Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Could Look Completely Different After the Trade Deadline

    The Twins still have time to climb back into the AL Central race, but if they become sellers, this roster could undergo some major changes over the next month.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    We're already counting down the days until the MLB Trade Deadline on August 3, but there's still a lot of uncertainty surrounding what exactly the Minnesota Twins should do. Depending on who you ask, you'll get a completely different answer.

    A lot of people think the Twins should be sellers once again. At the same time, there's still a sizable group that believes Minnesota should be an aggressive buyer, especially considering how underwhelming the AL Central has been this season. This time of year always makes things difficult. We're just over halfway through the season, but the standings remain incredibly tight. It's hard to know exactly where teams stand when one good week can completely change the outlook of a division race. There's still time for the Twins to gain some clarity, but the pressure is about to ramp up in a hurry.

    So, what should the Twins do at this year's trade deadline? And what would each path mean for the rest of the roster? A lot of that answer, obviously, depends on where they sit in about two weeks. The Twins currently own a 39-44 record, but they're still only 4.5 games behind in the AL Central. That's close enough to keep hope alive, but far enough back that another rough stretch could all but end any realistic postseason aspirations.

    The next 12 games should tell us a lot. Minnesota has three-game series coming up against the Rockies, Astros, Yankees and Guardians. If they somehow manage to go 8-4 during that stretch, the conversation around this team could look drastically different than it does today. On the flip side, if they go 4-8, the front office may not have much of a choice. Regardless of what happens over the next couple weeks, though, I still think the likeliest outcome is that the Twins end up as sellers.

    If that's the route they take, several names should immediately jump to the top of the trade market. Ryan Jeffers, Josh Bell, Trevor Larnach, and Kody Clemens all make a lot of sense. Larnach, in particular, feels like someone who should be moved regardless of where the Twins are in the standings. Minnesota simply has too many young corner outfielders knocking on the door in Triple-A, and eventually they're going to need everyday opportunities. Beyond that, all four players represent guys who are either in the prime of their careers or short-term pieces that probably aren't going to move the needle much for the Twins beyond this season.

    If those four players are traded, though, the lineup would suddenly look dramatically different. Four of the five hitters that typically occupy the top of Minnesota's lineup would be gone. The Twins would need a new catcher, a new primary left fielder, a designated hitter, and someone capable of filling the many different roles Clemens has handled this season. That creates opportunities for younger players.

    Alan Roden feels like one of the biggest beneficiaries. He has the defensive versatility to play either corner outfield spot, and his offensive production at Triple-A has looked more than deserving of a promotion. This would also be the perfect opportunity to finally see exactly what Aaron Sabato can offer at the major league level. The former first-round pick from the 2020 MLB Draft may never become the Twins' long-term answer at first base (and realistically probably won't), but when a player has produced 35 extra-base hits and a .927 OPS in Triple-A, it's worth finding out if there's something there before completely moving on.

    Catcher probably wouldn't change much immediately. Jeffers is already sidelined with a fractured hamate bone, so the Twins have already begun adjusting behind the plate without him. The biggest winners, however, would likely be the organization's wave of outfield prospects. Assuming he returns healthy, Emmanuel Rodriguez should receive even more opportunities down the stretch if the Twins pivot toward evaluating young talent. Walker Jenkins, Hendry Mendez, and Gabriel Gonzalez could all benefit as well, especially if multiple outfield spots suddenly become available over the final two months of the season.

    Of course, the Twins probably wouldn't stop at trading only four players. Taylor Rogers is another obvious candidate. He's an experienced left-handed reliever, and contenders are always looking to add bullpen help in July. Even Yoendrys Gomez could generate interest despite arriving less than two months ago. The Twins showed at last year's deadline that they aren't afraid to aggressively move relievers, so it wouldn't be surprising to see them take a similar approach again if they decide to sell.

    Then there are the two names everyone always talks about. Byron Buxton and Joe Ryan have been connected to trade rumors for what feels like years now. Buxton's situation is a little different because he owns a no-trade clause. If the Twins agreed to a deal, he would still have the ability to veto it. Ryan doesn't have that luxury. So how far out of the playoff picture would Minnesota need to be before seriously considering moving one of them? Or even both? And if they did, what kind of return could they realistically expect?

    The answer is probably a massive one. Both players have multiple years of team control remaining, both are among the best in baseball at their respective positions, and both would instantly become one of the most sought-after players available at the deadline.

    The Twins wouldn't simply be acquiring prospects in return. A trade involving Ryan or Buxton could realistically bring back major league-ready talent, along with one or more premium prospects capable of impacting the organization's future. I've been pretty vocal about my belief that the Twins should trade Joe Ryan–I don't necessarily feel that same way about Byron Buxton. But there's no denying the type of return either would command. 

    That's what makes the trade deadline so fascinating every single year. It's one of the most exciting times on the baseball calendar. Unfortunately for Twins fans, that excitement probably won't come from adding talent this summer. Instead, there's a very real chance the roster we see today looks nothing like the one we'll be watching just a little over a month from now.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I'd do the same as last year and trade our top 5 bullpen arms.🤫 Anybody know who that is? Winning a division by 2 games over 500(at best) doesn't exactly thrill me much, unless you enjoy watching the team getting its teeth kicked in.

    I'd trade or attempt to trade the same players already addressed by others here. Although with Wallner if he can't hit anything over 95 any more, I might plan on cutting him after the season. No reason to give away players for nothing, if the offers just aren't there.

    I've been watching bad baseball long enough, I'd prefer to see the team try to improve as much as possible by deadline trades and bringing in rookies the last 2 months of the year. Another year of just scraping by doesn't really do it for me.

    I actually want them to go for it in 2027. Pablo will be back - Ryan, Lopez and Bradley is a great start to a rotation. Prielipp, Matthews, Rojas round it out. 

    I think Lee, Culpepper, Clemens and Lewis is a decent infield. Caratini is a decent C. There are outfield bats in AAA who could be really good next season (Roden, Rodriguez, Jenkins, Gonzalez and even Mendez). 

    They need a bullpen and they could have one for about $20M. They have plenty of payroll room to make that happen.

    I’m selling Jeffers, Larnach, Ober, Bell, Banda, and Rogers. Everyone else they had better make a stupid offer to obtain.

    54 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    avco70.jpg

    (I think this is correct. All the guys we think of were actually minor trades or "cash considerations".)

    Lawrence was a waiver wire pickup from the Nationals. He was also picked back up from the waiver wire pile from the twins DFAing him . There are pitchers signed as free agents who were DFA, nobody picked them up, they elected free agency, and then they signed as a free agent with twins.  I think the correct term might be scrap heap. 

    48 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    I actually want them to go for it in 2027. Pablo will be back - Ryan, Lopez and Bradley is a great start to a rotation. Prielipp, Matthews, Rojas round it out. 

    I think Lee, Culpepper, Clemens and Lewis is a decent infield. Caratini is a decent C. There are outfield bats in AAA who could be really good next season (Roden, Rodriguez, Jenkins, Gonzalez and even Mendez). 

    They need a bullpen and they could have one for about $20M. They have plenty of payroll room to make that happen.

    I’m selling Jeffers, Larnach, Ober, Bell, Banda, and Rogers. Everyone else they had better make a stupid offer to obtain.

    I certainly understand this, and wouldn't be totally opposed to keeping Ryan. I'd deal him, but I'd be OK if they tried to win next year(i have zero confidence the Pohlads will ever try to win, though).

    1 hour ago, old nurse said:

    Lawrence was a waiver wire pickup from the Nationals. He was also picked back up from the waiver wire pile from the twins DFAing him . There are pitchers signed as free agents who were DFA, nobody picked them up, they elected free agency, and then they signed as a free agent with twins.  I think the correct term might be scrap heap. 

    Interesting but not relevant.  I'll ask again, what pitcher on the current 40-man is a waiver wire pickup?

    Not that I think it's super important.  If anything, it's a bit more damning, to pay cash to jump out in front before a player of the caliber they wind up with is exposed to waivers, or trade a prospect of any value for one of them.  

    Still, for all the roster churn and the gnashing of teeth here on TD, the current state of the roster is that none of the waiver wire pickups is responsible for the continuing weakness of the bullpen (or back end of the rotation).  I just thought it was an interesting datapoint / factoid.

    Don't blame the waiver wire pickups.  Blame the fact that more significant pickups haven't been made.

    8 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Unless I'm blown away, I keep Clemens. I also keep Gomez unless there is a ridiculous offer. 

    I agree on Clemens.  I get that he is older as people point out, but he is so good in so many places I think he is harder to replace than others realize.  He also appears to be a great locker room guy\leader.  For what he brings just keep him IMO.  

    Gomez too much control left and would take a huge offer to move.  I don't see another team taking that risk and with the pen in shambles they need arms for high leverage.  I'd keep him.

    6 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

    Me and others have said this for many months. This season was already decided on July 31, 2025 when they decimated the bullpen. The roster needs to be turned over because a bad bullpen and bad defense won’t win squat. 

    I’ve been waiting for this organization to turn it over to the next wave of prospects. As soon as Culpepper is healthy get him up here. Walker Jenkins and Alan Roden. 

    The Twins have no choice but to keep picking up waiver wire relievers and rolling the dice on them. I’d just prefer they’re under 28 with an option or 3 left. 

    I would just add that look what better athletes and defense has done for the White Sox.  They are a good team now.  We need to match that with guys better than Larnach and Wallner in the outfield.  As well as  better infield defense.  Saving runs is important just like creating runs.  I don't know if our young players will work out or not, but we need to try as it is the best way for this team to move forward and compete with better teams. 

    9 hours ago, MMBoys93 said:

    14-23 vs teams better than .500, good for 24th in baseball, 13th in the AL and worst among the division.

    Comes out to a 61-101 pace against winning baseball teams.

    Aggressively buying would be a giant mistake. Hope the Pohlad’s don’t force that because they finally realized they made a giant mistake 3 years ago by dropping payroll by 30m.


    Trade expiring contracts like Jeffers and Bell

    Trade Clemens and Larnach

    Jeffers hasn’t played in weeks and the Twins can replace the other 3 internally without losing much offensive ability.

    If they play decent baseball before the deadline, they can add 2-3 cheap expiring contract decent relievers and you’ll still come out ahead on the farm system while giving a chance at a wild card spot allowing everyone to be happy.

    if this team is going to serve up home runs to one guy Goodman by placing the ball in exactly the same spot, three consecutive times at back. that's his home run spot and we just gave it to him three straight times. don't they talk about this stuff in The dugout? he hit a home run from right there. don't put it there again. I don't know when I've seen it that bad. you're not going to win ball games if you do stuff like that so you might as well sell players off at the trade deadline but hopefully that won't be the approach.

    Yes, trading away current assets at the MLB level for prospects who might be productive MLB players is what teams do. The success rate of. doing this is spotty and often leads to multiple losing seasons.

    The Twins have a bunch of prospects already - trading for more is just a sign that the club doesn't trust they'll be able to count on them to become productive, winning players.

    Of course, standing pat and holding on to players that are playing significant roles for a losing team likely doesn't seem wise either.

    Many agreed with the strip mining like trade off at last year's deadline, Where did that get the Twins? 

    The bullpen was a strength and is now an unreliable, morale-killing mess. And building bullpens was posited by many on TD that bullpens can be stocked rather easily.

    Many suggest the Twins have a surplus of corner OF. Of those on the roster only Larnach is really producing. The much heralded group at St Paul are underperforming (Gonzalez) and/or are injured and stalled. (Jenkins, Rodriguez) I see that Keaschall played in RF. Martin's hot start has faded.

    On the infield we have witnessed an absurd array of position shifting in a few short months: Lee from SS - 3B, Lewis from 3B -1B, Keaschall from 2B - RF. Gray UTL- 3B - SS, Kriedler from Tigers cast off to SS/CF. Clemens was the 1B now he is UTL / OF.

    The Twins actually have only 3 players who would likely bring back prospects that might be upper end prospects. (Buxton, Ryan and Jeffers.) These three basically. constitute the Twins' core assets.

    Trading any of these three while seeming prudent to some is a symptom of organizational failure on a grand scale. 

    The Twins aren't likely going to be able to trade their way to competitive relevance by surrendering their best players leaving behind a depleted MLB roster  that can't compete and a slew of unproven hopefuls in the minors.

    But I guess we can focus on trading as the primary instrument the Twins have for improving their roster when their general non-participation in meaningful free agency is the real missing  component. 

    16 hours ago, MMBoys93 said:

    I love what Clemens has brought to the team but he’s 30 and players typically start the decline at 32, he has control which other teams would like and Kreidler has absolutely shown he can take his super utility spot. Absolutely hilarious that this marks the 3rd really good super utility guy the twins have nabbed from Detroit in the last 5 years for nothing 🤣🤣🤣

    Martin could even be the super utility guy down the road as well. 
    As for Wallner I’m definitely super down on the guy as well but I’m of the opinion that you don’t trade guys when their value has never been lower.

    Give him the rest of the season and then make your decision in the offseason. 

    Kreidler can take the utility spot, but I would not call it “super” if you include a productive bat in that equation. No utility man the Twins have gotten in my memory (including Escobar or Castro) have hit like Clemens has this year while being able to play what appears to be an above average CF along with the right side of the infield. I love having Kreidler for his SS play and ability to also play the OF, but not instead of Clemens.

    Those two make Martin and any other 4th outfield very expendable. 

    11 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    I actually want them to go for it in 2027. Pablo will be back - Ryan, Lopez and Bradley is a great start to a rotation. Prielipp, Matthews, Rojas round it out. 

    I think Lee, Culpepper, Clemens and Lewis is a decent infield. Caratini is a decent C. There are outfield bats in AAA who could be really good next season (Roden, Rodriguez, Jenkins, Gonzalez and even Mendez). 

    They need a bullpen and they could have one for about $20M. They have plenty of payroll room to make that happen.

    I’m selling Jeffers, Larnach, Ober, Bell, Banda, and Rogers. Everyone else they had better make a stupid offer to obtain.

    This

    I would think Jeffers, Larnach and Ober would bring back 2-3 BP arms and prospects in the A-AA range. The others won't bring back much. A Ball to Outman types.

    Fill out the roster with the guys already on the 40-man and maybe a couple of the guys you picked up. The odds of getting a WC spot drop, but probably not that much. 2027 (assuming there is a season) depending on the young guys should be a step forward.

    15 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    They won't offer Jeffers the QO. Zero chance. It night not even exist. 

    The QO framework for free agency this year would still fit under the current CBA that goes until the end of the calendar year rather than the season.  I agree that it likely won’t be a part of the next CBA but it is part of the current CBA, which will apply to Jeffers.

    12 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    I actually want them to go for it in 2027. Pablo will be back - Ryan, Lopez and Bradley is a great start to a rotation. Prielipp, Matthews, Rojas round it out. 

    I think Lee, Culpepper, Clemens and Lewis is a decent infield. Caratini is a decent C. There are outfield bats in AAA who could be really good next season (Roden, Rodriguez, Jenkins, Gonzalez and even Mendez). 

    They need a bullpen and they could have one for about $20M. They have plenty of payroll room to make that happen.

    I’m selling Jeffers, Larnach, Ober, Bell, Banda, and Rogers. Everyone else they had better make a stupid offer to obtain.

    Almost with you. Two issues:

    - Those AAA players will probably take longer than mid-27 to be leading a playoff charge. Just sorting wheat from chaff may take longer.

    - I think everyone is betting too heavy on Jackson and Caratini and thus undervaluing Jeffers. But I have no magic wand to make the Twins extend Jeffers or make the rest of the league value him below the QO, so your point stands. Sigh.

    13 hours ago, ashbury said:

    avco70.jpg

    (I think this is correct. All the guys we think of were actually minor trades or "cash considerations".)

    The cash considerations were just guys put on the waiver wire and we jumped the line by giving cash considerations.  So maybe technically correct but not in spirit.

    The Twins need a compelling vision. I don't think they have the resources for that vision to be going for it this year or next. They could make the playoffs either year, and maybe even surprise if their starters are clicking. I wouldn't mind buying a few cheap lotto tickets with that hope, but that is not a vision.

    They do have Jenkins, Houston, and Tait as up the middle, almost ready, VERY young, two-way prospects. If the pitching pipeline can keep churning, *that* is what you build your vision around. Get them all up as quickly as is reasonable (IMO before next year's All-Star break), and *be patient* while they figure it out. There is enough youth and quality around them (Erod, Culpepper, Mendez, Gonzalez; even Keaschall and Lee are still young) to maybe make 2028 the breakout. On that timeline, you still have Buxton, Lopez, and most of the current rotation.

    And if they don't make it happen quickly, that is a core that will get a lot of bites at the apple, or provide the resources to keep tuning and reloading.

    BUT, that vision requires step one: bring prospects up and jettison hope for this season.

    7 hours ago, GNess said:

    The Twins actually have only 3 players who would likely bring back prospects that might be upper end prospects. (Buxton, Ryan and Jeffers.) These three basically. constitute the Twins' core assets.

    Trading any of these three while seeming prudent to some is a symptom of organizational failure on a grand scale. 

    The organizational failure with Jeffers is not extending his contract two years ago.
    Unfortunately, he will be a free agent in a couple months and will command more in salary than he is worth to the Twins. They have to trade him now, especially with the Yankees desperate for a RH hitting catcher. The rumors are Carlos Lagrange plus another arm. That’s the Nelson Cruz for Joe Ryan trade all over again.

    25 minutes ago, ToddlerHarmon said:

    Almost with you. Two issues:

    - Those AAA players will probably take longer than mid-27 to be leading a playoff charge. Just sorting wheat from chaff may take longer.

    Which is why they need to get Roden and Rodriguez up and on the team ASAP. They need to be working through their sophomore slump adjustments (see Keaschall) next May and not next September.

    A targeted sell is completely appropriate.

    A second sell--off in two years sounds more like fan logic because you're annoyed with the roster. 

    Bell? Absolutely.
    Jeffers? Yes. But only if healthy enough to get value.
    Rogers? Yes. If we truly fall back and there's an offer. Not automatic if we're alive.
    Selling Larnach "regardless"? Illogical. 

    Larnach has a 126 wRC+ and a .377 OBP and has been one of the actual stabilizers in the lineup. He is not Bell. He is not a short-term dead-end rental. He is useful now, and the Twins are not overflowing with proven MLB corner bats.

    The “too many young corner outfielders knocking on the door” argument sounds good, until you remember one of those is Wallner, who is obviously very risky, and the rest are guys who have yet to prove anything at the major league level. 

    Yes--sell Bell. Create opportunities. Fire sell "regardless"? Dumb, honestly. 

    Clemens? From a value standpoint.....maybe. If we get a good offer. I would agree he has peaked. But I don't see it happening.

    Gomez? ......what? We have an absolutely terrible bullpen and you want to sell our best reliever that is controllable for years to come? What?


    We have enough upper-minor bats to move Bell and Jeffers, I agree. Everything else comes with a lot of risk that saying things like "regardless" is how we made the mistakes we made last year. That's trading Louis Varland logic. 

    16 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    Which is why they need to get Roden and Rodriguez up and on the team ASAP. They need to be working through their sophomore slump adjustments (see Keaschall) next May and not next September.

    What I'm saying is do so with eyes open: that move would be aimed at the long term vision. If it pays off earlier, great, but don't let Bell and Larnach block them

    1 hour ago, Czelgert said:

    The QO framework for free agency this year would still fit under the current CBA that goes until the end of the calendar year rather than the season.  I agree that it likely won’t be a part of the next CBA but it is part of the current CBA, which will apply to Jeffers.

    I'll be more clear..... There is a zero percent chance they offer him 23 million dollars for one year. Imo.

    I would say don't trade anyone except maybe for Jeffers.  The reason is do we trust this front office to make the right choices and decisions of who to trade.  What is the vision of the organization, do they value athletic players, sluggers, defense, strong baseball IQ any of the above.  The only trait I can see they value is versatility so they can platoon everyone, but what has that gotten us but sub .500 ball since 2020.

    Our infield has no one playing at the same position as opening day on a regular basis.  Have Lee, Keaschall or Lewis regressed defensively from the end of last season. They made assessments over the offseason and said these three were going to play the infield, but halfway thru the season that has changed.  That seems like either a very poor assessment or a knee jerk reaction with no real planning to change this much only halfway thru the season.  And they have also had Keaschall take grounders at first.  It feels like they are just throwing slop at the wall and see what sticks.

    Yes Lewis needed a reset for his offense which is not unique in baseball, even Hunter and Buxton were sent down a couple of times.  But should this have meant a position change.  Yes Keaschall's defense has been rough but it did seem to be better next to Kreidler, would stability and a better defender next to him help.  As for Lee, he didn't move for Culpepper who is not up here and who knows when he will be but instead they trot out Gray on a regular basis who is similar if not less defensively than Lee at short.  And remember they signed Bell to play 1B not DH, those were Falvey's words.  Based on all reports he favored a collaborative approach so I have to believe there are still people advising Zoll and maybe Zoll himself that believed Bell could play 1B that are still in this organization and will be helping make the decisions at the deadline.  Fortunately they finally figured out what the rest of baseball already knew, Bell is unplayable at 1B.

    Some have mentioned Lewis as a trade candidate, that to me would be a real indictment of this front office.  One of the first people Shelton visited in person not on the phone after being named manager was Lewis.  I have to believe this was part of the interview process discussing the core players and who to build around.  That would tell me Lewis was near the top of the list.  And they are having a jersey day for Lewis, this was planned in the offseason between baseball operations and marketing.  It shows they valued Lewis as one of their core players.  Yes he needed a reset but he has come back and has been producing.  So a half season after identifying him as a core piece you say no he's not let's trade him.  If I am Tom P.  I would look at Zoll and seriously question his process and decision making abilities if he tried to trade Lewis.  At the end of the season you could review this.  Yes he needs to learn to layoff the low outside sweeper just like Buxton.  And I know many don't like his eye black but that is not a reason to get rid of him.

    If last year's deadline is an example of their moves, I would like to see more of a vision.  They traded for two more LH outfielders that were semi major league ready when we already had two similar players slated at some point in 2026.  They did at least fill a void in the lower minor leagues for a catching prospect.  And did get one starting pitcher, maybe two.  I want to see a vision not just more prospects to say we have more prospects.

    So if you want to trade Clemens, Bell or one of the veteran relievers for a low A player, fine it at least clears roster space if you can find a taker.  But otherwise don't let this management put us further behind.

    End of rant.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...