone, so the Twins have already begun adjusting behind the plate without him. The biggest winners, however, would likely be the organization's wave of outfield prospects. Assuming he returns healthy, Emmanuel Rodriguez should receive even more opportunities down the stretch if the Twins pivot toward evaluating young talent. Walker Jenkins, Hendry Mendez, and Gabriel Gonzalez could all benefit as well, especially if multiple outfield spots suddenly become available over the final two months of the season.

    Of course, the Twins probably wouldn't stop at trading only four players. Taylor Rogers is another obvious candidate. He's an experienced left-handed reliever, and contenders are always looking to add bullpen help in July. Even Yoendrys Gomez could generate interest despite arriving less than two months ago. The Twins showed at last year's deadline that they aren't afraid to aggressively move relievers, so it wouldn't be surprising to see them take a similar approach again if they decide to sell.

    Then there are the two names everyone always talks about. Byron Buxton and Joe Ryan have been connected to trade rumors for what feels like years now. Buxton's situation is a little different because he owns a no-trade clause. If the Twins agreed to a deal, he would still have the ability to veto it. Ryan doesn't have that luxury. So how far out of the playoff picture would Minnesota need to be before seriously considering moving one of them? Or even both? And if they did, what kind of return could they realistically expect?

    The answer is probably a massive one. Both players have multiple years of team control remaining, both are among the best in baseball at their respective positions, and both would instantly become one of the most sought-after players available at the deadline.

    The Twins wouldn't simply be acquiring prospects in return. A trade involving Ryan or Buxton could realistically bring back major league-ready talent, along with one or more premium prospects capable of impacting the organization's future. I've been pretty vocal about my belief that the Twins should trade Joe Ryan–I don't necessarily feel that same way about Byron Buxton. But there's no denying the type of return either would command. 

    That's what makes the trade deadline so fascinating every single year. It's one of the most exciting times on the baseball calendar. Unfortunately for Twins fans, that excitement probably won't come from adding talent this summer. Instead, there's a very real chance the roster we see today looks nothing like the one we'll be watching just a little over a month from now.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Eduardo Tait

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, C
    On Saturday, Tait went 2-for-4 with a walk and his 17th double. The 19-year-old is hitting .219 with 17 doubles and 15 home runs at High-A Cedar Rapids.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    17 hours ago, MikeNC said:

    Trying to inject some realism here.  Jeffers is a UFA at end of season, Twins won’t pay him, yes trade him.  Joe Ryan is a UFA after 2027 season, so keep for 1 more year unless someone offers a boatload, then yes trade him (pay attention, Joe absolutely wants out).  Love Clemens, but he is 30, and baby daddy wants him in prime time, I’m thinking he’ll ask out at some point, and we have young guys to bring up.  Larnach is 4th from the bottom of MLB of worst defense in LF, and cannot hit lefties.  Yes trade him, we can do better.  Wallner probably has little value, everyone needs to see if he is really a MLB player.  Keaschall dead last defensively at 2B, and it is hurting them.  Where to put him?  And where to play Lewis. Both have too much potential upside to let go for cheap now it seems.  Byron is awesome when healthy, but he gets hurt - every season.  His trade value likely will never be better than right now, and next week he might be hurt again.  Hate to say it but if he wants to play in a Series he should go.

    Truly a long shot…….but as FO/Owners, I consider taking $7M being paid to Caratini (trade him at deadline) and the $5/6M Jeffers currently makes & add $4M………extend for 3 years at $16.5M (a bunch for a catcher that’s barely OK on defense) Worth a shot! …… Depth at Catcher would be Jackson & youth.

    There’s no payback, IMO, that is better than what Larnach & Clemens bring to the table. What “Major League ready player” does Team get that’s better than Larnach, for Larnach?? Clemens can play 4-5 positions and makes the minimum …… he’s learned to hit over last 12 months ….. why trade that & for what return?

    Martin is still mediocre ……. inclusive of defense, Keaschall is looking to be, not much different in value to Martin. Neither are important pieces going forward. Both energetic and seem to have potential, but potential unrealized sucks.

    IMO, Lewis has found a home at 1B and could “potentially” thrive there! 😉

    11 hours ago, GNess said:

    Yes, trading away current assets at the MLB level for prospects who might be productive MLB players is what teams do. The success rate of. doing this is spotty and often leads to multiple losing seasons.

    Do you have any data to support this assertion?  Having heard this often, I collected the acquisition method of every player over 1.5 WAR for every single 90-win team with below average revenue for the past 25 years.  It's not universally true that those teams had a major influence from prospects acquired in trade.  However, on average prospects acquired in trade contributed as much as prospects that were drafted and those two categories combined accounted for 80-90% of WAR for the most successful organizations.   

    It's an assumption of many that trading current MLB players for prospects diminishes the chances of building a playoff team.  History suggests the opposite.  Trading for established players has by far the smallest role in building a winning team among organizations with below average revenue.

    8 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

    Do you have any data to support this assertion?  Having heard this often, I collected the acquisition method of every player over 1.5 WAR for every single 90-win team with below average revenue for the past 25 years.  It's not universally true that those teams had a major influence from prospects acquired in trade.  However, on average prospects acquired in trade contributed as much as prospects that were drafted and those two categories combined accounted for 80-90% of WAR for the most successful organizations.   

    It's an assumption of many that trading current MLB players for prospects diminishes the chances of building a playoff team.  History suggests the opposite.  Trading for established players has by far the smallest role in building a winning team where organizations with below average revenue is concerned.

    Almost every single non-huge market team in the World Series the past decade had a tear down a rebuild a few years prior to their first appearance. It's non-optional. It's REQUIRED for a small or mid market team.

    Small and mid-market teams cannot sustain World Series viability without a purge of their players who are coming out of cost control. Those arb 3 and free agent players are boat anchors.

    26 guys on the roster.

    $3MM average = $79MM
    $4MM average = $104MM
    $5MM average = $130MM
    $6MM average = $156MM
    $7MM average = $182MM
    $8MM average = $208MM

    2 hours ago, karcherd said:

    The cash considerations were just guys put on the waiver wire and we jumped the line by giving cash considerations.  So maybe technically correct but not in spirit.

    No, that's not how it works.  Once a player is on the waiver wire they can't be taken off. The cash considerations were to persuade the other team not to do it.

    5 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    No, that's not how it works.  Once a player is on the waiver wire they can't be taken off. The cash considerations were to persuade the other team not to do it.

    Technically these players were designated for assignment and then we agreed to give cash considerations to skip the waiver wire hierarchy.  Bottom line these players were deemed no longer necessary to be on their former teams 40 man roster and the Twins made a move ahead of other teams to claim those players.

    1 hour ago, karcherd said:

    Technically these players were designated for assignment and then we agreed to give cash considerations to skip the waiver wire hierarchy.  Bottom line these players were deemed no longer necessary to be on their former teams 40 man roster and the Twins made a move ahead of other teams to claim those players.

    So we're in agreement, no pitcher on the 40-man was claimed on waivers.  Which is what I said but you wanted to play gotcha or something.

    As I went on to say in a followup post, IMO this is actually worse than waiver wire pickups.  We know this franchise is perpetually strapped for resources.  That they spend any resources at all on these marginal guys means they are not devoting those same resources to something more productive.  The fact that an occasional pickup seems to work out for a while has to be weighed against the bad results on the field while sifting through. 

    They're trying to find the pony in the pile.

    There will be some who agree with my opinion and some who don't. And that's OK.

    I would prefer TP put his $ where his mouth is and start to expand the payroll, beginning with his own team. The team is better overall having Jeffers on it. I'd love an extensuon but don't expect one this close to FA. So he's probably traded. If he goes to a larger market team, he's not really a rental as they'd have the $ to just offer him a solid extension. So if they really like him. The payback to the Twins might be decent.

    Ryan should also be offered a fair extension option. Why wouldn't you at least try to keep a #1 caliber, All Star starter? If he says no, I still don't know if I trade him. He could be very valuable to the 2027 Twins, could still be moved at the 2027 deadline...though the return would be less...or even kept all season and then offered a QO to at least bring back a draft pick.

    While I understand the opinions of others regarding a nice return for Ryan, I'm not sure that he necessarily brings back what is needed or hoped for in a deal. By that I mean a playoff contender isn't going to offer up players on their ML roster for him. NOBODY is trading a young, talented, controllable SP currently on their roster to acquire Ryan. They still need that arm, and other players on their roster to compete.

    So we'd be getting prospects back, not immediate, PROVEN help. Now, is it possible 1 or 2 of the returning players are top 100 and sitting at AAA or AA and close to making a difference or debut? Absolutely. That's why I'm not totally out on trading Ryan. But I'd sure like to have him for 2027, if not beyond.

    And speaking of prospects, or acquiring more, is there something wrong with playing ours first? K-Pepper should be up in a couple of weeks to take over SS and let Kreidler be the SU option on the team. While Rodriguez won't be ready until August, he's out of options after this season, is a top 100 prospect in his own right, and we've seen the type of potential he has.

    Meanwhile, Rojas is back and raking at St Paul, joined by Jenkins, off to a good start on his return as well. Gonzalez has actually been doing pretty well after a poor April. And Mendez looks to be an absolutely pure hitter. Oh, and Keaschall is really, basically a rookie and we're still not 100% sure where he fits going forward. (Opinions will vary). 

    So where do we put/play everyone? I'm not saying there aren't other good prospects available. But are we certain they would be better than our current prospects?

    Boy do I like an opening day 2027 rotation of Lopez, Ryan,  Bradley, Abel, Prielipp, and Matthews. And that doesn't even include Ober, still under control, as a 7th option if his velocity comes back, or he can continue to be successful throwing "old school".

    How does an OF or Rodriguez, Buxton, and Jenkins sound? Probably Gonzalez as a corner OF/1B/DH option as well? I don't see room for both of Roden AND Wentz, but what a nice "problem" that would be.

    Yes, the bullpen still needs to be figured out. But much like the OF, the rest of the season is for the development of Morris, Rojas, CJ Culpepper, and possibly Raya and Klein. Maybe Festa still makes it back at some point? Maybe Cory Lewis gets moved to the Saints bullpen and gets some 2nd half work with the Twins? 

    Plus, there is still FA in the upcoming offseason, and might Jeffers, Larnach, and Bell possibly bring back an interesting pen option or two?

    I think the team is better keeping Ryan, moving/removing various parts that don't fit long term, and get the prospects as much time as possible to get their feet wet, begin their careers, and get as much experience for 2027 as possible.

    Minor trades to improve the BP if they win series in the next 2-3 weeks. Major trades if they lose series and fall further below .500. Either way, this roster needs help. 
    As an earlier poster stated, can Falvey acolyte Zoll be trusted to make the right trades? He’s the decision maker about who to trade and what players to get back. They need defense and athleticism to be competitive long term. We’ll find out if they think they have the prospects now to step up and contribute or if they need to go get those players. From what Favey sold us for years, the prospect pipeline is loaded. That hype hasn’t borne fruit yet, but will the next wave pan out? I have my doubts based on the poor player development I’ve seen. 

    3 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    Do you have any data to support this assertion?  Having heard this often, I collected the acquisition method of every player over 1.5 WAR for every single 90-win team with below average revenue for the past 25 years.  It's not universally true that those teams had a major influence from prospects acquired in trade.  However, on average prospects acquired in trade contributed as much as prospects that were drafted and those two categories combined accounted for 80-90% of WAR for the most successful organizations.   

    It's an assumption of many that trading current MLB players for prospects diminishes the chances of building a playoff team.  History suggests the opposite.  Trading for established players has by far the smallest role in building a winning team among organizations with below average revenue.

    Yes, but it is anecdotal such as the Marlins trading away Miguel Cabrera for a host of prospects that never really worked out, the same for Yelich to the Brewers and some would argue the Twins did not get enough for Johan Santana. Of course there are examples of the reverse occurring.

    Your point though is understood.

    5 hours ago, GopherMike said:

    Larnach has a 126 wRC+ and a .377 OBP and has been one of the actual stabilizers in the lineup. He is not Bell. He is not a short-term dead-end rental. He is useful now, and the Twins are not overflowing with proven MLB corner bats.

    The “too many young corner outfielders knocking on the door” argument sounds good, until you remember one of those is Wallner, who is obviously very risky, and the rest are guys who have yet to prove anything at the major league level. 

    Larnach has been great no doubt, but if these prospects never get called up they can never prove anything at the major league level. If the organization does not believe in them, they need to trade several of these guys. There's no point to holding onto these prospects if they're not going to use them, may as well cash them in for something. Heck, I wouldn't complain if Rodriguez/Roden/Gonzalez/Mendez got flipped (as part of a package) for a major league player who can help in 2027/2028. That would be better than the alternative of watching said OF prospect continue to sit in AAA for 2026 and 2027 not helping the major league team. 

    I actually think it's more likely that the roster looks depressingly similar after the trade deadline.

    Ownership is pot-committed to the idea that this team is competitive.  Furthermore, as demonstrated in Tom's offseason comments, they operate under the midguided notion that maintaining the status quo constitutes doing something for the fans.  So as long as they're close enough to a playoff spot to feign contention, they're not selling off anything meaningful.  They think keeping Ryan around will drive increased attendance, even though that doesn't make any sense.  If they already weren't drawing a crowd with him on the team, why would simply keeping him drive any meaningful change?  This was the thought process behind holding onto their most valuable trade chips in the offseason (keeping Lopez/Ryan/Jeffers/et. al. constituted "doing something for the fans"), and I don't see why they would change their thinking now.

    They're also not going to be willing to pay the price necessary to make meaningful changes to the roster in a positive direction (it's looking to be an extreme sellers market if the entire AL can convince themselves they're contenders).  This is a franchise that has made nothing but incredibly marginal additions at trade deadlines even when they are legitimately contending, with the exception of the disastrous 2022 deadline.  And now, they're less than a season away from some potentially game-changing rules in the CBA that could make actual contention more realistic (read: less expensive) from their POV.  If they weren't willing to make any sort of investment at the beginning of the season, I don't know why they would now. 

    So they can't sell without ditching their narrative, and they won't be willing to buy.  That's the recipe for a holding pattern.  

    It's not what I want to see happen, but it's where I think we're headed.  They might flip a low-rated prospect for a marginal rental reliever so they can say they "tried", but not much of anything beyond that. 

    As noted philosopher Marlo Stanfield once said: "You want it to be one way ... but it's the other way."

     

    22 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

    Me and others have said this for many months. This season was already decided on July 31, 2025 when they decimated the bullpen. The roster needs to be turned over because a bad bullpen and bad defense won’t win squat. 

    I’ve been waiting for this organization to turn it over to the next wave of prospects. As soon as Culpepper is healthy get him up here. Walker Jenkins and Alan Roden. 

    The Twins have no choice but to keep picking up waiver wire relievers and rolling the dice on them. I’d just prefer they’re under 28 with an option or 3 left. 

    The Twins most certainly have options other than picking up waiver wire relief pitchers.  Instead of bringing up all these  cast-off loser RPs (like nearly every one has been so far!), here are some not-so-novel ideas:

    1) Bring up some AAA pitchers!!!!  That has worked out pretty well in the past.

    2) deal for some actually good RPs

    3) spend some F’in money already!!!!

    2 hours ago, DocBauer said:

    There will be some who agree with my opinion and some who don't. And that's OK.

    I would prefer TP put his $ where his mouth is and start to expand the payroll, beginning with his own team. The team is better overall having Jeffers on it. I'd love an extensuon but don't expect one this close to FA. So he's probably traded. If he goes to a larger market team, he's not really a rental as they'd have the $ to just offer him a solid extension. So if they really like him. The payback to the Twins might be decent.

    Ryan should also be offered a fair extension option. Why wouldn't you at least try to keep a #1 caliber, All Star starter? If he says no, I still don't know if I trade him. He could be very valuable to the 2027 Twins, could still be moved at the 2027 deadline...though the return would be less...or even kept all season and then offered a QO to at least bring back a draft pick.

    While I understand the opinions of others regarding a nice return for Ryan, I'm not sure that he necessarily brings back what is needed or hoped for in a deal. By that I mean a playoff contender isn't going to offer up players on their ML roster for him. NOBODY is trading a young, talented, controllable SP currently on their roster to acquire Ryan. They still need that arm, and other players on their roster to compete.

    So we'd be getting prospects back, not immediate, PROVEN help. Now, is it possible 1 or 2 of the returning players are top 100 and sitting at AAA or AA and close to making a difference or debut? Absolutely. That's why I'm not totally out on trading Ryan. But I'd sure like to have him for 2027, if not beyond.

    And speaking of prospects, or acquiring more, is there something wrong with playing ours first? K-Pepper should be up in a couple of weeks to take over SS and let Kreidler be the SU option on the team. While Rodriguez won't be ready until August, he's out of options after this season, is a top 100 prospect in his own right, and we've seen the type of potential he has.

    Meanwhile, Rojas is back and raking at St Paul, joined by Jenkins, off to a good start on his return as well. Gonzalez has actually been doing pretty well after a poor April. And Mendez looks to be an absolutely pure hitter. Oh, and Keaschall is really, basically a rookie and we're still not 100% sure where he fits going forward. (Opinions will vary). 

    So where do we put/play everyone? I'm not saying there aren't other good prospects available. But are we certain they would be better than our current prospects?

    Boy do I like an opening day 2027 rotation of Lopez, Ryan,  Bradley, Abel, Prielipp, and Matthews. And that doesn't even include Ober, still under control, as a 7th option if his velocity comes back, or he can continue to be successful throwing "old school".

    How does an OF or Rodriguez, Buxton, and Jenkins sound? Probably Gonzalez as a corner OF/1B/DH option as well? I don't see room for both of Roden AND Wentz, but what a nice "problem" that would be.

    Yes, the bullpen still needs to be figured out. But much like the OF, the rest of the season is for the development of Morris, Rojas, CJ Culpepper, and possibly Raya and Klein. Maybe Festa still makes it back at some point? Maybe Cory Lewis gets moved to the Saints bullpen and gets some 2nd half work with the Twins? 

    Plus, there is still FA in the upcoming offseason, and might Jeffers, Larnach, and Bell possibly bring back an interesting pen option or two?

    I think the team is better keeping Ryan, moving/removing various parts that don't fit long term, and get the prospects as much time as possible to get their feet wet, begin their careers, and get as much experience for 2027 as possible.

    Lots here.  Sure we have made some good progress this year is holding players accountable and have seen positive signs (e.g. Lewis and Lee).  But this is NOT a competitive team and we cannot make it one with all of these moves.  I agree, bring up the young OFers!  NOW!  And move some of these SPs to the bullpen.  
     

    But Ryan COULD return a top AAA rookie or two.  He’s that valuable.  And:  I highly doubt that te Twins will be able to sign an extension with him. He wants and deserved Ace $$ and TP won’t pay it.  He’s gonna prob hold out for $15-20 mill in arb!  He’s not stupid. And we might not even play ball next year so why hang on to him for a few months?  All we get is a comp pick, if that still exists!  So might as well capitalize on him now.  Sorry. We need to build for the future so that means either extend or trade.  He won’t extend so trade now.  Sorry.  Start filling holes (1B, RP, etc). I also assume we get a top SS or C in the draft.  

    5 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    Do you have any data to support this assertion?  Having heard this often, I collected the acquisition method of every player over 1.5 WAR for every single 90-win team with below average revenue for the past 25 years.  It's not universally true that those teams had a major influence from prospects acquired in trade.  However, on average prospects acquired in trade contributed as much as prospects that were drafted

    Connecting the two clauses I highlighted, don't you think there is at least a teensy risk that statistical bias was introduced?

    4 hours ago, Danchat said:

    Larnach has been great no doubt, but if these prospects never get called up they can never prove anything at the major league level. If the organization does not believe in them, they need to trade several of these guys. There's no point to holding onto these prospects if they're not going to use them, may as well cash them in for something. Heck, I wouldn't complain if Rodriguez/Roden/Gonzalez/Mendez got flipped (as part of a package) for a major league player who can help in 2027/2028. That would be better than the alternative of watching said OF prospect continue to sit in AAA for 2026 and 2027 not helping the major league team. 

    I agree with the general concern. At some point, the Twins cannot just keep collecting upper-minors corner bats and never give them MLB opportunities. If they don’t believe in all of their guys they should absolutely trade from that group for pitching or a major-league piece who fits 2027–2028.

    Where I disagree is making Larnach the automatic casualty and/or that we should force a trade for someone who is valuable now to create space for someone who may or may not be valuable. Trade Bell. That will free up one spot alone. Trade Jeffers and you've basically got two.

    Also, the prospects are not all in the same bucket. Roden looks ready. Mendez is interesting. Wallner has already struggled badly in MLB this year. Gonzalez is not forcing it yet. Jenkins should not be rushed. E-Rod is hurt. So “the prospects need a chance” is true, but it does not automatically mean “trade the proven productive left fielder.”

    But don't treat Larnach like he's a clog. He's not. Bell is the clog. 

    4 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    I actually think it's more likely that the roster looks depressingly similar after the trade deadline.

    Ownership is pot-committed to the idea that this team is competitive.  Furthermore, as demonstrated in Tom's offseason comments, they operate under the midguided notion that maintaining the status quo constitutes doing something for the fans.  So as long as they're close enough to a playoff spot to feign contention, they're not selling off anything meaningful.  They think keeping Ryan around will drive increased attendance, even though that doesn't make any sense.  If they already weren't drawing a crowd with him on the team, why would simply keeping him drive any meaningful change?  This was the thought process behind holding onto their most valuable trade chips in the offseason (keeping Lopez/Ryan/Jeffers/et. al. constituted "doing something for the fans"), and I don't see why they would change their thinking now.

    They're also not going to be willing to pay the price necessary to make meaningful changes to the roster in a positive direction (it's looking to be an extreme sellers market if the entire AL can convince themselves they're contenders).  This is a franchise that has made nothing but incredibly marginal additions at trade deadlines even when they are legitimately contending, with the exception of the disastrous 2022 deadline.  And now, they're less than a season away from some potentially game-changing rules in the CBA that could make actual contention more realistic (read: less expensive) from their POV.  If they weren't willing to make any sort of investment at the beginning of the season, I don't know why they would now. 

    So they can't sell without ditching their narrative, and they won't be willing to buy.  That's the recipe for a holding pattern.  

    It's not what I want to see happen, but it's where I think we're headed.  They might flip a low-rated prospect for a marginal rental reliever so they can say they "tried", but not much of anything beyond that. 

    As noted philosopher Marlo Stanfield once said: "You want it to be one way ... but it's the other way."

     

    Sounds like we’re about to go full Arte Moreno. And teams should never go full Arte Moreno. 

    4 hours ago, JADBP said:

    Lots here.  Sure we have made some good progress this year is holding players accountable and have seen positive signs (e.g. Lewis and Lee).  But this is NOT a competitive team and we cannot make it one with all of these moves.  I agree, bring up the young OFers!  NOW!  And move some of these SPs to the bullpen.  
     

    But Ryan COULD return a top AAA rookie or two.  He’s that valuable.  And:  I highly doubt that te Twins will be able to sign an extension with him. He wants and deserved Ace $$ and TP won’t pay it.  He’s gonna prob hold out for $15-20 mill in arb!  He’s not stupid. And we might not even play ball next year so why hang on to him for a few months?  All we get is a comp pick, if that still exists!  So might as well capitalize on him now.  Sorry. We need to build for the future so that means either extend or trade.  He won’t extend so trade now.  Sorry.  Start filling holes (1B, RP, etc). I also assume we get a top SS or C in the draft.  

    I don't necessarily disagree with you. I think I stated they SHOULD resign Ryan, but I'm open to the idea of trading him. I just don't LIKE the idea. 

    I'm TIRED of the idea that "we're not quite there". But of you DON'T once in a while KEEP a TOP player, how do you EVER actually GET THERE?

    Look, if someone offered another TOP SP like Abel, and a TOP Catcher or 2B and another "Varland type" of arm that's ready for a full BP conversion, I could be IN 100%.

    Maybe we extend Lopez instead of Ryan as the leader of the staff. I could see that happening. 

    Again, I'm not OPPOSED to trading Ryan. But I'd rather keep him as a Twin for the next 4 years. I think that makes more sense than looking for the next Ryan. But you give us the next Abel...which I really dispute a contending team would do...and a TOP CATCHER or 2B, and throw in a 23-25yo ARM who has real talent but is Varland Jr just converting, or ready to convert, my mind can change in a hurry.

    That's 2 top 100 prospects ready to debut, and a 3rd who might be the next Varland. Another team offers THAT, I'm on board for a trade.

    3 hours ago, GopherMike said:

    Where I disagree is making Larnach the automatic casualty and/or that we should force a trade for someone who is valuable now to create space for someone who may or may not be valuable. Trade Bell. That will free up one spot alone. Trade Jeffers and you've basically got two.

    Trading Larnach should rely on whether they will buy his final season of arbitration, if that's going to be too expensive for them then it's better to trade him at the deadline than let him hit the open market and get nothing for him. 

    7 hours ago, ashbury said:

    Connecting the two clauses I highlighted, don't you think there is at least a teensy risk that statistical bias was introduced?

    You will have to elaborate.  What statistical bias would be present by using a data set comprised of the highest WAR players or in this case generally the 10-12 highest producing players.   I was looking to identify how the highest producing players were acquired.  How could that result in statistical bias. Where is the issue with how the study was structured? If you want to conclude it's all about development, OK but the fact remains the majority of production does not come from free agency or trading for established players for the most successful modest revenue teams.

    On 6/27/2026 at 12:59 PM, MMBoys93 said:

    14-23 vs teams better than .500, good for 24th in baseball, 13th in the AL and worst among the division.

    Comes out to a 61-101 pace against winning baseball teams.

    Aggressively buying would be a giant mistake. Hope the Pohlad’s don’t force that because they finally realized they made a giant mistake 3 years ago by dropping payroll by 30m.


    Trade expiring contracts like Jeffers and Bell

    Trade Clemens and Larnach

    Jeffers hasn’t played in weeks and the Twins can replace the other 3 internally without losing much offensive ability.

    If they play decent baseball before the deadline, they can add 2-3 cheap expiring contract decent relievers and you’ll still come out ahead on the farm system while giving a chance at a wild card spot allowing everyone to be happy. 

    That 61-101 pace thing seems irrational since I have it on good authority that they are highly unlikely to only play winning teams this or any other year.

    8 hours ago, dxpavelka said:

    That 61-101 pace thing seems irrational since I have it on good authority that they are highly unlikely to only play winning teams this or any other year.

    They’re still 24th in baseball against winning teams and I can guarantee you that if they make the playoffs they’ll only be playing teams with winning records 

    This seems to always be the twins issue. They feast off weak competition. 2019 they won 101 games, had a record under .500 vs teams with a winning record. Got swept by the Yankees and everyone was somehow shocked.

    The point is if you can’t beat good teams, then buying at the trade deadline seems silly

    On 6/28/2026 at 11:43 AM, JBK said:

    Trade Bell, Larnach and Wallner.  Release Banda.  Bring up the young fellas and let them ride.

    Bell is leading in RBI so hits in the clutch, Larnach is one of our best hitters - but won't bring back much more than an A or AA prospect.    Wallner would be a give away.  Banda is one of our better arms.   Go to St. Paul to watch the young guys for some time yet

    On 6/28/2026 at 12:04 PM, DocBauer said:

    There will be some who agree with my opinion and some who don't. And that's OK.

    I would prefer TP put his $ where his mouth is and start to expand the payroll, beginning with his own team. The team is better overall having Jeffers on it. I'd love an extensuon but don't expect one this close to FA. So he's probably traded. If he goes to a larger market team, he's not really a rental as they'd have the $ to just offer him a solid extension. So if they really like him. The payback to the Twins might be decent.

    Ryan should also be offered a fair extension option. Why wouldn't you at least try to keep a #1 caliber, All Star starter? If he says no, I still don't know if I trade him. He could be very valuable to the 2027 Twins, could still be moved at the 2027 deadline...though the return would be less...or even kept all season and then offered a QO to at least bring back a draft pick.

    While I understand the opinions of others regarding a nice return for Ryan, I'm not sure that he necessarily brings back what is needed or hoped for in a deal. By that I mean a playoff contender isn't going to offer up players on their ML roster for him. NOBODY is trading a young, talented, controllable SP currently on their roster to acquire Ryan. They still need that arm, and other players on their roster to compete.

    So we'd be getting prospects back, not immediate, PROVEN help. Now, is it possible 1 or 2 of the returning players are top 100 and sitting at AAA or AA and close to making a difference or debut? Absolutely. That's why I'm not totally out on trading Ryan. But I'd sure like to have him for 2027, if not beyond.

    And speaking of prospects, or acquiring more, is there something wrong with playing ours first? K-Pepper should be up in a couple of weeks to take over SS and let Kreidler be the SU option on the team. While Rodriguez won't be ready until August, he's out of options after this season, is a top 100 prospect in his own right, and we've seen the type of potential he has.

    Meanwhile, Rojas is back and raking at St Paul, joined by Jenkins, off to a good start on his return as well. Gonzalez has actually been doing pretty well after a poor April. And Mendez looks to be an absolutely pure hitter. Oh, and Keaschall is really, basically a rookie and we're still not 100% sure where he fits going forward. (Opinions will vary). 

    So where do we put/play everyone? I'm not saying there aren't other good prospects available. But are we certain they would be better than our current prospects?

    Boy do I like an opening day 2027 rotation of Lopez, Ryan,  Bradley, Abel, Prielipp, and Matthews. And that doesn't even include Ober, still under control, as a 7th option if his velocity comes back, or he can continue to be successful throwing "old school".

    How does an OF or Rodriguez, Buxton, and Jenkins sound? Probably Gonzalez as a corner OF/1B/DH option as well? I don't see room for both of Roden AND Wentz, but what a nice "problem" that would be.

    Yes, the bullpen still needs to be figured out. But much like the OF, the rest of the season is for the development of Morris, Rojas, CJ Culpepper, and possibly Raya and Klein. Maybe Festa still makes it back at some point? Maybe Cory Lewis gets moved to the Saints bullpen and gets some 2nd half work with the Twins? 

    Plus, there is still FA in the upcoming offseason, and might Jeffers, Larnach, and Bell possibly bring back an interesting pen option or two?

    I think the team is better keeping Ryan, moving/removing various parts that don't fit long term, and get the prospects as much time as possible to get their feet wet, begin their careers, and get as much experience for 2027 as possible.

    I like the rotation and the depth it provides.   I don't want Rodriguez - he can be used to trade for a proven BP arm

    2 minutes ago, mickster said:

    Bell is leading in RBI so hits in the clutch, Larnach is one of our best hitters - but won't bring back much more than an A or AA prospect.    Wallner would be a give away.  Banda is one of our better arms.   Go to St. Paul to watch the young guys for some time yet

    I'm not sure your point about Larnach?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...