Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Is The WBC Even Worth it?


    Thiéres Rabelo

    The 2023 World Baseball Classic concluded on Tuesday night with Samurai Japan downing Team USA 3-2 in the championship game. The Classic closed with a final at-bat for the ages between Shohei Ohtani and Mike Trout. While most people agree such a spectacular final game is the cherry on top of a tremendous tournament, some still oppose the competition.

    Image courtesy of Rhona Wise-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    For three weeks, most of the baseball world celebrated the multicultural festivities of the World Baseball Classic (WBC) that took place in four different cities across three countries and two continents. The tournament had some of the world’s best players and broke, with ease, all of its attendance and viewership records. Still, in the middle of all that baseball fun, some people still managed to find a negative way to look at the competition.

    When Puerto Rico closer Edwin Díaz got hurt celebrating his country’s crucial win over the powerhouse from the Dominican Republic on March 15th, several media outlets and personalities bashed the WBC and its “lack of relevance.” Most notably, Barstool’s Kevin Clancy went on a rant about how “nobody gives a [expletive] about the WBC except for [expletive] losers.” Then, podcaster Keith Olbermann piled on by claiming the WBC is “a meaningless exhibition series designed to (...) split up teammates based on where their grandmothers got laid.”

     

    Despite being made in a grotesque way, there’s a very valid point in those statements, and they are definitely worth being politely discussed: is the World Baseball Classic fun worth the risk of superstars getting injured? Here are some reasons why I think it is.

    For many people, the WBC matters much more than the MLB
    This year’s WBC broke all of its attendance and viewership records. The tournament drew 1,010,999 fans to the stands during pool play, shattering the previous record of 510,056 set in 2017 with a 98% increase. Pool D, which was played in the US, drew 295,850 fans to the stands, making it the most-attended WBC round ever played in the United States – an 81% increase compared to the previous record.

    The TV viewership of this year’s WBC was also outstanding. Numbers on Tuesday night's championship game are not officially out yet, but one of the Samurai Japan games in this edition already broke an interesting record. Until this year, the most-watched baseball game in history was considered to be Game 6 of the 1980 MLB World Series, when 54,86 million people tuned on NBC to watch the Phillies defeat the Royals. But when Japan played against South Korea in their third pool play game, around 62 million people were watching the game in Japan – nearly half of the country. Tuesday’s championship game has the potential to be the most-watched game in baseball’s history.

    To put things in perspective, according to MLB, the 2022 World Series averaged 12.02 million total viewers per game across FOX, FOX Deportes, and FOX Sports streaming platforms. The final game of the series reached a peak audience of 14.73 million viewers during the game.

    Another fun number: when Puerto Rico played against the Dominican Republic in the final game of Pool D, about 62% of the island was watching the game, including 24% of viewers under the age of 35, and 55% were female viewers. Can you imagine over 60% of a country watching the same game? You can find some more fun stats about the WBC here and here.

    Finally: the players love it. Former Twin Nelson Cruz said, "the WBC is the real World Series.” It is easy to notice how important representing their country is for players, especially from countries like the Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela, where baseball is the number one sport. But it’s not only them. Here’s what Mike Trout and Mookie Betts had to say right after the Edwin Díaz injury.

    Injuries will happen anywhere, at any time
    Wanting the end of the WBC over injuries makes no sense. First and foremost because Major League Baseball has insurance in place to protect its teams in circumstances like this. The Mets, for instance, will get reimbursed for Edwin Díaz’s salary during the star closer’s time on the injured list. That should be the end of this.

    But in case that’s not enough, people should remember that injuries like that could happen anywhere, at any time. Gavin Lux suffered a non-contact knee injury in this year's spring training and will miss the entire season. Brandon Nimmo got injured sliding into second. Last Sunday, both Juan Soto and Austin Nola left their respective spring training games due to injuries, and the Padres might miss them for a while. Nola, specifically, was hit in the nose with a pitch. Yet, no one is calling for spring training to be canceled. And no one should, as it doesn’t make any sense.

    Injuries are unpredictable. Remember when Francisco Liriano missed out on roughly $11M when he broke his arm slamming into a door to scare his kids on Christmas? The odds of that happening might be the same as Díaz suffering a torn patellar tendon while celebrating a WBC win with his teammates.

    The WBC puts baseball on the map
    Finally and most importantly, the WBC makes baseball stronger. The United States is the birthplace of baseball, and it might even sound weird for a US native to hear that baseball needs to be strengthened. But the truth is that baseball is not among the most globally-spread sports in the world. Outside the US, it is only considerably popular in Central America and east Asia.

    I’m not from the USA. I’m a born and raised Brazilian who’s been living in Brazil my entire life. I had never watched a baseball game until I was 16, and I didn’t know the first thing about the sport. Unfortunately, that’s the case for most people in most countries outside the US and those two other areas. A global event such as the WBC is vital for baseball’s future, especially since it has been dropped from the Olympic Games.

    Baseball is the greatest game on the planet, and the whole world needs to know that. The WBC isn’t nearly as representative as other sports’ world cups, like FIFA’s, FIBA, the cricket world cup, the rugby world cup, etc. But it can be. It has to be. It will be, as long as we don’t give up on it over a superstar injury.

    What do you think? Is the World Baseball Classic important enough for superstar players to risk getting injured? Share your thoughts in the comments!

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Thursday night, his third straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Three games later, he is hitting .296/.359/.437 (.796).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    2 hours ago, Muppet said:

    How about this for a proposal. Since USA baseball is so broken that they have to come up with new ridiculous rules (I'm looking at you ghost runners and tightly wound pitch clocks) every year to speed up the game (that is presumably so boring that nobody wants to watch). Why don't we finally break up the entire notion of what USA (and Toronto) baseball is all about. Let's truly acknowledge the global sport that it is. 

    I'm not going to pretend I know how European, African, and South American footbal work, but I do like the excitement that comes when all of those teams play in the world cup. 

    Let's open it up. I'd be super excited to have the chance to see the Twins play the Sultanas de Monterrey or the Leones del Caracas, or some team from Havana once in awhile. Far more so than I'd want to watch them play the stinking Royals 25 times a year.  

    I'd much rather go back to an older era where four teams duke it out in the playoffs to see who goes to the world (or USA) series, but then get the chance to watch a wider playoff berth open up into a WBC that sends our best 4-8 teams. 

    To be honest. Baseball is getting a little old, convoluted, and tired, no thanks to all the rule changes and extra teams. What do we have to lose? The Marlins? I'll take it.  

    It is a global sport and every team is represented by teams made up from many nations. The Twins have players from multiple countries. Your idea won't work simply because of logistics ie travel time. From New York to Tokyo is a 15 hour flight. It could work but you'd have to shorten the season. And if you were to play a team from Caracas or Monterey or Seoul are you suggesting adding more teams or relegation like they do in Soccer 

    2 hours ago, TCSquad said:

    If MLB ever decides against allowing its players to participate in the World Baseball Classic against teams around the world, then they need to rename the World Series (which sees 29 teams from the United States of America and one Canadian team.)

    Why does it matter if they allow or don't allow the players to participate in the WBC to change the name? That doesn't change the fact were MLB teams are located?

    2 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

    I love it and I would remove the all-star game and put in a world classic instead.  Better time, more viewers and more fun that HR contests and All Star meaningless games. 

    I like this idea and think it works great from an offensive perspective, but not so sure from the pitching side, unless everybody is OK with the pitchers being minor league pitchers. I know I wouldn't want any of the top Twins starters or Duran pitching in games at that point in the season, but would for some of the top prospects doing it.

    Keith Olbermann likes to share controversial opinions that will elicit a response - its his schtick and job so to speak.

    Athletes in almost any sport risk injury at practice, workouts and competitions. You can't bubble wrap them although NFL quarterbacks and NBA stars seem to get protective treatment from officials and there is the load management deal in the NBA. But in the end, they must practice, workout and compete.

    Baseball definitely needed some new ideas - the WBC has captured the attention of fans and most players seem to like it. No one is forced to play. These objections seem like nay saying for nay saying's sake.

     

    4 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

    I love it and I would remove the all-star game and put in a world classic instead.  Better time, more viewers and more fun that HR contests and All Star meaningless games. 

    That would be a great time. I like it in theory. Longer break for the injured to recoup and those that don't play. But a lot of action and no rest for the teams that play until the Semi's and Finals, especially. And those players would probably be many of the very best in MLB. 

    But do you think that the "all -stars" egos could give up being all-stars and all the tradition and notoriety that goes with it? Perhaps contract bonuses. Interesting thing for the players to weigh in on.

    4 hours ago, Schmoeman5 said:

    It's been called the World Series since 1903 or somewhere in that time frame. I don't think we need to change the name to be "politically correct".

    It's not a question of political correctness; it's simply a misnomer. 29 American teams and Toronto does not constitute the world. That said, the "World Series" is steeped in history, and for me (especially when I was a kid) it evokes a magical time of year. So keep the name, but be aware that World Series champs are actually winners of the MLB season. There's nothing global about it.

    Nelson Cruz made a good point saying that the WBC is the real World Series. And by the way, hang on to that too. I think it has lots of potential to flourish.

    37 minutes ago, chinmusic said:

    It's not a question of political correctness; it's simply a misnomer. 29 American teams and Toronto does not constitute the world. That said, the "World Series" is steeped in history, and for me (especially when I was a kid) it evokes a magical time of year. So keep the name, but be aware that World Series champs are actually winners of the MLB season. There's nothing global about it.

    Nelson Cruz made a good point saying that the WBC is the real World Series. And by the way, hang on to that too. I think it has lots of potential to flourish.

    So Nelson Cruz made a statement. That's his opinion. Every MLB team is made up of players from all over the world. So IMHO that makes it a world series. They just happen to be based in the US and Canada. So let's just scrap the system. Form a league made up of all the Latin America countries. Have a US/Canadian/Mexico league. An Asian league and a European league. You'll be down to 12-16 teams in North America so you can kiss your Twins goodbye. And then you can have your REAL World Series. Top 2 teams and playoffs.

    Players get hurt and worn out during the All-star game. Should we discontinue that? WBC goes beyond the US, it grows the game in the world which is great. It probably grows the sport inside the US, especially with generational immigrants. Precautions are taken, so IMO it's well worth it.

    20 hours ago, TCSquad said:

    If MLB ever decides against allowing its players to participate in the World Baseball Classic against teams around the world, then they need to rename the World Series (which sees 29 teams from the United States of America and one Canadian team.)

    Little known fact:  the derivation of the name "world series" was from the New York World newspaper which was a popular paper in its day.  They sponsored or at least the series was named for that newspaper -- not because the series was a "world-wide" event.   One of the biggest mis-impressions in sport IMHO. 

    I am genuinely unable to fathom how any actual baseball fan would be anti-WBC at this point. The last tournament was absolutely amazing baseball to watch, high energy environments, big swings in win probability, big homers and outstanding defense and pitching. If you don't like watching those games I seriously question whether you like watching any baseball games at all. The pundits who come out with these rage bait takes I highly doubt are regular baseball fans and if they are then it's either a bit or they're just clouded by ignorance, bias and an engagement incentive.
    As for the tournament itself it will continue in 2026 and it absolutely should. Baseball is played globally and I think therefore needs a premier international competition like any other big sport. Just because it's not a big deal in the US, I'm sorry to say, doesn't mean a whole lot because the US is 1 out of 20 teams there and it's not even the biggest market for the tournament (that would be Japan). So the massive hype around the WBC in other countries is reason enough to keep it going for the MLB because you've got dedicated and large scale interest there.
    Finally, I think we can all agree that the WBC is good for baseball. As someone who watches rugby union purely on the national level the world cup is the biggest event. The same goes for the number 1 sport football. I see no reason why this shouldn't also be the case for baseball, which would help grow the sport to countries where baseball has either a minor or non-existent foothold. I think the onus is on MLB to try and market it better to the US audience, many of whom probably didn't even know it was happening (can't really blame them).

    16 hours ago, Schmoeman5 said:

    So Nelson Cruz made a statement. That's his opinion. Every MLB team is made up of players from all over the world. So IMHO that makes it a world series. They just happen to be based in the US and Canada. So let's just scrap the system. Form a league made up of all the Latin America countries. Have a US/Canadian/Mexico league. An Asian league and a European league. You'll be down to 12-16 teams in North America so you can kiss your Twins goodbye. And then you can have your REAL World Series. Top 2 teams and playoffs.

    I'd absolutely love that. I'd trade the Twins for an actual world league in a heartbeat.

    39 minutes ago, Old Twins Cap said:

    Little known fact:  the derivation of the name "world series" was from the New York World newspaper which was a popular paper in its day.  They sponsored or at least the series was named for that newspaper -- not because the series was a "world-wide" event.   One of the biggest mis-impressions in sport IMHO. 

    I think they've actually debunked this. The newspaper never sponsored the event, or had any official tie to it. It was known as the "World's Championship Series" early on, and eventually shortened to "World Series" over the years. It really was named for the idea of being the baseball champions of the world.

    I'm one that didn't care about the WBC, didn't watch any of it except a couple of innings of the US/UK game and maybe 6 innings of the final.  I don't mind that others liked it, but I was more interested in the NCAA tourney. 

    I think the jury is still out as to the effect it will have on attendance and viewership for MLB this season.  I'll ask because I don't know:  Is there an uptick in track meet attendance in the USA after the Olympics?  Do more people watch soccer on TV after the World Cup in America in the months after that exhibition is over?  

    JcS

    That was some of the best, most exciting baseball I’ve watched in a very, very long time. I equated the Mexico v Japan game to game 7 of the 1991 WS. I was an initial ‘poo-pooer’ of this, worried about the affect on players at the start of the season, but have since changed my mind 180 degrees. I hope it’s bigger in 2026, and maybe do the semis and finals instead of all-star week.

    On 3/25/2023 at 10:35 AM, Squirrel said:

    That was some of the best, most exciting baseball I’ve watched in a very, very long time. I equated the Mexico v Japan game to game 7 of the 1991 WS. I was an initial ‘poo-pooer’ of this, worried about the affect on players at the start of the season, but have since changed my mind 180 degrees. I hope it’s bigger in 2026, and maybe do the semis and finals instead of all-star week.

    I loved the WBC, too. The enthusiasm and excitement were so stirring!

    I agree that having early rounds in March and then the “Final Four” during the All Star week would be fun. Less competition from other sports, too. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...